SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gephyra / 2026 / Volume: 31

Constantine’s Great Palace in the Patria: Textual Layers and the Early Palatial Topography of Constantinople

Hüseyin Salikoğlu(MUGLA SITKI KOCMAN UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-7054-9259
Journal
Gephyra
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This model preserves the value of later sources while limiting the claims that can be made from them.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Patria 1.59-60 preserves the most extensive list of buildings attributed to Constantine within the Great Palace, but the notice combines evidence from different textual and chronological layers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The comparison shows that Patria 1.59-60 is not an inventory of a Constantinian building programme.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This model preserves the value of later sources while limiting the claims that can be made from them.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Great Palace · Constantine · Constantinople

Abstract

Patria 1.59-60 preserves the most extensive list of buildings attributed to Constantine within the Great Palace, but the notice combines evidence from different textual and chronological layers. Each lemma of the transmitted Greek is therefore tested philologically against the earliest independent attestation of the institution, name, function, or structure it denotes. Where no such attestation survives, the result remains open. The fourth-century palace is largely concealed beneath later construction and the modern city, while its most detailed written accounts belong to the Middle Byzantine period. Modern reconstructions have therefore tended to combine evidence produced across several centuries and to project the named spaces of the tenth-century palace back to Constantine. Eusebius, the Notitia Urbis Constantinopolitanae , Malalas, the Chronicon Paschale , the Patria , and the De Ceremoniis are compared by separating the chronologies of institutions, names, functions, and architectural settings. The comparison shows that Patria 1.59-60 is not an inventory of a Constantinian building programme. The passage gathers guard units, fiscal offices, workshops, gates, churches, halls, and baths whose independent attestations range from the fifth to the ninth century. Its attributions express Constantine’s place in the historical memory of the palace rather than construction history of every named space. Once these retrospective attributions are separated into chronological layers, the original palace can no longer be recovered as a detailed architectural plan. A more secure reconstruction identifies an upper-terrace residence with a controlled entrance, a principal representative hall, and protected access to the imperial box in the Hippodrome. The Constantinian palace is therefore best understood as a system of movement and regulated visibility. This model preserves the value of later sources while limiting the claims that can be made from them.

🔖

Cite This Article

Salikoğlu, H. (2026). Constantine’s Great Palace in the Patria: Textual Layers and the Early Palatial Topography of Constantinople. Gephyra, Volume: 31. https://doi.org/10.37095/gephyra.2028817

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (81)

