Journals / Balıkesir Medical Journal / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2

Evaluation of Rapid Antibody Test Compatibility in COVID-19 Cases Confirmed by RT-PCR Assay

RT-PCR Testi ile doğrulanmış COVID-19 olgularında hızlı antikor testi uyumluluğunun değerlendirilmesi

Asuman Akkaya Fırat(Health Sciences University Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training And Research Hospital, Medical Microbiology Laboratory, Ataşehir Istanbul, Turkey)0000-0001-7338-3282
Haluk Kılıç(Health Sciences University Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training And Research Hospital, Medical Microbiology Laboratory)0000-0002-3222-0601
Serkan Elarslan(Health Sciences University Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training And Research Hospital, Internal Medicine Clinic, Ataşehir Istanbul, Turkey)0000-0001-6386-4525
Ümit Bilgili(Health Sciences University Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training And Research Hospital, Medical Biochemistry Laboratory, Ataşehir Istanbul, Turkey)0000-0002-5301-9982
Hanife Aydın Yazıcılar(Health Sciences University Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training And Research Hospital, Medical Microbiology Laboratory, Ataşehir Istanbul, Turkey)0000-0001-6954-0580
Ebru Tarıkçı Kılıç(Health Sciences University Ümraniye Training And Research Hospital, Anesthesia And Reanimation Clinic, Ümraniye Istanbul, Turkey)0000-0002-5377-1090
Uğur Ayan(Goztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital İslab-2 Laboratory Kadıköy Istanbul)0000-0003-3567-0656
Pages
57–64
Publication Date
2024-08-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: We consider that antibody tests may be useful in screening for COVID-19 in circumstances where access to RT_PCR testing may be limited, particularly in cases in the first or second week of symptomatic infection.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: This study aimed to determine the reliability of rapid antibody detection test (RADT; Weimi Bio-Tech COVID-19 Antibody test) results and their compatibility with RT-PCR test in screening and control of COVID-19 infection.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Laboratory results of 624 healthcare personnel were recorded between May 2020 and November 2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: We consider that antibody tests may be useful in screening for COVID-19 in circumstances where access to RT_PCR testing may be limited, particularly in cases in the first or second week of symptomatic infection.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:COVID-19 · RT_PCR assey · Rapid antibody test

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to determine the reliability of rapid antibody detection test (RADT; Weimi Bio-Tech COVID-19 Antibody test) results and their compatibility with RT-PCR test in screening and control of COVID-19 infection. Material and Methods: Our study was conducted with the permission of the Ministry of Health and the local ethics committee of our hospital. Laboratory results of 624 healthcare personnel were recorded between May 2020 and November 2020. Two nasopharyngeal specimens were collected from each case to perform RT-PCR. Simultaneously serum/plasma samples were collected for RADT testing. Our hospital's data processing system (HIS) and laboratory information system (LIS) records were used for data collection. The level of agreement between the tests was calculated using Cohen's κ index. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software. Results: The mean age of the patients included in the study was 28.46 ± 2.35 years. Of all cases, 54% were female (n=337) and 46% (n=287) were male, and none of the cases had any comorbidity. Both RT-PCR and RADT were negative in 86% of the cases (n=540). RT-PCR results were positive in 13.6% (n=102) of the included cases. Of the 102 RT-PCR positive cases, 84 were positive by RADT and there were no false positive results with RADT. Sensitivity and specificity for all cases were 84.7% and 100%, respectively. In symptomatic cases, sensitivity was >95%. Conclusion: We consider that antibody tests may be useful in screening for COVID-19 in circumstances where access to RT_PCR testing may be limited, particularly in cases in the first or second week of symptomatic infection.

Özet

INTRODUCTION: It was aimed to determine the reliability of rapid antibody detection test (RADT) results and compatibility with RT-PCR assay in the screening and control of COVID-19 infection. METHODS: The retrospective study was performed with the permission of the Ministry of Health and the local ethics committee of our hospital. Between May 2020 and August 2021, 624 health staffs laboratory results were recorded. Data processing hospital (HIS) and laboratory information system (LIS) records of our hospital were used as data collection method. The level of agreement between tests was estimated using Cohen's κ index. Statistical analyzes were performed using SPSS open source software. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants in the study was 28,46 ± 2,35. 54% were female (337), 46% (n=287) were male, and they had no additional disease. Both rapid antibody testing and RT-PCR tests were negative in 86% (n=540) of all tests. Two nasopharyngeal specimens were collected from each case to perform the RADT and RT-PCR. 13,6% (n=102) of the included patients had positive RT-PCR results. The RADT detected 84 of the 102 RT-PCR-positive cases and there were no false positive results. Overall sensitivity and specificity were 84,7% and 100%, respectively. Sensitivity was found >95% in symptomatic cases. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The Weimi Bio-Tech COVID-19 Ag RADT can be useful in screening for COVID-19, especially in cases in the first or second weeks of symptomatic infection.

