Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2

Does applied ultrasound prior to laparoscopy predict the existence of intra-abdominal adhesions?

Pages
304–311
Publication Date
2020-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: We found that preoperative USG was successful in identifying adhesions [sensitivity, 96.39% 95% CI 89.8-99.2 ; specificity, 97.43%] Conclusion: Preoperative ultrasound examination of the abdominal wall may enhance the safety of abdominal entry during laparoscopic operations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of trans-abdominal ultrasonography USG , a noninvasive diagnostic tool, in predicting the presence of intraabdominal adhesions, especially near the trocar entry area, to provide safe surgical access to the abdomen.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: Fifty-nine women with a previous history of open abdominal surgery group A and a group of 91 women with no previous history of surgery group B underwent dynamic ultrasound evaluation of the abdominal fields before laparoscopic operations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: We found that preoperative USG was successful in identifying adhesions [sensitivity, 96.39% 95% CI 89.8-99.2 ; specificity, 97.43%] Conclusion: Preoperative ultrasound examination of the abdominal wall may enhance the safety of abdominal entry during laparoscopic operations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Adhesion · laparoscopy · ultrasonography

Abstract

Background/aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of trans-abdominal ultrasonography USG , a noninvasive diagnostic tool, in predicting the presence of intraabdominal adhesions, especially near the trocar entry area, to provide safe surgical access to the abdomen. Materials and methods: Fifty-nine women with a previous history of open abdominal surgery group A and a group of 91 women with no previous history of surgery group B underwent dynamic ultrasound evaluation of the abdominal fields before laparoscopic operations. The anterior abdominal wall was divided into six quadrants: right upper, right lower, left upper, left lower, suprapubic, and umbilical. Adhesions were evaluated by surgeons during the operation and by radiologists using USG prior to the operation. Visceral organ movements greater than 1 cm was defined as normal visceral slide positive test , with less than 1 cm of movement defined as abnormal visceral slide negative test . Sliding test measures movements of omental echogenicity or a stable echogenic focus that corresponds to intestine peritoneal echogenicity that underlies abdominal wall during exaggerated inspiration and expiration. Adhesions observed during surgery were evaluated on a four-point scale, with 0 indicating no adhesions present, 1 indicating the presence of a thin, filmy avascular adhesion, 2 indicating the presence of a dense and vascular adhesion, and 3 indicating adhesions that connect surrounding organs with the overlying peritoneal surfaces. The McNemar test was used to compare the results of USG and laparoscopy for each measure. Results: We found that preoperative USG was successful in identifying adhesions [sensitivity, 96.39% 95% CI 89.8-99.2 ; specificity, 97.43%] Conclusion: Preoperative ultrasound examination of the abdominal wall may enhance the safety of abdominal entry during laparoscopic operations.

🔖

Cite This Article

YUVACI, H. U., CEVRİOĞLU, A. S., GÜNDÜZ, Y., AKDEMİR, N., KARACAN, A., ERKORKMAZ, Ü., KESKİN, A. (2020). Does applied ultrasound prior to laparoscopy predict the existence of intra-abdominal adhesions?. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2, 304–311. https://ajindex.com/articles/113391

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Zinther NB, Zeuten A, Marinovskij E, Haislund M, FriisAndersen H. Detection of abdominal wall adhesions using visceral slide. Surgical Endoscopy 2010
  2. 24(12): 3161-3166. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1110-2 2. Sigel B, Golub RM, Loiacono LA, Parsons RE, Kodama I et al. Technique of ultrasonic detection and mapping of abdominal wall adhesions. Surgical Endoscopy 1991
  3. 5(4): 161-165. 3. Tu FF, Lamvu GM, Hartmann KE, Steege JF. Preoperative ultrasound to predict infraumbilical adhesions: a study of diagnostic accuracy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005
  4. 192(1): 74-79. 4. Brill AI, Nezhat F, Nezhat CH, Nezhat C. The incidence of adhesions after prior laparotomy: a laparoscopic appraisal. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1995
  5. 85(2): 269-72.5. 5. Okabayashi K, Ashrafian H, Zacharakis E, Hasegawa H, Kitagawa Y et al. Adhesions after abdominal surgery: a systematic review of the incidence, distribution and severity. Surgery Today 2014
  6. 44(3): 405-420. doi: 10.1007/s00595-013- 0591-8.6 6. Levrant SG, Bieber EJ, Barnes RB. Anterior abdominal wall adhesions after laparotomy or laparoscopy. The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists 1997
  7. 4(3): 353-356. 7. Operative Laparoscopy Study Group: Postoperative adhesion development after operative laparoscopy: evaluation at early second-look procedures. Fertility and Sterility 1991
  8. vanGoor H. Consequences and complications of peritoneal adhesions. Colorectal Disease 2007
  9. 9Suppl 2: 25-34. 9. van den Beukel BA, de Ree R, van Leuven S, Bakkum EA, Strik C et al. Surgical treatment of adhesion-related chronic abdominal and pelvic pain after gynaecological and general surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update 2017
  10. 23(3): 276-288. doi: 10.1093/ humupd/dmx004 10. Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN, Parker MC, Wilson MS et al. Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 1999
  11. 353(9163): 1476-1480. 11. Hindocha A, Beere L, Dias S, Watson A, Ahmad G. Adhesion prevention agents for gynaecological surgery: an overview of Cochrane reviews. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015
  12. CD011254. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD011254.pub2 12. Ahmad G, Baker J, Finnerty J, Phillips K, Watson A. Laparoscopic entry techniques. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2019
  13. CD006583. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD006583.pub5 13. van der Voort M, Heijnsdijk EA, Gouma DJ. Bowel injury as a compli