SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Balıkesir Medical Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3

The factor structure of the childbirth self-efficacy inventory in a sample of Turkish pregnant women

Pediatrik trakeostomi bakımı' çevrimiçi kursunun hemşirelik öğrencilerinin bilgi ve bakım verici rollerine ilişkin tutumlarına etkisi

Ruveyde Aydın(KARADENIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-4604-4570
Fatmanur Sena Bostan(KÜTAHYA SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, KÜTAHYA SAĞLIK YÜKSEKOKULU, HEMŞİRELİK PR.)0000-0002-8737-9265
Kamile Kukulu(AKDENIZ UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-7479-833X
Pages
131–139
Publication Date
2021-11-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The study demonstrated that the Turkish version of the “Childbirth Self-Efficacy Inventory” is a valid and reliable tool to measure the childbirth self-efficacy of women during pregnancy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ABSTRACT Aim: Childbirth self-efficacy is very important for the type and management of birth.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to examine the factor structure of the Childbirth Self-Efficacy Inventory Short-Version (CBSEI-32) in Turkish pregnant women.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The study demonstrated that the Turkish version of the “Childbirth Self-Efficacy Inventory” is a valid and reliable tool to measure the childbirth self-efficacy of women during pregnancy.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:doğum · öz-yeterlik · gebelik

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim: Childbirth self-efficacy is very important for the type and management of birth. Women with high self-efficacy prefer vaginal delivery, manage labor pain more easily, need fewer analgesic interventions, and experience fewer complications at birth. This study aimed to examine the factor structure of the Childbirth Self-Efficacy Inventory Short-Version (CBSEI-32) in Turkish pregnant women. Material and Method: This study was conducted in a methodological design. The sample of the study consisted of the pregnant women admitted to the obstetrics and gynecology outpatient clinic of Karaman State Hospital. The data were collected using the descriptive information form for the pregnant and the CBSEI. Numbers, percentages, arithmetic mean, factor analysis, and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient were used in the data analyses. Results: As a result of the exploratory factor analysis (EFA), items 6, 12, 13 and 16 in the OE sub-dimension were excluded because their factor load values were below 0.32. And the two-factor structure consisting of 28 items was obtained as the outcome expectancy (OE) and the self-efficacy expectancy (EE). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to obtain additional evidence of construct validity in line with the scores of the scale. It was determined that the fit indices calculated as a result of CFA without any modification were p=0.00, 2/SD; 2.43, GFI=0.90, AGFI=0.90, CFI=0.90, and RMSEA=0.06. The total Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient was 0.82. Conclusion: The study demonstrated that the Turkish version of the “Childbirth Self-Efficacy Inventory” is a valid and reliable tool to measure the childbirth self-efficacy of women during pregnancy.

Özet

ÖZ Amaç: Doğumda öz-yeterlik, doğumun türü ve yönetimi için önemlidir. Yüksek öz yeterliliğe sahip kadınlar vajinal doğumu tercih etmekte, doğum ağrısını daha kolay yönetmekte, daha az analjezik müdahaleye ihtiyaç duymakta ve doğumda daha az komplikasyon yaşamaktadır. Bu çalışma, Türk gebelerde Doğum Öz Yeterlik Envanteri Kısa Versiyonunun (CBSEI-32) faktör yapısını incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışma metodolojik bir tasarımda yapılmıştır. Çalışmanın örneklemini Karaman Devlet Hastanesi Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Polikliniğine başvuran gebeler oluşturmuştur. Veri toplama aracı olarak, anneleri tanıtıcı bilgi formu ve Doğum Öz-yeterlilik Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde sayı, yüzde, aritmetik ortalama, faktör analizi ve Cronbach alfa katsayısı kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Açımlayıcı faktör analizi (AFA) sonucunda sonuç beklentisi (SBAS) alt boyutunda yer alan 6, 12, 13 ve 16. maddeler faktör yük değerleri 0.32'nin altında olduğu için çıkarılmıştır. 28 maddeden oluşan iki faktörlü yapı ise sonuç beklentisi (SBAS) ve öz-yeterlik beklentisi (EBAS) olarak elde edilmiştir. Ölçekten elde edilen puanlar doğrultusunda yapı geçerliliğine ilişkin ek kanıt elde etmek amacıyla doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) uygulanmıştır. Herhangi bir modifikasyonun yapılmadığı DFA sonucunda hesaplanan uyum indekslerinin p=0.00, □2/sd=2.43, GFI=0.90, AGFI=0.90, CFI=0.90 ve RMSEA=0.06 olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ölçeğin genel Cronbach Alfa katsayısı 0.82 olarak bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Bu çalışma, “Doğum Öz-yeterlik Ölçeği”nin Türkçe versiyonunun kadınların gebelik sırasında doğum öz-yeterliğini ölçmek için geçerli ve güvenilir bir araç olduğunu göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aydın, R., Bostan, F. S., Kukulu, K., *, K. K. (2021). The factor structure of the childbirth self-efficacy inventory in a sample of Turkish pregnant women. Balıkesir Medical Journal, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3, 131–139. https://doi.org/10.33716/bmedj.943200

