SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 17 Sayı: 36

Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Studies Conducting on Noticing Skill in Mathematics Education

Matematik Eğitiminde Fark Etme Becerisi Üzerine Yapılan Araştırmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi

Ercan Dede(RECEP TAYYİP ERDOĞAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6483-7019
Ercan Özdemir(RECEP TAYYİP ERDOĞAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-4797-9327
Pages
1547–1571
Publication Date
2022-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, it was visualized the conceptual structure of the research related to noticing skills in this study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Bibliometric analysis is the one of the statistical analysis methods, which is conducted to illustrate, evaluate and keep track of an interested literature using bibliographic data including citation information about authors, publications, institutions, journals, and countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, it was performed a series of bibliometric analysis related to the published research on noticing skills in the literature. 128 publications with SSCI or ESCI index were examined from WoS database.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, it was visualized the conceptual structure of the research related to noticing skills in this study.
🔬Design:Sistematik Derlemeler ve Meta Analiz
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bibliyometrik Analiz · Fark Etme · Fark Etme Becerisi

Abstract

Bibliometric analysis is the one of the statistical analysis methods, which is conducted to illustrate, evaluate and keep track of an interested literature using bibliographic data including citation information about authors, publications, institutions, journals, and countries. In this study, it was performed a series of bibliometric analysis related to the published research on noticing skills in the literature. 128 publications with SSCI or ESCI index were examined from WoS database. In the light of the findings, it was seen that the USA, Turkey and Germany are the most productive countries on noticing skills research in mathematics education. In addition, the journal with the most publications are “journal of mathematics teacher education”, “international journal of science and mathematics education” and “zdm-mathematics education”, respectively. Moreover, the most productive institutions on noticing skills research in mathematics education are “University of Hamburg”, “Michigan State University” and “Northwestern University”, respectively. Finally, it was visualized the conceptual structure of the research related to noticing skills in this study.

Özet

Bibliyometrik analiz, yazarlar, yayınlar, kurumlar, dergiler ve ülkelerle ilgili atıf bilgileri dahil olmak üzere bibliyometrik verilerle ilgili yayınlanmış literatürü tanımlamak, değerlendirmek ve izlemek için kullanılan bir istatistiksel analiz türüdür. Bu çalışmada da fark etme becerisi ile ilgili yayınlanmış bilimsel çalışmaların bibliyometrik analizi yapılmıştır. WoS veri tabanından SSCI ya da ESCI indexli 128 yayın incelenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre en fazla yayın yapan ülkelerin “Amerika Birleşik Devletleri”, “Türkiye” ve “Almanya”; en fazla yayın yapılan dergilerin “journal of mathematics teacher education”, “international journal of science and mathematics education” ve “zdm-mathematics education”; en çok yayın yapan üniversitelerin “Hamburg Üniversitesi”, “Michigan Eyalet Üniversitesi” ve “Northwestern Üniversitesi” olduğu görülmüştür. Ayrıca fark etme becerisi ile ilgili kavramsal yapı ortaya çıkarılmış ve görselleştirilerek sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Dede, E., Özdemir, E. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Studies Conducting on Noticing Skill in Mathematics Education. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 36, 1547–1571. https://doi.org/10.35675/befdergi.1145811

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (35)

