SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 12 Issue: 2

Time-Varying Market Efficiency in the Turkish Stock Market: Evidence from an Entropy-Based Analysis

Serkan Alkan(Tarsus Üniversitesi)0000-0002-7773-7321
Aynur Süsay Alkan(Tarsus University)0000-0003-0935-7375
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our findings indicate that market efficiency decreases as the timescale increases, which suggests that indices are more efficient in the short-term periods than in the long-term periods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study analyzes the time-varying informational efficiency of the Borsa Istanbul composite index (XU100) and its main sector indices from January 2017 to June 2023.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample entropy method is used to measure market efficiency across multiple timescales ranging from 1 to 30 business days, and a rolling window approach is used to capture daily informational efficiency dynamics.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our findings indicate that market efficiency decreases as the timescale increases, which suggests that indices are more efficient in the short-term periods than in the long-term periods.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Informational Efficiency · Adaptive Market Hypothesis · Sample Entropy

Abstract

This study analyzes the time-varying informational efficiency of the Borsa Istanbul composite index (XU100) and its main sector indices from January 2017 to June 2023. The sample entropy method is used to measure market efficiency across multiple timescales ranging from 1 to 30 business days, and a rolling window approach is used to capture daily informational efficiency dynamics. Our findings indicate that market efficiency decreases as the timescale increases, which suggests that indices are more efficient in the short-term periods than in the long-term periods. Among the indices, BIST Financials (XUMAL) has the highest average efficiency, while BIST Technology (XUTEK) displays the lowest. The results also reveal that efficiency levels across all indices fluctuate widely on a daily basis, and a particularly sharp decline was noticed during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. This suggests that a major disruption in informational efficiency occurred during this time. The Russia-Ukraine war and the 2023 February earthquake further weakened the efficiency of all indices, though their impacts were comparatively less severe than COVID-19. An entropic correlation analysis reveals strong positive correlations between XU100 and BIST Industrials, which highlights that these indices are related in terms of efficiency dynamics. This study offers new insights into the dynamic nature of market efficiency in the Turkish stock market, emphasizing that informational efficiency is strongly influenced by sector-specific characteristics and external shocks. Our empirical findings strongly support the Adaptive Market Hypothesis (AMH), confirming that market efficiency evolves dynamically in response to changing market conditions and external events.

🔖

Cite This Article

Alkan, S., Alkan, A. S. (2025). Time-Varying Market Efficiency in the Turkish Stock Market: Evidence from an Entropy-Based Analysis. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 12 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1501091

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (82)

