Journals / Beykoz Akademi Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2

UNDERSTANDING TIPPING PERCEPTIONS IN TURKEY: A USER-GENERATED CONTENT ANALYSIS

TÜRKİYE’DE BAHŞİŞ ALGILARINI ANLAMAK: KULLANICI TARAFINDAN ÜRETİLEN İÇERİKLERİN ANALİZİ

Tuğba Pala Morkoç(MERSİN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8346-9901
Pages
247–260
Publication Date
2025-12-17
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, the results indicate that tipping in Turkey is still a developing practice and has not yet become a fully accepted social norm.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Tipping is a practice influenced by social, cultural, and economic factors, and it is perceived and practiced differently across countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims to explore how tipping is perceived in Turkey by analyzing user-generated content on Eksi Sozluk.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, the results indicate that tipping in Turkey is still a developing practice and has not yet become a fully accepted social norm.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:hizmet ekonomisi · bahşiş · bahşiş davranışı

Abstract

Tipping is a practice influenced by social, cultural, and economic factors, and it is perceived and practiced differently across countries. This study aims to explore how tipping is perceived in Turkey by analyzing user-generated content on Eksi Sozluk. The findings show that tipping in Turkey does not function as a strong social norm. Instead, tipping is understood in two opposite ways: (1) A positive attitude, where tipping is seen as an expression of gratitude, a social expectation, or a way to support low-paid workers; and (2) A negative attitude, where tipping is seen as an unnecessary burden, an exploitative tool that benefits employers, or a practice imposed by capitalism. Additionally, contributors mention different motivations for tipping, such as the desire to get better service in future visits, feeling social pressure. Furthermore, the results indicate that tipping in Turkey is still a developing practice and has not yet become a fully accepted social norm. As the first study to examine how tipping is understood from the consumer’s perspective in Turkey, this research is important and provides guidance for shaping tipping policies and practices in the country.

Özet

Bahşiş, sosyal, kültürel ve ekonomik faktörlerden etkilenen bir uygulamadır ve ülkeler arasında farklı şekillerde algılanmakta ve uygulanmaktadır. Bu çalışma, Ekşi Sözlük'te yer alan kullanıcı tarafından oluşturulan içerikleri analiz ederek, Türkiye’de bahşişin nasıl algılandığını incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bulgular, Türkiye’de bahşişin güçlü bir sosyal norm olarak işlemediğini göstermektedir. Bunun yerine, bahşiş iki zıt bakış açısıyla değerlendirilmektedir: (1) Olumlu tutum, bahşişin bir minnettarlık ifadesi, sosyal bir beklenti veya düşük ücretli çalışanlara destek olma yolu olarak görülmesi; (2) Olumsuz tutum, bahşişin gereksiz bir yük, işverenlerin yararına işleyen sömürü aracı ya da kapitalizmin dayattığı bir uygulama olarak görülmesi. Buna ek olarak, katılımcılar bahşiş vermeye dair gelecekte daha iyi hizmet almak istemek ve sosyal baskı hissetmek gibi farklı motivasyonlardan da söz etmektedir. Ayrıca, bulgular Türkiye’de bahşişin hâlâ gelişmekte olan bir uygulama olduğunu ve henüz tam anlamıyla kabul edilmiş bir toplumsal norm haline gelmediğini göstermektedir. Türkiye’de bahşişin tüketici bakış açısından nasıl anlaşıldığını inceleyen ilk çalışma olması bakımından önemli olan bu araştırma, ülkede bahşiş politikalarının ve uygulamalarının şekillendirilmesine yönelik yol gösterici bilgiler sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Morkoç, T. P. (2025). UNDERSTANDING TIPPING PERCEPTIONS IN TURKEY: A USER-GENERATED CONTENT ANALYSIS. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2, 247–260. https://doi.org/10.14514/beykozad.1662213

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (33)

