Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 4

Surgical considerations and audiological results of cochlear implantation in patients with otosclerosis

Pages
855–859
Publication Date
2020-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Our experience on CI in patients with OS revealed that the implantation was a relatively safe procedure and had satisfactory impact on audiological performances.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: To emphasize the role of cochlear implantation CI in the auditory rehabilitation of patients with otosclerosis OS and share our surgical experiences on this rare group of patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis of the patients who have a diagnosis of otosclerosis and implanted between January 1998-May 2019 was performed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Our experience on CI in patients with OS revealed that the implantation was a relatively safe procedure and had satisfactory impact on audiological performances.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Otosclerosis · cochlear implantation · cochlear ossification

Abstract

Background/aim: To emphasize the role of cochlear implantation CI in the auditory rehabilitation of patients with otosclerosis OS and share our surgical experiences on this rare group of patients. Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis of the patients who have a diagnosis of otosclerosis and implanted between January 1998-May 2019 was performed. Preoperative and postoperative clinical, radiological, audiological and surgical findings are presented. Results: Among 2195 patients who have been implanted in our institution, 12 0.54% met the diagnostic criteria of OS according to their preoperative clinical, radiological, audiological and peroperative surgical findings. Electrode insertion was performed via "round window membrane and cochleostomy"in 8 and 4 patients, respectively. No major complications occured. All patients showed satisfactory performances by means of audiometric scores postoperatively. Nonauditory stimulation NAS which manifested as "facial twitching"was a challenging problem in one patient during the surgery and subsided after the operation. Conclusion: Our experience on CI in patients with OS revealed that the implantation was a relatively safe procedure and had satisfactory impact on audiological performances.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇATLI, T., TOKAT, T., BOZKURT, E. B., ADIBELLİ, Z. H., ERGÜN, U., ALTAŞ, E., OLGUN, L. (2020). Surgical considerations and audiological results of cochlear implantation in patients with otosclerosis. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 4, 855–859. https://ajindex.com/articles/113196

References (14)

  1. Faranesh N, Magamseh E, Zaaroura S, Zeidan R, Shupak A. Hearing and otoacoustic emission outcome of stapedotomy: does the prosthesis diameter matter? Journal of International Advanced Otology 2017; 13: 162-170
  2. Yetiser S. Bilateral vestibulopathy due to severe cochlear otosclerosis: a well-known condition without any favorable solution. Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology 2018; 56 (3): 174-176
  3. West N, Brand M, Foghsgaard S, Cayé-Thomasen P. Surgical results and complications of cochlear implantation in faradvanced otosclerosis. Journal of International Advanced Otology 2017; 13: 304-307
  4. Laske RD, Röösli C, Chatzimichalis MV, Sim JH, Huber AM. The influence of prosthesis diameter in stapes surgery: a metaanalysis and systematic review of the literature. Otology and Neurotology 2011; 32: 520-528
  5. Semaan MT, Gehani NC, Tummala N, Coughlan C, Fares SA et al. Cochlear implantation outcomes in patients with far advanced otosclerosis. American Journal of Otolaryngology 2012; 33: 608-614
  6. Bayrak F, Çatlı T, Atsal G, Tokat T, Olgun L. Waardenburg syndrome: an unusual indication of cochlear implantation experienced in 11 Patients. Journal of International Advanced Otology 2017; 13: 230-232
  7. Sainz M, Garcia-Valdecasas J, Ballesteros JM. Complications and pitfalls of cochlear implantation in otosclerosis: a 6-year follow-up cohort study. Otology and Neurotology 2009; 30: 1044-1048
  8. Rotteveel LJ, Snik AF, Cooper H, Mawman DJ, Van Olphen AF et al. Speech perception after cochlear implantation in 53 patients with otosclerosis: multicentre results. Audiology and Neurootology 2010; 15: 128-136
  9. Ruckenstein MJ, Rafter KO, Montes M, Bigelow DC. Management of far advanced otosclerosis in the era of cochlear implantation. Otology and Neurotology 2001; 22: 471-474
  10. Kwok OT, Nadol JBJ. Correlation of otosclerotic foci and degenerative changes in the organ of Corti and spiral ganglion. American Journal of Otolaryngology 1989; 10: 1-12
  11. Swartz JD, Mandell DW, Wolfson RJ, Marlowe FI, Popky GL et al. Fenestral and cochlear otosclerosis: computed tomographic evaluation. American Journal of Otology 1985; 6: 476-481
  12. Fayad J, Moloy P, Linthicum FH Jr. Cochlear otosclerosis: does bone formation affect cochlear implant surgery? American Journal of Otology 1990; 11: 196-200
  13. Purohit B, Hermans R, Op de Beeck K. Imaging in otosclerosis: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging 2014; 5 (2): 245-252
  14. Shea JJ III, Domico EH. Facial nerve stimul