SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Alphanumeric Journal / 2021 / Volume: 9 Issue: 2

An Integrated PIPRECIA and COPRAS Method under Fuzzy Environment: A Case of Truck Tractor Selection

Aşkın Özdağoğlu(DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-5299-0622
Gülin Zeynep Öztaş(PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-6901-6559
Murat Kemal Keleş(ISPARTA UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES, ISPARTA VOCATIONAL SCHOOL)0000-0003-0374-6839
Volkan Genç(DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY, INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES)0000-0003-2184-482X
Pages
—
Publication Date
2021-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, the findings of this study will pave the way for those who conduct academic studies and the authorities of companies involved in road transport in the logistics sector.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Selecting the right truck tractor is critical for logistics companies involved in road freight transportation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The fact that having many conflicting criteria and many alternatives complicates the decision-making process for the decision-makers (DMs).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, the findings of this study will pave the way for those who conduct academic studies and the authorities of companies involved in road transport in the logistics sector.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Truck Tractor Selection · F-PIPRECIA · F-COPRAS

Abstract

Selecting the right truck tractor is critical for logistics companies involved in road freight transportation. The fact that having many conflicting criteria and many alternatives complicates the decision-making process for the decision-makers (DMs). The determination of the criteria that are effective in the selection of truck tractors and then the evaluation of the alternatives are the main objectives of this study. In this context, a hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) model composed of Fuzzy PIPRECIA (F-PIPRECIA) and Fuzzy COPRAS (F-COPRAS) methods is proposed to be used in the selection of truck tractors. In the related literature, no studies that applied F-PIPRECIA and F-COPRAS together to determine the best truck tractor have been published yet. In this regard, this study is thought to contribute to the literature both in terms of the methods used and the application of truck tractor selection. Moreover, the findings of this study will pave the way for those who conduct academic studies and the authorities of companies involved in road transport in the logistics sector.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özdağoğlu, A., Öztaş, G. Z., Keleş, M. K., Genç, V. (2021). An Integrated PIPRECIA and COPRAS Method under Fuzzy Environment: A Case of Truck Tractor Selection. Alphanumeric Journal, Volume: 9 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.17093/alphanumeric.1005970

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (31)