  1. Baldini, I. – Cosentino, S. 2021. “Rituali di corte. Il Triclinio dei XIX Letti del Grande Palazzo di Costantinopoli.” BZ 114/1: 65-110.
  2. Baldini Lippolis, I. 2001. La domus tardoantica. Forme e rappresentazioni dello spazio domestico nelle città del Mediterraneo.
  3. Bardill, J. 1999. “The Great Palace of the Byzantine Emperors and the Walker Trust Excavations.” JRA 12: 216-230.
  4. Bardill, J. 2006. “Visualizing the Great Palace of the Byzantine Emperors at Constantinople. Archaeology, Text, and Topography.” In: F. A. Bauer (ed.), Visualisierungen von Herrschaft. Frühmittelalterliche Residenzen. Gestalt und Zeremoniell, 5-46.
  5. Bardill, J. 2012. Constantine, Divine Emperor of the Christian Golden Age.
  6. Bardill, J. 2026. Review: A. Calahorra Bartolomé, The Great Palace (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2026), ByzRev 8: 207-223.
  7. Barnes, T. D. 1981. Constantine and Eusebius.
  8. Bassett, S. 2004. The Urban Image of Late Antique Constantinople.
  9. Bauer, F. A. 1996. Stadt, Platz und Denkmal in der Spätantike. Untersuchungen zur Ausstattung des öffentlichen Raums in den spätantiken Städten Rom, Konstantinopel und Ephesos.
  10. Bayülgen, B. – Saner, T. 2024. İstanbul’daki Bizans Kalıntılarının Mimari Anlatımı. Sur İçindeki Kazılar ve Yüzey Araştırmaları 1927-2021.
  11. Beckby, H. (ed.) 1965. Anthologia Graeca. Vol. 3, Books IX-XI.
  12. Bekker, I. (ed.) 1838. Theophanes Continuatus, Ioannes Cameniata, Symeon Magister, Georgius Monachus.
  13. Berger, A. 1987. “Die Altstadt von Byzanz in der vorjustinianischen Zeit.” In: Varia II, Poikila Byzantina 6, 8-30.
  14. Berger, A. 1988. Untersuchungen zu den Patria Konstantinupoleos. Poikila Byzantina 8.
  15. Berger, A. (trans.) 2013a. Accounts of Medieval Constantinople. The Patria.
  16. Berger, A. 2013b. “The Byzantine Court as a Physical Space.” In: A. Ödekan, N. Necipoğlu – E. Akyürek (edd.), The Byzantine Court. Source of Power and Culture, 12-22.
  17. Bolognesi Recchi-Franceschini, E. 1999. “The Great Palace of Constantinople. An Introduction to the Main Areas of Activity, Ground Levels and Phases of Development.” In: W. Jobst, R. Kastler – V. Scheibelreiter (edd.), Neue Forschungen und Restaurierungen im byzantinischen Kaiserpalast von Istanbul, 9-16.
  18. Bolognesi Recchi-Franceschini, E. 2008. “The Scholae of the Master of the Offices as the Palace Praetorium.” AnatAnt 16: 231-257.
  19. Brandes, W. 2002. Finanzverwaltung in Krisenzeiten. Untersuchungen zur byzantinischen Administration im 6.-9. Jahrhundert. Forschungen zur byzantinischen Rechtsgeschichte 25.
  20. Brenk, B. 1996. “Innovationen im Residenzbau der Spätantike.” In: B. Brenk (ed.), Innovationen in der Spätantike. Kolloquium Basel, 6. und 7. Mai 1994, 67-114.
  21. Brett, G. – Macaulay, W. J. – Stevenson, R. B. K. 1947. The Great Palace of the Byzantine Emperors. First Report on the Excavations Carried Out in Istanbul on Behalf of the Walker Trust.
  22. Brubaker, L. 1999. “The Chalke Gate, the Construction of the Past, and the Trier Ivory.” BMGS 23: 258-285.
  23. Bury, J. B. 1911. The Imperial Administrative System in the Ninth Century.
  24. Calahorra Bartolomé, A. 2022. “On the Toponymics of the Great Palace of Constantinople. The Daphne.” BZ 115/1: 1-29.
  25. Calahorra Bartolomé, A. 2026. The Great Palace. Cambridge Elements in the History of Constantinople.
  26. Cameron, A. 1997. “Eusebius’ Vita Constantini and the Construction of Constantine.” In: M. J. Edwards – S. Swain (edd.), Portraits. Biographical Representation in the Greek and Latin Literature of the Roman Empire, 145-174.
  27. Cameron, A. – Hall, S. G. (trans.) 1999. Eusebius. Life of Constantine.
