Journals / Kader / 2012 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Kur'an'daki 'Furkân' Kavramına Dair Farklı Bir Yaklaşım

Journal
Kader
Pages
81–106
Publication Date
2012-02-08
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, we underline the fact that even though the Qur??n does mention the word furq?n, this furq?n does not refer exclusively to the Qur??n itself or any other sacred scripture, neither to the Old Tastement nor to the New Tastement.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Muslim scholars define in general the word furq?n in the Qur??n as ?separator/proof between haqq (truth) and b?til (false)?.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Of the meanings of this word they also report ?salvation?, ?assistance?, ?victory?, ?way out (of a difficult situation)?, and the like.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, we underline the fact that even though the Qur??n does mention the word furq?n, this furq?n does not refer exclusively to the Qur??n itself or any other sacred scripture, neither to the Old Tastement nor to the New Tastement.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Furqān · yawm al-furkān · hudā

Özet

Muslim scholars define in general the word furq?n in the Qur??n as ?separator/proof between haqq (truth) and b?til (false)?. Of the meanings of this word they also report ?salvation?, ?assistance?, ?victory?, ?way out (of a difficult situation)?, and the like. As for Orientalist scholars, they claim that furq?n is a loan word from Syriac going back to the word purq?na, meaning ?salvation? again. Acknowledging the partial credibility of all these meanings, in this article we present a different definion for the furq?n. On the basis of its etimological morphology, semantical and contextual peculiarities in the Qur??nic verses, we argue that instead of ?separator/proof? between haqq and b?til, furq?n means ?separating judgment? between the group that respresents haqq (ahl al- haqq) and the group that represents b?til (ahl al- b?til), or ?separation judgment? regarding the two groups. On the other hand, we underline the fact that even though the Qur??n does mention the word furq?n, this furq?n does not refer exclusively to the Qur??n itself or any other sacred scripture, neither to the Old Tastement nor to the New Tastement.

🔖

Cite This Article

HACIMÜFTÜOĞLU, H. (2012). Kur'an'daki 'Furkân' Kavramına Dair Farklı Bir Yaklaşım. Kader, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 81–106. https://ajindex.com/articles/115102

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. ‘Abduh, Muhammed, Tefsîru’l-Menâr (telif: Muhammed Reşîd Rıdâ), Dâru’l-Menâr, 1947 ‘Abdu’l-Bâkî, Muhammed Fuâd, el-Mu‘cemu’l-Mufehres li Elfâzi’l-Kur’âni’l-Kerîm, Dâru’d- Da‘ve, İstanbul, 1990
  2. Ahmed b. Hanbel, Musnedu’l-İmâm Ahmed b. Hanbel (tah. Şu‘ayb el-Arnaûd vd.), Muessesetu’r-Risâle, Beyrût, 1999
  3. Aydın, M. Akif, “Osmanlı Hukukunda Kazaî Boşanma ‘Tefrîk’”, Osmanlı Araştırmaları,, sayı:5 Bedevi, Cemal, “Kitâb-ı Mukaddes’te Hz. Muhammed (S.A.V.)[çev. Ahmet Tahir Dayhan]”, D.E.Ü. İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, sayı:XI, İzmir, 1998
  4. Bediuzzaman, Sözler, Envar Neşriyat, İstanbul, 1995 el-Beydâvî, Nâsıru’d-Dîn Ebû Sa‘îd ‘Abdu’llâh b. ‘Umar b. Muhammed, Tefsîru’l-Beydâvî, Dersaadet Kitabevi, İstanbul, t.siz Cündioğlu, Dücane, Söz’ün Özü, Kitabevi Yay., İstanbul, 1999
  5. Çanga, Mahmud, Kur’an-ı Kerim Lugatı, Timaş Yay., İstanbul, 1991
  6. Çantay, H. Basri, Kur’ân-ı Hakîm ve Meâl-i Kerîm (naşir: Yekta Saraç), Risale Yay., İstanbul, ed-Dimeşkî, Ebû Hafs ‘Umar b. ‘Alî, el-Lubâb fî ‘Ulûmi’l-Kitâb (tah. eş-Şeyh ‘Âdil Ahmed; eş-Şeyh ‘Alî Muhammed Mu‘avvid), Dâru’l-Kutubi’l-‘İlmiyye, Beyrût, 1998 el-Endelûsî, Ebû Hayyân, Tefsîru’l-Bahri’l-Muhît (tah. ‘Âdil Ahmed ‘Abdu’l-Mevcûd; ‘Alî Muhammed Mu‘avvid), Dâru’l-Kutubi’l-‘İlmiyye, Beyrût, 2001 el-Fahru’r-Râzî, Tefsîru’l-Fahri’r-Râzî, Dâru’l-Fikr, Beyrût, 1981 el-Fîrûzâbâdî, Mecdu’d-Dîn Muhammed b. Ya‘kûb, el-Kâmûsu’l-Muhît, Muessesetu’r- Risâle, Beyrût, 1993
  7. Hacımüftüoğlu, Halil, Kuran Tercümelerinde Yöntem Sorunu, İz Yay., İstanbul, 2008 el-Halil b. Ahmed, Kitâbu’l-‘Ayn Muratteben ‘alâ Hurûfi’l-Mu‘cem (tah. ‘Abdu’l-Hamîd Hindâvî), Dâru’l-Kutubi’l-‘İlmiyye, Beyrût, 2003 el-Isfehânî, er-Râğıb, Mufredâtu Ğarîbi’l-Kur’ân (tah. ‘Adnân Dâvûdî), Dâru’l-Kalem, Dimeşk, 1992
  8. Izutsu, Toshihiko, Kur’ân’da Allah ve İnsan (çev. Süleyman Ateş), Kevser Yay., Ankara, t.siz İbn ‘Âşûr, Muhammed Tâhir, Tefsîru’t-Tahrîr ve’t-Tenvîr, ed-Dâru’t-Tûnusiyye li’n-Neşr, Tûnus, 1984 İbn Hişâm, Ebû Muhammed ‘Abdu’l-Melik, es-Sîratu’n-Nebeviyye (tahr. ‘Umar ‘Abdu’s- Selâm Tedmurî), Dâru’l-Kitâbi’l-‘Arabî, Beyrût, 1990 İbn Kesîr, Tefsîru’l-Kur’âni’l-‘Azîm (tah. Muhammed İbrâhîm el-Bennâ vd.), Kahraman Yay., İstanbul, 1992 İbn Manzûr, Lisânu’l-‘Arab (tah. ‘Abdu’llâh ‘Aliyyu’l-Kebîr vd.), Dâru’l-Ma‘ârif, el-Kâhira, t.siz İbnu’l-Esîr, en-Nihâye fî Ğarîbi’l-Hadîsi ve’l-Eser (tah. Tâhir Ahmed ez-Zâvî; Mahmûd Muhammed et-Tanâhî), el-Mektebetu’l-İslâmiyye, t.siz Jeffery, Arthur, The Foreign Vocabulary of The Qur’ân, Oriental Institute, Baroda, 1938 (Komisyon), Kutsa