Journals / Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 12 Issue: 1

Measuring Türkiye's Fiscal Credibility and Transparency through Fiscal Balance and Debt Stock

İbrahim Al(KARADENIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-2653-4663
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-03-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the findings, it is possible to say that fiscal credibility decreased in Türkiye, the absolute deviation between fiscal balance expectations and official targets increased, and fiscal transparency decreased, especially in the 2019-2022 period.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Fiscal credibility and fiscal transparency affect many basic macroeconomic variables, especially economic growth, inflation and interest rates through expectations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, increasing credibility and transparency increase the effectiveness of fiscal policy by enabling better management of expectations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the findings, it is possible to say that fiscal credibility decreased in Türkiye, the absolute deviation between fiscal balance expectations and official targets increased, and fiscal transparency decreased, especially in the 2019-2022 period.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010-2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Fiscal Credibility · Fiscal Transparency · Fiscal Opacity

Abstract

Fiscal credibility and fiscal transparency affect many basic macroeconomic variables, especially economic growth, inflation and interest rates through expectations. Therefore, increasing credibility and transparency increase the effectiveness of fiscal policy by enabling better management of expectations. The aim of this study is to determine Türkiye’s fiscal credibility and transparency. For this purpose, Türkiye's fiscal credibility and transparency were measured for the 2010-2023 period with the help of various indices, based on the International Monetary Fund's fiscal balance and debt stock expectations. According to the findings, it is possible to say that fiscal credibility decreased in Türkiye, the absolute deviation between fiscal balance expectations and official targets increased, and fiscal transparency decreased, especially in the 2019-2022 period.

Özet

Fiscal credibility and fiscal transparency affect many basic macroeconomic variables, especially economic growth, inflation and interest rates through expectations. Therefore, increasing credibility and transparency increase the effectiveness of fiscal policy by enabling better management of expectations. The aim of this study is to determine Türkiye’s fiscal credibility and transparency. For this purpose, Türkiye's fiscal credibility and transparency were measured for the 2010-2023 period with the help of various indices, based on the International Monetary Fund's fiscal balance and debt stock expectations. According to the findings, it is possible to say that fiscal credibility decreased in Türkiye, the absolute deviation between fiscal balance expectations and official targets increased, and fiscal transparency decreased, especially in the 2019-2022 period.

🔖

Cite This Article

Al, İ., Yıldız, G. A., Yıldız, B. (2025). Measuring Türkiye's Fiscal Credibility and Transparency through Fiscal Balance and Debt Stock. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 12 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1565223

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (36)

