SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Sağlık Hizmetleri Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Küresel Kamu Özel Ortaklığı Uygulamaları ve Türkiye Sağlık Sektörü Açısından Bir Değerlendirme

Perihan ŞENEL TEKİN
Pages
5–20
Publication Date
2017-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The purpose of this paper is to give an overview of the country experiences that provide public service financing, usually using the P3 method; in particular, to provide a general assessment of health sector practices in Turkey

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the last four decades, countries under the influence of neo-liberalism have undergone serious changes in meeting the need for financing public goods and services.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The publicprivate partnership (P3) method has created an opportunity for short-term investments in various scales for countries that are exploring different alternative financing methods for large-scale investments that can not be met with public budgets.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The purpose of this paper is to give an overview of the country experiences that provide public service financing, usually using the P3 method; in particular, to provide a general assessment of health sector practices in Turkey
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kamu özel ortaklığı · Köo · Sağlık hizmetleri

Abstract

In the last four decades, countries under the influence of neo-liberalism have undergone serious changes in meeting the need for financing public goods and services. The publicprivate partnership (P3) method has created an opportunity for short-term investments in various scales for countries that are exploring different alternative financing methods for large-scale investments that can not be met with public budgets. P3, used in many sectors such as transportation, energy, education, health, defense and various infrastructural investments, has been an alternative method of financing, first using the countries such as the United Kingdom and the United States. The purpose of this paper is to give an overview of the country experiences that provide public service financing, usually using the P3 method; in particular, to provide a general assessment of health sector practices in Turkey

Özet

Son kırk yılda neo-liberalizmin etkisi altında kalan ülkelerin kamu mal ve hizmet sunumunda finansman ihtiyacını karşılamada ciddi değişimler yaşanmıştır. Kamu bütçeleri ile karşılanması mümkün olmayan büyük ölçekli yatırımlar için farklı alternatif finansman yöntemlerini araştıran ülkeler için, kamu-özel sektör ortaklığı (KÖO) yöntemi, çeşitli ölçeklerde yatırımları kısa sürede gerçekleştirebilme fırsatı yaratmıştır. Ulaşım, enerji, eğitim, sağlık, savunma ve çeşitli altyapı yatırımları gibi birçok sektörde kullanılan KÖO, ilk olarak İngiltere ve Amerika Birleşik Devletleri gibi ülkelerce kullanılan alternatif bir finansman yöntemi olmuştur. Bu yazının amacı, genelde KÖO yöntemini kullanarak kamu hizmet finansmanını sağlayan ülke deneyimlerine bir bakış; özelde ise, Türkiye sağlık sektör uygulamalarına ilişkin genel bir değerlendirme sunmaktır

🔖

Cite This Article

TEKİN, P. Ş. (2017). Küresel Kamu Özel Ortaklığı Uygulamaları ve Türkiye Sağlık Sektörü Açısından Bir Değerlendirme. Ankara Sağlık Hizmetleri Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 5–20. https://ajindex.com/articles/115540

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. ALLARD, G. VE TRABANT, A. (2007). Public-private partnerships in Spain: lessons and opportunities. IE Business School Working Paper, WP10-07. BARLOW, J. (Eylül 2007). Redefining healthcare infrastructure: integrating services and the built environment. Revaluing Construction 2007-Crossing Boundaries, Health and Care Infrastructure Research and Innovation Centre-HaCIRIC, Copenhagen. BARLOW, J. VE KÖBERLE-GAISER, M. (2008) The private finance initiative, project form and design innovation the UK’s hospitals programme. Research Policy, 37, 1392-1402.
  2. BESLEY, T. VE GHATAK, M. (1999). Public-private partnerships for the provision of public goods: theory and an application to NGOs. The Development Economics Discussion Paper Series, BETTIGNIES, J-E. VE ROSS, T. W. (2004). The economics of public-private partnerships. Canadian Public Policy, 30, 2. BHAT, R. (1999). Public- private partnerships in health sector: issues and prospects. IIMA Working Papers, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department, Erişim:12.5.2008, http://econpapers.repec.org
  3. BROADBENT, J. VE LAUGHLIN, R. (Şubat 2005). The role of PFI in the UK governments modernisation agenda. Financial Accountability and Management, 21, 1. BROADBENT, J. VE RICHARD, L. (2003). Public private partnerships: an introduction. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 16, 3, 332-341.
  4. BROWN, C. (2005). Policy forum: financing public infrastructure financing transport infrastructure: for whom the road tolls. The Australian Economic Review, 38, 4, 431-439.
  5. BULT-SPIERING, M. VE DEWULF, G. (2006). Strategic Issues in Public-Private Partnerships in International Perspective. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK. Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE). (8 Mart 2006). Britain having second thoughts about PFI hospitals. Erişim: 5.Aralık.2008, http://cupe.ca
  6. CHONG, E., HUET, F., SAUSSIER, S. VE STEINER F. (2006). Public-private partnerships and prices: evidence from water distribution in France. Review of Industrial Organization, 29, 149 ÇIÇEK, A.K. (2002). Finansman Modeli Olarak Yap-İşlet-Devret Modeli ve Atatürk Hava Limanı Yeni Dış Hatlar Terminal Binası ve Katlı Otoparkı Projesinde Uygulanması. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi,
  7. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İşletme Anabilim Dalı, Eskişehir. DAVIS, K. (2005). Policy forum: finansing public infrastructure PPPs and infrastructure investment. The Australian Economic Review, 38, 4, 439-44.
  8. DUTZ, M. (2003). PPP Systems for good govern