Journals / Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

TERRITORIAL DIMENSION OF GOVERNANCE AND ITS INSTITUTIONAL EFFECT ON THE GEOGRAPHICAL LEVELS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

Avrupa Birliği’nde Yönetişimin Teritoryal Boyutu ve Coğrafi Düzeyler Üzerindeki Kurumsal Etkisi

Pages
585–608
Publication Date
2021-03-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Its main purpose is to discuss the institutional effect of territorial governance on the geographical levels in the EU.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Territorial matters increasingly gain importance in the European Union (EU).
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study elaborates on the fundamentals of territorial governance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Its main purpose is to discuss the institutional effect of territorial governance on the geographical levels in the EU.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:European Union · Territory · Governance

Abstract

Territorial matters increasingly gain importance in the European Union (EU). The EU considers territory as a variable in specification and implementation of policies. So, the territorial dimension has been added to various policy areas, and governance has also been addressed on a territorial basis. In this framework, as a relatively new concept, territorial governance has entered into the EU’s agenda to improve the efficiency of governing processes and ensure territorial development. This study elaborates on the fundamentals of territorial governance. Its main purpose is to discuss the institutional effect of territorial governance on the geographical levels in the EU.

Özet

Teritoryal meseleler, Avrupa Birliği (AB) içerisinde artan oranda önemli hâle gelmektedir. AB, politikaların belirlenmesinde ve uygulanmasında teritoryayı bir değişken olarak ele almaktadır. Bu bakımdan teritoryal boyut, çeşitli politika alanlarına eklemlenmiş ve yönetişim de teritoryal bir bağlamda ele alınmaya başlanmıştır. Bu çerçevede göreli olarak yeni bir kavram olan teritoryal yönetişim, yönetim süreçlerinin etkinliğinin arttırılması ve teritoryal gelişimin sağlanması amacıyla AB gündemine dâhil edilmiştir. Bu çalışma, teritoryal yönetişimin temel unsurlarını ele almaktadır. Çalışmanın temel amacı, teritoryal yönetişimin AB içerisindeki coğrafi düzeyler üzerindeki kurumsal etkisini tartışmaktır

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, S. (2021). TERRITORIAL DIMENSION OF GOVERNANCE AND ITS INSTITUTIONAL EFFECT ON THE GEOGRAPHICAL LEVELS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 585–608. https://ajindex.com/articles/115224

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Agnew, John. “The Territorial Trap: The Geographical Assumptions of International Relations Theory.” Review of International Political Economy 1, no 1 (1994): 53-80.
  2. Allen, John. “Three Spaces of Power: Territory, Networks, Plus a Topological Twist in the Tale of Domination and Authority.” Journal of Power 2, no 2 (2009): 197-212.
  3. Antonsich, Marco. “Rethinking Territory.” Progress in Human Geography 35, no 3 (2010): 422-425.
  4. Bache, Ian ve Matthew Flinders. “Themes and Issues in Multi-Level Governance.” içinde Multi-Level Governance, ed. Ian Bache ve Matthew Flinders, 1-11. Oxford: Oxford University, 2004.
  5. Barca, Fabrizio. An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. A Place-Based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations. Brussels: Directorate General for Regional Policy, European Commission, 2009. Erişim Tarihi: Nisan 04, 2020, www.ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/policy/future/barca_en.htm Basılgan, Müslüm. “Avrupa Birliği’nin Bölgesel Ekonomik Kalkınma Politikası.” Global Journal of Economics and Business Studies 1, no 1 (2012): 47-66.
  6. Beck, Joachim. “Cross-Border Cooperation and the Challenge of Transnational Institution-Building–the Example of the European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC).” RECERC, no 1 Spécial (2017): 1-13, Erişim Tarihi: Nisan 04, 2020, http://recerc.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/R9beck.pdf.
  7. Bevir, Mark. Governance: A Very Short Introduction. Hampshire: Oxford University, 2012.
  8. Bialasiewicz, Luiza, Paolo Giaccaria, Alun Jones ve Claudio Minca. “Re-Scaling 'EU'rope: EU Macro-Regional Fantasies in the Mediterranean.” European Urban and Regional Studies 20, no 1 (2003): 59-76.
  9. Böhme, Kai, Sabine Zillmer, Maria Toptsidou ve Frank Holstein. Territorial Governance and Cohesion Policy. Brussels: European Parliament. Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies, 2015. Erişim Tarihi: Nisan 04, 2020, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/563382/IPOL_S TU%282015%29563382_EN.pdf Böhme, Kai. Philippe Doucet, Tomasz Komornicki, Jacek Zaucha ve Dariusz Świątek. How to Strengthen the Territorial Dimension of ‘Europe 2020’ and the EU Cohesion Policy. Warsaw: Polish Ministry of Regional Development, 2011. Erişim Tarihi: Nisan 04, 2020, https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/studies/pdf/challenges20 20/2011_territorial_dimension_eu2020.pdf Börzel, Tanja. “European Governance: Negotiation and Competition in the Shadow of Hierarchy.” Journal of Common Market Studies 48, no 2 (2010