  1. Aggarwal, D. (2019). Do Bitcoins follow a random walk model?. Research in Economics, 73(1), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2019.01.002
  2. Ahmed, F. (2021). Assessment of capital market efficiency in COVID-19. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 6(3), 42-46. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.3.839
  3. Ahmetoğulları, K. (2024). BİST elektrik sektöründe etkin piyasa hipotezinin sınanması. Journal of Economics and Research, 5(2), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.53280/jer.1512720
  4. Aksoy, M., & Akyüzlü, M. K. (2024). Depremin hisse senedi piyasasi üzerindeki etkileri: 6 Şubat 2023 Kahramanmaraş örneği. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(4), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1481104
  5. Ali, M., Alam, N., & Rizvi, S. A. R. (2020). Coronavirus (COVID-19)—An epidemic or pandemic for financial markets. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 27, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100341
  6. Alkan, S. (2024). Liquidity and market efficiency in Borsa Istanbul. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 42(3), 371-384. https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.1388807
  7. Alnıpak, S., & Kale, S. (2021). COVID-19 sürecinin ulaştırma sektörü finansal performansına etkileri. Journal of Research in Economics, Politics & Finance, 6(IERFM Special Issue), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.1020882
  8. Altunöz, U. (2020). Türk finans piyasaları etkin mi? Yapısal kırılma ve uzun hafıza yöntemleriyle Borsa Istanbul üzerine bir uygulama. Econder 2020 3rd. International Economics Business and Social Sciences Congress Full Text Proceeding E-Book, 9-18.
  9. Altuntaş, M., Kılıç, E., Pazarcı, Ş., & Umut, A. (2022). Borsa İstanbul alt endekslerinde etkin piyasa hipotezinin test edilmesi: Fourier kırılmalı ve doğrusal olmayan birim kök testlerinden kanıtlar. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(1), 169-185. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.1041187
  10. Alvarez-Ramirez, J., & Rodriguez, E., & Alvarez, J. (2012). A multiscale entropy approach for market efficiency. International Review of Financial Analysis, 21, 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2011.12.001
  11. Ammy-Driss, A., & Garcin, M. (2023). Efficiency of the financial markets during the COVID-19 crisis: Time-varying parameters of fractional stable dynamics. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 609, 128335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2022.128335
  12. Anagnostidis, P., Varsakelis, C., & Emmanouilides, C. J. (2016). Has the 2008 financial crisis affected stock market efficiency? The case of Eurozone. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 447, 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2015.12.017
  13. Ayaydın, H., Çam, A. V., Barut, A., & Pala, F. (2018). Harvey doğrusallık testi ile BIST piyasa etkinliğinin analizi. TURAN Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi TURAN-CSR International Scientific Peer-Reviewed Refereed Journal, 40(10), 112-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.15189/1308-8041
  14. Aytekin, S., & Doğan, S. (2023). Testing the Adaptive Market Hypothesis in equity markets in global financial crisis periods: An application on Borsa Istanbul indices. İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(21), 377-402. https://doi.org/10.25204/iktisad.1208721
  15. Aytekin, S., Abdioğlu, N., & Sezgin, A. (2021). BİST pay piyasasında açığa satış yasağı ve COVID-19 düzenlemelerinin piyasa etkinliği üzerindeki etkisi. MANAS Journal of Social Studies, 10(4), 2433-2448. https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.759448
  16. Bal, H., Algan, N., Erdoğan, E., & Tekin, İ. (2021). Etkin piyasa hipotezinin zayıf formunun Türkiye’de bankacılık sektörü için test edilmesi, Journal of Cukurova University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 25(2), 327-345. https://doi.org/10.51945/cuiibfd.995297
  17. Bektur, Ç., & Aydın, M. (2019). Borsa İstanbul ve alt endekslerinde zayıf formda piyasa etkinliğinin analizi: Fourier yaklaşımı. Journal of Academic Inquiries, 14(2), 59-76. https://doi.org/10.17550/akademikincelemeler.556185
  18. Çevik, E. (2012). İstanbul Menkul Kıymetler Borsası’nda etkin piyasa hipotezinin uzun hafıza modelleri ile analizi: Sektörel bazda bir inceleme. Journal of Yaşar University, 7(26), 4437-4454.
  19. Çevik, E. İ., & Erdoğan, S. (2009). Bankacılık sektörü hisse senedi piyasasının etkinliği: Yapısal kırılma ve güçlü hafıza. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 10(1), 26-40.
  20. Chen, F., & Jarrett, J. E. (2011). Financial crisis and the market efficiency in the Chinese equity markets. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 16(3), 456-463. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2011.589632
