SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 73

THE MEDIATING ROLE OF JOB SECURITY IN THE EFFECT OF LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE ON CAREER SUCCESS

LİDER-ÜYE DEĞİŞİMİNİN KARİYER BAŞARISI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNDE İŞ GÜVENCESİNİN ARACILIK ROLÜ

Ülkühan Bike Esen(ÇANKIRI KARATEKİN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-0967-2140
Alper Ali Gökbulut(Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi)0000-0003-3630-8296
Pages
1–15
Publication Date
2026-03-02
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, job security emerges as a critical moderating factor, whereby employees with stable job prospects demonstrate greater autonomy in career decision-making, independent of leadership support.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Leader-Member Exchange Theory explores the intricate dynamics and relationships between leaders and their subordinates, focusing on key aspects like trust, mutual respect, and effective communication.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Job Security, on the other hand, represents the employees' confidence in the continuity of their roles, shaped by organizational policies, labor market conditions, individual performance metrics, and broader economic trends.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, job security emerges as a critical moderating factor, whereby employees with stable job prospects demonstrate greater autonomy in career decision-making, independent of leadership support.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İç grup · Dış grup · Kariyer başarısı

Abstract

Leader-Member Exchange Theory explores the intricate dynamics and relationships between leaders and their subordinates, focusing on key aspects like trust, mutual respect, and effective communication. Job Security, on the other hand, represents the employees' confidence in the continuity of their roles, shaped by organizational policies, labor market conditions, individual performance metrics, and broader economic trends. Together, these constructs significantly influence employees' career plans and work-related attitudes, which in turn shape organizational outcomes. This research investigates how job security modulates the interplay between leader-employee dynamics and employees' perceptions of career success. The data for this study were collected from a sample of 308 participants using a structured questionnaire and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling. Research shows that high-quality interactions significantly enhance employees' perceptions of career success. Furthermore, job security emerges as a critical moderating factor, whereby employees with stable job prospects demonstrate greater autonomy in career decision-making, independent of leadership support.

Özet

Lider-Üye Değişim Teorisi, liderler ve astları arasındaki karmaşık dinamikleri ve ilişkileri araştırmakta ve güven, karşılıklı saygı ve etkili iletişim gibi temel unsurlara odaklanmaktadır. İş Güvenliği ise, çalışanların rollerinin sürekliliğine olan güvenini temsil etmektedir ve bu güven, kurumsal politikalar, işgücü piyasası koşulları, bireysel performans ölçütleri ve daha geniş ekonomik eğilimler tarafından şekillendirilmektedir. Bu yapılar birlikte, çalışanların kariyer planlarını ve iş ile ilgili tutumlarını önemli ölçüde etkilemekte ve bu da kurumsal sonuçları şekillendirmektedir. Bu çalışma, iş güvenliğinin lider-çalışan dinamikleri ile çalışanların kariyer başarısı algıları arasındaki etkileşimi nasıl düzenlediğini araştırmaktadır. Çalışma için gerekli veri, yapılandırılmış bir anket kullanılarak 308 katılımcıdan oluşan bir örneklemden toplanmış ve Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmanın sonucu, yüksek kaliteli etkileşimlerin çalışanların kariyer başarısı algılarını önemli ölçüde artırdığını göstermektedir. Dahası, iş güvenliği, istikrarlı iş beklentileri olan çalışanların liderlik desteğinden bağımsız olarak kariyer karar alma sürecinde daha fazla özerklik gösterdiği kritik bir düzenleyici faktör olarak ortaya çıkmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Esen, Ü. B., Gökbulut, A. A. (2026). THE MEDIATING ROLE OF JOB SECURITY IN THE EFFECT OF LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE ON CAREER SUCCESS. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı: 73, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1756776

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (43)