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (34)

  1. Aktaş S, Aydın R. The analysis of negative birth experiences of mothers: a qualitative study. Journal of Reproductive Infant Psychology. 2019;37(2):176-192. doi:10.1080/02646838.2018.1540863
  2. Yıldız H. Pozitif Doğum Deneyimi İçin İntrapartum Bakım Modeli: Dünya Sağlık Örgütü Önerileri. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 2019; 5(2), 98-105.
  3. Namujju J, Muhindo R, Mselle LT, Waiswa P, Nankumbi J, Muwanguzi P. Childbirth experiences and their derived meaning: a qualitative study among postnatal mothers in Mbale regional referral hospital, Uganda Reproductive Health. 2018;15(183):1-11. doi:10.1186/s12978-018-0628-y.
  4. Ayers S. Birth trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder: the importance of risk and resilience. Journal of Reproductive Infant Psycholgy. 2017; 35(5): 427-432. doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2017.1386874
  5. Aydın R, Barkin JL, Kukulu K. Attempts to strengthen maternal functioning in the postpartum period: a literature review. Journal of Human Science. 2016;13(3):5751–5759. doi: 10.14687/jhs.v13i3.4170.
  6. Crawley R, Wilkie S, Gamble J, Creedy DK, Fenwick J, Cockburn N, Ayers S. Characteristics of memories for traumatic and nontraumatic birth. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2018; 32(5): 584-591. doi.org/10.1002/acp.3438
  7. Ip WY, Chung TK, Tang CS. The Chinese Childbirth Self‐Efficacy Inventory: the development of a short form. Journal of Clinical. Nursing. 2008; 17(3):333-340. doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01919.x
  8. Ip WY, Tang CS, Goggins WB. An educational intervention to improve women’s ability to cope with childbirth. Journal of Clinical. Nursing. 2009; 18(15): 2125-2135. doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02720.x
  9. Preis H, Eisner M, Chen R, Benyamini Y. First-time mothers' birth beliefs, preferences, and actual birth: A longitudinal observational study. Women and Birth 2019; 32(1): 110-117. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2018.04.019
  10. Gao LL, Ip WY, Sun K. Validation of the short form of the chinese childbirth self-efficacy inventory in Mainland China. Research in Nursing & Health., 2010;34(1):49–59. doi:10.1002/nur.20400 Byrne J, Hauck Y, Fisher C, Bayes S, Schutze R. Effectiveness of a mindfulness‐based childbirth education pilot study on maternal self‐efficacy and fear of childbirth. Journal of Midwifery Womens Health 2014; 59(2): 192-197. doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.1207
  11. Serçekuş P, Başkale H. Effects of antenatal education on fear of childbirth, maternal self-efficacy and parental attachment. Midwifery. 2016;(34):166–172. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2015.11.016
  12. Campbell V, Nolan M. “It definitely made a difference”: a grounded theory study of yoga for pregnancy and women’s self-efficacy for labour. Midwifery 2018; 1(68): 74-83. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.10.005
  13. Aktaş S, Aydın R. The analysis of negative birth experiences of mothers: a qualitative study. Journal of Reproductive Infant Psychogyl. 2019;37(2): 176-192. doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2018.1540863
  14. Nilsson L, Thorsell T, Hertfelt Wahn E, Ekström A. Factors influencing positive birth experiences of first-time mothers. Nursing Research Practice, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/349124
  15. Aydın R, Kukulu K. Adaptation of the Barkin scale of maternal functioning and examination of the psychometric properties. Health Care for Women International 2018;39(1): 50-64. doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2017.1385616
