Journals / Balkan Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1

MONTENEGRO’S FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS

KARADAĞ’IN MALİ YERELLEŞME SÜRECİ

Ceyda Şataf(SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7112-6546
Pages
221–261
Publication Date
2026-07-16
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

All this shows that fiscal decentralization and stable local finance systems are not actually among the strategic orientations of the central government of Montenegro.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:According to the 2007 constitution, Montenegro is a unitary state with a republican and single-tiered local government structure.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The only local government units are the municipalities, of which there are 25, and there are no regional or other subordinate levels of government.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:All this shows that fiscal decentralization and stable local finance systems are not actually among the strategic orientations of the central government of Montenegro.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Yerel Yönetimler · Mali Yerelleşme. · Karadağ

Abstract

According to the 2007 constitution, Montenegro is a unitary state with a republican and single-tiered local government structure. The only local government units are the municipalities, of which there are 25, and there are no regional or other subordinate levels of government. The local government finance system in Montenegro has undergone frequent and significant changes. The intergovernmental financial relations and the legal frameworks for local government finance and functions have been changed frequently, leading to unpredictability and instability. These changes have ultimately reduced local government budgets and weakened their ability to provide services, make investments, and carry out other municipal functions. Moreover, local governments have been unable to influence policy-making and legislative processes. All this shows that fiscal decentralization and stable local finance systems are not actually among the strategic orientations of the central government of Montenegro.

Özet

Karadağ, 2007 anayasasına göre cumhuriyetçi ve tek kademeli bir yerel yönetim yapısına sahip üniter bir devlettir. Tek yerel yönetim birimi belediyeler olup 25 belediyeden oluşmaktadır. Bölge ya da diğer ara yönetim düzeyleri bulunmamaktadır. Karadağ’daki yerel yönetim finans sistemleri sık sık köklü değişikliklere uğramıştır. Yönetimler arası mali ilişkilerle yerel yönetim finansmanı ve işlevlerine ilişkin yasal çerçeveler sık sık değiştirilerek öngörülemezliğe ve istikrarsızlığa yol açmıştır. Yasal çerçevedeki değişiklikler nihayetinde yerel yönetim bütçelerinin azalmasına ve hizmet, yatırım ve diğer belediye işlevlerini yerine getirme kabiliyetlerinin azalmasına yol açmıştır. Buna ek olarak, yerel yönetimler politika oluşturma ve yasama süreçlerini etkileyememiştir. Bunların tümü göz önüne alındığında Karadağ merkezi hükümetinin stratejik yönelimleri arasında mali yerelleşme ve istikrarlı yerel finans sistemlerinin fiilen yer almadığı söylenebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Şataf, C. (2026). MONTENEGRO’S FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS. Balkan Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1, 221–261. https://doi.org/10.30903/baed.1993002

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (50)

  1. Mevzuat:
  2. 2006, The Law on Local Communal Fees, “Official Gazette of the Republic of Montenegro”, https://montenegrotaxation.com/index.php/local-level-tax-forms/local-communal-fees, (13.02.2025).
  3. 2008, The Law on Spatial Planning and Structure Development, “Official Gazette of Montenegrohttps://montenegrotaxation.com/index.php/local-level-tax-forms/local-communal-fees, (13.02.2025).
  4. 2010, The Law on Local Government Finance, “Official Gazette of Montenegro,”, https://montenegrotaxation.com/index.php/local-level-tax-forms/local-communal-fees, (13.02.2025).
  5. 03, 28/04, 75/05, 13/06 The Law on Local Self-Government, “Official Gazette of the Republic of Montenegro,”, https://montenegrotaxation.com/index.php/local-level-tax-forms/local-communal-fees, (13.02.2025).
  6. 09, 3/10 “Official Gazette of Montenegro,”, https://montenegrotaxation.com/index.php/local-level-tax-forms/local-communal-fees, (13.02.2025).
  7. 03, 44/03, The Law on Local Government Finance, “Official Gazette of the Republic of Montenegro”, https://montenegrotaxation.com/index.php/local-level-tax-forms/local-communal-fees, (13.02.2025).
  8. Kitaplar:
  9. BARTLETT, Will ve ŠİŠEVİC, “Božidar, Regional Policy and Decentralization in Montenegro”, Decentralization and local development in South East Europe, (ed.) William Bartlett, Sanja Malekovic, Vassilis Monastiriotis, Palgrave Macmillan, London 2013, ss. 83-100.
  10. JOCOVİĆ, Mijat, “Analysis of the Legal Framework for Fiscal Decentralisation in Montenegro”, Fiscal Decentralisation and Local Government Financing in Serbia and Montenegro, (eds.) Sanja Kmezić, Katarina Đulić, Mijat, Jocović, ve Jadranka Kaluđerović, Institute for Local Self-Government and Public Procurement, Maribor 2016, ss. 261-295.
  11. KALUDJEROVİC, Jadranka, “Audit Function Survey Montenegro”, Making Government Accountable Local Government Audit In Postcommunist Europe, (ed.) Kenneth Davey, Open Society Institute, 2015, ss. 150-181.
  12. ________, “Analysis of the Fiscal Effects of Legal Framework Amendments on the Montenegrin Municipal Budget”, Fiscal Decentralisation and Local Government Financing in Serbia and Montenegro, (eds.) Sanja Kmezić, Katarina Đulić, Mijat, Jocović, ve Jadranka Kaluđerović, Institute for Local Self-Government and Public Procurement, Maribor 2016, ss. 311-350.
  13. ________, “Montenegro: Volatile Municipal Revenues”, Fiscal Decentralisation, Local Government and Policy Reversals in Southeastern Europe, (ed.),William Bartlett, Sanja Kmezić, Katarina Đulić ve Jocović Mijat, Palgrave Macmillan, 2018, ss. 123-161.
  14. KARIC, Mirsad ve AYDIN, Sejma, “Local Government Financing in Montenegro”, Studies in Urbanization and Local Governance in Balkan Countries -Essays on Municipal Services, Urbanization, Environment, Transportation, Energy, Finance, Sports and Immigration-, (ed.) Hüseyin Korkut, First edition, Sarajevo, September 2021, ss. 157-174.
  15. KMEZIĆ, Sanja, “Introduction”, Fiscal Decentralisation and Local Government Financing in Serbia and Montenegro, (eds.) Sanja Kmezić, Katarina Đulić, Mijat, Jocović, ve Jadranka Kaluđerović, Institute for Local Self-Government and Public Procurement, Maribor 2016, ss. 1-8.
  16. Makaleler:
  17. KRAAN Dirk-Jan, KOSTYLEVA Valentina, DUZLER Barbara ve OLOFSSON Ragnar, “Budgeting in Montenegro”, OECD Journal on Budgeting, Cilt 2012, Sayı 1, 2012, ss. 1-44.
  18. OTT, Katarina ve BAJO, Anto, “Lokalne financije i lokalni proračuni”, Financijska teorija i praksa, Cilt 23, Sayı 3, 2001, ss. 311-449. YÜKSEL, Harun, “Türkiye’de Mali Yerelleşmenin Boyutları ve Ölçümü Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme”, Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, Cilt 20, Sayı 2, Aralık 2013, ss. 191-208.
  19. Yayınlanmış Raporlar:
  20. AGRAWAL, Arun ve RİBOT, Jesse C., “Analyzing Decentralization: A Framework with South Asian and East African Environmental Cases”, Working Papers, Environmental Governance in Africa, World Resources Institute, ss. 1-43, http://pdf.wri.org/eaa_wp1.pdf, (23.03.2025).
