SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1

Effects of Public Investments on Gross Domestic Product: Case of Artvin Province

Kamu Yatırımlarının Gayri̇ Safi̇ Yurti̇çi̇ Hâsıla Üzeri̇ndeki̇ Etki̇si̇: Artvi̇n İli̇ Örneği̇

Mustafa ÇAYIR
Pages
125–137
Publication Date
2021-03-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of Granger test, there is a causality relationship at 5% level of statistically significance from public investments to the income of Artvin citizens, whereas there isn't any significant causal relationship from income to public investments.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper investigates that the effects of total real public investments made to Artvin upon the real per capita income in Artvin.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Also, the analysis has covered the period of 1988-2017, based on annual observations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of Granger test, there is a causality relationship at 5% level of statistically significance from public investments to the income of Artvin citizens, whereas there isn't any significant causal relationship from income to public investments.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Kamu Yatırımları · Gelir · Granger Nedensellik

Abstract

This paper investigates that the effects of total real public investments made to Artvin upon the real per capita income in Artvin. The relationship between public investments and income is analyzed using Granger causality and cointegration tests. Also, the analysis has covered the period of 1988-2017, based on annual observations. According to the results of Granger test, there is a causality relationship at 5% level of statistically significance from public investments to the income of Artvin citizens, whereas there isn't any significant causal relationship from income to public investments. A long-term relationship hasn’t been determined between public investments and per capita income in Artvin in Johansen cointegration test. Key Words: Public Investments, Income, Granger Causality, Johansen CointegrationJEL Classification: H50, R11, O47

Özet

Çalışmada kamu yatırımları ile kişi başına düşen gelir arasındaki ilişki Granger nedensellik ve eş-bütünleşme testleri kullanılarak analiz edilmektedir. Ayrıca, analiz 1988 – 2017 dönemini kapsamakta ve yıllık gözlemlere dayanmaktadır. Granger nedensellik testinden elde edilen sonuçlara göre, Artvin’e yapılan kamu yatırımlarından Artvin halkının kişi başına düşen gelirine doğru % 5 önem seviyesinde istatistiki olarak anlamlı bir nedensellik varken, Artvin’de kişi başına düşen gelirden kamu yatırımlarına doğru anlamlı bir nedensellik bulunmamaktadır. Yapılan Johansen eş-bütünleşme testinde Artvin’de kamu yatırımlarıyla kişi başına düşen gelir arasında anlamlı düzeyde uzun dönemli bir ilişkinin olmadığı tespit edilmiştir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Kamu Yatırımları, Gelir, Granger Nedensellik, Johansen Eş-bütünleşmeJEL Sınıflandırması: H50, R11, O47

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAYIR, M. (2021). Effects of Public Investments on Gross Domestic Product: Case of Artvin Province. Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1, 125–137. https://ajindex.com/articles/115290

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abiad, A., Furceri, D. & Topalova, P. (2016). The Macroeconomic Effects of Public Investment: Evidence from Advanced Economies. Journal of Macroeconomics, 50 (2016), 224 – 240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2016.07.005.
  2. Ansari, M. I., Gordon, D. V. & Akuamoah, C. (1997). Keynes versus Wagner: public expenditure and national income for three African countries. Applied Economics, 29, 543 – 550. https://doi.org/10.1080/000368497327038.
  3. Barro, R. J. (1990). Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98 (S5), 103 – 125. doi:10.1086/261726. Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106 (2), 407 – 443. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2937943.
  4. Bor, Y. J., Chuang, Y. C., Lai, W. W. & Yang, C. M. (2010). A Dynamic General Equilibrium Model for Public R&D Investment in Taiwan. Economic Modelling, 27, 171 –183. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2009.08.007. Chen, C., Yao, S., Hu, P. & Lin, Y. (2017). Optimal Government Invesment and Public Debt in an Economic Growth Model. China Economic Review, 45, 257 – 278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2016.08.005.
  5. Creel, J., Monperrus-Veroni, P. & Saraceno, F. (2009). On the Long-Term Effects of Fiscal Policy in the United Kingdom: The Case for a Golden Rule. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 56 (5), 580 – 607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9485.2009.00499.x.
  6. Dastagiri, M. B. (2010). The Effects of Government Expenditure on Promoting Livestock GDP and Reducing Rural Poverty in India. Outlook on AGRICULTURE, 39 (2), 127 – 133. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.5367/000000010791745402.
  7. Dickey, D. A. & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series With a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74 (366), 427 – 431. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2286348.
  8. Dickey, D. A. & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Econometrica, 49 (4), 1057 – 1072. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1912517.
  9. Donath, L., Miloş, M. & Miloş, L. R. (2009). Public Investment and Economic Growth in the European Union Member States. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 26E, 39 – 53. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/12954/1/MPRA_paper_12954.pdf.
  10. Fosu, A. K., Getachew, Y. Y. & Ziesemer, T. H. W. (2016).
  11. Optimal Public Investment, Growth, and Consumption: Evidence from African Countries. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 20, 1957 – 1986. doi: