SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 4

The ProFitMap-neck - a questionnaire for measuring symptoms and functional limitations in neck pain: reliability, validity and cross-cultural adaptation of the Turkish version

Hatice ÇETİN
Nezire KÖSE
Sevil BİLGİN
Haluk TEKERLEK
Esra DÜLGER
Ceyhun TÜRKMEN
Jale KARAKAYA
Pages
937–944
Publication Date
2020-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Use of this scale can reveal how, how often, and how much these patients- pain affects their symptoms and functional activities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: The Profile Fitness Mapping neck questionnaire ProFitMap-neck is a reliable and valid assessment instrument for measuring neck-related symptoms and functional limitations in people with neck pain, but a Turkish version of it had not been published.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this study was to investigate the adaptation, validity, and intrarater reliability of the Turkish version of the ProFitMap-neck.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Use of this scale can reveal how, how often, and how much these patients- pain affects their symptoms and functional activities.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Neck · pain · ProFitMap-neck

Abstract

Background/aim: The Profile Fitness Mapping neck questionnaire ProFitMap-neck is a reliable and valid assessment instrument for measuring neck-related symptoms and functional limitations in people with neck pain, but a Turkish version of it had not been published. The purpose of this study was to investigate the adaptation, validity, and intrarater reliability of the Turkish version of the ProFitMap-neck. Materials and methods: Two hundred and thirty-five individuals with chronic neck pain were enrolled in the study. Intrarater reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient ICC and Cronbach's alpha was calculated for internal consistency. For concurrent validity, ProFitMap-neck scores were compared with neck disability index NDI and visual analoguepain scale VAS scores using Pearson's correlation coefficient analysis. The ProFitMap-neck, NDI, VAS, and short form health survey SF-36 were administered to all participants. Results: For intrarater analysis, ICC ranged between 0.72 and 0.84. The total score was 0.83, indicating excellent reliability. The correlation of the ProFitMap-neck with NDI and VAS was 0.71 and 0.68, respectively, indicating good concurrent validity. Conclusion: The ProFitMap-neck is an evaluation instrument with sufficient validity and reliability to be used for evaluating Turkish patients with neck pain. Use of this scale can reveal how, how often, and how much these patients- pain affects their symptoms and functional activities.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇETİN, H., KÖSE, N., BİLGİN, S., TEKERLEK, H., DÜLGER, E., TÜRKMEN, C., KARAKAYA, J. (2020). The ProFitMap-neck - a questionnaire for measuring symptoms and functional limitations in neck pain: reliability, validity and cross-cultural adaptation of the Turkish version. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 4, 937–944. https://ajindex.com/articles/113194

References (1)

  1. Miyamoto GC, Lin C-WC, Cabral CMN, Van Dongen JM, Van Tulder MW. Cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy in the treatment of non-specific neck pain and low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2019; 53 (3): 172-181. doi: 10.1136/ bjsports-2017-098765 2. Genebra CVDS, Maciel NM, Bento TPF, Simeão SFAP, De Vitta A. Prevalence and factors associated with neck pain: a population-based study. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy 2017; 21 (4): 274-280. doi:10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.05.005 3. Nijs J, Leysen L, Vanlauwe J, Logghe T, Ickmans K et al. Treatment of central sensitization in patients with chronic pain: time for change? Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 2019; 20 (16): 1961-1970. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1647166 4. Crofford LJ. Chronic pain: where the body meets the brain. Transactions of the American Clinical Climatological Association 2015; 126: 167-183. 5. Saltychev M, Mattie R, McCormick Z, Laimi K. Psychometric properties of the neck disability index amongst patients with chronic neck pain using item response theory. Disability and Rehabilitation 2018; 40 (18): 2116-2121. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1325945 6. Wiitavaara B, Björklund M, Brulin C, Djupsjöbacka M. How well do questionnaires on symptoms in neck-shoulder disorders capture the experiences of those who suffer from neck-shoulder disorders? A content analysis of questionnaires and interviews. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2009; 9: 10- 30. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-30 7. Peterson DB. International classification of functioning, disability and health: an introduction for rehabilitation psychologists. Rehabilitation Psychology 2005; 50 (2): 105. doi: 10.1037/0090-5550.50.2.105 8. Xu Y, Wang Y, Chen J, He Y, Zeng Q et al. The comorbidity of mental and physical disorders with self-reported chronic back or neck pain: results from the China mental health survey. Journal of Affective Disorders 2020; 260: 334-341. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.08.089 9. Vargus-Adams JN, Majnemer A. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) as a framework for change: revolutionizing rehabilitation. Journal of Child Neurology 2014; 29 (8): 1030-1035. doi: 10.1177/0883073814533595 10. Hoving JL, O’leary EF, Niere KR, Green S, Buchbinder R. Validity of the neck disability index, Northwick Park neck pain questionnaire, and problem elicitation technique for measuring disability associated with whiplash-associated disorders. Pain 2003; 10 (3): 273-281.