  21. Choi, S. Y. (2021). Analysis of stock market efficiency during crisis periods in the US stock market: Differences between the global financial crisis and COVID-19 pandemic. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 574, 125988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2021.125988
  22. Costa, M., Goldberger, A. L., & Peng, C. K. (2002). Multiscale entropy analysis of complex physiologic time series. Physical review letters, 89(6), 068102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.068102
  23. Dallı, T., & Uğur, B. (2022). BİST Gıda ve Içecek Sektörü Endeksinin zayıf formda etkinliğinin sınanması. Alanya Akademik Bakış, 6(3), 3189-3197. https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.1016279
  24. Darrat, A. F., & Zhong, M. (2000). On testing the random‐walk hypothesis: A model‐comparison approach. Financial Review, 35(3), 105-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.2000.tb01423.x
  25. Demiralp, A., & Belliler, İ. S. (2023). Seçilmiş Bist alt endekslerinde etkin piyasa hipotezinin sınanması. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15(4), 2807-2815. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2023.1749
  26. Duman Atan,S., Özdemir, Z. A., & Atan, M. (2009). Hisse senedi piyasasında zayıf formda etkinlik: İMKB üzerine ampirik bir çalışma. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(2), 33-48.
  27. Durusu-Ciftci, D., Ispir, M. S., & Kok, D. (2019). Do stock markets follow a random walk? New evidence for an old question. International Review of Economics & Finance, 64, 165-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2019.06.002
  28. Ekmen, C., & Evci, S. (2024). Havayolu sektöründe zayıf formda piyasa etkinliğinin analizi: Borsa İstanbul üzerine bir uygulama. Turizm Ekonomi ve İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(2), 155-167.
  29. Erer, D., Erer, E., & Güngör, S. (2023). The aggregate and sectoral time-varying market efficiency during crisis periods in Turkey: A comparative analysis with COVID-19 outbreak and the global financial crisis. Financial Innovation, 9(1), 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00484-4
  30. Ertaş, F. C., & Özkan, O. (2018). Piyasa etkinliği açısından adaptif piyasa hipotezi’nin test edilmesi: Türkiye ve ABD hisse senedi piyasaları örneği. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar, (642), 223-240.
  31. Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417. https://doi.org/10.2307/2325486
  32. Gaio, L. E., Stefanelli, N. O., Júnior, T. P., Bonacim, C. A. G., & Gatsios, R. C. (2022). The impact of the Russia-Ukraine conflict on market efficiency: Evidence for the developed stock market. Finance Research Letters, 50, 103302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103302
  33. Gözbaşı, O. (2014). Borsa İstanbul hisse senedi piyasasında doğrusal olmayan yöntemler ile piyasa etkinliğinin test edilmesi. Journal of Productivity, (4), 7-18.
  34. Huang, C. (2019). US Stock market efficiency: EMH or AMH?. In 2019 4th International Conference on Financial Innovation and Economic Development (ICFIED 2019), Atlantis Press, 171-175. https://doi.org/10.2991/icfied-19.2019.32
  35. Karademir, F., & Evci, S. (2020). Testing of the weak form market efficiency on Borsa Istanbul: An analysis in the sectoral framework. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(1), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i1.1416
  36. Kim, J. H., Shamsuddin, A., & Lim, K. P. (2011). Stock return predictability and the adaptive markets hypothesis: Evidence from century-long US data. Journal of Empirical Finance, 18(5), 868-879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2011.08.002
  37. Lalwani, V., & Meshram, V. V. (2020). Stock market efficiency in the time of COVID-19: Evidence from industry stock returns. International Journal of Accounting & Finance Review, 5(2), 40-44. https://doi.org/10.46281/ijafr.v5i2.744
  38. Lim, K. P., Brooks, R. D., & Kim, J.H. (2008). Financial crisis and stock market efficiency: Empirical evidence from Asian countries. International Review of Financial Analysis, 17(3), 571–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2007.03.001
  39. Lim, K.-P., Luo, W., & Kim, J. H. (2013). Are US stock index returns predictable? Evidence from automatic autocorrelation-based tests. Applied Economics, 45(8), 953–962. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.613782
  40. Lo, A. W. (2004). The Adaptive Markets Hypothesis. Journal of Portfolio Management, 30(5), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2004.442611
  41. Malcıoğlu, G., & Aydın, M. (2016). Borsa İstanbul’da piyasa etkinliğinin analizi: Harvey dogrusallık testi. Journal of Accounting, Finance and Auditing Studies, 2(1), 112-122.
