Journals / Cukurova Medical Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of effectiveness of laparoscopic and transvaginal mesh operations in uterus protective surgery of women in reproductive-age with pelvic organ prolapse (stage ≥2).

Pelvik organ prolapsusu olan üreme çağındaki kadınların uterus koruyucu cerrahisinde laparoskopik ve transvajinal meş operasyonlarının etkinliğinin karşılaştırılması (evre ≥2)

Pages
141–148
Publication Date
2021-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Transvaginal mesh surgery was found to be a relatively successful technique in pelvic organ prolapse surgery owing to the high rate of success and minimal rates of complications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of laparoscopic and transvaginal mesh operations with conservative surgery of reproductive-age women with pelvic organ prolapse (stage≥2) (POP).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: In this study, we retrospectively evaluated 22 cases of 105 patients who diagnosed with symptomatic POP-Q stage 2 and above pelvic prolapse, part of whom underwent laparoscopic surgery (Group-1) while the other part composed of those who underwent transvaginal mesh (TVM) surgery (Group-2).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Transvaginal mesh surgery was found to be a relatively successful technique in pelvic organ prolapse surgery owing to the high rate of success and minimal rates of complications.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Pelvic Prolapse · Laparoscopic Surgery · Transvaginal Mesh Surgery

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of laparoscopic and transvaginal mesh operations with conservative surgery of reproductive-age women with pelvic organ prolapse (stage≥2) (POP). Materials and Methods: In this study, we retrospectively evaluated 22 cases of 105 patients who diagnosed with symptomatic POP-Q stage 2 and above pelvic prolapse, part of whom underwent laparoscopic surgery (Group-1) while the other part composed of those who underwent transvaginal mesh (TVM) surgery (Group-2). Urogenital prolapse Pelvic Organ was graded using POP-Q.As the current TVM surgical kits four-arms mesh was used. Results: The mean age of the patients of both groups was 42.2±11.4 and 38.3±12.8 years, respectively. The mean duration of hospitalization for the patients underwent laparoscopy was 2.3 days (range:1-4 days), that period was observed as 3 days in Group-2 (range:2-4 days). None of our patients had any adverse reactions in the early or late stages. The rate of success was 95.45% for patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery, while it was 98.10% for the group of TVM surgery. Conclusion: Transvaginal mesh surgery was found to be a relatively successful technique in pelvic organ prolapse surgery owing to the high rate of success and minimal rates of complications.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, pelvik prolapsusu (POP) olan (evre≥2) üreme çağındaki kadınlarda laparoskopik ve transvajinal meş ameliyatlarının etkinliğini ile karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada, semptomatik POP-Q evre 2 ve üzeri pelvik prolapsus tanısı alan laparoskopik cerrahi geçiren 22 hasta ile (Grup-1), transvajinal meş (TVM) uygulanan 83 olguyu (grup 2) retrospektif olarak değerlendirdik. Prolapsus Pelvik Organ POP-Q kullanılarak derecelendirildi. Mevcut TVM cerrahi kitleri olarak dört kollu mesh kullanıldı. Bulgular: Her iki gruptaki hastaların ortalama yaşı sırasıyla 42,2 ± 11,4 ve 38,3 ± 12,8 yıldı. Laparoskopi yapılan hastaların ortalama hastanede kalış süresi 2,3 gün (1-4 gün), bu süre Grup-2'de 3 gün (2-4 gün) olarak gözlendi. Hastalarımızın hiçbirinde erken veya geç dönemde herhangi bir yan etki görülmedi. Başarı oranı laparoskopik cerrahi uygulanan hastalarda% 95.45 iken TVM cerrahisi grubunda% 98.10 idi. Sonuç: Transvajinal meş cerrahisinin, yüksek başarı oranı ve minimal komplikasyon oranları nedeniyle pelvik organ prolaps cerrahisinde başarılı bir teknik olduğu gösterilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SUKGEN, G., TURKAY, Ü., OZSURMELİ, M. (2021). Comparison of effectiveness of laparoscopic and transvaginal mesh operations in uterus protective surgery of women in reproductive-age with pelvic organ prolapse (stage ≥2).. Cukurova Medical Journal, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1, 141–148. https://ajindex.com/articles/115459

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Constantini E, Porena M, Lazzeri M, Mearini L, Bini V, Zucchi A. Changes in female sexual function after pelvic organ prolapse repair. Int Urogynecol. J. 2013
  2. 7 2. El Haddad R, Svabik K, Masata J, Koleska T, Hubka P, Martan A. Women's quality of life and sexual function after transvaginal anterior repair with mesh insertion. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013
  3. Jarząbek-Bielecka G, Buks J, Witkowska J, Wilczak M, Pisarska-Krawczyk M, Kędzia W et al. Aging: Women sexual activity, pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Polski Przegląd Nauk o Zdrowiu. 2014
  4. Pattel MS, Mellen C, O’ Sullivan DM, Lassala CA. Pessary use and impact on quality of life and body image. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2011
  5. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Managing pelvic organ prolapse. In: Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women NICE guideline Draft. October 2018
  6. Zucchi A, Lazzeri M Porena M, Del Zingaro M, Costantini E. Uterus preservation in prolapse surgery. Nat Med. 2010
  7. 626–33. 7. Tola EN, Erdemoğlu E, Erdemoğlu E. Uterine sparing surgical methods in pelvic organ prolapse. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2015
  8. 168–72. 8. Walter JE. Transvaginal mesh procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011
  9. 168– 74. 9. Rogo-Gupta L. Current trends in surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2013
  10. Acsinte OM, Rabischong B, Bourdel N, Canis M, Botchorishvili R. Laparoscopic promontofixation in 10 steps. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018
  11. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, Shull BL et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996
  12. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004
  13. Florin M and Florin Z. Laparoscopic Treatment of Inguinal Hernias. In Mihaileanu Florin and Florin Zaharie (Eds). Laparoscopic Treatment of Inguinal Hernias, Romania. 2018
  14. Dietz V, van der Vaart CH, van der Graaf Y, Heintz P, Schraffordt Koops SE. One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2010
  15. Gutman R, Maher C. Uterine-preserving POP surgery. Int Urogynecol