  21. BAŞ, Cemal ve SCHUMACHER, Sören, “Monitoring of the Application of the European Charter of Local Self-Government in Montenegro”, Türkiye (L, EPP/CCE), 27 March 2024, ss. 1-38, https://rm.coe.int/monitoring-of-the-application-of-the-european-charter-of-local-self-go/1680aecea6, (15.02.2025).
  22. BİRD, Richard, “Subnational Taxation in Developing Countries: A Review of the Literature”, World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper, October 2010, ss. 1-60, https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/ server/api/core/bitstreams/bf0f6c0c-7d00-5fbe-860d-ce70dc299dbd/content, (09.03.2025).
  23. COLETTI, Raffaella ve STOCCHIERO, Andrea, “Decentralisation and Local Development in Western Balkans: Convergences and Divergences Among Different Contexts”, Second Research Report, June 2011, ss. 1-134, https://populari.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/seenet_report.pdf, (31.03.2025).
  24. Discussions on Changed Context and Trends in Fıscal Decentralization in South-East Europe Report, NALAS, 2013, https://www.nalas.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/FiscalDecentralization-Indicators-2006-2012.pdf, (01.03.2025).
  25. DJUKIC, Zana, “For the Union of Municipalities of Montenegro”, NALAS, “Discussions on Changed Context and Trends in Fıscal Decentralization in South-East Europe Report”, Skopje March 2013, ss. 39-49, https://nalas.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Discussions-in-Fiscal-decentralisation-in-SEE.pdf, (12.03.2025). DUKIC, Mirko, “Legal Protection Of Local Self-Government in Montenegro”, Local and Regional Governance 2010A Faculty of Public Adminsitry University of Ljubljana, March 2024, ss. 1-7, https://www.academia.edu/116226854/Legal_Protection_Of_Local_Self_government_in_Montenegro, (14.02.2025).
  26. DZANKIU, Jelena, “Political Transformation Process In Montenegro”, Integration Perspectives and Synergic Effects of European Transformation in the Countries Targeted by EU Enlargement and Neighbourhood Policies Technical Report, Center for EU Enlargement Studies, June 2008, s. 15-35, https://cens-integrationperspectivesmontenegro.pdf, (29.03.2025).
  27. DŽANKIU, Jelena, KALUŸEROVIU, Jadranka, VOJİNOVIU, Ivana, KRSMANOVIU, Ana, DAKOVIU, Milica, RADOJEVIU, Gordana, JOVETIU, Ivan, GOLUBOVIU, Vojin, MU LEŠKOVIU, Mirza ve MİRKOVIU, Milika,, “Integration Perspectives and Synergic Effects of European Transformation in the Countries Targeted by EU Enlargement and Neighbourhood Policies”, Technical Report, Central European University, Institute for Strategic Studies and Prognosis Bosiljka Vukoviü, June 2008, ss. 45-60, https://cens-integrationperspectivesmontenegro.pdf, (23.03.2025).
  28. EKİNCİ, Mehmet Uğur, Karadağ Siyasetini Anlama Kılavuzu, Seta Yayınları, Ankara 2014, https://file.setav.org/Files/Pdf/20140912171432karadag-siyasetini-anlama-kilavuzu-pdf.pdf, (18.02.2025).
  29. Fiscal Decentralization Report, Social Welfare At The Intersection of Municipal Finance Governance In South- East Europe Report, NALAS, June 2021, https://www.nalas.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/8th-NALAS-Fiscal-Decentralisation-Indicators-Report.pdf, (12.04.2025).
  30. Fiscal Decentralization Indicators for South-East Europe:2006-2014 Report, NALAS, March 2016, s. 98. https://www.nalas.eu/wp-content/upload /2022/12/2016-Fiscal-Decentralisation-Report.pdf, (12.04.2025).
  31. Fiscal Decentralization Indicators for South-East Europe: 2006-2015 Report, NALAS, 2017, https://www.nalas.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Fiscal-Decentralisation-Indicators-Report-for-South-East-Europe-2006-2015.pdf, (29.03.2025).
  32. Fiscal Decentralization Indicators for South-East Europe Report, NALAS, February 2024, https://core.nalas-observatory.eu/files /publications/pdf/1716365628.pdf, (12.02.2025).