  16. Reisz S, Jacobvitz D, George C. Birth and motherhood: childbirth experience and mothers' perceptions of themselves and their babies. Infant Mental Health Journal 2015; 36(2): 167-178. doi:10.1002/imhj.21500
  17. WHO. Pregnancy, childbirth, postpartum and newborn care: a guide for essential practice –3rd ed. World Health Organization. 2015, WHO Press, Geneva, Switzerland
  18. Carlsson IM, Ziegert K, Nissen E. The relationship between childbirth self-efficacy and aspects of well-being, birth interventions and birth outcomes. Midwifery. 2015;31(10):1000‐1007. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2015.05.005
  19. Maimburg RD, Vaeth M, Dahlen H. Women's experience of childbirth - A five year follow-up of the randomised controlled trial "Ready for Child Trial". Women Birth, 2016;29(5): 450-454. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2016.02.003
  20. Toohill J, Creedy DK, Gamble J, Fenwick J. A cross-sectional study to determine utility of childbirth fear screening in maternity practice - An Australian perspective. Women Birth. 2015;28(4):310‐316. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2015.05.002
  21. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1977; 1(4): 139–161. doi:10.1016/0146-1993; 6402(78): 90002-4
  22. Yancey, George B. Self-efficacy. Salem Press Encyclopedia of Health. 2019;3p
  23. Lowe NK. Maternal confidence for labor: development of the Childbirth Self-Efficacy Inventory. Research in Nursing & Health 1993;16(2): 141–149. doi:10.1002/nur.4770160209
  24. Ip WY, Chung TK, Tang CS. The Chinese Childbirth Self-Efficacy Inventory: the development of a short form. Journal Clinical Nursing 2007;17(3): 333-340. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01919.x
  25. Şencan H. Sosyal ve davranışsal ölçümlerde güvenirlik ve geçerlilik. Ankara Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2005
  26. Ersoy, Y. Doğum eyleminde öz-yeterlilik ölçeği geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması (unpublished master thesis). Antalya; Akdeniz Üniversitesi, 2011
  27. Kızılkaya-Beji N. Hemşire ve ebelere yönelik kadın sağlığı ve hastalıkları. İstanbul; Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri, 2017
  28. Çiçek Ö, Okumuş H. Self-effıcacy perception at birth: its importance and effective factors. International Refereed Journal of Gynaecological Diseases and Maternal Child Health. 2017; May / June / July / August Summer (10):35-46.
  29. Khorsandi M, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Jahani F. Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Testing of the Short Form of Iranian Childbirth Self Efficacy Inventory. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal; 15(11): e11741 doi: 10.5812/ircmj.11741.
  30. Björk E, Thorildsson M. Childbirth Self-Efficacy Inventory in Tanzania –a pilot study. Diva. 2007 retriver from;https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.
  31. Çokluk Ö, Şekercioğlu G, Büyüköztürk Ş. Sosyal bilimler için değişkenli istatistik uygulamaları. Ankara; PegemAkademi Yayıncılık, 2012
  32. Aktaş S, Pasinlioğlu T, Çalik K. The Effect of Empathy Traning Given to Midwives on Mothers' Birth Perceptions and Their Satisfaction with Midwives. Life Science. 2016; 11(3), 1-10.
  33. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics (7th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Inc, 2019
  34. Fournier-Vicente S, Larigauderie P, Gaonac’h D. More dissociations and interactions within central executive functioning: A comprehensive latent-variable analysis. Acta psycholgy, 2018; 129(1), 32-48.