Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3

Across-breed genomic prediction for body weight in Siberian cattle populations

Pages
675–680
Publication Date
2020-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings have significant implications for the understanding of the way in which common ancestors and/or the presence of quantitative trait loci might affect the accuracy of the GP results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Body weight BW is an important heritable phenotype and related to other functional and production traits in cattle.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The past decade has seen an increase in emphasis on genome wide association studies GWAS for detecting single nucleotide polymorphisms SNPs that are associated with quantitative phenotypes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings have significant implications for the understanding of the way in which common ancestors and/or the presence of quantitative trait loci might affect the accuracy of the GP results.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Body weight · genomic selection · genome wide association analyses

Abstract

Body weight BW is an important heritable phenotype and related to other functional and production traits in cattle. The past decade has seen an increase in emphasis on genome wide association studies GWAS for detecting single nucleotide polymorphisms SNPs that are associated with quantitative phenotypes. Prediction of phenotypes using across-breed GWAS information [genomic prediction GP ] is an also important research area but received less attention from the community. Understanding the link between major genes and common ancestors within and between breeds will contribute to a deeper understanding of GP across breeds. The aims of the present study were two-fold: 1 to examine genetic structure and to detect associated SNPs for BW using various single and multiple locus genomic models and 2 genomic prediction of BW using Siberian cattle populations based on across-breed genomic information. The most obvious finding to emerge from this study was the increase in the across-GP accuracy when gene segregation in both related populations was found. These findings have significant implications for the understanding of the way in which common ancestors and/or the presence of quantitative trait loci might affect the accuracy of the GP results.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARACAÖREN, B. (2020). Across-breed genomic prediction for body weight in Siberian cattle populations. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3, 675–680. https://ajindex.com/articles/115307

References (12)

  1. 1 Karacaören B, Jaffrézic F, Kadarmideen HN. Genetic parameters for functional traits in dairy cattle from daily random regression models. Journal of Dairy Science 2016
  2. 89 (2): 791-798. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72141-5 2. Yin T, König S. Genome-wide associations and detection of potential candidate genes for direct genetic and maternal genetic effects influencing dairy cattle body weight at different ages. Genetics Selection Evolution 2019
  3. doi: 10.1186/ s12711-018-0444-4 3. Koenen EPC, Veerkamp RF. Genetic covariance functions for live weight, condition score, and dry-matter intake measured at different lactation stages of Holstein Friesian heifers. Livestock Production Science 1998
  4. doi: 10.1016/ S0301-6226(98)00159-6 4. Veerkamp RF. Selection for economic efficiency of dairy cattle using information on live weight and feed intake: a review. Journal of Dairy Science 1998
  5. 81 (4): 1109-1119. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75673-5 5. Veerkamp RF, Oldenbroek JK, Van Der Gaast HJ, Van Der Werf JHJ. Genetic correlation between days until start of luteal activity and milk yield, energy balance, and live weights. Journal of Dairy Science, 2000
  6. 583 doi: 10.3168/jds. S0022-0302(00)74917-4 6. Yi H, Breheny P, Imam N, Liu Y, Hoeschele I. Penalized multimarker vs. single-marker regression methods for genomewide association studies of quantitative traits. Genetics 2015
  7. 199 (1): 205-222. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.167817 7. Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ, Goldstein DB, Hindorff LA et al. Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature 2009
  8. 461 (7265): 747-753. doi: 10.1038/nature08494 8. Yang J, Manolio TA, Pasquale LR, Boerwinkle E, Caporaso N et al. Genome partitioning of genetic variation for complex traits using common SNPs. Nature Genetics 2011
  9. 43 (6): 519-25. doi: 10.1038/ng.823 9. Tam V, Patel N, Turcotte M, Bossé Y, Paré G et al. Benefits and limitations of genome-wide association studies. Nature Reviews Genetics 2019
  10. 20 (8): 467-484. doi: 10.1038/s41576- 019-0127-1 10. Campos G, Gianola D, Allison DB. Predicting genetic predisposition in human: the promise of whole-genome markers. Nature Reviews Genetics 2010
  11. doi: 10.1038/nrg2898 11. Lello L, Avery SG, Tellier L, Vazquez AI, de los Campos G, Hsu, SD. Accurate genomic prediction of human height. Genetics 2018
  12. 210 (2): 477-497. doi.: 10.1534/genetics.118.301267 12. Speed D, Cai N, Johnson MR, Nejentsev S, Balding DJ, UCLEB Consortium. Reevaluation of