🔖

Cite This Article

Fırat, A. A., Kılıç, H., Elarslan, S., Bilgili, Ü., Yazıcılar, H. A., Kılıç, E. T., Ayan, U. (2024). Evaluation of Rapid Antibody Test Compatibility in COVID-19 Cases Confirmed by RT-PCR Assay. Balıkesir Medical Journal, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 57–64. https://doi.org/10.33716/bmedj.1440843

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Dortet, L., Ronat, J.-B., Vauloup-Fellous, C., Langendorf, C., Mendels, D.-A., Emeraud, C., Oueslati, S., Girlich, D., Chauvin, A., & Afdjei, A. (2021). Evaluating 10 commercially available SARS-CoV-2 rapid serological tests by use of the STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) method. Journal of clinical microbiology, 59(2), 10.1128/jcm. 02342-02320.
  2. Kaçmaz, A. B., Sümbül, B., Bolukcu, S., Okay, G., Durdu, B., Akkoyunlu, Y., & Koç, M. M. (2020). Utility of Rapid Antibody Test for Screening COVID-19 among Healthcare Professionals.
  3. Lawandi, A., & Danner, R. L. (2020). Antibody tests have higher sensitivity at≥ 15 days after symptom onset and 99% specificity for detecting SARS-CoV-2. Annals of internal medicine, 173(10), JC57.
  4. Masiá, M., Fernández-González, M., Sánchez, M., Carvajal, M., García, J. A., Gonzalo-Jiménez, N., Ortiz de la Tabla, V., Agulló, V., Candela, I., & Guijarro, J. (2021). Nasopharyngeal Panbio COVID-19 antigen performed at point-of-care has a high sensitivity in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with higher risk for transmission and older age. Open Forum Infectious Diseases,
  5. McAloon, C., Collins, Á., Hunt, K., Barber, A., Byrne, A. W., Butler, F., Casey, M., Griffin, J., Lane, E., & McEvoy, D. (2020). Incubation period of COVID-19: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of observational research. BMJ open, 10(8), e039652.
  6. Mina, M. J., Parker, R., & Larremore, D. B. (2020). Rethinking Covid-19 test sensitivity—a strategy for containment. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(22), 120.
  7. Sabat, J., Subhadra, S., Rath, S., Ho, L. M., Satpathy, T., Pattnaik, D., Pati, S., & Turuk, J. (2023). A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing with realtime RT-PCR among symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. BMC Infectious Diseases, 23(1), 87.
  8. Santos, R. E. A., da Silva, M. G., do Monte Silva, M. C. B., Barbosa, D. A. M., do Vale Gomes, A. L., Galindo, L. C. M., da Silva Aragão, R., & Ferraz-Pereira, K. N. (2021). Onset and duration of symptoms of loss of smell/taste in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review. American Journal of Otolaryngology, 42(2), 102889.
  9. Sethuraman, N., Jeremiah, S. S., & Ryo, A. (2020). Interpreting diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2. Jama, 323(22), 2249-2251.
  10. Sidiq, Z., Hanif, M., Dwivedi, K. K., & Chopra, K. (2020). Benefits and limitations of serological assays in COVID-19 infection. indian journal of tuberculosis, 67(4), S163-S166.
  11. Tanrıverdi Çaycı, Y., Seyfi, Z., Hacieminoglu Ulker, K., Gür Vural, D., Bilgin, K., Akdemir, H., Akyüz Özkan, E., & Birinci, A. (2023). Evaluation of Rapid Antigen Test Results and Real-time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Laboratory Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2. Mediterranean Journal Of Infection Microbes And Antimicrobials.
  12. Yuan, X., Yang, C., He, Q., Chen, J., Yu, D., Li, J., Zhai, S., Qin, Z., Du, K., & Chu, Z. (2020). Current and perspective diagnostic techniques for COVID-19. ACS infectious diseases, 6(8), 1998-2016.
  13. Zhao, J., Yuan, Q., Wang, H., Liu, W., Liao, X., Su, Y., Wang, X., Yuan, J., Li, T., & Li, J. (2020). Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with novel coronavirus disease 2019. Clinical infectious diseases, 71(16), 2027-2034.