  1. Abele, A. E., & Spurk, D. (2009). How do objective and subjective career success interrelate over time? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(4), 803–824. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X470924
  2. Ahmed, S., & Bashir, S. (2022). Leader–member exchange and subjective career success through the functional aspect of the negative emotion of envy. Journal of Managerial Sciences, 12(3), 178–189.
  3. Al-Hyari, H. S. (2023). Job security as a mediating variable between innovative leadership and innovative work behavior among employees. Journal of System and Management Sciences, 13(1), 532–574. https://doi.org/10.33168/JSMS.2023.0128
  4. Altınay, L., Dai, Y. D., Chang, J., Lee, C. H., Zhuang, W. L., & Liu, Y. C. (2019). How to facilitate hotel employees’ work engagement: The roles of leader–member exchange, role overload and job security. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(3), 1525–1542. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2017-0613
  5. Anand, S., Hu, J., Liden, R. C., & Vidyarthi, P. R. (2011). Leader–member exchange: Recent research findings and prospects for the future. In A. Bryman, D. Collinson, K. Grint, B. Jackson, & M. Uhl-Bien (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of leadership (pp. 311-325). Sage.
  6. Azadeh, A., & Ahranjani, P. M. (2014). The impact of job security, satisfaction and stress on performance assessment and optimization of generation companies. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, (32), 343–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2014.10.002
  7. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(1), 8- 34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0278-x
  8. Baş, T., Keskin, N., & Mert, İ. S. (2010). Lider–üye etkileşimi (LÜE) modeli ve ölçme aracının Türkçe’de geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizi. Ege Akademik Bakış, 10(3), 1013–1039.
  9. Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1996). Development of leader–member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1538–1567. https://doi.org/10.2307/257068
  10. Bekmezci, M., Orçanlı, K., & Fırat, Z. M. (2020). The mediating role of organizational support perception in the relationship between psychological capital and subjective career success. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 34(3), 853–876. https://doi.org/10.16951/atauniiibd.687592
  11. Budak, G., & Gürbüz, S. (2017). Öznel kariyer başarısı: Bir ölçek uyarlama çalışması. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 4(2), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.280529
  12. Demirel, Z. H. (2019). The effect of bank employees’ career commitment levels on their subjective career success. Journal of Business Research, 11(3), 1332- 1345. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2019.674
  13. Dewi, Y. K., Ingarianti, T. M., & Andriany, D. (2022). The role of leader–member exchange on subjective career success among teachers. Indigenous: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 7(1), 59- 74. https://doi.org/10.23917/indigenous.v7i1.17319
  14. Dyke, L., & Duxbury, L. (2011). The implications of subjective career success. Zeitschrift für Arbeitsmarktforschung, 43(3), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12651-010-0044-4
  15. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage.
  16. Gutermann, D., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Boer, D., Born, M., & Voelpel, S. C. (2017). How leaders affect followers’ work engagement and performance: Integrating leader–member exchange and crossover theory. British Journal of Management, 28(2), 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12214
  17. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
  18. Hiltrop, J. M. (1995). The changing psychological contract: The human resource challenge of the 1990s. European Management Journal, 13(3), 286–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-2373(95)00019-H
  19. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
  20. Hur, H. (2022). Job security matters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between job security and work attitudes. Journal of Management & Organization, 28(5), 925–955. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2019.3
  21. Jarosch, G. (2023). Searching for job security and the consequences of job loss. Econometrica, 91(3), 903–942. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA14008
  22. Jha, S., & Jha, S. (2013). Leader–member exchange: A critique of theory and practice. Journal of Management and Public Policy, 4(2), 42–53.
  23. Karcıoğlu, F. & Kahya, C. (2011). Leader–member exchange and conflict management style relationship. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 15(2), 337–352.
  24. Law, K. S., Wang, H., & Hui, C. (2009). Currencies of exchange and global LMX: How they affect employee task performance and extra-role performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(4), 625–646.
  25. Le, H., Jiang, Z., & Greenhaus, J. (2023). Building cultural intelligence through supervisor support: Social exchange and subjective career success as mediators and organizational support as a moderator. International Migration, 61(3), 270–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.13045
  26. Littler, C. R., Wiesner, R., & Dunford, R. (2003). The dynamics of delayering: Changing management structures in three countries. Journal of Management Studies, 40(2), 225–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00339
  27. Lu, C. Q., Du, D. Y., Xu, X. M., & Zhang, R. F. (2017). Revisiting the relationship between job demands and job performance: The effects of job security and traditionality. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 90(1), 28–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12158
  28. Martin, R., Guillaume, Y., Thomas, G., Lee, A., & Epitropaki, O. (2016). Leader–member exchange (LMX) and performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 67–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12100
  29. Nabi, G. R. (2003). Situational characteristics and subjective career success: The mediating role of career-enhancing strategies. International Journal of Manpower, 24(6), 653–672. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720310496148
  30. Ng, T. W. H., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 367–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00515.x
  31. Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2014). Subjective career success: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.06.001
  32. Önder, Ç., & Wasti, S. A. (2002). İş güvencesi endeksi ve iş güvencesi memnuniyeti ölçeği: Güvenirlik ve geçerlik analizi. Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 23–47.
  33. Özçelik, G., Aybas, M., & Uyargil, C. (2019). The mediating role of perceived employability in the effect of personalized contracts on career success. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 74(2), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.33630/ausbf.536170
  34. Park, S. G., Kang, H. J., Lee, H. R., & Kim, S. J. (2017). The effects of LMX on gender discrimination and subjective career success. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 55(1), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12098
  35. Peng, Z., Gao, B., & Zhao, H. (2019). Coaching leadership and subordinates’ career success: The mediating role of leader–member exchange. Social Behavior and Personality, 47(11), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.8406
  36. Rençber, İ., Baş, D. P., & Kurt, Y. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of subjective career success literature. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(1), 212- 231. https://doi.org/10.33437/ksusbd.1135901
  37. Shao, A. T. (2002). Marketing research: An aid to decision making. South-Western/Thomson Learning.
  38. Shockley, K. M., Ureksoy, H., Rodopman, O. B., Poteat, L. F., & Dullaghan, T. R. (2016). Development of a new scale to measure subjective career success: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(1), 128–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2046
  39. Spurk, D., Hirschi, A., & Dries, N. (2019). Antecedents and outcomes of objective versus subjective career success: Competing perspectives and future directions. Journal of Management, 45(1), 35–69.
  40. Umrani, W. A., Afsar, B., Khan, M., & Ahmed, U. (2019). Addressing the issue of job performance among hospital physicians in Pakistan: The role of job security, organizational support, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 24(3), 1–17.
  41. Walumbwa, F. O., Cropanzano, R., & Goldman, B. M. (2011). How leader–member exchange influences effective work behaviors: Social exchange and internal–external efficacy perspectives. Personnel Psychology, 64(3), 739–770.
  42. Wang, H. J., Le Blanc, P., Demerouti, E., Lu, C. Q., & Jiang, L. (2019). A social identity perspective on the association between leader–member exchange and job insecurity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(6), 800–809.
  43. Ye, J., Cardon, M. S., & Rivera, E. (2012). A mutuality perspective of psychological contracts regarding career development and job security. Journal of Business Research, 65(3), 294–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.03.006