In this paper, commentary of Celaleddin Devani for the epistle About the Proof of Siyrik Tozleri named as “kulli akil” by Nasir Tusi is addressed primarily and then Turkish version of commentary at issue is submitted to auduince interest
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, commentary of Celaleddin Devani for the epistle About the Proof of Siyrik Tozleri named as “kulli akil” by Nasir Tusi is addressed primarily and then Turkish version of commentary at issue is submitted to auduince interest
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this paper, commentary of Celaleddin Devani for the epistle About the Proof of Siyrik Tozleri named as “kulli akil” by Nasir Tusi is addressed primarily and then Turkish version of commentary at issue is submitted to auduince interest
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this paper, commentary of Celaleddin Devani for the epistle About the Proof of Siyrik Tozleri named as “kulli akil” by Nasir Tusi is addressed primarily and then Turkish version of commentary at issue is submitted to auduince interest
In this paper, commentary of Celaleddin Devani for the epistle About the Proof of Siyrik Tozleri named as “kulli akil” by Nasir Tusi is addressed primarily and then Turkish version of commentary at issue is submitted to auduince interest
Özet
Bu çalışmada öncelikle 15. yüzyıl düşünürü Celaleddin Devvani’nin, Nasır Tûsî’nin “Külli Akıl” diye adlandırılan Sıyrık Tözleri İsbat Hakkındaki Risalesinin Şerhi ele alınıp değerlendirilecek, ardından söz konusu risalenin Türkçesi verilerek okuyucuların ilgisine sunulacaktır
Duran, R. (2016). Celaleddin Devani for the epistle About the Proof of Siyrik Tozleri named as “kulli akil” by Tûsî. Dört Öge, Sayı: 9, 75–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/114313