Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 4

Evaluation of brain FDG PET images in temporal lobe epilepsy for lateralization of epileptogenic focus using data mining methods

Pages
738–748
Publication Date
2020-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The application of data mining can contribute to the reader in the process of visual evaluation of FDG PET images of the brain.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: In temporal lobe epilepsy TLE , brain positron emission tomography PET performed with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose FDG is commonly used for lateralization of the epileptogenic temporal lobe.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: Presurgical interictal brain FDG PET images of 49 adult mesial TLE patients with a minimum of 2 years of postsurgical follow-up and Engel I outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The application of data mining can contribute to the reader in the process of visual evaluation of FDG PET images of the brain.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Temporal lobe epilepsy · F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose · positron emission tomography

Abstract

Background/aim: In temporal lobe epilepsy TLE , brain positron emission tomography PET performed with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose FDG is commonly used for lateralization of the epileptogenic temporal lobe. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the success of quantitative analysis of brain FDG PET images using data mining methods in the lateralization of the epileptogenic temporal lobe. Materials and methods: Presurgical interictal brain FDG PET images of 49 adult mesial TLE patients with a minimum of 2 years of postsurgical follow-up and Engel I outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. Asymmetry indices were calculated from PET images from the mesial temporal lobe and its contiguous structures. The J48 and the logistic model tree LMT data mining algorithms were used to find classification rules for the lateralization of the epileptogenic temporal lobe. The classification results obtained by these rules were compared with the physicians' visual readings and the findings of single-patient statistical parametric mapping SPM analyses in a test set of 18 patients. An additional 5-fold cross-validation was applied to the data to overcome the limitation of a relatively small sample size. Results: In the lateralization of 18 patients in the test set, J48 and LMT methods were successful in 16 89% and 17 94% patients, respectively. The visual consensus readings were correct in all patients and SPM results were correct in 16 patients. The 5-fold crossvalidation method resulted in a mean correct lateralization ratio of 96% 47/49 for the LMT algorithm. This ratio was 88% 43 / 49 for the J48 algorithm. Conclusion: Lateralization of the epileptogenic temporal lobe with data mining methods using regional metabolic asymmetry values obtained from interictal brain FDG PET images in mesial TLE patients is highly accurate. The application of data mining can contribute to the reader in the process of visual evaluation of FDG PET images of the brain.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKDEMİR, Ü. Ö., ÇAPRAZ, İ., ATEŞ, S. G., ŞEKER, K., AYDOS, U., KURT, G., KARABACAK, N., ATAY, L. Ö., BİLİR, E. (2020). Evaluation of brain FDG PET images in temporal lobe epilepsy for lateralization of epileptogenic focus using data mining methods. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 4, 738–748. https://ajindex.com/articles/113201

References (11)

  1. Theodore WH. Presurgical focus localization in epilepsy: PET and SPECT. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 2017
  2. 47 (1): 44-53. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2016.09.008 2. Kumar A, Chugani HT. The role of radionuclide imaging in epilepsy, Part 1: Sporadic temporal and extratemporal lobe epilepsy. Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology 2017
  3. 45 (1): 14-21. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.114397 3. Van Bogaert P, Massager N, Tugendhaft P, Wikler D, Damhaut P et al. Statistical parametric mapping of regional glucose metabolism in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuroimage 2000
  4. 12 (2): 129-138. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0606 4. Willmann O, Wennberg R, May T, Woermann FG, PohlmannEden B. The contribution of 18F-FDG PET in preoperative epilepsy surgery evaluation for patients with temporal lobe epilepsy: A meta-analysis. Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy 2007
  5. 16 (6): 509-520. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2007.04.001 5. Soma T, Momose T, Takahashi M, Koyama K, Kawai K et al. Usefulness of extent analysis for statistical parametric mapping with asymmetry index using inter-ictal FGD-PET in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Annals of Nuclear Medicine 2012
  6. 26 (4): 319-326. doi: 10.1007/s12149-012-0573-8 6. Takahashi M, Soma T, Kawai K, Koyama K, Ohtomo K et al. Voxel-based comparison of preoperative FDG-PET between mesial temporal lobe epilepsy patients with and without postoperative seizure-free outcomes. Annals of Nuclear Medicine 2012
  7. 26 (9): 698-706. doi: 10.1007/s12149-012- 0629-9 7. Yang PF, Pei JS, Zhang HJ, Lin Q, Mei Z et al. Long-term epilepsy surgery outcomes in patients with PET-positive, MRInegative temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior 2014
  8. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.09.054 8. Capraz IY, Kurt G, Akdemir Ö, Hirfanoglu T, Oner Y et al. Surgical outcome in patients with MRI-negative, PET-positive temporal lobe epilepsy. Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy 2015
  9. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2015.03.015 9. Peter J, Houshmand S, Werner TJ, Rubello D, Alavi A. Novel assessment of global metabolism by F-18-FDG-PET for localizing affected lobe in temporal lobe epilepsy. Nuclear Medicine Communications 2016
  10. 37 (8): 882-887. doi: 10.1097/ MNM.0000000000000526 10. Akman CI, Ichise M, Olsavsky A, Tikofsky RS, Van Heerturn RL et al. Epilepsy duration impacts on brain glucose metabolism in temporal lobe epilepsy: Results of voxel-based mapping. Epilepsy & Behavior 2010
  11. 17 (3): 373-380. doi: 10.1016/j. yebeh.2009.12.007 11. Ohta Y, Nariai T, Ishii K, Ishiwata K, M