  33. Karadağ Ülke Profili, T.C. Ticaret Bakanlığı Uluslararası Anlaşmalar ve Avrupa Birliği Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları, 2024, https://ticaret.gov.tr/data, (01.03.2025).
  34. MAROVİĆ, Jovana, “Decentralisation, Power of Local Self-government and Multi-level Dynamics in Budva Municipality” (Institute Alternative, Podgorica), Assignment done under the CeSPI guidance, Second Report June 2011, ss. 109-120, https://www.cespi.it/sites/default/files/ /documenti/report-2-completo.pdf, (24.02.2025).
  35. Montenegro Public Finance Synthesis Report, Restoring Sustainability and Strengthening Efficiency of Public Finance, May 2019, https://documents1.worldbank.org/ (01.03.2015).
  36. Montenegro: Options to Restore Fiscal Sustainability and Improve Spending Efficiency at Subnational Level Report, World Bank Group, November 2015, https://documents1.worldbank.org/, (25.02.2025).
  37. Montenegro Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Assessment Public Financial Management Performance Report, Worldbank, July 2009, https://documents1.worldbank.org//curated/en/791681468053962177/pdf/696850ESW0P10100Report0FINAL0090709.pdf, (08.04.2025).
  38. SIGMA Monitoring Reports Public administration in Montenegro-Assessment against the Principles of Public Administration-, OECD Public Governance Committee, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1787/9c2f22f8-en, (12.03.2025).
  39. ŠĆEPANOVIĆ, Vera, “EU Regional Development Policy in the Accession Countries: Opportunistic Decentralization, Fiscal Risks, and the Premature Death of Multi-Level Governance”, EUI Working Paper, Max Weber Programme, August 2016, ss.1 -14, https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/ /1814/41304/MWP_2016_08.pdf? sequence=1&isAllowed=y, (02.02.2025).
  40. Tax Policy Enforcement Analysis Report, Government of Montenegro. Ministry of Finance, 2013, https://www.gov.me/en/mif, (25.03.2025). The Union of Municipality of Montenegro of Our Union Bulletin, How to Overcome Financial Problems of Municipalities, Montenegro 2015, http://www.uom.co.me/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Bilten-18.pdf, (15.02.2025).
  41. WORLD BANK GROUP, “Montenegro: Options to Restore Fiscal Sustainability and Improve Spending Efficiency at Subnational Level Report”, November 2015, https://documents1.worldbank.org/, (08.04.2025).
  42. İnternet Kaynakları:
  43. ASSEMBLY OF EUROPEAN REGIONS, “Regionalisation in Montenegro: not Regions, but municipalities #RoR2017”,19 February 2018, https://aer.eu/regionalisation-montenegrono-regions-municipalitiesror2017/, (12.04.2025).
  44. COUNCIL OF EUROPEAN MUNICIPALITIES AND REGIONS, “Montenegro Country Profiles”, 2025, https://terri.cemr.eu/en/ /country-profiles/montenegro.html, (03.03.2025).
  45. EUROPEAN COMITTEES OF THE REGIONS, “Montenegro-Fiscal Powers”, https://portal.cor.europa.eu/divisionpowers/Pages/Montenegro-Fiscal-Powers.aspx., (25.03.2025).
  46. Karadağ’ın Kısa Tarihçesi”, Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Podgoritsa Büyükelçiliği, (22.08.2011), https://podgoricabe.mfa.gov.tr//Mission/ShowInfoNote/129599, (12.02.2025). Montenegro, “Equal Future”, 2024, https://www.equalfuture-eurasia.org/, (01.03.2015).
  47. NALAS OBSERVATORY, https://www.nalas-observatory.eu/data/lgfi/national-data-visualization?country=10, (27.03.2025).
  48. OECD/UCLG WORLD OBSERVATORY ON SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE AND INVESTMENT, “Montenegro Country Profiles”, 2022, https://www.sng-wofi.org/country-profiles/montenegro.html, (07.04.2025).
  49. Regional Development Strategy of Montenegro 2014-2020, Government of Montenegro Ministry of Economy, 2014, https// www.mek.gov.me/./FileDownload.asp, (19.02.2025).
  50. Regional Development Strategy of Montenegro 2014-2020, Government of Montenegro Ministry of Economy, 2014, https// www.mek.gov.me/./FileDownload.asp, (19.02.2025).