Journals / Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 13 Issue: 2

Digital Warfare, Global Governance and Disinformation: International Verification Dynamics in the Context of the Russia-Ukraine War

Resul Taşan(SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5993-3548
Ümit Arklan(SULEYMAN DEMIREL UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-0066-3122
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the analysis, it is understood that in terms of continent-based verification density, intersection and stakeholder within the global verification ecosystem - with a special focus on the Russia-Ukraine War - the European continent is in a central position, followed by Asia and the Americas, while Africa is isolated in this ecosystem and needs integration and cooperation in many ways.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Following the 2016 US Presidential Election and the Brexit Referendum, discussions intensified globally regarding attempts to disrupt transnational politics through disinformation activities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Alongside these events, the role of digital warfare conducted via social media platforms in shaping transnational politics and the efforts of states to intervene in the internal politics of other countries through digital channels have increased significantly.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the analysis, it is understood that in terms of continent-based verification density, intersection and stakeholder within the global verification ecosystem - with a special focus on the Russia-Ukraine War - the European continent is in a central position, followed by Asia and the Americas, while Africa is isolated in this ecosystem and needs integration and cooperation in many ways.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Digital Warfare · Global Verification · Disinformation

Abstract

Following the 2016 US Presidential Election and the Brexit Referendum, discussions intensified globally regarding attempts to disrupt transnational politics through disinformation activities. Alongside these events, the role of digital warfare conducted via social media platforms in shaping transnational politics and the efforts of states to intervene in the internal politics of other countries through digital channels have increased significantly. These developments have brought disinformation activities to the forefront as a direct determinant of political, social, and economic dynamics at the global level and have placed the borderless spread of misinformation, one of the most critical issues of the digital age, at the center of the global agenda. This study examines the evolving digital information environment using the example of the Russian-Ukrainian War, looking at how misinformation circulates at the transnational level, which actors fuel it, and how global fact-checking efforts have been shaped in response. It thus aims to present both the global dissemination dynamics of disinformation and the increasingly important international verification ecosystem from a holistic perspective. In the study, 537 pieces of content on the Russian-Ukrainian War, which were verified on ukrainefacts.org between January 2022 and March 2023, were analyzed using the descriptive analysis method. As a result of the analysis, continent and country-based verification density, clustering status, intersection relations, stakeholder levels and change in the process were tried to be revealed. As a result of the analysis, it is understood that in terms of continent-based verification density, intersection and stakeholder within the global verification ecosystem - with a special focus on the Russia-Ukraine War - the European continent is in a central position, followed by Asia and the Americas, while Africa is isolated in this ecosystem and needs integration and cooperation in many ways.

🔖

Cite This Article

Taşan, R., Arklan, Ü. (2026). Digital Warfare, Global Governance and Disinformation: International Verification Dynamics in the Context of the Russia-Ukraine War. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 13 Issue: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1149250

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (40)

