SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Alphanumeric Journal / 2021 / Volume: 9 Issue: 2

Do Astrological Beliefs Reflects Systematic Bias in Personality Measurement?

Gözde Bozkurt(BEYKENT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8413-1099
Ahmet Çilingirtürk(MARMARA UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-8677-7969
Pages
—
Publication Date
2021-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The significant effects indicates either a direct reasoning or a systematic bias without questioning the belief of respondent.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Personality is a complex concept specified by many factors and separated from character concept in many ways.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Astrology is an ancient study that involves classifications based upon the zodiac and regarded now as a pseudo-science.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The significant effects indicates either a direct reasoning or a systematic bias without questioning the belief of respondent.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Five Factor Personality Model · Multivariate Analysis of Variance · Astropsychology

Abstract

Personality is a complex concept specified by many factors and separated from character concept in many ways. Astrology is an ancient study that involves classifications based upon the zodiac and regarded now as a pseudo-science. In this study, aim was to investigate the effect of the astrological personality on the personality characteristics, which were measured by the Five Factor Personality Model. The research studies finding that the pre-scientific beliefs had an effect on personality measuremets, motivates to accept the astrological groupings as a factor on explaining the personality and trait. The significant effects indicates either a direct reasoning or a systematic bias without questioning the belief of respondent.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bozkurt, G., Çilingirtürk, A. (2021). Do Astrological Beliefs Reflects Systematic Bias in Personality Measurement?. Alphanumeric Journal, Volume: 9 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.17093/alphanumeric.908546

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Olson, C.L. (1974). Comparative Robustness of Six Tests in Multivariate Analysis of Variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 894-908.
  2. Oxford Dictionary, https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/personality, Date of Access: 11 April 2016.
  3. Özgür, U. (2006). Felsefi Farklılaşma Sorulardan Değil Cevaplardan Doğar: Sofistler ve Platon. Journal of Philosophy and Social Sciences, 1, 69-76.
  4. Perry, G. (1992). The new paradigm and postmodern astrology. Astrological Journal, 34, 139-146.
  5. Propat, A.E. and Corr, P.J. (2015). Thinking bigger: The Cronbachian paradigm & personality theory integration. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 56-69.
  6. Rogers, C.R. (2011). Kişi Olmaya Dair (trans. A. Babacan). Istanbul: Okuyanus Yayıncılık, 176.
  7. Saucier, G. & Goldberg, L.R. (1996). Evidence for The Big Five in Analyses of Familiar English Personality Adjectives. European Journal of Personality, 10(1), 61-77.