SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 12 Issue: 3

Türkiye’s Development Assistance: Current Status and the Perspective of the 12th Development Plan

Esat İpek(ANKARA YILDIRIM BEYAZIT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0440-9690
Emrah Kayabaşı(BURSA ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ, BİLGİSAYAR VE ÖĞRETİM TEKNOLOJİLERİ EĞİTİMİ BÖLÜMÜ, BİLGİSAYAR VE ÖĞRETİM TEKNOLOJİLERİ EĞİTİMİ ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0002-3732-9315
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This comprehensive approach not only increases Türkiye’s global influence but also contributes to international development cooperation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Türkiye’s development assistance has evolved significantly, positioning the country as a key global donor.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since 1990, Türkiye has increased its aid, focusing on regions with historical, cultural, and strategic ties, such as Central Asia, the Balkans, the Middle East, and Africa.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This comprehensive approach not only increases Türkiye’s global influence but also contributes to international development cooperation.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:development assistance · technical aid programs · financial aid program

Abstract

Türkiye’s development assistance has evolved significantly, positioning the country as a key global donor. Since 1990, Türkiye has increased its aid, focusing on regions with historical, cultural, and strategic ties, such as Central Asia, the Balkans, the Middle East, and Africa. Through institutions like TİKA, the Turkish Red Crescent, and the Maarif Foundation, Türkiye provides aid in areas such as education, health, infrastructure, agriculture, and humanitarian relief. The country’s development model emphasizes cooperation, mutual benefit, and sustainability rather than traditional hegemonic aid approaches. Türkiye's assistance strategy aligns with its foreign policy goals and is shaped by national development plans, including the Twelfth Development Plan. This plan emphasizes technical cooperation, infrastructure development, energy, digitalization, and migration management. The plan also encourages increased collaboration with international organizations and NGOs, aiming for more effective aid delivery and regional cooperation, particularly in Africa. Türkiye’s development assistance prioritizes demand-driven aid while integrating economic and strategic objectives. By strengthening coordination among public, private, and civil society actors, Türkiye aims to enhance the impact and sustainability of its aid programs. This comprehensive approach not only increases Türkiye’s global influence but also contributes to international development cooperation.

🔖

Cite This Article

İpek, E., Kayabaşı, E. (2025). Türkiye’s Development Assistance: Current Status and the Perspective of the 12th Development Plan. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 12 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1702854

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (25)

  1. Bermeo, S. (2011). Foreign aid and regime change: A role for donor intent [Working paper]. Duke University. https://pedl.byu.edu/documents/foreign%20aid%20and%20regime%20change.pdf.
  2. Brown, S. (2005). Foreign aid and democracy promotion: Lessons from Africa. The European Journal of Development Research, 17(2), 179-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/09578810500130799
  3. Cardoso, F. H. (2007). The accidental president of Brazil: A memoir. Ingram Publisher Services.
  4. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
  5. Dunning, T. (2004). Conditioning the effects of aid, cold war politics, donor credibility and democracy in Africa. International Organization, 58(2), 409-423. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818304582073
  6. Easterly, W. & Pfutze, T. (2008). Where does the money go? Best and worst practices in foreign aid. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(2), 29-52. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.22.2.29
  7. Easterly, W. (2002). How did heavily indebted poor countries become heavily indebted. World Development, 30(10), 1677-1696. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00073-6
  8. Eichengreen, B. (2022, May 15). Shaping a Marshall Plan for Ukraine. Diplomatic Courier. https://www.diplomaticourier.com/posts/s haping-a-marshall-plan-for-ukraine
  9. Fidan, H. & Nurdun, R. (2008). Turkey's role in the global development assistance community: The case of TİKA. Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, 10(1), 93-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613190801895888
  10. Frank, A. G. (1966). The development of underdevelopment. Monthly Review, 18(4), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-018-04-1966-08_3
  11. Fuller, S. (2002). A Question of Motivations: Determining Why Donor Countries Give Aid. Res Publica - Journal of Undergraduate Research, 7(1), 77-109.
  12. Heckelman, J. & Knack, S. (2008). Foreign aid and market-liberalizing reform. Economica, 75(299), 524-548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2007.00623.x
  13. IEA (2022, 14 March). Today’s energy crisis makes supporting clean energy start-ups more important than. IEA. https://www.iea.org/news/today-s-energy-crisis-makes-supporting-clean-energy-start-ups-more-important-than-ever
  14. IREA (2020). Renewable power generation costs in 2020. IREA. https://www.irena.org/publications/2021/Jun/Renewable-Power-Costs-in-2020
  15. Little, I. M. D. & Clifford, J. M. (2009). International aid: The flow of public resources from rich to poor countries. Transaction Publishers.
  16. Mawdsley, E. (2012). From recipients to donors: Emerging powers and the changing development landscape. Zed Books.
  17. Milner, H. V. & Tingley, D. (2012). The choice for multilateralism: Foreign aid and American foreign policy. The Review of International Organizations, 8(3), 313-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-012-9153-x OECD (2015). Official development assistance - Definition and coverage. OECD. http://www.oecd.org/dac/stats/officialdevelopmentassistancedefinitionandcoverage.htm
  18. OECD (2021). OECD economic outlook: Volume 2021, issue 2. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.17.87/66c5ac2c-en
  19. OECD (2022). OECD economic outlook, interim report March 2022: Economic and social impacts and policy implications of the war in Ukraine. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/4181d61b-en
  20. OECD Data Explorer (2024). https://data-explorer.oecd.org/
  21. Pettinger, T. (2017, April 25). Washington Consensus - Definition and criticism. Economics Help. https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/7387/economics/washington-consensusdefinition-and-criticism/
  22. U.S. Department of State (2022, June 1). $700 million drawdown of new U.S. military assistance for Ukraine. United States Department of State. https://www.state.gov/700-million-drawdown-of-new-u-s-military-assistance-for-ukraine/
  23. UKCOP26 (2021). Climate finance delivery plan: Meeting the US$100 billion goal. https://ukcop26.org/wp- content/uploads/2021/10/Climate-Finance-Delivery-Plan-1.pdf
  24. Williamson, J. (2004). A short history of Washington Consensus. Fundacion CİDOB. http://www.iie.com/publications/papers/williamson0904-2.pdf
  25. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (12.baskı). Seçkin Yayınları.