  1. Andrade, P., Crump, R. K., Eusepi, S., & Moench, E. (2016). Fundamental disagreement. Journal of Monetary Economics, 83, 106–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2016.08.007
  2. Anzoátegui-Zapata, J. C., & Galvis-Ciro, J. C. (2021). Effects of fiscal credibility on inflation expectations: Evidence from an emerging economy. Public Sector Economics, 45(1), 125–148. https://doi.org/10.3326/pse.45.1.4
  3. Arbatlı, E., & Escolano, J. (2015). Fiscal transparency, fiscal performance and credit ratings. Fiscal Studies, 36(2), 237–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12051
  4. Atılgan-Yasa, A., Sanlısoy, S. & Ozen, A. (2020). Bütçe tutarlılığı ile politik istikrarsızlık ilişkisi: Türkiye’de 1984-2018 dönemi analizi. Sosyoekonomi, 28(44), 337-354. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2020.02.15
  5. Bağdigen, M. (2005). An empirical analysis of accurate budget forecasting in Turkey. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 6(2), 190-201.
  6. Baxter, M. (1985). The role of expectations in stabilization policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 15, 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(85)90021-2
  7. Blinder, A. S. (2000). Central-bank credibility: Why do we care? How do we build it? American Economic Review, 90(5), 1421–1431. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.5.1421
  8. Clark, C. S. (2011). What is ‘credible’ fiscal policy? The Canadian experience, 1983–2010: The view of a former practitioner. In New directions for intelligent government in Canada: Papers in honour of Ian Stewart (pp. 101–126). Centre for the Study of Living Standards.
  9. Cukierman, A., & Meltzer, A. H. (1986). A theory of ambiguity, credibility, and inflation under discretion and asymmetric information. Econometrica, 54(5), 1099–1128. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912324
  10. de Mendonça, H. F., & Auel, G. E. (2016). The effect of monetary and fiscal credibility on public debt: Empirical evidence from the Brazilian economy. Applied Economics Letters, 23(11), 816–821. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2015.1111980
  11. de Mendonça, H. F., & Baca, A. C. (2022). Fiscal opacity and reduction of income inequality through taxation: Effects on economic growth. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 83, 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2021.11.006
  12. de Mendonça, H. F., & Calafate, V. R. L. (2021). Lack of fiscal transparency and economic growth expectations: An empirical assessment from a large emerging economy. Empirical Economics, 61, 2985–3027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-02000-4
  13. de Mendonça, H. F., & Machado, M. R. (2013). Public debt management and credibility: Evidence from an emerging economy. Economic Modelling, 30(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.09.009
  14. de Mendonça, H. F., & da Silva, R. (2016). Observing the influence of fiscal credibility on inflation: Evidence from an emerging economy. Economics Bulletin, 36(4), 2333–2349.
  15. de Mendonça, H. F., & Tostes, F. S. (2015). The effect of monetary and fiscal credibility on exchange rate pass-through in an emerging economy. Open Economies Review, 26(4), 787–816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-014-9339-3
  16. de Mendonça, H. F., Vereda Oliveira, L., & Dias, M. I. S. (2024). The impact of fiscal opacity on business confidence: Empirical investigation from an emerging economy. Journal of Economic Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-01-2024-0007
  17. End, N. (2020). Rousseau's social contract or Machiavelli's virtue? A measure of fiscal credibility. AMSE Working Papers, 42, 1–56.
  18. End, N. (2023). Big brother is also being watched: Measuring fiscal credibility. Journal of Macroeconomics, 77, 103548, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2023.103548
  19. End, N., & Hong, G. H. (2022). Trust what you hear: Policy communication, expectations, and fiscal credibility. IMF Working Papers, WP/22/36, 1–59.
  20. Frankel, J., & Schreger, J. (2013). Over-optimistic official forecasts and fiscal rules in the Eurozone. Review of World Economics, 149(2), 247–272.
  21. Gaol, S. L., Kuncoro, H., & Sebayang, K. D. (2015). The impact of fiscal credibility on the exchange rate. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 8(3), 13–20.
  22. Hauner, D., Jonás, J., & Kumar, M. S. (2007). Policy credibility and sovereign credit: The case of the new EU member states. IMF Working Paper, WP/07/1, 1–29.
  23. Kasal, S. & Özpençe, Ö. (2020). A fiscal space analysis in terms of Turkey’s domestic debt. Sosyoekonomi, 28(43), 33-48.
  24. Kuncoro, H. (2017). Does the sustainable fiscal policy foster its credibility? Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 9(1), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.20885/ejem.vol9.iss1.art9
  25. Lahiri, K., & Sheng, X. (2008). Evolution of forecast disagreement in a Bayesian learning model. Journal of Econometrics, 144, 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.02.002
  26. Mankiw, N. G., Reis, R., & Wolfers, J. (2003). Disagreement about inflation expectations. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 18, 209–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/ma.18.3585256
  27. Montes, G. C., & Acar, T. (2018). Fiscal credibility and disagreement in expectations about inflation: Evidence for Brazil. Economics Bulletin, 38(2), 826–843.
  28. Montes, G. C., & Acar, T. (2020). Fiscal credibility, target revisions, and disagreement in expectations about fiscal results. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 76, 38–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2019.06.002
  29. Montes, G. C., & Luna, P. H. L. (2022). Do fiscal opacity, fiscal impulse, and fiscal credibility affect disagreement about economic growth forecasts? Empirical evidence from Brazil considering the period of political instability and presidential impeachment. Review of Development Economics, 26(4), 2356–2393. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12914
  30. Montes, G. C., de Oliveira, A. J., & Nicolay, R. (2019). Empirical evidence on the relation between fiscal credibility and central bank credibility: The Brazilian case. Estudos Economicos, 49(1), 105-129. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-41614914gar
  31. Montes G. C., & Souza, I. (2020). Sovereign default risk, debt uncertainty and fiscal credibility: The case of Brazil, The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 51, 100851, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2018.09.009.
  32. Muth, J. F. (1961). Rational expectations and the theory of price movements. Econometrica, 29(3), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.2307/1909635
  33. Oliveira, L. V., & Curi, A. (2016). Disagreement in expectations and the credibility of monetary authorities in the Brazilian inflation targeting regime. EconomiA, 17, 56–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econ.2016.03.002
  34. Patton, A. J., & Timmermann, A. (2010). Why do forecasters disagree? Lessons from the term structure of cross-sectional dispersion. Journal of Monetary Economics, 57, 803–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2010.07.001
  35. Pıçak, S. (2022). Türkiye’de bütçe gider ve gelir tahminlerinin objektif doğruluk açısından değerlendirilmesi. Ekonomi İşletme ve Maliye Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 146-158. https://doi.org/10.38009/ekimad.1139292
  36. Wieland, V., & Wolters, M. (2011). The diversity of forecasts from macroeconomic models of the US economy. Econometric Theory, 47, 247–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-010-0549-7