Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2016 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1

Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive end-tidal carbon dioxide measurement in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism

Pages
84–90
Publication Date
2016-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The diagnostic value of calculated ADSF and noninvasive bedside ETCO2 for PE was found to be low.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a frequent health problem representing a diagnostic challenge with high mortality and morbidity rates.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study was to investigate the value of end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) and alveolar dead space fraction (ADSF) in the diagnosis of PE.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The diagnostic value of calculated ADSF and noninvasive bedside ETCO2 for PE was found to be low.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Pulmonary embolism · end-tidal carbon dioxide · alveolar dead space fraction

Abstract

Background/aim: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a frequent health problem representing a diagnostic challenge with high mortality and morbidity rates. The aim of this study was to investigate the value of end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) and alveolar dead space fraction (ADSF) in the diagnosis of PE. Materials and methods: ETCO2 levels of patients with suspected PE were measured with a noninvasive mainstream sensor. ADSF of patients was calculated and PaCO2 levels were also obtained. ROC curve analysis was used to determine diagnostic values of ETCO2 and ADSF for PE. Results: The study included 159 patients. The mean values for ETCO2 and ADSF were 16.27 (95% CI, 14.52?18.03) and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.43?0.539) in the PE group and 21.57 (95% CI, 20.52?22.639) and 0.35 (95% CI, 0.32?0.38) in the non-PE group. The area under the curve (AUC) and the cut-off point for ETCO2 were found as 0.751 and ?19, with 83.8% sensitivity and 61.5% specificity. AUC and cut-off point for ADSF were found as 0.738 and >0.443, with 67.57% sensitivity and 73.77% specificity. Conclusion: The diagnostic value of calculated ADSF and noninvasive bedside ETCO2 for PE was found to be low.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜKSEL, M., PEKDEMİR, M., YILMAZ, S., YAKA, E., KARTAL, A. G. (2016). Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive end-tidal carbon dioxide measurement in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1, 84–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/113818

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...