SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2

EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL POLICY LINKAGES IN THE JUST TRANSITION PROCESS: SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE CLIMATE CRISIS

ADİL GEÇİŞ SÜRECİNDE İSTİHDAM VE SOSYAL POLİTİKA: İKLİM KRİZİNİN YANSIMALARI

Eray Karagöz0000-0002-0315-2021
Pages
984–1010
Publication Date
2026-06-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicate that social protection expenditures and general employment levels exert a positive impact on green employment, whereas unemployment has a negative effect.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Climate change has transcended being a mere environmental issue to become a multidimensional crisis with direct implications for economic structures, social relations, and labor markets.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study evaluates the socioeconomic vulnerabilities intensified by the climate crisis and investigates the multi-layered risks faced by disadvantaged groups, including women, migrants, agricultural workers, and the young unemployed.Within the scope of the empirical analysis, a panel cointegration analysis was conducted for the 2011–2023 period, utilizing secondary data from the Eurostat database for country samples categorized by different welfare regime typologies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicate that social protection expenditures and general employment levels exert a positive impact on green employment, whereas unemployment has a negative effect.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2011–2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:İklim Değişikliği · İstihdam · Yeşil İşler

Abstract

Climate change has transcended being a mere environmental issue to become a multidimensional crisis with direct implications for economic structures, social relations, and labor markets. This transformation has emerged as a primary concern on the global policy agenda. This study examines the impacts of said crisis on employment within the framework of the "just transition" approach, shaped by the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In particular, the concept of "green jobs," which has evolved within the scope of the green economy, offers new employment opportunities while simultaneously exacerbating social inequalities and vulnerabilities. The study evaluates the socioeconomic vulnerabilities intensified by the climate crisis and investigates the multi-layered risks faced by disadvantaged groups, including women, migrants, agricultural workers, and the young unemployed.Within the scope of the empirical analysis, a panel cointegration analysis was conducted for the 2011–2023 period, utilizing secondary data from the Eurostat database for country samples categorized by different welfare regime typologies. The findings indicate that social protection expenditures and general employment levels exert a positive impact on green employment, whereas unemployment has a negative effect. These results emphasize the necessity of holistic social policy reforms aimed at balancing sustainable development and employment policies in the face of structural transformations, such as the emergence of new forms of employment.

Özet

İklim değişikliği, çevresel bir sorun olmanın ötesine geçerek ekonomik yapılar, toplumsal ilişkiler ve işgücü piyasaları üzerinde doğrudan etkili çok boyutlu bir krize dönüşmüştür. Bu dönüşüm, günümüzde küresel politika gündeminin öncelikli konularından biri haline gelmiştir. Bu çalışma, söz konusu krizin istihdam üzerindeki etkilerini sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedefleri doğrultusunda şekillenen “adil geçiş” (just transition) yaklaşımı çerçevesinde ele almaktadır. Özellikle yeşil ekonomi kapsamında gelişen “yeşil işler” kavramı, yeni istihdam olanakları sunarken eş zamanlı olarak sosyal eşitsizlikleri ve kırılganlıkları da derinleştirmektedir. Çalışmada, iklim krizinin artırdığı sosyoekonomik kırılganlıklar değerlendirilmiş; kadınlar, göçmenler, tarım işçileri ve genç işsizler gibi dezavantajlı grupların maruz kaldığı çok katmanlı riskler incelenmiştir.Ampirik analiz kapsamında, Eurostat veri tabanından elde edilen ikincil veriler kullanılarak 2011–2023 dönemi için, farklı refah rejimi tipolojisine sahip ülke örnekleri için panel eş bütünleşme analizi yapılmıştır. Bulgular, yeşil istihdam üzerinde sosyal koruma harcamalarının ve genel istihdam seviyesinin pozitif yönde, işsizliğin ise negatif yönde etkisi olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu bulgular, yeni istihdam biçimleri gibi yapısal dönüşümler karşısında, sürdürülebilir kalkınma ile istihdam politikaları arasında denge kurmayı amaçlayan bütüncül sosyal politika reformlarının gerekliliğini vurgulamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karagöz, E. (2026). EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL POLICY LINKAGES IN THE JUST TRANSITION PROCESS: SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE CLIMATE CRISIS. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2, 984–1010. https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.1741564

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (58)

