SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Beykoz Akademi Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2

CIRCULAR ECONOMY AND WASTE MANAGEMENT: EFFECTS OF THE WASTE MANAGEMENT ON ECONOMIC GROWTH IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND TURKIYE

Nurdan Cansu Yüce(ANTALYA BİLİM ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0709-4471
Gülçin Güreşçi(DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-3761-8547
Pages
586–604
Publication Date
2025-12-17
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, the main difference of this study from other studies is that the effect of waste management on economic growth has been measured in various studies for the EU member countries, but there is no such econometric study for Türkiye yet.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A circular economy is a new economic system aiming to grow in line with sustainable development goals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the correlation between economic growth and the recycling rate of biological waste, total environmental taxes, and patents related to ecological technologies were analyzed with panel data analysis for the years from 2008 to 2019 using data for 27 EU countries and Türkiye.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, the main difference of this study from other studies is that the effect of waste management on economic growth has been measured in various studies for the EU member countries, but there is no such econometric study for Türkiye yet.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Economic Growth · Circular Economy · Prais-Winsten Robust Regression Model.

Abstract

A circular economy is a new economic system aiming to grow in line with sustainable development goals. This system is a more environmentally friendly and resource-efficient economic system, unlike the linear economy. Thanks to the circular economy; it is predicted that the environmental and economic problems created by the linear economy will be solved. In this study, the correlation between economic growth and the recycling rate of biological waste, total environmental taxes, and patents related to ecological technologies were analyzed with panel data analysis for the years from 2008 to 2019 using data for 27 EU countries and Türkiye. According to the basic assumption tests, since the model was found to have autocorrelation, heteroscedasticity, and inter-unit autocorrelation problems, the model was estimated with the Prais-Winsten estimator, which is resistant to these problems. This paper analyzes the relationship between economic growth and waste management in the EU countries and Türkiye. The results imply a positive relationship between economic growth and waste management. On the other hand, the main difference of this study from other studies is that the effect of waste management on economic growth has been measured in various studies for the EU member countries, but there is no such econometric study for Türkiye yet.

Özet

A circular economy is a new economic system aiming to grow in line with sustainable development goals. This system is a more environmentally friendly and resource-efficient economic system, unlike the linear economy. Thanks to the circular economy; it is predicted that the environmental and economic problems created by the linear economy will be solved. In this study, the correlation between economic growth and the recycling rate of biological waste, total environmental taxes, and patents related to ecological technologies were analyzed with panel data analysis for the years from 2008 to 2019 using data for 27 EU countries and Türkiye. According to the basic assumption tests, since the model was found to have autocorrelation, heteroscedasticity, and inter-unit autocorrelation problems, the model was estimated with the Prais-Winsten estimator, which is resistant to these problems. This paper analyzes the relationship between economic growth and waste management in the EU countries and Türkiye. The results imply a positive relationship between economic growth and waste management. On the other hand, the main difference of this study from other studies is that the effect of waste management on economic growth has been measured in various studies for the EU member countries, but there is no such econometric study for Türkiye yet.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yüce, N. C., Güreşçi, G. (2025). CIRCULAR ECONOMY AND WASTE MANAGEMENT: EFFECTS OF THE WASTE MANAGEMENT ON ECONOMIC GROWTH IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND TURKIYE. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2, 586–604. https://doi.org/10.14514/beykozad.1630486

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (29)

