SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2024 / Cilt: 27 Sayı: 52

The research on the role of happiness at work in the relationship of emotional labor with organizational citizenship

Duygusal emeğin örgütsel vatandaşlık ile ilişkisinde işte mutluluğun rolü üzerine bir araştırma

Serdar Uslu(AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7939-1398
Recep Caner Erselcan(MANİSA CELÂL BAYAR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6561-8563
Mustafa Tepeci(Manisa Celal Bayar Universitesi)0000-0001-9311-1532
Pages
425–449
Publication Date
2024-12-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analysis conducted on a sample of 386 responses, the findings reveal that happiness at work positively influences employees’ OCB and serves a full mediator between emotional labor and OCB.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The research aims to examine the explanatory effects of "emotional labor" on "organizational citizenship behavior"(OCB) through the mediating role of "happiness at work" and to explore the interrelations among these variables.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Based on Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analysis conducted on a sample of 386 responses, the findings reveal that happiness at work positively influences employees’ OCB and serves a full mediator between emotional labor and OCB.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study reinforces the notion that happy employees are more likely to contribute to organizational goals and highlights the role of happiness at work in enhancing OCB in the context of emotional labor.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Duygusal emek · İşte mutluluk · Örgütsel Vatandaşlık davranışı

Abstract

The research aims to examine the explanatory effects of "emotional labor" on "organizational citizenship behavior"(OCB) through the mediating role of "happiness at work" and to explore the interrelations among these variables. Based on Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analysis conducted on a sample of 386 responses, the findings reveal that happiness at work positively influences employees’ OCB and serves a full mediator between emotional labor and OCB. The study reinforces the notion that happy employees are more likely to contribute to organizational goals and highlights the role of happiness at work in enhancing OCB in the context of emotional labor.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, duygusal emeğin işte mutluluk aracılığı ile örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı üzerindeki etkilerinin belirlenmesidir. Kolayda örnekleme yöntemi ile 386 katılımcıdan elde edilen veriye uygulanan Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli (YEM) analizinde, iş yerinde mutluluğun çalışanların örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışını olumlu yönde etkilediği, duygusal emek ile örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasında tam aracılık etkisi olduğu belirlenmiştir. Çalışma, “mutlu çalışanların örgütün gereklerine uygun davranışlarla işyerinde daha çok katkı verebileceği” varsayımına güncel geçerlilik sağlamakta, duygusal emeklerinin varlığı söz konusu olduğunda mutlu çalışanların örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışlarını artırdığı yönünde tespitte bulunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Uslu, S., Erselcan, R. C., Tepeci, M., *, M. T. (2024). The research on the role of happiness at work in the relationship of emotional labor with organizational citizenship. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 52, 425–449. https://doi.org/10.31795/baunsobed.1485385

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (129)

  1. Adelmann, P. K. (1995). Emotional labor as A potential source of job stress. S. L. Sauter ve L. R. Murphy (Ed.). Organizational risk factors for job stress içinde (ss.371-381). American Psychological Association.
  2. Arslan, Y., ve Polat, S. (2017). Adaptation of well-being work scale to Turkish. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 23(4), 603-622.
  3. Arslantaş, C.C., ve Pekdemir, I. (2007). Dönüşümcü liderlik, örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ve örgütsel adalet arasındaki ilişkileri belirlemeye yönelik görgül bir araştırma. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1, 261-286.
  4. Ashforth, B. E. ve Humphrey, R.H. (1993). Emotional labor in service roles: The influence of identity. Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 88-115.
  5. Ashkanasy, N. M. (2003). Emotions in organizations: A multi-level perspective. Multi-level issues in organizational behavior and strategy içinde (ss. 9-54). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  6. Aston-James, C. E. ve Ashkanasy, N. M. (2008). Affective events theory: A strategic perspective. W. J.Zerbe, C.E.J. Hartel, N. M. Ashkanasy (Ed.). Research on Emotion in Organizations, 4, Emotions, Ethics, and Decisions-Making içinde (ss.1-34). Emerald Group Publishing.
  7. Ayana, Ç. (2016). Duygusal zekâ ve duygusal emeğin örgütsel sinizm algısına Etkisi: Beş yıldızlı otel işletmelerinde bir uygulama.Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Afyonkarahisar.
  8. Bailey. J. J. (1996). Service agents, emotional labor, and costs to overall customer service. Poster presented at the 2th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.
  9. Baron, R. M. ve Kenny, D.A. (1986). The Moderator-mediator variable distinction in social pyschological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6), 1173-1182.
  10. Basch, J. ve Fisher, C. D. (1998). Affective events events-emotions matrix: A classification of work events and associated emotions. Discussion Paper No 65. Queensland:Bond University.
  11. Basım, H. N. ve Şeşen, H. (2006). Örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ölçeği uyarlama ve karşılaştırma çalışması. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 61(4), 83-101.
  12. Basım, H. N. ve Beğenirbaş, M. (2012). Çalışma yaşamında duygusal emek: Bir ölçek uyarlama çalışması. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 19 (1), 77-90.
  13. Becker, W. J., Cropanzano, R., Van Wagoner, P., ve Keplinger, K. (2018). Emotional labor within teams: Outcomes of individual and peer emotional labor on perceived team support, extra-role behaviors, and turnover intentions. Group & Organization Management, 43 (1), 38-71.
  14. Bateman, T. S. ve Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee “Citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 587-595.
  15. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. John Wiley.
  16. Blustein, D. L., Lysova, E. I., ve Duffy, R. D. (2023). Understanding decent work and meaningful work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. 10, 289-314.
  17. Brotheridge, C. M. ve Grandey, A. A. (2002). Emotional labor and burnout: Comparing two perspectives of people work. Journal of Vocational Behaviour. 60, 17-39.
  18. Bono, J. E. ve Vey, M. A. 2005. Toward understanding emotional management at work: A quantitative review of emotional labor research. C. E. J. Hartel, W. J. Zerbe, ve N. M. Ashkanasy (Ed.), Emotions in organizational behavior içinde. (ss. 213-233). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  19. Cheung, F. Y. ve Tang, C. S. (2009). Quality of work life as a Mediator between emotional labor and Work-family interference. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24, 245-255.
  20. Cheung, F. Y. ve Lun, V. M. C. (2015). Relation between emotional labor and organizational citizenship behavior: An investigation among Chinese teaching professionals. The Journal of General Psychology, 142 (4), 253-272.
  21. Cho, Y. ve Lee, Y. (2023). Effect of emotional labor on job engagement and work Happiness: mediating role of psychological capital and moderating role of trust from leader. The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research, 23(2), 111-125.
  22. Cropanzano, R. ve Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.
  23. Çetin, M. (2003). Öğretmenlerin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 17, 39-54.
  24. Çolakoğlu, Ü., Yurcu, G., Atay, H., ve Yanık, A. (2015). Dimensional comparatives of organizational citizenship and emotional labor: A study on accommodation companies. Journal of Human Sciences, 12 (1), 933-950.
  25. Dahling, J. J. ve Perez, L. A. (2010). Older worker, different actor? Linking age and emotional labor strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(5), 574-578.
  26. Dalal, R. S., Lam, H., Weiss, H. M., Welch, E. R., ve Hulin, C. L. (2009). A within person approach to work behavior and performance: Concurrent and lagged citizenship counter productivity associations and dynamic relationships with affect and overall, job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 1051-1066.
  27. Deci, E. L. ve Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology, 49(1), 14-23.
  28. Diefendorff, J. M. ve Gosserand, R. H. (2003). Understanding the emotional labor process: A control theory perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(8), 945-959.
  29. Diefendorff, J., Croyle, M., ve Gosserand, R. (2005). The dimensioality and antecedents of emotional labor strategies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 339-57.
  30. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575.
  31. Diener, E.(2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55, 34-43.
  32. DiPaola, M. F., Tarter, C. J., ve Hoy, W. K. (2007). Measuring organizational citizenship of schools: The OCB scale. (Ed.) W. K. Hoy ve M. F. DiPaola. Essential ideas for the reform of American schools içinde (ss. 227-250). Information Age Publishing.
  33. Domagalski, T. A. (1999). Emotion in Organizations: Main Currents. Human Relations. 52, 833-852.
  34. Ehrhart, M. G. (2004). Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit. Level organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 57, 61-94.
  35. Elvi, E. ve Tunjungsari, H. K. (2022). Gender, diversity management perceptions, workplace happiness, and organizational citizenship behavior. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 216, 350-355.
  36. Ertürk, E. ve Bedük, A. (2015). Sosyal mübadele teorisi bağlamında güç mesafesi ve örgütsel adalet algılamalarının örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı üzerindeki etkisi. İşletme Bilimi Dergisi, 3(1), 1-19.
  37. Farh, J. L., Podsakoff, P. M., ve Organ, D. W. (1990). Accounting for organizational citizenship behavior: Leader fairness and task scope versus satisfaction, Journal of Management, 16, 705-721.
  38. Fineman, S. (2006). On being positive: Concerns and counterpoint, Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 270-291.
