Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3

Impacts of nipple drinker position on water intake, water wastage and drinking duration of pigs

Pages
562–572
Publication Date
2020-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Correspondingly, the T3 treatment might create opportunities to drink more water in group housed pigs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Water determines the life quality of pigs, however, adequate measures need to be taken in order to reduce wastage while the animals are drinking.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the NMA, 3 independent treatments were investigated with angles placed at clockwise 30°, 0°, and counter clockwise 30°.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Correspondingly, the T3 treatment might create opportunities to drink more water in group housed pigs.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Drinking pattern · drinking duration · nipple drinker height

Abstract

Water determines the life quality of pigs, however, adequate measures need to be taken in order to reduce wastage while the animals are drinking. The current study hypothesized and examined a suitable position at which to fix the nipple drinker to provide sufficient drinking water to pigs while also limiting water wastage. Additionally, this study describes both the drinking pattern and drinking duration of pigs. The height to place the drinker was calculated based on the neck movement of the pigs neck movement angle, NMA . According to the NMA, 3 independent treatments were investigated with angles placed at clockwise 30°, 0°, and counter clockwise 30°. These positions will be correspondingly referred to as T1, T2, and T3, respectively. To understand the diurnal drinking pattern and drinking duration, along with each pig?s drinking cycle, the number of visits to the drinker was recorded with a camera. The outcome shows that T3 had less water wastage and a higher average daily gain compared to T1 and T2. Further, the number of visits to the drinker and drinking duration were affected by the treatments. The research affirmed that the nipple drinker with a counter clockwise 30° angle at a proper height is the best at reducing water wastage for finishing pigs. Correspondingly, the T3 treatment might create opportunities to drink more water in group housed pigs.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARULMOZHI, E., BASAK, J. K., PARK, J., OKYERE, F. G., KHAN, F., LEE, Y., LEE, J., LEE, D., KIM, H. T. (2020). Impacts of nipple drinker position on water intake, water wastage and drinking duration of pigs. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3, 562–572. https://ajindex.com/articles/114947

References (14)

  1. Araújo GGL, Voltolini TV, Chizzotti ML, Turco SHN, Carvalho FFR. Water and small ruminant production. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 2010
  2. doi:10.1590/S1516- 35982010001300036 2. Adan A. Cognitive Performance and Dehydration. Journal of the American College of Nutrition 2012
  3. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2012.10720011 3. Faries FC, Sweeten J, Reagor J. Water quality: its relationship to livestock. Texas Agricultural Extension Service 1998
  4. L-2374. 4. Robert S, Weary DM, Gonyou H. Segregated early weaning and welfare of piglets. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 1999
  5. 2 (1): 31-40. doi: 10.1207/s15327604jaws0201_3 5. Kober JA. Water: the most limiting nutrient. Agri-Practice 1993
  6. Brooks PH, Carpenter JL, Barber J, Gill BP. Production and welfare problems relating to the supply of water to growingfinishing pigs. Pig Veterinary Journal 1989
  7. Dybkjaer L, Jacobsen AP, Togersen FA. Eating and drinking activity of newly weaned piglets- effects of mixing and adding zinc to the feed. Journal of Animal Science 2006
  8. 84 (3): 702- 711. doi: 10.2527/2006.843702x 8. Brumm MC, Dahlquist JM, Heemstra, JM. Impact of feeders and drinker devices on pig performance, water use, and manure volume. Journal of Swine Health and Production 2000
  9. 8 (2): 51- 57. 9. López-Vergé S, Gasa J, Temple D, Bonet J, Coma J et al. Strategies to improve the growth and homogeneity of growing-finishing pigs: feeder space and feeding management. Porcine health management 2018
  10. doi:10.1186/s40813-018-0090-9 10. Bøe KE, Kjelvik O. Water nipples or water bowls for weaned piglets: Effect on water intake, performance, and plasma osmolality. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica A: Animal Sciences 2011
  11. 61 (2): 86-91. doi: 10.1080/09064702.2011.599859 11. Phillips PA, Fraser D, Thompson BK. The influence of water nipple flow rate and position, and room temperature on sow water intake and spillage. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 1990
  12. doi: 10.13031/2013.26348 12. Li YZ, Chénard L, Lemay SP, Gonyou HW. Water intake and wastage at nipple drinkers by growing-finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 2005
  13. 83 (6): 1413-1422. doi: 10.2527/2005.8361413x 13. Verhoeve RSJM. Analysis of measurement data obtained from simulated whiplash motions on anaesthetised pigs. TU/e: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven 1993
  14. Fraser D, Patience JF, Phillips PA, Mcleese JM. Water for piglets and lactating sows: quantity, quality and quandaries. Rece