  1. Acci, Y.A, Karsu, G. and Cafri, R. (2023). Döngüsel ekonomi ve yeşil büyüme çerçevesinde sürdürülebilir kalkınma göstergelerinin ekonomik büyüme üzerine etkisi: Seçilmiş AB ülkelerinden ampirik kanıtlar. Verimlilik Dergisi, (Özel Sayı), 53-66.
  2. Apaydin, S. (2020). OECD Ülkelerinde atık yönetimi ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: Bir panel kantil regresyon yaklaşımı. Third Sector Social Economic Review, 55(1), 300-312.
  3. Ates, E. (2021). Döngüsel ekonomi kapsamında GSYH ile geri dönüşüm ilişkisi: Avrupa Birliği ülkeleri örneği. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (67), 125-137.
  4. Baltagi, B. H., (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data. John Wiley & Sons.
  5. Breusch, T. S. and Pagan, A. R. (1980). The lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47 (1), 239-253.
  6. Busu, M. (2019). Adopting circular economy at the European Union level and its impact on economic growth. Social Sciences, 8(5): 159-171.
  7. Căutisanu, C., Asandului, L., Borza, M. and Turturean, C. (2018). Quantitative approach to circular economy in the OECD countries. Amfiteatru Economic, 20(48), 262-277.
  8. Cirak, A. N. (2021). Almanya özelinde döngüsel ekonomi prspektifinden GSYH ve geri dönüşüm ilişkisi: Zaman serileri analizi. 19 Mayıs Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(4), 816- 836.
  9. Cogoy, M. (2009). A model of eco-efficiency and recycling. Economics, 3(1), 20090021.
  10. Curran, T. and Williams, I. D. (2012). A zero waste vision for industrial networks in Europe. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 207-208, 3-7.
  11. Di Vita, G. (2001). Technological change, growth and waste recycling. Energy Economics, 23(5), 549-567.
  12. Duran, M. S., and Bozkaya, S. (2024). Sürdürülebilir büyüme için döngüsel ekonominin teşvik edici rolü: AB 27’den ampirik kanıtlar. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 20(2), 221-236.
  13. European Commission [EC] (2015). Closing the loop - an EU Action Plan for the circular economy, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:8a8ef5e8-99a0-11e5-b3b7 01aa75ed71a1.0012.02/DOC_1&format=PDF (03.04.2022).
  14. George, D. A., Lin, B. C. A. and Chen, Y. (2015). A circular economy model of economic growth. Environmental modelling & software, 73, 60-63.
  15. Georgescu, I., Kinnunen, J. and Androniceanu, A. M. (2022). Empirical evidence on circular economy and economic development in Europe: a panel approach. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 23(1), 199-217.
  16. Grdic, S. Z., Krstinic Nizic, M. and Rudan, E. (2020). Circular economy concept in the context of economic development in EU countries. Sustainability, 12(7): 3060-3073.
  17. Hysa, E., Kruja, A., Rehman, N. U. and Laurenti, R. (2020). Circular economy innovation and environmental sustainability impact on economic growth: An integrated model for sustainable development. Sustainability, 12(12), 4831-4847.
  18. Marino, A. and Pariso, P. (2020). Comparing European countries' performances in the transition towards the Circular Economy. Science of the Total Environment, 729, 1-12. Onder, H. (2018). Döngüsel ekonomi ve Avrupa ülkeleri üzerine bir analiz. Ekin Basın Yayın Dağıtım A.Ş.
  19. Ornek, G., Türkmen, S. (2019). Gelişmiş ve yükselen piyasa ekonomilerinde çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi hipotezi’nin analizi, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 28(3), 109-129.
  20. Pelau, C. and Chinie, A. C. (2018). Econometric model for measuring the impact of the education level of the population on the recycling rate in a circular economy. Amfiteatru Economic, 20(48), 340-355.
  21. Potting, J., Hekkert, M., Worrell, E. and Hanemaaijer, A. (2017). Circular economy: Measuring innovation in the product chain, PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
  22. Su, B., Heshmati, A., Geng, Y. and Yu, X. (2013). A review of the circular economy in China: moving from rhetoric to implementation. Journal of cleaner production, 42, 215-227.
  23. Trica, C. L., Banacu, C. S. and Busu, M. (2019). Environmental factors and sustainability of the circular economy model at the European Union level. Sustainability, 11(4), 1114.
  24. Türk, B. (2020). Döngüsel ekonomi çerçevesinde atık yönetimi ve sıfır atık yaklaşımı. Gazi Kitapevi.
  25. Utkulu, U. and Bilik, M. (2020). Atık yönetimi ve ekonomik büyüme: Avrupa Birliği için dinamik panel veri analiz bulguları. (Ed.: Ferhan Sayın), Döngüsel ekonomi-makro ve mikro incelemeler, 181-207.
  26. Vuţă, M., Vuţă, M., Enciu, A. and Cioacă, S. I. (2018). Assessment of the circular economy's impact in the EU economic growth. Amfiteatru Economic, 20(48), 248-261.
  27. Wilson, D. C., Rodic, L., Modak, P., Soos, R., Carpintero R., A., Velis, C. and Simonett, O. (2015), Global waste management outlook (GWMO). Prepared for United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and International Solid Waste Association (ISWA); Wilson, DC, Ed. UNEP International Environment Technology Centre (IETC): Osaka, Japan.
  28. Yerdelen Tatoglu, F. (2018). Panel veri ekonometrisi. Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım A.Ş. Jørgensen, S. ve Pedersen, L. J. T. (2018). The circular rather than the linear economy. Palgrave Macmillan.
  29. Zaman, A. U. (2013). Identification of key assessment indicators of the zero waste management systems. Ecological indicators, 36, 682-693.