  39. Fisher, C. D. (2010a). Happiness at Work. Bond University Publications.
  40. Fisher, C. D. (2010b). Happiness at Work, International Journal of Management Reviews, 12 (4), 384-412.
  41. Fornell, C., ve Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  42. Gadhavi, D., Parikh, A., Patel, V., Joshi, N., Thaker, D. (2021). Employee wellbeing and employee's happiness: A study of an Indian University. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20, 1-11.
  43. Graham, J. W. (1989). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, operationalization and Validation. Unpublished working paper, Loyola University of Chicago.
  44. Graham, J. W. (1991). An essay on organizational citizenship behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4, 249-270.
  45. Grandey, A. (2000). Emotion regulation in the workplace: A new way to conceptualize emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3(5), 95-110.
  46. Grandey, A.A ve Gabriel, A. S. (2015). Emotional labor at a crossroads: Where do we go from here? Annual Review Organizatonal. Psychology Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 323-349.
  47. Grandey, A.A., Rupp, D., ve Brice, W.N. (2015). Emotional labor threatens decent work: A proposal to eradicate emotional display rules. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(6), 770-785.
  48. Goel, P. (2022). A Study of happiness at workplace and organizational citizenship behavior of edtech employees. Dissertation of Doctorate. Manav Rachna University.
  49. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: Apreliminary statement. American Sociological Rewiew, 25, 161-178
  50. Halbesleben, J. R. ve Bowler, W. M. (2007). Emotional exhaustion and job performance: The mediating role of motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 93-106.
  51. Hançer, M. (2003). Ölçeklerin yazım dilinden başka bir dile çevirileri ve kullanılan değişik yaklaşımlar. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(10), 47-59.
  52. Hao, Q. ve Yu, S.C. (2022). Effects of emotional labor on organizational citizenship behaviors of secondary vocational teachers: A Cross-level moderation intermediary model. International Journal of Multidisciplinary in Management and Tourism, 6(2), 139-150.
  53. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., ve Synderman, B. (1959). The Motivation to work. Wiley.
  54. Hobfoll, E. S. (1989). Conversation of resurces: A New attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(30), 513-524.
  55. Hochschild, A.R. (1983). The managed heart: The commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.
  56. Homans, G.C.(1961). Social behavior and elemantary forms. Brace and World.
  57. Humphrey, R. H. (2012). How do leaders use emotional labor? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(5), 740-744.
  58. Humphrey, R. H., Ashforth, B. E., ve Diefendorff, J. M. (2015). The bright side of emotional labor. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(6), 749-769.
  59. ILO (2019). Time to Act for SDG 8, Integrating Decent Work, Sustained Growth and Environmental Integrity, International Labour Office, Geneva.
  60. Johnson, H. A. M., ve Spector, P. E. (2007). Service with a smile: Do emotional intelligence, gender, and autonomy moderate the emotional labor process? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(4), 319.
  61. Kaewchua, P. (2017). Organizational citizenship behavior in Thailand. Academic Journal of Pathum Thani University, 9(1), 210-217.
  62. Kalkan, A. (2013). Algılanan örgüt kültürünün örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı üzerindeki etkisi: Kuramsal ve görgül bir araştırma. Doktora Tezi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Konya.
  63. Karabanow, J. (2000), The organizational culture of a street kid agency: Understanding employee reactions to pressures to feel. Emotions in the workplace: Research, theory, and practice. Quorum Books.
  64. Kaya, Ç. ve Altınkurt, Y. (2018). Öğretmenlerin psikolojik sermayeleri ile tükenmişlik düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkide psikolojik ve yapısal güçlendirmenin rolü. Eğitim ve Bilim, 43(193), 63-78.
  65. Keser, A. (2018). İşte Mutluluk Araştırması. Paradoks Ekonomi Sosyoloji ve Politika Dergisi, 14(1), 43-57.
  66. Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., ve Ryff, C.D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007-1022.
  67. Kittinorarat, J. (2022). The antecedents of happiness at work and its impact on organizaional citizenship behavior among staff in public higher education institutions in Thailand. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 11(2), 19-32.
  68. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd Edition). The Guilford Press.
  69. Kruml, S. M., ve Geddes, D. (2000). Exploring the dimensions of emotional labor: The Heart of Hochschild’s work. Management Communication Quarterly, 14(1), 8-49.
  70. Lai, K., ve Green, S. B. (2016). The problem with having two watches: Assessment of fit when RMSEA and CFI disagree. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(2-3), 220–239.
  71. Lam, C. K., Walter, F., ve Ouyang, K. (2014). Display rule perceptions and job performance in a Chinese retail firm: The moderating role of employees’ affect at work. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(2), 575-597.
