SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 71

RELIGIOUS MYTH CRITICISM IN MYTHOPOEIC FANTASY LITERATURE: TERRY PRATCHETT’ SMALL GODS (1992)

MİTOPOEİK FANTASTİK EDEBİYATTA DİNSEL MİT ELEŞTİRİSİ: TERRY PRATCHETT’IN KÜÇÜK TANRILAR (1992) ROMANI

Tuğçe Soygül(TÜRK HAVA KURUMU ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-9267-0228
Pages
427–445
Publication Date
2025-11-03
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The novel thus subverts the relationship between myth and religion within the Discworld universe, offering a critical lens on the socio-political function of religious systems.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Fantasy literature, particularly in its mythopoeic mode, is a modern literary form rooted in ancient myth-making, reconfiguring traditional narratives to engage with contemporary concerns.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study, therefore, analyses Terry Pratchett’s Small Gods (1992) as a representative work of mythopoeic fantasy, drawing on Mircea Eliade’s theories of religious myth criticism to examine how the novel deconstructs religious dogma and exposes mechanisms, sustaining belief through revisionist myth-making.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The novel thus subverts the relationship between myth and religion within the Discworld universe, offering a critical lens on the socio-political function of religious systems.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mitopoeik fantazi · Terry Pratchett · Küçük Tanrılar

Abstract

Fantasy literature, particularly in its mythopoeic mode, is a modern literary form rooted in ancient myth-making, reconfiguring traditional narratives to engage with contemporary concerns. Rather than reinforcing myth’s original function in pre-modern societies, this narrative mode transforms established mythic structures into symbolic frameworks for critique. This study, therefore, analyses Terry Pratchett’s Small Gods (1992) as a representative work of mythopoeic fantasy, drawing on Mircea Eliade’s theories of religious myth criticism to examine how the novel deconstructs religious dogma and exposes mechanisms, sustaining belief through revisionist myth-making. Building on Eliade’s conception of myth as a sacred framework, the analysis explores how Pratchett reimagines sacred geography, divine authority, and the institutionalisation of myth and religion as human constructs shaped by belief rather than expressions of transcendent truth. The novel thus subverts the relationship between myth and religion within the Discworld universe, offering a critical lens on the socio-political function of religious systems.

Özet

Fantastik edebiyat, özellikle mitopoeik türüyle, antik mit yaratımına dayanan modern bir anlatı biçimidir ve geleneksel anlatıları çağdaş sorunlarla etkileşime girecek şekilde yeniden kurgular. Mitin ilkel toplumlarda üstlendiği özgün işlevi yeniden üretmek yerine, bu anlatı tarzı yerleşik mitsel yapıları eleştirel ve simgesel çerçeveler halinde dönüştürür. Bu çalışma, Terry Pratchett’ın Küçük Tanrılar (1992) adlı romanını mitopoeik fantastik edebiyatın öne çıkan bir örneği olarak incelemekte ve eserin dinsel dogmayı nasıl sorguladığını, inancı sürdüren yapıları nasıl gözler önüne serdiğini Mircea Eliade’ın dinsel mit eleştirisine dayanan kuramsal yaklaşımı çerçevesinde ele almaktadır. Eliade’ın miti kutsal olan ile dünyevi olan arasındaki ilişkiyi kuran bir yapı olarak yorumlamasına dayanan analiz, Pratchett’ın kutsal coğrafyayı, ilahi otoriteyi ve mit ile dinin kurumsallaşmasını aşkın hakikatlerden ziyade inanca dayalı insan yapıları olarak nasıl yeniden tasarladığını ortaya koyar. Roman böylece Diskdünya evreninde mit ile din arasındaki ilişkiyi ters yüz eder ve dinsel yapıların toplumsal ve politik işlevlerine eleştirel bir perspektif sunar.

🔖

Cite This Article

Soygül, T. (2025). RELIGIOUS MYTH CRITICISM IN MYTHOPOEIC FANTASY LITERATURE: TERRY PRATCHETT’ SMALL GODS (1992). Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı: 71, 427–445. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1711726

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (42)

