SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2010 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 1

A comparison of the treatment of DDH in the older children by femoral shortening with a) acetabular shelf and b) innominate osteotomy plus shelf

Metin DOĞAN
Savaş AĞAOĞLU
Ali ÖÇGÜDER
Mahmut UĞURLU
Pages
83–89
Publication Date
2010-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, it can be concluded that, in patients 7 years old or younger with a diagnosis of developmental hip dislocation, the 2 techniques described here are effective.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:To examine the surgical outcome of 2 different techniques used in the treatment of developmental dislocation of the hip with delayed diagnosis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the technique applied: 21 hips of 18 patients were included in Group 1 and 20 hips of 16 patients were included in Group 2.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, it can be concluded that, in patients 7 years old or younger with a diagnosis of developmental hip dislocation, the 2 techniques described here are effective.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: Developmental dislocation of the hip · delayed diagnosis · acetabuloplasty techniques

Abstract

To examine the surgical outcome of 2 different techniques used in the treatment of developmental dislocation of the hip with delayed diagnosis. Materials and methods: The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the technique applied: 21 hips of 18 patients were included in Group 1 and 20 hips of 16 patients were included in Group 2. Initially, all the patients were subjected to femoral osteotomy, shortening, varization and derotation. In Group 1, additionally extra-articular grafting was performed for acetabulum and in Group 2, acetabular osteotomy and extraarticular grafting were performed. The mean age of Group 1 was 8 years, and the mean age of Group 2 was 7 years. Results: The results were evaluated radiologically and clinically. The mean follow-up time was 4 years. In the patients under 7 years of age, successful results were obtained in both groups. Of 7 patients with poor outcome, 6 were older than 7 years of age. Conclusion: The surgical treatment of childhood developmental dislocation of the hip with delayed diagnosis is difficult. However, it can be concluded that, in patients 7 years old or younger with a diagnosis of developmental hip dislocation, the 2 techniques described here are effective.

Özet

To examine the surgical outcome of 2 different techniques used in the treatment of developmental dislocation of the hip with delayed diagnosis. Materials and methods: The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the technique applied: 21 hips of 18 patients were included in Group 1 and 20 hips of 16 patients were included in Group 2. Initially, all the patients were subjected to femoral osteotomy, shortening, varization and derotation. In Group 1, additionally extra-articular grafting was performed for acetabulum and in Group 2, acetabular osteotomy and extraarticular grafting were performed. The mean age of Group 1 was 8 years, and the mean age of Group 2 was 7 years. Results: The results were evaluated radiologically and clinically. The mean follow-up time was 4 years. In the patients under 7 years of age, successful results were obtained in both groups. Of 7 patients with poor outcome, 6 were older than 7 years of age. Conclusion: The surgical treatment of childhood developmental dislocation of the hip with delayed diagnosis is difficult. However, it can be concluded that, in patients 7 years old or younger with a diagnosis of developmental hip dislocation, the 2 techniques described here are effective.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞAN, M., AĞAOĞLU, S., ÖÇGÜDER, A., UĞURLU, M. (2010). A comparison of the treatment of DDH in the older children by femoral shortening with a) acetabular shelf and b) innominate osteotomy plus shelf. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 1, 83–89. https://ajindex.com/articles/114060

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Berkeley ME, Dickson JH, Cain TE, Donovan MM. Surgical therapy for congenital dislocation of the hip in patients who are twelve to thirty-six months old. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984 Mar; 66(3): 412-20
  2. Dimitriou JK, Cavadias AX. One-stage surgical procedure for congenital dislocation of the hip in older children. Clin Orthop 1989 Sep; (246): 30-8
  3. Karakas ES, Baktir A, Argun M, Turk CY. One stage treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip in older children. J Pediatr Orthop 1995 May-Jun; 15(3): 330-6
  4. MacEwen GD. Treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip in older children. Clin Orthop 1987 Dec; (225): 86-92
  5. Massie WK, Howorth MB. Congenital dislocation of the hip. Part II. Results of open reduction as seen in early adult period. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1951; 33: 171-90
  6. Severin E. Congenital dislocation of the hip: development of the joint after closed reduction. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1950; 32-A: 507-18
  7. Tükenmez M, Perçin S, Tezeren G, Cingöz MA, The outcomes of salter innominate osteotomy in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2006; 26(4): 390-95
  8. Ryan MG, Johnson LO, Quanbeck DS, Minkowitz B. Onestage treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip in children three to ten years old. Functional and radiographic results. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1998; 80: 336-44
  9. Boyer DW, Mickelson MR, Ponseti IV. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Long-termfollow-up study of one hundred and twenty-one patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1981; 63: 85-95
  10. Williamson DM, Glover SD, Benson MK. Congenital dislocation of the hip presenting after the age of three years. A long-term review. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1989; 71: 745-51
  11. Barrett WP, Staheli LT, Chew DE. The effectiveness of the Salter innominate osteotomy inthe treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1986; 68-A: 79-87
  12. Dogan M, Bozkurt M, Sesen H, Yildirim H. One stage treatment of congenital severely dislocated hips in older children through various acetabuloplasty techniques: 22 children followed for 1-5 years. Acta Orthop 2005; Apr; 76(2): 212-9
  13. Kalamchi A, MacEven GD. Avascular necrosis following treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1980; 62: 876-88
  14. Kinik H, Mergen E, Radical reduction for developmental dislocation of the hip (Çakırgil’s procedure). Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2007; 41, Suppl 1; 47-53
  15. Tönnis D. Normal values of the hip joint for th