Journals / Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

ASSOCIATION POLICY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE ASYMMETRY QUESTION

Avrupa Birliği Ortaklık Politikası ve Asimetri Sorunu

Pages
365–400
Publication Date
2021-03-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is concluded that a new association policy may accommodate better interests of both the EU and associate countries.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this article is to put an emphasis on the asymmetrical aspects of association policy of the EU.
📊
Key Findings & Data:European in the sense of the article 49 of the Treaty on the EU.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is concluded that a new association policy may accommodate better interests of both the EU and associate countries.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:EU Association Policy · Association Agreements · Asymmetry

Abstract

The aim of this article is to put an emphasis on the asymmetrical aspects of association policy of the EU. The article problematizes the weakness of institutional association between the EU and associated countries despite the high volume of direct and indirect rule taking by these countries. The main argument of the article is that the EU needs to develop an institutionalized associate membership status at least for associated countries in Europe, i.e. European in the sense of the article 49 of the Treaty on the EU. It is concluded that a new association policy may accommodate better interests of both the EU and associate countries. This is especially important for an improved image of the EU in these countries.

Özet

Bu makalenin amacı, AB'nin ortaklık politikasının asimetrik yönlerine vurgu yapmaktır. Çalışmada, ortak ülkelerin doğrudan ve dolaylı olarak çok fazla kuralı üstlenmelerine rağmen, AB ile aralarındaki kurumsal ortaklığın zayıflığı sorunsallaştırılmaktadır. Makalenin temel argümanı, AB'nin, en azından AB Antlaşması madde 49’da ifade edilen Avrupalı ülkeler için kurumsallaşmış bir ortak üyelik statüsü geliştirmesi gerektiği şeklindedir. Yeni bir ortaklık politikasının hem AB hem de ortak ülkelerin çıkarlarını daha iyi karşılayabileceği sonucuna varılmaktadır. Bu, özellikle ortak ülkelerde AB'nin imajını iyileştirmesi için önemlidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALKAN, U. (2021). ASSOCIATION POLICY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE ASYMMETRY QUESTION. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 365–400. https://ajindex.com/articles/115217

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Bartels, Lorand. “Human Rights and Sustainable Development Obligations in EU Free Trade Agreements”. In Global Governance through Trade: EU Policies and Approaches, editors Jan Wouters, Axel Marx, Dylan Geraets and Bregt Natens, 73-91. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2015.
  2. Eeckhout, Piet. EU External Relations Law. 2nd Volume, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
  3. Eriksen, Erik Oddvar and John Erik Fossum, editors. The European Union’s Nonmembers: Independence Under Hegemony?. London: Routledge, 2015.
  4. Evans, Andrew. “Institutions.” in Handbook on European Enlargement, ed. Andrea Ott and KirstynInglis (La Hey: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2002), 1043-1078.
  5. Hillion, Christophe. “Anatomy of EU Norm Export Towards the Neighbourhood the Impact of Article 8 TEU”. In Legislative Approximation and Application of EU Law in the Eastern Neighbourhood of the European Union, editors Peter Van Elsuwege and Roman Petrov, 13-20. London and New York: Routledge, 2014.
  6. Klabbers, Jan. An Introduction to International Organizations Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
  7. Kochenov, Dimitry. “The Issue of Values”. In Legislative Approximation and Application of EU Law in the Eastern Neighbourhood of the European Union, editors Peter Van Elsuwege and Roman Petrov, 46-62. London and New York: Routledge, 2014.
  8. Kochenov, Dimitry. EU Enlargement and the Failure of Conditionality. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2008.
  9. Leuffen, Dirk, Berthold Rittberger and Frank Schimmelfennig. Differentiated Integration: Explaining Variation in the European Union. New York: PalgraveMacmillan, 2013.
  10. Lycourgos, Constantinos. L'association avec union douanière: un mode de relations entre la CEE et des Etats tiers. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1994.
  11. Maurer, Andreas and Max Haerder. “Alternatives to Full Membership of the European Union”. In European Neighbourhood Policy Challenges for the EU Policy Towards the New Neighbours, editors Johannes Varwick and Kai Olaf Lang, 197-216. Opladen and Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich Publishers, 2007.
  12. Ott, Andrea. “Different Forms of EC Agreements”. In Handbook on European Enlargement, editors Andrea Ott and KirstynInglis, 205-208. La Hey: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2002.
  13. Phinnemore, David. Association: Stepping-Stone or Alternative to EU Membership. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1999.
  14. Pirim, Ceren Zeynep. Un exemple d'association à la communauté européenne: le cas de la Turquie, Brussels: Bruylant, 2012.
  15. Alkan, Ufuk. “The Modernization of