Journals / Journal for the Mathematics Education and Teaching Practices / 2025 / Volume: 6 Issue: 2

Mathematics and environmental management: A synergistic approach to education for sustainable development

Antara Mukherjee(Central University of Jharkhand)0009-0002-2401-8064
Shashi Singh(Central University of Jharkhand)
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-12-26
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings revealed a generally positive outlook, with some teachers embracing the integration of mathematics and environmental management as a means of engaging students in meaningful learning experiences, while others viewed it as enhancing mathematics and environmental skills at the same time.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Amid the pressing need for environmental management through multidisciplinary approaches, this study investigated the perceptions and attitudes of prospective mathematics teachers towards integrating environmental management and sustainability topics into their pedagogical practices.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A quantitative survey was conducted with 156 prospective mathematics educators, enrolled in a B.Ed. program, who incorporated environmental concepts into their lessons during their practicum sessions in schools.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings revealed a generally positive outlook, with some teachers embracing the integration of mathematics and environmental management as a means of engaging students in meaningful learning experiences, while others viewed it as enhancing mathematics and environmental skills at the same time.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Prospective teachers · Mathematics pedagogy · Environmental management

Abstract

Amid the pressing need for environmental management through multidisciplinary approaches, this study investigated the perceptions and attitudes of prospective mathematics teachers towards integrating environmental management and sustainability topics into their pedagogical practices. A quantitative survey was conducted with 156 prospective mathematics educators, enrolled in a B.Ed. program, who incorporated environmental concepts into their lessons during their practicum sessions in schools. Using exploratory factor analysis, three factors were identified influencing the participants’ attitudes toward this integrated approach. The findings revealed a generally positive outlook, with some teachers embracing the integration of mathematics and environmental management as a means of engaging students in meaningful learning experiences, while others viewed it as enhancing mathematics and environmental skills at the same time. Importantly, these attitudes were consistent across gender and teaching experience. The study highlighted the potential of this interdisciplinary approach in enhancing students’ holistic development, and provide actionable insights for curriculum designers and educators seeking to promote sustainable education practices. By addressing a notable gap in empirical research on the intersection of mathematics pedagogy and environmental management, this work contributes to the ongoing dialogue on embedding sustainability within mathematics instruction and preparing future global citizens with both mathematical and environmental competencies.

🔖

Cite This Article

Mukherjee, A., Singh, S. (2025). Mathematics and environmental management: A synergistic approach to education for sustainable development. Journal for the Mathematics Education and Teaching Practices, Volume: 6 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17996038

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (38)

