Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2

Different perspectives of immunizations during pregnancy

Pages
316–323
Publication Date
2020-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Dissemination of maternal immunization must be supported by the team work of healthcare professionals, authorities, universities, professional associations, stake holders, media and patients with current, evidence based knowledge.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Pregnant women and infants are at risk of severe lower respiratory tract infections induced by influenza or pertussis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: This cross-sectional and interventional study was conducted in northern Turkey in 2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Dissemination of maternal immunization must be supported by the team work of healthcare professionals, authorities, universities, professional associations, stake holders, media and patients with current, evidence based knowledge.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Immunization · pregnancy · influenza

Abstract

Background/aim: Pregnant women and infants are at risk of severe lower respiratory tract infections induced by influenza or pertussis. The uptake of both vaccines is poor in spite of proven benefits and safety. We aimed to determine the knowledge and attitude of pregnant women and their primary healthcare providers towards immunization during pregnancy. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional and interventional study was conducted in northern Turkey in 2016. It had 3 different groups including 786 pregnant women, 146 primary healthcare staff, and 97 family practitioners. Different questionnaires were filled by each group. The intervention phase of the study consisted of education of the expectant mothers about immunizations during pregnancy. Results: 786 pregnant women aged between 17-44 years were enrolled to the study. Most of the participants had favourable attitude about vaccination, but only 1.1% had influenza immunization, none had Tdap immunization. None of the participants joining the intervention stage were immunized. The healthcare staff and family physicians had knowledge about vaccinations, but had abstention for administration. Postexposure prophylaxis was also provided by referral centres. Conclusions: Most of the participants either pregnant women or healthcare workers were not vaccinated against pertussis and influenza. Dissemination of maternal immunization must be supported by the team work of healthcare professionals, authorities, universities, professional associations, stake holders, media and patients with current, evidence based knowledge.

🔖

Cite This Article

CELEP, G., ÇAMURDAN, A. D., AKSAKAL, F. N. B., KARA, O. F. (2020). Different perspectives of immunizations during pregnancy. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2, 316–323. https://ajindex.com/articles/113413

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Barss VA. Immunizations during pregnancy-UptoDate; 2016
  2. Karçaaltıncaba D, Aydoğmuş S, İskender C, Avşar AF. Immunization during pregnancy. Journal of Clinical Sciences & Doctor 2005; 11 (5): 225-230
  3. Bruhn K, Tillett J. Administration of vaccinations in pregnancy and postpartum. MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing. 2009; 34 (2): 98-105. doi: 10.1097/01. NMC.0000347303.62585.65 4. Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. Turkey Demographic and Health Survey (main report). Ankara, Turkey: HIPS; 2013
  4. Healy CM, Rench MA, Montesinos DP, Ng N, Swaim LS. Knowledge and attitiudes of pregnant women and their providers towards recommendations for immunization during pregnancy. Vaccine 2015; 33 (41): 5445-5451. doi: 10.1016/j. vaccine.2015.08.028 6. World Health Organization. Maternal and neonatal tetanus (MNT) elimination. Geneva, Switzerland; 2015
  5. Munoz FM, Bond NH, Maccato M, Pinell P, Hammill HA et al. Safety and immunogenicity of tetanus diphtheria and acellular pertussis (Tdap) immunization during pregnancy in mothers and infants: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 311 (17): 1760-1769. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.3633 8. Steinhoff MC, Omer SB. A review of fetal and infant protection associated with antenatal influenza immunization. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2012; 207 (3 Suppl): S21-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.071 9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated recommendations for use of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) in pregnant women—Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices ACIP; 2012. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2012; 62: 131-135
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention and control of seasonal influenza with vaccines. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices— United States, 2013–2014. ACIP; 2013 MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2013; 62:1-43
  7. World Health Organization. Influenza (Seasonal) Fact Sheets. Geneva, Switzerland; 2015
  8. World Health Organization. Pertussis vaccines: WHO position paper - August 2015. Geneva, Switzerland; 2015
  9. Gebe Bilgilendirme Sınıfı Eğitim Kitabı. Ankara, Turkey: T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı, Yayın No: 955; 2014 (in Turkish)
  10. Mese S, Uyanik A, Ozakay A, Ozturk S, Badur S. Influenza surveillance in Western Turkey in the era of quadrivalent vaccines: A 2003-2016 retrospective analysis. Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics 2