Journals / Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

CRITICAL ARGUMENTS ABOUT READMISSION PRACTICES AND POLICIES BETWEEN EU AND TURKEY

AB ve Türkiye Arasındaki Geri Kabul Uygulamaları ve Politikaları Üzerine Eleştirel Tartışmalar

Pages
501–522
Publication Date
2021-03-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Within the scope of the analyses, it is aimed to discuss the critical arguments on political approaches and security policies of the European Union and Turkey on migration control and elaborate why both sides preferred to solve the migration crisis through regional, and specifically, bilateral instruments.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper aims to analyze the historical background and the recent developments concerning the Readmission Agreement and free visa negotiations between Turkey and the European Union through the official documents of Ministry for Foreign Affairs and the European Union.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a third view, the policies of Turkey and the EU will be critically assessed from the perspectives of the international governmental organizations and non-governmental actors, namely the United Nations, Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International through their regular reports.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Within the scope of the analyses, it is aimed to discuss the critical arguments on political approaches and security policies of the European Union and Turkey on migration control and elaborate why both sides preferred to solve the migration crisis through regional, and specifically, bilateral instruments.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:European Union · Turkey · migration control

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the historical background and the recent developments concerning the Readmission Agreement and free visa negotiations between Turkey and the European Union through the official documents of Ministry for Foreign Affairs and the European Union. As a third view, the policies of Turkey and the EU will be critically assessed from the perspectives of the international governmental organizations and non-governmental actors, namely the United Nations, Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International through their regular reports. Within the scope of the analyses, it is aimed to discuss the critical arguments on political approaches and security policies of the European Union and Turkey on migration control and elaborate why both sides preferred to solve the migration crisis through regional, and specifically, bilateral instruments.

Özet

Bu çalışma Türkiye ve Avrupa Birliği arasındaki Geri Kabul Anlaşması ve vize muafiyeti görüşmelerine ilişkin tarihsel arkaplanı ve güncel gelişmeleri, Dışişleri Bakanlığı ve Avrupa Birliği’nin resmi belgelerine dayanarak analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Türkiye ve Avrupa Birliği’nin politikaları, üçüncü bir göz olarak uluslararası hükümet ve hükümet dışı örgütler perspektifinden, özellikle Birleşmiş Milletler, İnsan Hakları İzleme Örgütü ve Uluslararası Af Örgütü’nün düzenli olarak yayınlamakta olduğu raporlar aracılığıyla eleştirel bir yaklaşımla değerlendirilecektir. Bu çerçevede, Türkiye ve Avrupa Birliği’nin göç kontrolünü sağlamak için sergilediği siyasi yaklaşımlar ve güvenlik politikaları üzerine kritik öneme sahip argümanlar tartışılacak; tarafların göç krizini neden bölgesel ve özellikle iki taraflı araçlarla çözmeyi tercih ettiği değerlendirilecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNALP-ÇEPEL, Z. (2021). CRITICAL ARGUMENTS ABOUT READMISSION PRACTICES AND POLICIES BETWEEN EU AND TURKEY. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 501–522. https://ajindex.com/articles/115221

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Bürgin, Alexander. “European Commission’s Agency meets Ankara’s Agenda: Why Turkey is Ready for a Readmission Agreement, Journal of European Public Policy, 19, no: 6, (2012): 883-899.
  2. Bürgin, Alexander and Derya Aşıkoğlu. “Turkey’s New Asylum Law: a Case of EU Influence”, Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies (2015): 1-15.
  3. Carrera, Sergio and Roberto Cortinovis. “The EU’s Role in Implementing the UN Global Impact on Refugees”, “CEPS Paper in Liberty and Security in Europe, no 2018-04 (2019): 1-18. “CFSP Report on Our Priorities in 2018”,
  4. Council of the European Union, Brussels, 2018, Accessed November 20, 2019, http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-10766-2018-INIT/en/pdf. “Çavuşoğlu: Geri Kabul Anlaşması’nı Askıya Aldık”, Deutsche Welle, July 22, 2019, Accessed November 20, 2019, https://www.dw.com/tr/%C3%A7avu%C5%9Fo%C4%9Flu-geri-kabulanla%C5%9Fmas%C4%B1n%C4%B1-ask%C4%B1ya-ald%C4%B1k/a49699277.
  5. De Marcilly, Charles and Angéline Garde. “The EU-Turkey Agreement and Its Implications”, Fondation Robert Schuman Policy Paper, European Issues, no 396 (2016): 1-8. Directorate General of Migration Management Mission, Accessed November 20, 2019, https://en.goc.gov.tr/mission (Accessed on 27.01.2020).
  6. Ekşi, Nuray. “Readmission Agreement between the European Union and Turkey: A Chain of Mistakes”. In International Community and Refugees: Responsibilities, Possibilities, Human Rights and Violations, 143-183. İstanbul: Amnesty International Turkey Publications, 2016: 143-183.
  7. EU Asylum Procedures Directive, Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on Common Procedures for Granting and Withdrawing international Protection (Recast), Accessed on February 19, 2020, https://easo.europa.eu/sites/default/files/public/Dve-2013-32-AsylumProcedures.pdf “European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations”, European Commission, 2019, Accessed on November 20, 2019, https://ec.europa.eu/echo/where/europe/turkey_en. “European Commission Makes Progress on Agenda on Migration”, European Commission, May 27, 2015, Accessed on November 20, 2019, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_15_5039. European Council Presidency Conclusions on Migration, EUCO 22/15, Brussels, June 26, 2015, Accessed on February 21, 2020, http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-22-2015-INIT/en/pdf “EU: Don’t Send Syrians Back to Turkey, Human Rights Watch”, June 20, 2016, Accessed on May 21, 2020, https://www.hrw.org/news/2