Journals / Gıda / 2021 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2

DETERMINATION OF THE BEST DRYING CONDITIONS FOR GELATIN BASED CANDIES

JELATİN BAZLI YUMUŞAK ŞEKERLERİN KURUTMA KOŞULLARININ OPTİMİZASYONU

Journal
Gıda
Pages
279–295
Publication Date
2021-03-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of the study suggested that, to achieve and keep the desired quality parameters during shelf life, each unit weight candy should be processed separately.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, objective was to determine the best drying and conditioning times for achieving the desired quality for jelly candies of different weights.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Drying time (also known as Stoving time) (12, 16, 20, 24 h) in oven, conditioning time (WIP time) (0, 24, 48, 72 h), unit weight of the candies (2.5 g, 3 g, 6 g) were the variable parameters investigated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of the study suggested that, to achieve and keep the desired quality parameters during shelf life, each unit weight candy should be processed separately.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Jelatin bazlı yumuşak şeker · tekstür · nem

Abstract

In this study, objective was to determine the best drying and conditioning times for achieving the desired quality for jelly candies of different weights. Drying time (also known as Stoving time) (12, 16, 20, 24 h) in oven, conditioning time (WIP time) (0, 24, 48, 72 h), unit weight of the candies (2.5 g, 3 g, 6 g) were the variable parameters investigated. TPA, moisture content, water activity, TSSC, TD-NMR Relaxometry experiments were performed. Optimum drying time was found as 20 h for 2.5 g and 24 h for both 3 g and 6 g. Following drying, the best conditioning time with respect to unit weight was determined as 72 h for 2.5 g and 48 h for 3 g and 6 g candies. The results of the study suggested that, to achieve and keep the desired quality parameters during shelf life, each unit weight candy should be processed separately.

Özet

Bu çalışmada amaç, farklı ağırlıklardaki jelatin bazlı şekerlerde istenen kaliteyi elde etmek için optimum kurutma ve tavlama sürelerini belirlemektir. Fırında kuruma süresi (Fırınlama süresi) (12, 16, 20, 24 saat), tavlama süresi (WIP zamanı) (0, 24, 48, 72 saat), şekerlerin birim ağırlığı (2.5 g, 3 g, 6 g) incelenen değişken parametrelerdir. Şekerlerin karakterizasyonu için Tekstür Profil Analizi, nem içeriği, su aktivitesi, toplam çözünür katı içerik ve NMR Relaksometre deneyleri yapılmıştır. En iyi kuruma süresi 2.5 g için 20 saat, 3 g ve 6 g için 24 saat olarak bulunmuştur. Kurutmadan sonra, birim ağırlığa göre en iyi tavlama süresi, 2.5 g için 72 saat, 3 g ve 6 g şekerlemeler için ise 48 saat olarak belirlenmiştir. NMR relaksasyon süreleri olarak tanımlanan T1 ve T2 fiziksel parametrelerle ilişkili bulunmuştur. Çalışmanın sonuçları, raf ömrü boyunca istenen kalite parametrelerini elde etmek ve korumak için, farklı birim ağırlıkta olan şekerlemelerin ayrı olarak işlenmesi gerektiğini önermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

POCAN, P., KAYA, D., ÖZTOP, M. H., MERT, B. (2021). DETERMINATION OF THE BEST DRYING CONDITIONS FOR GELATIN BASED CANDIES. Gıda, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2, 279–295. https://ajindex.com/articles/115415

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Akbas E, Soyler UB, Oztop MH (2016) Capsaicin Emulsions: Formulation and Characterization. Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology Botosoa EP, Chèné C, Blecker C, Karoui R (2015)
  2. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Thermogravimetric and Differential Scanning Calorimetry for Monitoring Changes of Sponge Cakes During Storage at 20 ° C and 65 % Relative Humidity. 1020–1031.
  3. Burey P, Bhandari BR, Rutgers RPG, et al (2009) Confectionery gels: A review on formulation, rheological and structural aspects. Cikrikci S, Mert B, Oztop MH (2018) Development of pH Sensitive Alginate/Gum Tragacanth Based Hydrogels for Oral Insulin Delivery. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 66:11784–11796. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b02525 Delgado P, Bañón S (2015) Determining the minimum drying time of gummy confections based on their mechanical properties. CYTA - Journal of Food 13:329–335. doi: 10.1080/19476337.2014.974676 Efe N, Bielejewski M, Tritt-Goc J, et al (2019) NMR relaxometry study of gelatin based low-calorie soft candies. Molecular Physics 117:1034–1045. doi: 10.1080/00268976.2018.1564392 Ergun R, Lietha R, Hartel RW (2010a) Moisture and shelf life in sugar confections. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 50:162–192. doi: 10.1080/10408390802248833 Ergun R, Lietha R, Hartel RW, et al (2010b) Moisture and Shelf Life in Sugar Confections Moisture and Shelf Life in Sugar. doi: 10.1080/10408390802248833 Ilhan E, Pocan P, Ogawa M, Oztop MH (2020) Role of ‘D-allulose’ in a starch based composite gel matrix. Carbohydrate Polymers 228:115373. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115373 Kirtil E, Cikrikci S, McCarthy MJ, Oztop MH (2017) Recent advances in time domain NMR & MRI sensors and their food applications. Current Opinion in Food Science 17:9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2017.07.005 Kirtil E, Oztop MH, Sirijariyawat A, et al (2014) Effect of pectin methyl esterase (PME) and CaCl2 infusion on the cell integrity of fresh-cut and frozen-thawed mangoes: An NMR relaxometry study. Food Research International 66:409–416. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.10.006 Le Botlan D, Casseron F, Lantier F (1998) Polymorphism of sugars studied by time domain NMR. Analusis 26:198–204. doi: 10.1051/analusis:1998135 Lees R, Jackson EB (2012) Sugar Confectionery and Chocolate Manufacture. Mathlouthi M (2001)
  4. Water content, Water Activity, Water structure and The Stability of Foodstuffs. Food Control 12:409–417. doi: 10.1016/S0956-7135(01)00032-9
  5. Nur Farah Hani M, Wan Nur Zahidah W, Saniah K, Mohd Irwani