  1. Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
  2. Adler, P. S. (2022). Capitalism, socialism, and the climate crisis. Organization Theory, 3, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877221084713
  3. Bakti, I., Tursunov, D., & Pong, M. (2025). The effect of the climate crisis on social mobility and economic well-being. Journal of Social Science Utilizing Technology, 3(1), 32–41.
  4. Başol, O. (2018). Dünyada ve Türkiye'de yeşil işlerin gelişimine ilişkin bir değerlendirme. Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 55(636), 71–87.
  5. Bodrožić, Z., & Adler, P. (2025). System change, not climate change: Charting alternative responses to the climate crisis through international comparative research. Journal of Management Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13192
  6. Dellve, L., Fonn, S., Köhlin, G., & Skagert, K. (2025). Introduction: Interdisciplinary and contextualised knowledge to accelerate SDG 8. In L. Dellve, S. Fonn, G. Köhlin, & K. Skagert (Eds.), Achieving UN sustainable development goal 8: Economic growth and decent work for all (pp. 1–14). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032624723
  7. Dijkerman, S., Hossain, J., Persson, M., Konika, R. A., & Paul, D. (2025). Applying an intersectional climate justice lens to understand climate crisis impacts on sexual and reproductive health and rights and identify local solutions: Qualitative findings from Khulna, Bangladesh. Women's Health, 21, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057251339283
  8. Durmuş, S. (2017). Eğitim harcamalarının ekonomik büyüme üzerine etkisi: Ampirik bir çalışma. Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 54(629), 9–18.
  9. Engström, G., Gars, J., Jaakkola, N., Lindahl, T., Spiro, D., & van Benthem, A. A. (2020). What policies address both the coronavirus crisis and the climate crisis?. Environmental and Resource Economics, 76, 789–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00451-y
  10. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879100100108
  11. European Commission. (2019). The European Green Deal. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2019%3A640%3AFIN
  12. European Commission. (2023). Transitions Performance Index (TPI): Measuring progress towards fair and sustainable transitions. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation.
  13. Eurostat. (2024a). Environmental goods and services sector (EGSS) – metadata.
  14. Eurostat. (2024b). Social protection expenditure (SPR) – database & metadata.
  15. Eurostat. (2024c). Labour market indicators – employment & unemployment.
  16. Eurostat. (2024d). Unemployment indicators – employment & unemployment.
  17. Erşan Tan, E. (2023). İklim değişikliği ve sosyal politika: Adil bir gelecek için yol haritası. Ulisa: Uluslararası Çalışmalar Dergisi, 7(2), 114–122.
  18. Ferrera, M. (1996). The "Southern" model of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879600600102
  19. Flanagan, E., & Raphael, D. (2023). From personal responsibility to an eco-socialist state: Political economy, popular discourses and the climate crisis. Human Geography, 16(3), 244–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/19427786221138965
  20. Fragouli, E., & Louka, X. M. (2022). Employee engagement, ethical leadership and crisis. The Business and Management Review, 13(2), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.24052/BMR/V13NU02/ART-10
  21. Gabric, A. J. (2023). The climate change crisis: A review of its causes and possible responses. Atmosphere, 14(7), 1081. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14071081
  22. Gal, J. (2010). Is there an extended family of Mediterranean welfare states? Journal of European Social Policy, 20(4), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928710374374
  23. Gedik, Y. (2020). Sosyal, ekonomik ve çevresel boyutlarla sürdürülebilirlik ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma. International Journal of Economics, Politics, Humanities & Social Sciences, 3(3), 196–215.
  24. Gough, I. (2015). Welfare states and environmental states: A comparative analysis. Environmental Politics, 25(1), 24–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1074382
  25. Hickel, J. (2021). Less is more: How degrowth will save the world. Penguin Random House.
  26. Hickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2020). Is green growth possible? New Political Economy, 25(4), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964
  27. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844
  28. International Labour Organization (ILO). (2015). Guidelines for a just transition towards environmentally sustainable economies and societies for all. ILO.
  29. International Labour Organization (ILO). (2018). World employment and social outlook 2018: Greening with jobs. ILO.
  30. International Labour Organization (ILO). (2019). Working on a warmer planet: The impact of heat stress on labour productivity and decent work. ILO.
  31. Kallis, G. (2018). Degrowth. Agenda Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781911116813
  32. Klinenberg, E., Araos, M., & Koslov, L. (2020). Sociology and the climate crisis. Annual Review of Sociology, 46, 649–669. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054750