  72. Lawler, E. E. (1992). The ultimate advantage: Creating the high-involvement organization. Jossey-Bass.
  73. Lu, C. J., Shih, Y. Y., ve Chen, Y. L. (2013). Effects of emotional labor and job satisfaction on organizational citizenship behaviors: A Case study on business hotel chains. International Journal of Organizational Innovation (Online), 5(4), 165-233.
  74. Luthans, F. ve Avolio, B. J. (2009). The “Point” of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(2), 291-307.
  75. Martínez-Iñigo, D., Totterdell, P., Alcover, C. M., ve Holman, D. (2007). Emotional labour and emotional exhaustion: Interpersonal and intrapersonal mechanisms. Work & Stress, 21(1), 30-47.
  76. Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W.B., ve Leiter, M.P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 397-422.
  77. Morris, A. ve Feldman, D. C. (1996). The dimensions, antecedents and consequences of emotional labor. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 986-1010.
  78. Morris, A. ve Feldman, D. C. (1997). Managing emotions in the workplace. Journal of Managerial Issues, 9(3), 257-274.
  79. Moorman, R.H. ve Blakey, Y.G.L. (1995). Individualism-collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 127-142.
  80. Mousa, M., Massoud, H. K., ve Ayoubi, R. M. (2020). Gender, diversity management perceptions, workplace happiness and organisational citizenship behaviour. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 42(6), 1249-1269.
  81. Naring, G., Briet, M., ve Brouwers, A. (2006). Beyond Demand-Control: Emotional Labor and Symptoms of Burnout in Teachers. Work&Stress, 20(4), 303-315.
  82. Nylander, P. A., Lindberg, O., ve Bruhn, A. (2011). Emotional labour and emotional strain among Swedish prison officers. European Journal of Criminology, 8(6), 469-483.
  83. Organ, D.W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books.
  84. Organ, D. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 43-72.
  85. Organ, D. W., Podsakoff,P. M., ve MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Sage Publications.
  86. Özdemir, S., Sever, M., ve Acar, O. K. (2020). İş’te mutluluk ölçeğinin geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 18(2), 1-10.
  87. Özgüleş, B. ve Arslanoğlu, A. (2020). Sağlık çalışanlarında öznel iyi oluşun duygusal emek davranışı üzerine etkisi. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 15(22), 1114-1133.
  88. Pala, T. ve Tepeci, M. (2014). Otel işletmelerinde çalışanların duygusal emek boyutlarının belirlenmesi ve duygusal emek boyutlarının iş tatmini ve işte kalma niyeti üzerine etkisi. Seyahat ve Otel İşletmeciliği Dergisi, 11(1), 21-37.
  89. Pala, T. ve Sürgevil, O. (2016). Duygusal emek ölçeği: Ölçek geliştirme, güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik çalışması. Ege Akademik Bakış, 16(4), 773-787.
  90. Pala, T., Tepeci, M., ve Timur, A. (2018). Duygusal emeğin iş-aile çatışması üzerine etkisi: İzmir şehir otelleri örneği. Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi. 29(1), 7-18.
  91. Park, S. ve Lee, J. (2016). The effects of interpersonal character strength on service employees’ happiness in the emotional labor context. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 29(2), 203-232.
  92. Paschoal, T. ve Tamayo, A. (2008). Construção e validação da escala de bem-estar no trabalho [Construction and validation of the work well-being scale]. Avaliação Psicológica,7(1), 11-22.
  93. Paschoal, T. ve Demo, G. (2016). Well-being at work scale: Exploratory and confirmatory validation in the USA. Paidéia, 26(63), 35-43.
  94. Pfeffer, J. (1998). The human equation: Building profits by putting people first. Harvard Business School Press.
  95. Podsakoff, P. ve Mackenzie, S., (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior and sales unit effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 351-363.
  96. Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., ve Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107-142.
  97. Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., ve Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A Critical review of the theoritical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563.
  98. Podsakoff, N. P., Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Maynes, T. D., ve Spoelma, T. M. (2014). Consequences of unit-level organizational citizenship behaviors: A Review and recommendations for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 87-119.
  99. Rafaeli, A. ve Sutton, R.I., (1987), Expression of emotion as part of the work role. The Academy of Management Review, 1(12), 23-37.
  100. Ramachandran, Y., Jordan, P. J., Troth, A. C., ve Lawrence, S. A. (2011). Emotional intelligence, emotional labor and organisational citizenship behavior in service environments. International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, 4(2), 136-157.
  101. Rego, A., Ribeiro, N., ve Cunha, M. P. (2010). Perceptions of organizational virtuousness and happiness as predictors of organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 215-235.