  28. Cameron, A. – Herrin, J. (edd.) 1984. Constantinople in the Early Eighth Century. The Parastaseis Syntomoi Chronikai. Introduction, Translation and Commentary. Columbia Studies in the Classical Tradition 10.
  29. Croke, B. 2005. “Leo I and the Palace Guard.” Byzantion 75: 117-151.
  30. Ćurčić, S. 1993. “Late-Antique Palaces. The Meaning of Urban Context.” ArsOr 23: 67-90.
  31. Dagron, G. 1974. Naissance d’une capitale. Constantinople et ses institutions de 330 à 451.
  32. Dagron, G. 1984. Constantinople imaginaire. Études sur le recueil des Patria.
  33. Dagron, G. 2011. L’Hippodrome de Constantinople. Jeux, peuple et politique.
  34. Dagron, G. – Flusin, B. – Feissel, D. – Stavrou, M. (edd.) 2020. Constantin VII Porphyrogénète. Le Livre des cérémonies. CFHB 52/1-5. 5 vols. in 6 parts.
  35. Dark, K. – Kostenec, J. 2023. Hagia Sophia in Context. An Archaeological Re-examination of the Cathedral of Byzantine Constantinople.
  36. de Boor, C. (ed.) 1883. Theophanis Chronographia. Vol. 1.
  37. Dindorf, L. (ed.) 1832. Chronicon Paschale. Vol. 1.
  38. Duval, N. 2003. “Hommage à Ejnar et Ingrid Dyggve. La théorie du palais du Bas-Empire et les fouilles de Thessalonique.” AntTard 11: 273-300.
  39. Dyggve, E. 1953. “Recherches sur le palais impérial de Thessalonique.” In: Studia Orientalia Ioanni Pedersen dicata, 59-70.
  40. Ebersolt, J. 1910. Le Grand Palais de Constantinople et le Livre des cérémonies.
  41. Featherstone, M. 2006. “The Great Palace as Reflected in the De Cerimoniis.” In: F. A. Bauer (ed.), Visualisierungen von Herrschaft. Frühmittelalterliche Residenzen. Gestalt und Zeremoniell, 47-61.
  42. Featherstone, M. 2015a. “The Everyday Palace in the Tenth Century.” In: M. Featherstone – J.-M. Spieser – G. Tanman – U. Wulf-Rheidt (edd.), The Emperor’s House. Palaces from Augustus to the Age of Absolutism, 149-158.
  43. Featherstone, M. 2015b. “Space and Ceremony in the Great Palace of Constantinople under the Macedonian Emperors.” In: Le corti nell’alto medioevo, 587-608.
  44. Featherstone, M. – Signes Codoñer, J. (edd.) 2015. Chronographiae quae Theophanis Continuati nomine fertur Libri I-IV. CFHB 53.
  45. Frank, R. I. 1969. Scholae Palatinae. The Palace Guards of the Later Roman Empire.
  46. Girgin, Ç. 2008. “La porte monumentale trouvée dans les fouilles près de l’ancienne prison de Sultanahmet.” AnatAnt 16: 259-290.
  47. Guilland, R. 1969. Études de topographie de Constantinople byzantine. Berliner Byzantinistische Arbeiten 37. 2 vols.
  48. Haldon, J. F. 1990. Byzantium in the Seventh Century. The Transformation of a Culture.
  49. Holum, K. G. – Vikan, G. 1979. “The Trier Ivory, Adventus Ceremonial, and the Relics of St. Stephen.” DOP 33: 113-133.
  50. Humphrey, J. H. 1986. Roman Circuses. Arenas for Chariot Racing.
  51. Janin, R. 1964. Constantinople byzantine. Développement urbain et répertoire topographique. 2nd ed.
  52. Jobst, W. – Vetters, H. (edd.) 1992. Mosaikenforschung im Kaiserpalast von Konstantinopel. Vorbericht über das Forschungs- und Restaurierungsprojekt am Palastmosaik in den Jahren 1983-1988. Denkschriften der philosophisch-historischen Klasse 228.
  53. Jobst, W. – Erdal, B. – Gurtner, C. 1997. Istanbul. The Great Palace Mosaic. The Story of its Exploration, Preservation and Exhibition 1983-1997.
  54. Kostenec, J. 2004. “The Heart of the Empire. The Great Palace of the Byzantine Emperors Reconsidered.” In: K. Dark (ed.), Secular Buildings and the Archaeology of Everyday Life in the Byzantine Empire, 4-36.
  55. Labarte, J. 1861. Le Palais impérial de Constantinople et ses abords, Sainte-Sophie, le Forum Augustéon et l’Hippodrome, tels qu’ils existaient au Xe siècle.