  1. Allan, S. (1991). The shape of the turtle: Myth, art, and cosmos in early China. State University of New York Press.
  2. Allen, D. (2002). Myth and religion in Mircea Eliade. Routledge.
  3. Attebery, B. (1992). Strategies of fantasy. Indiana University Press.
  4. Bould, M., Vint, S. (2012). Political readings. In E. James & F. Mendlesohn (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to fantasy literature (pp. 102–112). Cambridge University Press.
  5. Brawley, C. (2014). Nature and the numinous in mythopoeic fantasy literature. McFarland.
  6. Butler, A. M. (2007). An unofficial companion to the novels of Terry Pratchett. Greenwood Publishing Group.
  7. Cabell, C. (2012). Terry Pratchett. Kings Road Publishing.
  8. Cohen, A. (2010). Myth and myth criticism following The dialectic of enlightenment. The European Legacy, 15(5), 583–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2010.501660
  9. Csapo, E. (2005). Theories of mythology. Blackwell Publishing.
  10. Eliade, M. (1959). The sacred and the profane: The nature of religion. Harcourt, Brace & World.
  11. . (1963). Myth and reality. Harper & Row.
  12. . (1969). Images and symbols: Studies in religious symbolism. Sheed and Ward.
  13. . (2021). The myth of the eternal return: Cosmos and history. Princeton University Press.
  14. Encyclopaedia Britannica. (2024, August 28). Myth. Encyclopaedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/myth
  15. Frye, N. (1957). Anatomy of criticism. Princeton University Press.
  16. Gruner, E. R. (2011). Wrestling with religion: Pullman, Pratchett, and the uses of story. Children’s Literature Association Quarterly, 36(3), 276–295. https://doi.org/10.1353/chq.2011.0035
  17. Hall, J. M. (2007). In the name of the politics: Ancient Greek myth and modern mythmaking. In R. D. Woodard (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Greek mythology (pp. 331–357). Cambridge University Press.
  18. Hart, D. B. (2013). The experience of God: Being, consciousness, bliss. Yale University Press.
  19. Herald, D. T. (1999). Fluent in fantasy: A guide to reading interests. Libraries Unlimited.
  20. Hume, K. (1984). Fantasy and mimesis: Responses to reality in Western literature. Methuen.
  21. Johnson, K. J. (2014). Rooted deep: Discovering the literary identity of mythopoeic fantasist George MacDonald. Linguaculture, 2, 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1515/lincu-2015-0027
  22. Kidby, P. (2013). Great A’Tuin II. Paul Kidby: Terry Pratchett artist. https://www.paulkidby.com/paintings/
  23. Kochhar-Lindgren, G. (2014). Tell it slant: Of gods, philosophy and politics in Terry Pratchett’s Discworld. In A. H. Alton & W. C. Spruiell (Eds.), Discworld and the disciplines: Critical approaches to the Terry Pratchett works (pp. 81–91). McFarland.
  24. Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
  25. Leeming, D. (2005). The Oxford companion to world mythology. Oxford University Press.
  26. Leftow, B. (1998). Classical theism. In E. Craig (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy (Vol. 4). Routledge. https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/god-concepts-of/v-1/sections/classical-theism
  27. Lincoln, B. (1999). Theorizing myth: Narrative, ideology, and scholarship. University of Chicago Press.
  28. Mathews, R. (2002). Fantasy: The liberation of imagination. Routledge.
  29. Oziewicz, M. (2008). Joseph Campbell’s ‘new mythology’ and the rise of mythopoeic fantasy. The AnaChronisT, 13, 114–130.
  30. Pratchett, T. (2013). Small gods. Random House.
  31. Pratchett, T., Briggs, S. (2004). The new Discworld companion (Rev. and updated ed.). Victor Gollancz.
  32. Pratchett, T., Simpson, J. (2008). The folklore of Discworld. Doubleday.
  33. Rayment, A. (2014). Fantasy, politics, postmodernity: Pratchett, Pullman, Miéville and stories of the eye. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401211000
  34. Rhone, Z. A. (2017). The great tower of Elfland: The mythopoeic worldview of J. R. R. Tolkien, C. S. Lewis, G. K. Chesterton, and George MacDonald. Kent State University Press.
  35. Richardson, A., Bowden, J. (Eds.). (1983). A new dictionary of Christian theology. SCM Press.
  36. Simpson, J. A., Weiner, E. S. C. (Eds.). (1998). The Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed., Vol. 10: Moul–Ovum). Clarendon Press.
  37. Simpson, J. (2015). Sir Terry Pratchett OBE (1948–2015). Folklore, 126(2), 232–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015587X.2015.1042722
  38. Slochower, H. (1970). Mythopoesis: Mythic patterns in the literary classics. Wayne State University Press.
  39. Stableford, B. M. (2005). Historical dictionary of fantasy literature. Scarecrow Press.
  40. Tolkien, J. R. R. (1947). On fairy-stories. In C. Tolkien (Ed.), The monsters and the critics and other essays. HarperCollins.
  41. Trident Press International. (1996). Mythopoeic. In The New International Webster’s Comprehensive Dictionary of the English Language (Deluxe ed.). Trident Press International.
  42. Watt-Evans, L. (2008). The turtle moves!: Discworld’s story unauthorized. BenBella Books.