SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 73

THE POSITION OF EMOTIONS IN HISTORIOGRAPHY WITHIN REDDY’S CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

REDDY’NİN KAVRAMSAL ÇERÇEVESİ BAĞLAMINDA DUYGULARIN TARİHYAZIMINDAKİ KONUMU

Gülçin Ayıtgu Metin(ADIYAMAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5807-2512
Pages
196–213
Publication Date
2026-03-02
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Accordingly, the study engages with the question of whether emotions should be regarded as an inherent dimension of historiography or remain a thematic and limited field of inquiry by employing Reddy’s analytical approach centered on the concept of emotive and reopens fundamental issues such as the position of the subject in history and the possibilities of representation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines William M.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Drawing on the connections between emotions and political representations, and narrative strategies, and historical experiences, this evaluation provides a philosophical basis for rethinking the theoretical boundaries of historiography.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Accordingly, the study engages with the question of whether emotions should be regarded as an inherent dimension of historiography or remain a thematic and limited field of inquiry by employing Reddy’s analytical approach centered on the concept of emotive and reopens fundamental issues such as the position of the subject in history and the possibilities of representation.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:William M. Reddy · Duygular tarihi · Tarihyazımı

Abstract

This study examines William M. Reddy’s theoretical approach to emotions within the framework of the relationship between the philosophy of history and historiography, focusing on the constitutive role of emotions in the production of historical knowledge. Reddy argues that emotions are not confined to individual experiences but are historically shaped through interactions with cultural representations, cognitive processes, and social norms. The concepts he developed—emotive, emotional regime, emotional liberty, and emotional refuge—allow emotional expressions to be understood as performative processes that exert directive and transformative effects within historical contexts. Drawing on the connections between emotions and political representations, and narrative strategies, and historical experiences, this evaluation provides a philosophical basis for rethinking the theoretical boundaries of historiography. Accordingly, the study engages with the question of whether emotions should be regarded as an inherent dimension of historiography or remain a thematic and limited field of inquiry by employing Reddy’s analytical approach centered on the concept of emotive and reopens fundamental issues such as the position of the subject in history and the possibilities of representation.

Özet

Öz Bu çalışma, William M. Reddy’nin duygulara ilişkin kuramsal yaklaşımını, tarih felsefesi ile tarihyazımı arasındaki ilişki bağlamında ele alarak, duyguların tarihsel bilgi üretimindeki kurucu rolünü incelemektedir. Reddy, duyguların bireysel yaşantılarla sınırlı olmadığını, kültürel temsiller, bilişsel süreçler ve toplumsal normlarla etkileşim içinde tarihsel olarak biçimlendiğini ileri sürer. Bu doğrultuda geliştirdiği emotive, duygusal rejim, duygusal özgürlük ve duygusal sığınak kavramları, duygusal ifadeleri tarihsel bağlamda yönlendirici ve dönüştürücü etkiler taşıyan edimsel süreçler olarak değerlendirmeye olanak tanır. Duyguların siyasal temsiller, anlatı stratejileri ve tarihsel deneyimlerle kurduğu ilişkiler doğrultusunda yürütülen bu değerlendirme, tarihyazımının kuramsal sınırlarını yeniden düşünmeye yönelen felsefi bir tartışma zemini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu bağlamda çalışma, duyguların tarihyazımına içkin mi yoksa tematik ve sınırlı bir alan olarak mı ele alınması gerektiği sorusunu, Reddy’nin emotive kavramı etrafında şekillenen çözümleyici yaklaşımıyla ele alarak, tarihte öznenin konumu ve temsilin imkânları gibi temel sorunları yeniden değerlendirmeye açmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Metin, G. A. (2026). THE POSITION OF EMOTIONS IN HISTORIOGRAPHY WITHIN REDDY’S CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı: 73, 196–213. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1756009

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (23)

  1. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words: The William James lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford University Press.
  2. Brenneis, D. (1997). Against constructionism: The historical ethnography of emotions, by William M. Reddy [Comment]. Current Anthropology, 38(3), 340–341. https://doi.org/10.1086/204622
  3. Febvre, L. (1973). Sensibility and history: How to reconstitute the emotional life of the past? In P. Burke (Ed.), A new kind of history: From the writings of Febvre (K. Folca, Trans., pp. 12–26). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  4. Hunt, L. (1997). Against constructionism: The historical ethnography of emotions, by William M. Reddy [Comment]. Current Anthropology, 38(3), 343–344. https://doi.org/10.1086/204622
  5. James, W. (1884). What is an emotion? Mind, 9(34), 188–205.https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/os-IX.34.188
  6. Oatley, K. (2004). Emotions: A brief history. Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470776322
  7. Plamper, J., Reddy, W. M., Rosenwein, B. H., & Stearns, P. N. (2010). The history of emotions: An interview with William Reddy, Barbara Rosenwein, and Peter Stearns. History and Theory, 49(2), 237–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2010.00541.x
  8. Plamper, J. (2015). The history of emotions: An introduction (K. Tribe, Trans.). Oxford University Press. Platon. (2010). Devlet (S. Eyüboğlu & M. A. Cimcoz, Çev.). Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
  9. Platon. (2015). Timaios (F. Akderin, Çev.). Say Yayınları.
  10. Reddy, W. M. (1987). Money and liberty in modern Europe: A critique of historical understanding. Cambridge University Press.
  11. Reddy, W. M. (1992). Postmodernism and the public sphere: Implications for an historical ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 7(2), 135– 68. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1992.7.2.02a00010
  12. Reddy, W. M. (1997). Against constructionism: The historical ethnography of emotions. Current Anthropology, 38(3), 327–351. https://doi.org/10.1086/204622
  13. Reddy, W. M. (1999). Emotional liberty: Politics and history in the anthropology of emotions. Cultural Anthropology, 14(2), 256–288. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1999.14.2.256
  14. Reddy, W. M. (2004). The navigation of feeling: A framework for the history of emotions. Cambridge University Press.
  15. Reddy, W. M. (2010). Neuroscience and the fallacies of functionalism [Review of the book On deep history and the brain, by D. L. Smail]. History and Theory, 49(3), 412–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2010.00551.x
  16. Reddy, W. M. (2016). The Eurasian origins of empty time and space: Modernity as temporality reconsidered. History and Theory, 55(3), 325–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.10815
  17. Reddy, W. M. (2020). The unavoidable intentionality of affect: The history of emotions and the neurosciences of the present day. Emotion Review, 12(3), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073920930781
  18. Reddy, W. M. (2023). To fly the plane: Language games, historical narratives, and emotions. History and Theory, 62(1), 30–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.12289
  19. Rosenwein, B. H. (2007). Emotional communities in the early Middle Ages. Cornell University Press.
  20. Scheer, M. (2012). Are emotions a kind of practice (and is that what makes them have a history)? A Bourdieusian approach to understanding emotion. History and Theory, 51(2), 193–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2012.00621.x
  21. Scott, J. W. (1991). The evidence of experience. Critical Inquiry, 17(4), 773- 797. https://doi.org/10.1086/448612
  22. Stearns, P. N., & Stearns, C. Z. (1985). Emotionology: Clarifying the history of emotions and emotional standards. The American Historical Review, 90(4), 813–836. https://doi.org/10.2307/1858841
  23. White, H. (1978). The historical text as literary artifact. In Tropics of discourse: Essays in cultural criticism (pp. 81–100). Johns Hopkins University Press.