  1. Ahmed, W., Vidal-Alaball, J., Downing, J., & Seguí, F. (2020). COVID-19 and the 5G conspiracy theory: Social network analysis of Twitter data. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(5), Article e19458. https://doi.org/10.2196/19458
  2. Bakir, V., & McStay, A. (2018). Fake news and the economy of emotions: Problems, causes, solutions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 154-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1345645
  3. Barua, Z., Barua, S., Aktar, S., Kabir, N., & Li, M. (2020). Effects of misinformation on COVID-19 individual responses and recommendations for resilience of disastrous consequences of misinformation. Progress in Disaster Science, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100119
  4. BBC. (2018, December 17). Russia 'meddled in all big social media' around US election. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-46590890
  5. Brown, J., Broderick, A. J., & Lee, N. (2007). Word of mouth communication within online communities: Conceptualizing the online social network. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(3), 2-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20082
  6. Charquero-Ballester, M., Walter, J., Nissen, I., & Bechmann, A. (2021). Different types of COVID-19 misinformation have different emotional valence on Twitter. Big Data & Society, 8(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211041279
  7. Corera, G. (2016, December 22). Can US election hack be traced to Russia?. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38370630
  8. Del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., Stanley, H. E., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2016). The spreading of misinformation online. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(3), 554-559. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517441113
  9. Dilanian, K., & Popken, B. (2018, December 17). Russia favored Trump, targeted African-Americans with election meddling, reports say. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/russia-favored-trump-targeted-african-americans-election-meddling-reports-say-n948731
  10. Frenda, S. J., Nichols, R. M., & Loftus, E. F. (2011). Current issues and advances in misinformation research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 20-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410396620
  11. Greene, S., Asmolov, G., Fagan, A., Fridman, O., & Gjuzelov, B. (2021). Mapping fake news and disinformation in the Western Balkans and identifying ways to effectively counter them. European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/653621/EXPO_STU(2020)653621_EN.pdf
  12. Hill, J. (2022, August 2). Policy responses to false and misleading digital content: A snapshot of children’s media literacy. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/en/publications/policy-responses-to-false-and-misleading-digital-content_1104143e-en.html
  13. Howard, P. N., Ganesh, B., & Liotsiou, D. (2018). The IRA, social media and political polarization in the United States, 2012-2018. OXFORD Internet Institute. https://demtech.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2018/12/The-IRA-Social-Media-and-Political-Polarization.pdf
  14. Isaac, M., & Wakabayashi, D. (2017, October 30). Russian influence reached 126 million through Facebook alone. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/30/technology/facebook-google-russia.html
  15. Lee, D. (2017, September 7). Facebook uncovers 'Russian-funded' misinformation campaign. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-41182519
  16. Lee, D. (2018, February 17). The tactics of a Russian troll farm. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-43093390
  17. Lesher, M., Pawelec, H., &Desai, A. (2022, March 29). Disentangling untruths online: Creators, spreaders and how to stop them. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/en/publications/disentangling-untruths-online_84b62df1-en.html
  18. Lucas, R. (2020, August 18). Senate releases final report on Russia's interference in 2016 election. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2020/08/18/903616315/senate-releases-final-report-on-russias- interference-in-2016-election
  19. Malhotra, P. (2020). A relationship-centered and culturally informed approach to studying misinformation on COVID-19. Social media+ Society, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120948224
  20. Myers, S. A., Zhu, C., & Leskovec, J. (2012, August 3-7). Information diffusion and external influence in networks. [Conference presentation abstract]. The 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, Toronto, ON, Canada. https://cs.stanford.edu/people/jure/pubs/ext-kdd12.pdf
  21. Naeem, S. B., & Bhatti, R. (2020). The Covid‐19 ‘infodemic’: a new front for information professionals. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 37(3), 233-239. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12311
  22. Ogbette, A. S., Idam, M. O., Kareem, A. O., & Ogbette, D. N. (2019). Fake news in Nigeria: Causes, effects and management. Information and Knowledge Management, 9(2), 96-99. https://doi.org/10.7176/IKM
  23. Ozawa, J. V., Woolley, S., & Lukito, J. (2024). Taking the power back: How diaspora community organizations are fighting misinformation spread on encrypted messaging apps. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 5(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-146
  24. Pennycook, G., McPhetres, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, J., & Rand, D. (2020). Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: Experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy-nudge intervention. Psychological Science, 31(7), 770-780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620939054
  25. Polat, B., & Sutcu, C. (2022). #Plandemi enfodemisinin anatomisi: COVID-19 pandemisi döneminde yanlış bilginin yayılımı üzerine bir vaka analizi. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 40, 376-393. https://doi.org/10.17829/turcom.1050723
  26. Poynter. (2026). International fact-checking network empowering fact-checkers worldwide. https://www.poynter.org/ifcn/
  27. Ramsay, G., & Robertshaw, S. (2019). Weaponizing news: RT, Sputnik and targeted disinformation. Kings’s College London. https://www.kcl.ac.uk/policy-institute/research-analysis/weaponising-news
  28. Reuters (2017, October 2). Facebook to give Russia-linked ads to U.S. congress on monday. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-facebook-politics-idUSKCN1C706L
  29. Rivas-de-Roca, R., & Pérez-Curiel, C. (2023). Global political leaders during the COVID-19 vaccination: Between propaganda and fact-checking. Politics and the Life Sciences, 42(1), 104-119. https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2023.4
  30. Taşan, R., & Arklan, Ü. (2023). Kamuyu bilgilendirme modeli bağlamında uluslararası doğruluk kontrolü ağı’nın (ifcn) betimsel bir analizi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (51), 140-158. https://doi.org/10.52642/susbed.1281708
  31. Tasnim, S., Hossain, M., & Mazumder, H. (2020). Impact of rumors and misinformation on COVID-19 in social media. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, 53(3), 171-174. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.20.094
  32. Topsakal, T. (2021). Dijital ortamda yanliş bilgi ve haberlerin yayilmasi: Koronavirüs salgin haberlerine dair bir inceleme. İnönü Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 6(1), 383-401. https://doi.org/10.47107/inifedergi.867934
  33. Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
  34. Watts, D. J., & Dodds, P. S. (2007). Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 441-458. https://doi.org/10.1086/518527
  35. Wearesocial & Hootsuite. (2024, January 3). Digital 2024. https://wearesocial.com/id/blog/2024/01/digital-2024/
  36. World Bank. (2024, January 18). Dijital Dönüşüm Afrika'da Kalkınmayı Tetikliyor. https://www.worldbank.org/en/results/2024/01/18/digital-transformation-drives-development-in-afe-afw-africa
  37. World Health Organization. (2021). Infodemic. https://www.who.int/health-topics/infodemic#tab=tab_1
  38. Yamaguchi, S., & Tanihara, T. (2023). Relationship between misinformation spreading behaviour and true/false judgments and literacy: An empirical analysis of COVID-19 vaccine and political misinformation in Japan. Global Knowledge Memory and Communication, 74(1/2), 35-53. https://doi.org/10.1108/gkmc-12-2022-0287
  39. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. Seçkin Publishing.
  40. Zhang, Z. K., Liu, C., Zhan, X. X., Lu, X., Zhang, C. X., & Zhang, Y. C. (2016). Dynamics of information diffusion and its applications on complex networks. Physics Reports, 651, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2016.07.002