  56. Lavin, I. 1962. “The House of the Lord. Aspects of the Role of Palace Triclinia in the Architecture of Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages.” ArtB 44: 1-27.
  57. MacCormack, S. G. 1981. Art and Ceremony in Late Antiquity.
  58. Magdalino, P. 2007. “Medieval Constantinople.” In: P. Magdalino, Studies on the History and Topography of Byzantine Constantinople, 1-111. Variorum Collected Studies Series CS 855.
  59. Magdalino, P. 2024. Roman Constantinople in Byzantine Perspective. The Memorial and Aesthetic Rediscovery of Constantine’s Beautiful City, from Late Antiquity to the Renaissance. Brill Research Perspectives in Byzantine Studies 1.
  60. Mamboury, E. – Wiegand, T. 1934. Die Kaiserpaläste von Konstantinopel zwischen Hippodrom und Marmarameer.
  61. Mango, C. 1959. The Brazen House. A Study of the Vestibule of the Imperial Palace of Constantinople.
  62. Mango, C. 1985. Le développement urbain de Constantinople. IVe-VIIe siècles. Travaux et mémoires du Centre de recherche d’histoire et civilisation de Byzance. Monographies 2.
  63. Matthews, J. 2012. “The Notitia Urbis Constantinopolitanae.” In: L. Grig – G. Kelly (edd.), Two Romes. Rome and Constantinople in Late Antiquity, 81-115.
  64. Parrish, D. C. 2005. “The Art-Historical Context of the Great Palace Mosaic at Constantinople.” In: La mosaïque gréco-romaine IX. Vol. 2, 1103-1117.
  65. Pasinli, A. 2000. “‘Büyük Saray’ Bölgesinde Sultanahmet Eski Cezaevi Bahçesindeki 1997-1998 Yılı Kazı Çalışmalarına Ait Rapor.” 10. Müze Kurtarma Kazıları Semineri, 26-28 Nisan 1999, Kuşadası, 95-114.
  66. Preger, T. (ed.) 1901. Scriptores originum Constantinopolitanarum. Vol. 1.
  67. Preger, T. (ed.) 1907. Scriptores originum Constantinopolitanarum. Vol. 2.
  68. Rance, P. 2008. “Noumera or Mounera. A Parallel Philological Problem in De Cerimoniis and Maurice’s Strategikon.” JÖB 58: 121-129.
  69. Reiske, J. J. (ed.) 1829-1830. Constantini Porphyrogeniti imperatoris De cerimoniis aulae byzantinae libri duo. 2 vols.
  70. Scagliarini Corlàita, D. 2003. “Domus–villae–palatia. Convergenze e divergenze nelle tipologie architettoniche.” In: J. Ortalli – M. Heinzelmann (edd.), Abitare in città. La Cisalpina tra impero e medioevo = Leben in der Stadt. Oberitalien zwischen römischer Kaiserzeit und Mittelalter, 153-172.
  71. Seeck, O. (ed.) 1876. Notitia dignitatum accedunt Notitia urbis Constantinopolitanae et Laterculi provinciarum.
  72. Ševčenko, I. (ed.) 2011. Chronographiae quae Theophanis Continuati nomine fertur Liber V quo Vita Basilii Imperatoris amplectitur. CFHB 42.
  73. Spieser, J.-M. 1984. Thessalonique et ses monuments du IVe au VIe siècle. Contribution à l’étude d’une ville paléochrétienne.
  74. Talbot Rice, D. (ed.) 1958. The Great Palace of the Byzantine Emperors. Second Report.
  75. Thurn, I. (ed.) 2000. Ioannis Malalae Chronographia. CFHB 35.
  76. Trilling, J. 1989. “The Soul of the Empire. Style and Meaning in the Mosaic Pavement of the Byzantine Imperial Palace in Constantinople.” DOP 43: 27-72.
  77. Wahlgren, S. (ed.) 2006. Symeonis Magistri et Logothetae Chronicon. CFHB 44/1.
  78. Westbrook, N. 2019. The Great Palace in Constantinople. An Architectural Interpretation. Architectural Crossroads 2.
  79. Whitby, M. – Whitby, M. (trans.) 1989. Chronicon Paschale 284-628 AD.
  80. Winkelmann, F. (ed.) 1991. Eusebius Werke I.1. Über das Leben des Kaisers Konstantin. 2nd ed. GCS 7.
  81. Zervou Tognazzi, I. 1996. “Propilei e Chalké, ingresso principale del Palazzo di Costantinopoli.” In: C. Barsanti (ed.), Bisanzio e l’Occidente. Arte, archeologia, storia. Studi in onore di Fernanda de’ Maffei, 33-42.