  1. Alsina, Á. (2022). On integrating mathematics education and sustainability in teacher training: Why, to what end, and how? In D. Ortega-Sánchez (Ed.), Controversial issues and social problems for an integrated disciplinary teaching (Vol. 8). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08697-7_2
  2. Alsina, Á., & Calabuig, M. T. (2019). Vinculando educación matemática y sostenibilidad: Implicaciones para la formación inicial de docentes como herramienta de transformación social. Revista Educación Ambiental y Sostenibilidad, 1, 1203. https://revistas.uca.es/index.php/REAyS/article/view/4758/5369
  3. Berlin, D. F., & White, A. L. (2012). A longitudinal look at attitudes and perceptions related to the integration of mathematics, science, and technology education. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00111.x
  4. Clark, C. R., Heimlich, J. E., Ardoin, N. M., & Braus, J. (2020). Using a Delphi study to clarify the landscape and core outcomes in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 26(3), 381–399.
  5. Esa, N. (2010). Environmental knowledge, attitude and practices of student teachers. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 19(1), 39–50.
  6. Fasinu, V. G., & Alant, B. (2023). University electronics engineering students’ approaches of integrating mathematical ideas into the learning of physical electronics in basic electronics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(1), Article 2214. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12797
  7. Follong, B. M., Verdonschot, A., Prieto-Rodriguez, E., Miller, A., Collins, C. E., & Bucher, T. (2022). Nutrition across the curriculum: A scoping review exploring the integration of nutrition education within primary schools. Nutrition Research Reviews, 35(2), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954422421000111
  8. Gürbüz, R., & Çalık, M. (2021). Intertwining mathematical modeling with environmental issues. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 79(3), 412–424. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/21.79.412
  9. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
  10. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
  11. Howlett, C., Ferreira, J., & Blomfield, J. (2016). Teaching sustainable development in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 17(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-07-2014- 0102
  12. IBM Corp. (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 20.0) [Computer software]. IBM Corp.
  13. Jianguo, M. (2004). Teaching environmental awareness in mathematics. Chinese Education and Society, 37(4), 53–56.
  14. Jing, L., Watabe, Y., & Goto, T. (2022). Integrating sustainability themes for enhancing interdisciplinarity: A case study of a comprehensive research university in Japan. Asia-Pacific Education Review, 23(4), 695–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09788-z
  15. Ko, A. C., & Lee, J. C. (2003). Teachers’ perceptions of teaching environmental issues within the science curriculum: A Hong Kong perspective. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12, 187–204.
  16. Kuhlman, T., & Farrington, J. (2010). What is sustainability? Sustainability, 2(11), 3436–3448. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2113436
  17. Kumar, S. (2018). Structural equation modeling: Basic assumptions and concepts—A novice’s guide. Asian Journal of Management Sciences, 3(7).
  18. Lee, J. C. K. (2001). Pre-school environmental education in Hong Kong: An exploratory study. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 17, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0814062600002408
  19. Liao, C. W., Liao, Y. H., Chen, B. S., Tseng, Y. J., & Ho, W. S. (2022). Elementary teachers’ environmental education cognition and attitude: A case study of the second largest city in Taiwan. Sustainability, 14(21), Article 14480. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114480
  20. Lucas, C., & Paulo, J. (2023). The usefulness of mathematical modelling for economic and environmental sustainability in the scope of university teacher education. International Journal of Innovation Science. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-08-2022-0152
  21. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84
  22. Marques, R., & Xavier, C. R. (2020). The challenges and difficulties of teachers in the insertion and practice of environmental education in the school curriculum. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 2(1). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1264000.pdf
  23. Moreno-Pino, F. M., Jiménez-Fontana, R., Domingo, J. M. C., & Goded, P. A. (2021). Study of the presence of sustainability competencies in teacher training in mathematics education. Sustainability, 13(10), Article 5629. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105629
  24. Mukherjee, A., & Singh, S. (2025). Eco-math connections: Exploring the challenges and possibilities among prospective mathematics educators on environmental integration. MIER Journal of Educational Studies, Trends and Practices, 15(2), 410–435. https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2025/v15/i2/2878
  25. National Education Policy. (2020). National education policy 2020. Government of India. https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf
  26. Özdemir, R. D. (2021). Integration of mathematics and environmental education: Change in the views of 5th grade students toward sustainability. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 14(2), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.14.2.14
  27. Pentang, J., Chua, C. C., Mancera, A., Solis, Y. J., & Bautista, R. (2023). Preservice teachers’ self-concept, self- efficacy, and attitude: Its implications to mathematics achievement. Studies in Technology and Education, 1(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.55687/ste.v1i1.22
  28. Salam, M., Jafar, & Prajono, R. (2020). Effectiveness of integrative learning models in improving understanding of mathematical concepts. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.666875
  29. Semerjian, L., El-Fadel, M., Zurayk, R., & Nuwayhid, I. (2004). Interdisciplinary approach to environmental education. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 130(3), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2004)130:3(173)
  30. Shrestha, N. (2021). Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.12691/ajams-9-1-2
  31. Situmorang, M. T. N. (2020). Environmental management strategy in schools: A case study at SMA Negeri 1 Bekasi, West Java. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 2(10). https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v2i10.3310
  32. Spiropoulou, D., Roussos, G., & Voutirakis, J. (2005). The role of environmental education in compulsory education: The case of mathematics textbooks in Greece. International Education Journal, 6(3), 400–406. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ854993
  33. Su, C. S., Díaz-Levicoy, D., Vásquez, C., & Hsu, C. C. (2023). Sustainable development education for training and service teachers teaching mathematics: A systematic review. Sustainability, 15(10), Article 8435. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108435
  34. Suzana, Y., Sabaruddin, S., Maharani, S., & Abidin, Z. (2021). Mathematics learning through character education based on integrated thematic learning: Development of learning materials. Infinity Journal, 10(2), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v10i2.p301-318
  35. Syafei, M. (2020). The implementation of integrated curriculum in the primary school: A case study of Sekolah Alam Cikeas. Journal of Modern Education Review, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.15341/jmer(2155- 7993)/02.10.2020/007
  36. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
  37. Vásquez, C. (2023). Integrating sustainability in mathematics education and statistics education: A systematic review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(11), Article 2357. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13809
  38. Zachariou, F., Tsami, E., Chalkias, C., & Bersimis, S. (2017). Teachers’ attitudes towards the environment and environmental education: An empirical study. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 12(7), 1567–1593. http://www.ijese.net/makale_indir/IJESE_1924_article_59b63fb40e81e.pdf