  1. Alkan, Ö., & Albayrak, Ö. K. (2020). Ranking of renewable energy sources for regions in Turkey by fuzzy entropy based fuzzy COPRAS and fuzzy MULTIMOORA. Renewable Energy, 162, 712-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.08.062
  2. Ansari, Z. N., Kant, R., & Shankar, R. (2020). Evaluation and ranking of solutions to mitigate sustainable remanufacturing supply chain risks: a hybrid fuzzy SWARA-fuzzy COPRAS framework approach. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 13(6), 473-494. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2020.1758973
  3. Başaran, B., & Çakir, S. (2021). Evaluation of food safety and halal criteria in supplier selection: an application in food sector with fuzzy COPRAS method. International Food Research Journal, 28(3), 576-585. ISSN: 19854668
  4. Baykaşoğlu, A. (2010). Çok kriterli TIR çekici seçimi. LODER Lojistik Dergisi, 14, 32-36.
  5. Baykasoğlu, A., & Golcuk, I. (2014). Çok kriterli tır çekici seçiminde bulanık integral yaklaşımı. 3. Ulusal Lojistik ve Tedarik Zinciri Kongresi, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, 15-17 Mayıs 2014, Trabzon, 776-786.
  6. Baykaşoğlu, A., Dereli, T., Altun, K., (2011). Kullanılmış tır çekici seşimi: pratik bir karar destek yaklaşımı EVEN-SWAP. Lojistik, 19, 18-22
  7. Baykaşoğlu, A., Kaplanoğlu, V., Durmuşoğlu, Z. D., & Şahin, C. (2013). Integrating fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS methods for truck selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(3), 899-907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.046
  8. Blagojević, A., Kasalica, S., Stević, Ž., Tričković, G., & Pavelkić, V. (2021). Evaluation of safety degree at railway crossings in order to achieve sustainable traffic management: A novel integrated fuzzy MCDM model. Sustainability, 13(2), 832. DOI: 10.3390/su13020832
  9. Blagojević, A., Stević, Ž., Marinković, D., Kasalica, S., & Rajilić, S. (2020). A novel entropy-fuzzy PIPRECIA-DEA model for safety evaluation of railway traffic. Symmetry, 12(9), 1479. doi:10.3390/sym12091479
  10. Chakraborty, S., & Prasad, K. (2016). A QFD-based expert system for industrial truck selection in manufacturing organizations. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management.
  11. Chan, F. T., Jha, A., & Tiwari, M. K. (2016). Bi-objective optimization of three echelon supply chain involving truck selection and loading using NSGA-II with heuristics algorithm. Applied soft computing, 38, 978-987.
  12. Đalić, I., Stević, Ž., Karamasa, C., & Puška, A. (2020). A novel integrated fuzzy PIPRECIA–interval rough SAW model: Green supplier selection. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3(1), 126-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2003114d
  13. de Sousa Junior, W. T., Souza, M. J. F., Cabral, I. E., & Diniz, M. E. (2014). Multi-Criteria Decision Aid methodology applied to highway truck selection at a mining company. Rem: Revista Escola de Minas, 67(3), 285-290.
  14. Dhiman, H. S., & Deb, D. (2020). Fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy COPRAS based multi-criteria decision making for hybrid wind farms. Energy, 202, 117755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117755
  15. Doğan, E. M., Eren, M., & Çelik, K. (2017). Lojistik sektöründe ağır ticari araç seçimi problemine yönelik COPRAS-G yöntemi ile karar verme. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(1), 153-178.
  16. Garg, R., Kumar, R., & Garg, S. (2019). MADM-based parametric selection and ranking of E-learning websites using fuzzy COPRAS. IEEE Transactions on Education, 62(1), 11-18. DOI: 10.1109/TE.2018.2814611
  17. Görçün, Ö. F. (2019). Uluslararası Taşımacılık İşletmelerinin Çekici Araç Seçimlerinin Entegre AHP, Entropi ve TOPSIS Yöntemleri Kullanılarak Analizi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21(3), 899-922. https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.521611
  18. Hasheminezhad, A., Hadadi, F., & Shirmohammadi, H. (2021). Investigation and prioritization of risk factors in the collision of two passenger trains based on fuzzy COPRAS and fuzzy DEMATEL methods. Soft Computing, 25, 4677-4697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05478-3
  19. Khorasani, S. T. (2018). Green supplier evaluation by using the integrated fuzzy AHP model and fuzzy copras. Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability, 2(1), 17-25. DOI: 10.1007/s41660-017-0027-9
  20. Marković, V., Stajić, L., Stević, Ž., Mitrović, G., Novarlić, B., & Radojičić, Z. (2020). A novel integrated subjective-objective mcdm model for alternative ranking in order to achieve business excellence and sustainability. Symmetry, 12(1), 164. DOI: 10.3390/SYM12010164
  21. Nedeljković, M., Puška, A., Doljanica, S., Virijević Jovanović, S., Brzaković, P., Stević, Ž., & Marinkovic, D. (2021). Evaluation of rapeseed varieties using novel integrated fuzzy PIPRECIA–Fuzzy MABAC model. Plos one, 16(2), e0246857. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246857
  22. Puška, A., Nedeljković, M., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., & Pamučar, D. (2021). Application of interval fuzzy logic in selecting a sustainable supplier on the example of agricultural production. Symmetry, 13(5), 774. DOI: 10.3390/sym13050774
  23. Roozbahani, A., Ghased, H., & Shahedany, M. H. (2020). Inter-basin water transfer planning with grey COPRAS and fuzzy COPRAS techniques: A case study in Iranian Central Plateau. Science of the Total Environment, 726, 138499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138499
  24. Shaikh, A., Singh, A., Ghose, D., & Shabbiruddin. (2020). Analysis and selection of optimum material to improvise braking system in automobiles using integrated Fuzzy-COPRAS methodology. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 15(4), 265-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2020.1772895
  25. Stanković, M., Stević, Ž., Das, D. K., Subotić, M., & Pamučar, D. (2020). A new fuzzy MARCOS method for road traffic risk analysis. Mathematics, 8(3), 457. DOI: 10.3390/MATH8030457
  26. Stevic, Ž., Stjepanovic, Ž., Božickovic, Z., Das, D. K., & Stanujkic, D. (2018). Assessment of Conditions for Implementing Information Technology in a Warehouse System: A Novel Fuzzy PIPRECIA Method. Symmetry, 10 (586), 1-28. doi: 10.3390/sym10110586.
  27. Tolga, A. C., & Durak, G. (2019). Evaluating innovation projects in air cargo sector with fuzzy COPRAS. In International Conference on Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems (pp. 702-710). Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-23756-1_84
  28. Tomašević, M., Lapuh, L., Stević, Ž., Stanujkić, D., & Karabašević, D. (2020). Evaluation of criteria for the implementation of high-performance computing (HPC) in Danube Region countries using fuzzy PIPRECIA method. Sustainability, 12(7), 3017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073017
  29. Vesković, S., Milinković, S., Abramović, B., & Ljubaj, I. (2020). Determining criteria significance in selecting reach stackers by applying the fuzzy PIPRECIA method. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 3(1), 72-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta2001072v
  30. Yazdani, Morteza., Alidoosti, Ali., Zavadskas, Edmundas, K. (2011). Risk Analysis of Critical Infrastructures Using Fuzzy Copras, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 24:4, 27-40, DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2011.11517478.
  31. Zarbakhshnia, N., Soleimani, H., & Ghaderi, H. (2018). Sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider evaluation and selection using fuzzy SWARA and developed fuzzy COPRAS in the presence of risk criteria. Applied Soft Computing, 65, 307-319. DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2018.01.023