  42. Maneenop, S., & Kotcharin, S. (2023). Comparative evidence on the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak and vaccine discovery on the global transportation industry. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 17, 100741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100741
  43. Martins, A. M., & Cró, S. (2022). Airline stock markets reaction to the COVID-19 outbreak and vaccines: An event study. Journal of Air Transport Management, 105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2022.102281
  44. Maurya, P. K., Bansal, R., & Mishra, A. K. (2024). Dynamic connectedness among market volatilities: A perspective of COVID-19 and Russia-Ukraine conflict. Studies in Economics and Finance, 41(5), 1119-1140. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-01-2024-0029
  45. Memon, B. A., Aslam, F., Naveed, H. M., Ferreira, P., & Ganiev, O. (2024). Influence of the Russia–Ukraine War and COVID-19 pandemic on the efficiency and herding behavior of stock markets: Evidence from G20 Nations. Economies, 12(5), 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12050106
  46. Mishra, P. K., Das, K. B., & Pradhan, B. B. (2009). Empirical evidence on Indian stock market efficiency in context of the global financial crisis. Global Journal of Finance and Management, 1(2), 149-157.
  47. Oh, G., Kim, S., & Eom, C. (2007). Market efficiency in foreign exchange markets. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 382(1), 209-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2007.02.032
  48. Ortiz-Cruz, A., Rodriguez, E., Ibarra-Valdez, C., & Alvarez-Ramirez, J. (2012). Efficiency of crude oil markets: Evidences from informational entropy analysis. Energy Policy, 41, 365–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.10.057
  49. Özkan, O. (2020a). In which sectors can historical prices be used for return predictability? An empirical study on Istanbul stock exchange with automatic portmanteau test. Business and Economics Research Journal, 11(3), 703-712.
  50. Özkan, O. (2020b). Weak-form market efficiency comparison of stock markets on global scale: An empirical study on G-20 members. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18(02), 327-338. https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.695125
  51. Özkan, O. (2020c). Time-varying return predictability and adaptive markets hypothesis: Evidence on MIST countries from a novel wild bootstrap likelihood ratio approach. Bogazici J: Rev Soc Econ Adm Stud, 34(2), 101-113.
  52. Özkan, O. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 on stock market efficiency: Evidence from developed countries. Res. Int. Bus. Finance, 58, 101445. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RIBAF.2021.101445
  53. Özkan, O. (2022). Rusya-Ukrayna Savaşının Türkiye hisse senedi piyasasina etkileri. In Cuma Cataloluk and Dogan Bozdagan (Eds.), Sosyal Bilimlerde Degisim ve Gelisim Yazilari V (pp. 3-20). Iksad Yayinlari.
  54. Özkan, O., & Çakar, R. (2020). Türkiye’deki islami endekslerin zayıf form bilgisel etkinlikleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 38(4), 805-822. https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.700420
  55. Palamalai, S., Kumar, K. K., & Maity, B. (2021). Testing the random walk hypothesis for leading cryptocurrencies. Borsa Istanbul Review, 21(3), 256-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2020.10.006
  56. Patra, S., & Hiremath, G. S. (2022). An entropy approach to measure the dynamic stock market efficiency. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 20(2), 337-377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-022-00295-x
  57. Poshakwale, S. (2002). The random walk hypothesis in the emerging Indian stock market. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29(9‐10), 1275-1299. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.00469
  58. Rehman, S., Chhapra, I. U., Kashif, M., & Rehan, R. (2018). Are stock prices a random walk? An empirical evidence of Asian stock markets. Etikonomi, 17(2), 237-252. http//dx.doi.org/10.15408/etk.v17i2.7102
  59. Richman, J. S., & Moorman, J. R. (2000). Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 278(6), H2039–H2049, https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.2000.278.6.H2039
  60. Rizvi, S. A. R., & Arshad, S. (2014). Investigating the efficiency of East Asian stock markets through booms and busts. Pacific Science Review, 16(4), 275–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscr.2015.03.003
  61. Sadat, A. R., & Hasan, M. E. (2019). Testing weak form of market efficiency of DSE based on random walk hypothesis model: A parametric test approach. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 9(1), 400-413. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijafr.v9i1.14454