  1. Azar, O.H. (2003). The implications of tipping for economics and management. The International Journal of Social Economics, 30, 1084–1094. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290310492878.
  2. Azar, O. H. (2004). The history of tipping: from sixteenth-century England to United States in the 1910s. Journal of Socio-Economics, 33, 745-764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.043
  3. Azar, O.H. (2005). Who do we tip and why? An empirical investigation. Applied Economics, 37(16), 1871-1879. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500119018
  4. Azar, O. H. (2010a). Do people tip because of psychological or strategic? Applied Economics, 42(23), 3039-3044. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840801964831
  5. Azar, O. H. (2010b). Tipping motivations and behavior in the US and Israel. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(2), 421 – 457. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00581
  6. Azar, O. H. (2020). The economics of tipping. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(2), 215- 36. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.34.2.215
  7. Bujisic, M., Wu, L., Mattila, A. ve Bilgihan, A. (2013). Not all smiles are created equal ınvestigating the effects of display authenticity and service relationship on customer tipping behavior. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 26 (2), 293-306. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2012-0181
  8. Crespi, L. P. (1947). The implications of tipping in America. Public Opinion Quarterly, 11, 424- 435.
  9. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  10. Conlin, M., Lynn, M. ve O’Donoghue, T. (2003). The norm of restaurant tipping. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 52(3), 297-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167- 2681(03)00030-1
  11. Curran, J. (2012) Reinterpreting the internet. In Curran, J, Fenton, N. & Freedman, D. (Ed). Misunderstanding the internet (ss.3-34). Routledge.
  12. Ekşi Sözlük (2025, 8 Şubat). Bahşiş https://eksisozluk.com/2020-yilinda-eksi-sozlukte-olan-biten--6781198.
  13. Ferguson, G., Megehee, C. M. ve Woodside, A. G. (2017). Culture, religiosity, and economic configural models explaining tipping-behavior prevalence across nations. Tourism Management, 62, 218-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.05.001
  14. Fernandez, S., Gössling, S., Martin-Rios, C., Fointiat, V., Pasamar, S., Isaac, R., ve Lunde, M. (2024). To tip or not to tip? Explaining tipping behavior in restaurants with service- inclusive pricing. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 117, 103640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103640
  15. Gössling, S., Fernandez, S., Martin-Rios, C., Reyes, S. P., Fointiat, V., Isaac, R. K. ve Lunde, M. (2021). Restaurant tipping in Europe: a comparative assessment. Current Issues in Tourism, 24(6), 811-823. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1749244
  16. Gurel, E. and Yakın, M. (2007). Eksisozluk: Postmodern elektronik kültür. Selçuk İletişim, 4(4), 203-219. https://doi.org/10.18094/si.36509
  17. Jacob, C., Gueguen, N., Boulbry,G ve Ardiccioni, R. (2010). Waitresses’ facial cosmetics and tipping: A field experiment. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29, 188– 190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.04.003
  18. Kowalczuk, I. ve Gębski, J. (2021). Factors influencing restaurant tipping behaviour–the case of Poland. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 15(2), 172-182. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCTHR-102019-0189
  19. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  20. Lynn, M., Zinkhan, G. M. ve Harris, J. (1993). Consumer tipping: A cross-country study. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 478-488.
  21. Lynn, M. (1997). Tipping customs and status seeking: A cross-country study. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 16(2), 221-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278- 4319(97)00007-8
  22. Lynn, M. (2000). National personality and tipping customs. Personality and Individual Differences 28(2): 395-404
  23. Lynn, M. (2015). Service gratuities and tipping: A motivational framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 46, 74-88. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2014.12.002
  24. Lynn, M. (2016a). Why are we more likely to tip some service occupations than others? theory, evidence, and implications. Journal of Economic Psychology, 54, 134-150. DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2016.04.001
  25. Lynn, M. ve McCall, M. (2016). Beyond gratitude and gratitude and gratuity: A meta-analytic review of the view of the predictors of restaurant tipping. Working Paper No. 21.
  26. Lynn, M. (2016b). Motivations for tipping: How they differ across more and less frequently tipped services. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 65, 38-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2016.09.001
  27. Ogbonna, E. ve Harris, L. C. (2002). Institutionalization of tipping as a source of managerial control. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 40(4), 725-752. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8543.00254
  28. Pala T. (2020). The tip perception of the hotel employees: Wage or reward? Ege Academic Review, 20 (3), 209-220. DOI: 10.21121/eab.795969
  29. Parett, M. (2015). Beauty and the feast: Examining the effect of beauty on earnings using restaurant tipping data. Journal of Economic Psychology, 49, 34-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.04.002
  30. Saayman, M. ve Saayman, A. (2015). Understanding tipping behaviour—An Economic perspective. Tourism Economics, 21(2), 247-265. https://doi.org/10.5367/te.2014.0448
  31. Seiter, J.S. (2007). Ingratiation and gratuity: The effect of complimenting customers on tipping behavior in restaurants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(3), 478–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00169.x
  32. Seiter, J.S. ve Weger, H. (2018). The principle of reciprocity in hospitality Contexts: The relationship between tipping behavior and food servers’ approaches to handling leftovers., Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 42(2), 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348014562425
  33. Shamir, B. (1984). Between gratitude and gratuity: An analysis of tipping. Annals of Tourism Research, 11, 59-78.