  102. Rhoades, L. ve Eisenberger, R.(2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698-714.
  103. Roehling, M. V., Cavanaugh, M. A., Moynihan, L. M., ve Boswell, W. R. (2001). The nature of the new employment relationship: A content analysis of the practitioner and academic literatures. Human Resource Management, 3(4), 305-320.
  104. Roberts, L. M. (2006). Response-shifting the lens on organizational life: The added value of positive scholarship. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 74-80.
  105. Riforgiate, S. E., Howes, S. S., ve Simmons, M. J. (2022). The impact of daily emotional labor on health and well-being. Management Communication Quarterly, 36(3) 391-417.
  106. Sabir, F. S., Maqsood, Z., Tariq, W., ve Devkota, N. (2019). Does happiness at work lead to organisation citizenship behaviour with mediating role of organisation learning capacity? A gender perspective study of educational institutes in Sialkot, Pakistan. International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, 10(4), 281-296.
  107. Salas-Vallina, A., Alegre, J., Fernandez, R. (2017). Happiness at work and organisational citizenship behaviour: Is organisational learning a missing link? International Journal of Manpower, 38(3), 470-488.
  108. Sancar, O. ve Bekaroğlu, B.Ş. (2020). Örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy, 5(2), 99-107.
  109. Seligman, M. E. P. ve Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5-14.
  110. Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic Happiness: Using the New Positive Psychology to Realize Your Potential for Lasting Fullfilment. Free Press.
  111. Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., ve Peterson, C. (2005). Positive Psychology Progress: Empirical Validation of Interventions. American Psychologist, 60, 410-421.
  112. Shagirbasha, S. ve Sivakumaran, B. (2021). Cognitive appraisal, emotional labor and organizational citizenship behavior: Evidence from hotel industry. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 48, 582-592.
  113. Sheldon, K. M. ve Eliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction and longitudinal well-being:The self concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 482-497.
  114. Shrestha, N. (2021). Factor Analysis as a tool for survey analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 9(1), 4-11.
  115. Singh, A. ve Banerji, R. (2022). Happiness at work, organization citizenship behaviour and workplace diversity: A study on Indian private sector bank employees. Industrial and Commercial Training, 54(3), 460-475.
  116. Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., ve Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653-663.
  117. Sousa, J. M. ve Porto, J. B. (2015). Happiness at work: Organizational values and person-organization fit impact. Paidéia (ribeirão preto), 25(6), 211-220.
  118. Tanyolaç, C. ve Şenyuva, Z. (2019). Duygusal olaylar kuramı. S.Yürür (Ed.). Örgütsel Davranış Kuramları içinde. (ss.313-340). Beta.
  119. Thompson, P. S., Bergeron, D. M., ve Bolino, M. C. (2020). No obligation? How gender influences the relationship between perceived organizational support and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(11), 1338-1350.
  120. Van Dyne, L. ve LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119.
  121. Vassallo, M. ve Saba, A. (2015). Does money for grocery expenditure Sway Italian consumers’ motivational values in predicting attitude towards eco-sustainable food products?. Contemporary Management Research, 11(1), 3-24.
  122. Wang, D, Ma E., Kim, Y. S., Liu, A., ve Berbekova A. (2021). From good soldiers to happy employees: Exploring the emotional and well-being outcomes of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 49, 570–579.
  123. Wang, L., Hinrichs, K. T., Prieto, L., ve Howell, J. P. (2013). Five dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior: Comparing antecedents and levels of engagement in China and the US. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(1), 115–147.
  124. Warr, P. (2007). Work, happiness and unhappiness. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  125. Weiss, H.M. ve Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theroretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. B.M.Staw ve L.L. Cummings (Ed.), Research in Organization Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essay and Critical Reviews içinde. (ss.1-74). Greenwich.
  126. Wharton, Amy S. ve Ericsson, R.J. (1993). Managing emotions on the job and at home: Understanding the consequences of multiple emotional roles. Academy of Management Review, 18(3), 457-486.
  127. Xu, S. T., Cao, Z. C., Huo, Y. (2020). Antecedents and outcomes of emotional labor in hospitality and tourism: A Meta-analysis. Tourism Management, 79, 1-15.
  128. Yastıoğlu, S. (2023). İnsana yakışır iş ve alt boyutlarının işin anlamı ve işten ayrılma niyeti ile ilişkisi: Bir meta-analiz çalışması. Sosyal Mucit Academic Review, 4, 1-25.
  129. Ziegler, R., Schlett, C., Casel, K., ve Diehl, M. (2012), The role of job satisfaction, job ambivalence, and emotions at work in predicting organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 11(4), 176-190.