  62. Şahin, Ö. (2020). Finansal piyasa etkinliğinin run testi ve volatilite modelleri ile analizi: BIST 100, dolar kuru ve altın fiyatı piyasaları üzerine bir uygulama. The International Journal of Economic and Social Research, 16(2), 333-348.
  63. Sakınç, S. Ö., & Sakınç, İ. (2023). Borsa İstanbul Katılım Endekslerinin etkin piyasa hipotezi analizi: Zayıf formda etkinlik incelemesi. Hitit Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (ICAFR'23 Özel Sayısı), 42-53. https://doi.org/10.17218/hititsbd.1391325
  64. Scalamonti, F. (2025). The weak form efficient markets hypothesis: Macroeconomic Evidence from MEDA capital markets. Available at SSRN 5078907. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5078907
  65. Sensoy, A. (2013). Generalized Hurst exponent approach to efficiency in MENA markets. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 392(20), 5019-5026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2013.06.041
  66. Shternshis, A., Mazzarisi, P., & Marmi, S. (2022). Measuring market efficiency: The Shannon entropy of high-frequency financial time series. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, (162), 112403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112403
  67. Stakić, N., Jovancai, A., & Kapor, P. (2016). The efficiency of the stock market in Serbia. Journal of Policy Modeling, 38(1), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2015.12.001
  68. Stosic, D., Stosic, D., Ludermir, T., & Stosic, T. (2016) Correlations of multiscale entropy in the FX market. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, (457), 52-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.03.099
  69. Süsay Alkan, A. (2024). Yerli ve yabancı yatırımcıların Borsa İstanbul’un piyasa etkinliğine etkisi: Fourier eşbütünleşme yaklaşımı. Trakya Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi E-Dergi, 13(1), 66-81. https://doi.org/10.47934/tife.13.01.05
  70. Suyadal, M. (2021). COVID-19 pandemisinde piyasa etkinliği ve davranışsal finans teorilerinin geçerliliği: Uluslararası piyasalarda bir uygulama. Erciyes University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, (60), 519-546. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.994139
  71. Tanrıöver, B., & Çöllü, D. A. (2015). Türkiye’de yatırımcıların öngörü performanslarının rassal yürüyüş modeli çerçevesinde analizi. Business and Economics Research Journal, 6(2), 127-139.
  72. Tiwari, A. K., & Kyophilavong, P. (2014). New Evidence from the random walk hypothesis for BRICS stock indices: A wavelet unit root test approach. Economic Modelling, (43), 38–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.07.005
  73. Turkish Capital Markets Association (2021). Turkish Capital Markets 2020 Annual Review. https://tspb.org.tr/en/periodic-publications/
  74. Turkish Investor Relations Society. (2022). BIST Trends Report (January - December 2022), No: 43. https://www.tuyid.org/files/yayinlar/BorsaTrendleriRaporu_4C22.pdf
  75. Unal, S. (2020). COVID-19 Salgınında Borsa Istanbul sirketlerinin fiyatlamalarının etkinliği. Journal of Research in Economics Politics and Finance, 5(Special Issue), 13-31. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.795868
  76. Vasileiou, E. (2021). Behavioral finance and market efficiency in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic: Does fear drive the market?. International Review of Applied Economics, 35(2), 224–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2020.1864301
  77. Wang, G. J., Xie, C., & Han, F. (2012). Multi-scale approximate entropy analysis of foreign exchange markets efficiency. Systems Engineering Procedia, 3, 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sepro.2011.10.030
  78. Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2021). COVID-19 and financial market efficiency: Evidence from an entropy-based analysis. Finance Research Letters, (42), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101888
  79. Yıldıran, M. (2021). COVID-19 korkusu altında finansal piyasalarda getiriler ve etkinlik analizi: Türkiye örneği. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3940392
  80. Yücel, Ö. (2016). Finansal piyasa etkinliği: Borsa İstanbul üzerine bir uygulama. International Review of Economics and Management, 4(3), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.18825/irem.16916
  81. Zeren, F., Kara, H., & Arı, A. (2013). Piyasa etkinliği hipotezi: İMKB için ampirik bir analiz. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences, (36), 141-148.
  82. Duman Atan,S., Özdemir, Z. A., & Atan, M. (2009). Hisse senedi piyasasında zayıf formda etkinlik: İMKB üzerine ampirik bir çalışma. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(2), 33-48.