Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2015 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 6

The patterns and clinical relevance of contact allergen sensitization in a pediatric population with atopic dermatitis

Pages
1207–1213
Publication Date
2015-12-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In particular, NS sensitization should be considered for children with severe AD or larger extent of eczema and trunk involvement.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Data about contact allergen sensitization (CAS) in children with atopic dermatitis (AD) are limited.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: Of 134 children with AD, 33.8% (n = 45) had at least 1 positive reaction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In particular, NS sensitization should be considered for children with severe AD or larger extent of eczema and trunk involvement.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Atopic dermatitis · children · contact allergen sensitization

Abstract

Background/aim: Data about contact allergen sensitization (CAS) in children with atopic dermatitis (AD) are limited. The purpose of this study was to identify the frequency and patterns of CAS in children with AD by using a ready-to-use patch test system. Materials and methods: After receiving the history of CAS in the patients, the severity of AD and IgE-mediated allergen sensitization were determined. Results: Of 134 children with AD, 33.8% (n = 45) had at least 1 positive reaction. The most frequent positive reaction was to nickel sulfate (NS) (37.8%, 17/45), followed by methylchloroisothiazolinone (20.0%, 9/45) and thimerosal (15.6%, 7/45). The total Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) score was significantly higher in the NS-sensitized group (P = 0.036). The patients with NS sensitization had moderate-severe AD more frequently than those without any reaction (P = 0.020). When the SCORAD score was evaluated in detail, extent of eczema, score of sleep loss, and pruritus were significantly higher in the patients with NS sensitization than those without any reaction (P = 0.002, P = 0.001, and P = 0.002, respectively). Conclusion: Our study confirms the necessity of CAS in the management of AD. In particular, NS sensitization should be considered for children with severe AD or larger extent of eczema and trunk involvement.

Özet

Background/aim: Data about contact allergen sensitization (CAS) in children with atopic dermatitis (AD) are limited. The purpose of this study was to identify the frequency and patterns of CAS in children with AD by using a ready-to-use patch test system. Materials and methods: After receiving the history of CAS in the patients, the severity of AD and IgE-mediated allergen sensitization were determined. Results: Of 134 children with AD, 33.8% (n = 45) had at least 1 positive reaction. The most frequent positive reaction was to nickel sulfate (NS) (37.8%, 17/45), followed by methylchloroisothiazolinone (20.0%, 9/45) and thimerosal (15.6%, 7/45). The total Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) score was significantly higher in the NS-sensitized group (P = 0.036). The patients with NS sensitization had moderate-severe AD more frequently than those without any reaction (P = 0.020). When the SCORAD score was evaluated in detail, extent of eczema, score of sleep loss, and pruritus were significantly higher in the patients with NS sensitization than those without any reaction (P = 0.002, P = 0.001, and P = 0.002, respectively). Conclusion: Our study confirms the necessity of CAS in the management of AD. In particular, NS sensitization should be considered for children with severe AD or larger extent of eczema and trunk involvement.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKAN, A., TOYRAN, M., VEZİR, E., AZKUR, D., KAYA, A., ERKOÇOĞLU, M., CİVELEK, E., MISIRLIOĞLU, E. D., KOCABAŞ, C. N. (2015). The patterns and clinical relevance of contact allergen sensitization in a pediatric population with atopic dermatitis. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 6, 1207–1213. https://ajindex.com/articles/113721

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. de Waard-van der Spek FB, Andersen KE, Darsow U, Mortz CG, Orton D, Worm M, Muraro A, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Grimalt R, Spiewak R et al. Allergic contact dermatitis in children: which factors are relevant? (review of the literature). Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2013; 24: 321–329.
  2. Giordano-Labadie F, Rance F, Pellegrin F, Bazex J, Dutau G, Schwarze HP. Frequency of contact allergy in children with atopic dermatitis: results of a prospective study of 137 cases. Contact Dermatitis 1999; 40: 192–195.
  3. Czarnobilska E, Obtulowicz K, Dyga W, Wsolek-Wnek K, Spiewak R. Contact hypersensitivity and allergic contact dermatitis among school children and teenagers with eczema. Contact Dermatitis 2009; 60: 264–269. 4. Sharma AD. Allergic contact dermatitis in patients with atopic dermatitis: a clinical study. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2005; 71: 96–98. 5. Belhadjali H, Mohamed M, Youssef M, Mandhouj S, Chakroun M, Zili J. Contact sensitization in atopic dermatitis: results of a prospective study of 89 cases in Tunisia. Contact Dermatitis 2008; 58: 188–189.
  4. Mailhol C, Lauwers-Cances V, Rance F, Paul C, Giordano- Labadie F. Prevalence and risk factors for allergic contact dermatitis to topical treatment in atopic dermatitis: a study in 641 children. Allergy 2009; 64: 801–806.
  5. Herro EM, Matiz C, Sullivan K, Hamann C, Jacob SE. Frequency of contact allergens in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 2011; 4: 39–41. 8. Uehara M, Sawai T. A longitudinal study of contact sensitivity in patients with atopic dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 1989; 125: 366–368.
  6. Clayton TH, Wilkinson SM, Rawcliffe C, Pollock B, Clark SM. Allergic contact dermatitis in children: should pattern of dermatitis determine referral? A retrospective study of 500 children tested between 1995 and 2004 in one U.K. centre. Br J Dermatol 2006; 154: 114–117.
  7. Belloni Fortina A, Romano I, Peserico A, Eichenfield LF. Contact sensitization in very young children. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011; 65: 772–779. Mowad CM. Patch testing: pitfalls and performance. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2006; 6: 340–344.
  8. Jacob SE, Yang A, Herro E, Zhang C. Contact allergens in a pediatric population: association with atopic dermatitis and comparison with other North American referral centers. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 2010; 3: 29–35.
  9. Onder M, Adisen E. Patch test results in a Turkish paediatric population. Contact Dermatitis 2008; 58: 63–65.
  10. Hanifin JM, Rajka G. Diagnostic features of atopic-dermatitis. Acta Dermato-