  33. Krawchenko, T. A., & Gordon, M. (2021). How do we manage a just transition? A comparative review of national and regional just transition initiatives. Sustainability, 13(11), 6070. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116070
  34. Long, J. (2021). Crisis capitalism and climate finance: The framing, monetizing, and orchestration of resilience-amidst-crisis. Politics and Governance, 9(2), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i2.3739
  35. Madzivhandila, T. S., & Niyimbanira, F. (2020). Rural economies and livelihood activities in developing countries: Exploring prospects of the emerging climate change crisis. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, 12(1), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.34109/ijefs.202012115
  36. Maibach, E., Frumkin, H., & Ahdoot, S. (2021). Health professionals and the climate crisis: Trusted voices, essential roles. World Medical & Health Policy, 13(1), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/wmh3.421
  37. Metayer, S., Postic, S., & Kessler, L. (2022). Jointly tackling the climate crisis and social issues: Integrating social considerations into climate budget tagging exercises. Revue de l'OFCE, 176(1), 87–119. https://doi.org/10.3917/e.reof.176.0087
  38. Misra, J., Budig, M. J., & Moller, S. (2006). Reconciliation policies and the effects of motherhood on employment, earnings, and poverty (LIS Working Paper Series No. 429). Luxembourg Income Study.
  39. Murat, G., & Şengül, B. (2024). Küresel iklim değişikliğinin işgücü verimliliği ve istihdam üzerine yansımaları: Bir sosyal politika önlemi olarak yeşil işler. Mülkiye Dergisi, 48(3), 715–746. https://doi.org/10.25064/mulkiye.1420974
  40. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). Employment implications of the green transition. OECD Publishing.
  41. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2022). Employment Outlook. OECD Publishing.
  42. Raftowicz, M. (2021). The climate crisis as a product of globalization. SHS Web of Conferences, 92, 06029. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219206029
  43. Sarıipek, D. B. (2022). İklim değişikliğinin istihdam ve sosyal adalet üzerine yansımaları. A. Çelik (Ed.), İklim krizi ve sosyal politika (ss. 73–99) içinde. Ekin Yayınevi.
  44. Stanef-Puică, M. R., Badea, L., Șerban-Oprescu, G. L., Șerban-Oprescu, A. T., Frâncu, L. G., & Crețu, A. (2022). Green jobs—A literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13), 7998. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137998
  45. Swyngedouw, E. (2011). Depoliticized environments: The end of nature, climate change and the post-political condition. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 69, 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246111000300
  46. Şengül, B., & Murat, G. (2024). Küresel iklim krizinin sosyal boyutu ve sosyal politika önlemleri. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 15(41), 342–358. https://doi.org/10.21076/vizyoner.1310015
  47. Tănasie, A. V., Năstase, L. L., Vochița, L. L., Manda, A. M., Boțoteanu, G. I., & Sitnikov, C. S. (2022). Green economy—Green jobs in the context of sustainable development. Sustainability, 14(8), 4796. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084796
  48. Tannock, S. (2024). Adaptation strategies: Labour education, climate crisis and the UK trade union movement. Global Labour Journal, 15(2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.15173/glj.v15i2.5576
  49. Uncular, S. (2022). Workers' rights in the era of climate crisis: An analysis about Turkey. C. Chacartegui Javega (Ed.), Labour law and ecology (ss. 263–292) içinde. Thomson Reuters Aranzadi.
  50. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2020). Human Development Report 2020: The next frontier – Human development and the Anthropocene. UNDP.
  51. United Nations Development Programme. (UNDP). (2021). Environmental justice: Comparative experiences in legal empowerment.
  52. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2023). What does gender equality have to do with climate change?https://climatepromise.undp.org/news-and-stories/what-does-gender-equality-have-do-climate-change
  53. T.C. İklim Kanunu, Kanun No. 7552, Kabul Tarihi: 2024, Resmî Gazete, Sayı: 32951.
  54. Van Buuren, S. (2018). Flexible imputation of missing data (2nd ed.). Chapman & Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429492259
  55. Viola, I., Pontrandolfi, A., & Manelli, A. (2016). The employment crisis and green orientation in agriculture: New educational models. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 8, 560–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.074
  56. White, I. R., Royston, P., & Wood, A. M. (2011). Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Statistics in Medicine, 30(4), 377–399. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4067
  57. Yardımcıoğlu, D. (2024). İklim değişikliğinin çalışma hayatına etkileriyle mücadele: Adil bir geçiş için toplu iş hukuku düzenlemelerinden yararlanılması. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 26(1), 467–511. https://doi.org/10.33717/deuhfd.1383496
  58. Zhironkin, S., & Cehlár, M. (2022). Green economy and sustainable development: The outlook. Energies, 15(3), 1167. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15031167