  1. Birkle, C., Pendlebury, D. A., Schnell, J., & Adams, J. (2020). Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 363-376. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00018
  2. Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual review of information science and technology, 37(1), 179-255.
  3. Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146–166. https://doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
  4. Çelik, M. (2022). Erken çocukluk matematik eğitimi çalışmalarının bibliyometrik profili. Türkiye Bilimsel Araştırmalar Dergisi, VII (I), 55-71
  5. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.
  6. Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?. Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809-1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
  7. Gökçe, S. & Güner, P. (2021). Forty years of mathematics education: 1980-2019. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 9(3), 514-539. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1361
  8. Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M., Martínez, M. Á., Moral-Munoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Cobo, M. J. (2018). Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields. Applied intelligence, 48(5), 1275-1287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-1105-y
  9. Gürlen, E., Özdiyar, Ö., & Şen, Z. (2018). Social Network Analysis of Academic Studies on Gifted People. Education and Science, 44(197), 185-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2018.7735
  10. Gülmez, D., Özteke, İ., & Gümüş, S. (2020). Overview of Educational Research from Turkey Published in International Journals: A Bibliometric Analysis. Education and Science, 46(206). http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.9317
  11. Gülmez, D., Özteke, İ & Gümüş, S. (2021). Uluslararası dergilerde yayımlanan Türkiye kaynaklı eğitim araştırmalarının genel görünümü: Bibliyometrik Analiz. Eğitim ve Bilim, 46 (206), 213-239
  12. Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2021). Science mapping the knowledge base in educational leadership and management: A longitudinal bibliometric analysis, 1960 to 2018. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(1), 5-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219859002
  13. Huan, C., Meng, C.C. & Suseelan, M. (2022). Mathematics Learning from Concrete to Abstract (1968-2021): A Bibliometric Analysis. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 9(4), 445-468. http://dx.doi.org/10.17275/per.22.99.9.4
  14. Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children's mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169-202.
  15. Köse, M. (2021). Pedagojik alan bilgisine yönelik bibliyometrik bir araştırma: 1987-2020 yılları arasında yapılan çalışmaların analizi. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 41(3), 2217-2250.
  16. Liñán, F., & Fayolle, A. (2015). A systematic literature review on entrepreneurial intentions: citation, thematic analyses, and research agenda. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(4), 907-933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-015-0356-5
  17. MEB, (2017). Öğretmenlik Mesleği Genel Yeterlilikleri. Öğretmen Yetiştirme ve Geliştirme Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
  18. Noyons, E., Moed, H., & Van Raan, A. (1999). Integrating research performance analysis and science mapping. Scientometrics, 46(3), 591-604.
  19. Özkaya A. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of the studies in the field of mathematics education. Educational Research and Reviews, 13(22), 723-734. doi: 10.5897/ERR2018.3603
  20. Özkaya, A. (2019). STEM eğitimi alanında yapılan yayınların bibliyometrik analizi. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 590-628.
  21. Small, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American society for Information Science, 50(9), 799-813. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:9 3.0.CO;2-G
  22. Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Philipp, R. A. (Eds.). (2011). Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers' eyes. New York: Routledge.
  23. Şimşek, M.G. (2019). Matematik öğretmen adaylarının fark etme becerilerinin kavram yanılgıları ve öğrenci zorlukları esas alınarak oluşturulan limit dersi videoları kullanılarak incelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü
  24. Tür, N. (2019). Web of science veri tabanı eğitim ve eğitim bilimleri alanında Türkiye adresli yayınların trend analizi: Tanımlayıcı trend analizi çalışması. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi
  25. Ulutaş, F. & Ubuz, B. (2008). Matematik eğitiminde araştırmalar ve eğilimler: 2000 ile 2006 yılları arası. İlköğretim Online, 7(3), 614-626.
  26. Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  27. Van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2011). Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer. ISSI Newsletter, 7(3), 50–54. (paper, preprint, supplementary material).
  28. Van Eck N.J., & Waltman L. (2014). Visualizing Bibliometric Networks. In: Ding Y., Rousseau R., Wolfram D. (Eds.), Measuring Scholarly Impact (pp. 285-320). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
  29. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2021). VOSviewer Manual (version 1.6.17). Univeristeit Leiden.
  30. van Es, E. A. & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571–596.
  31. van Es, E. A. (2011). A framework for learning to notice student thinking. In M. G.Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 134-151). New York: Routledge.
  32. Waltman, L. (2017). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of informetrics, 10(2), 365-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007
  33. Zan, B. U. (2012). Türkiye’de bilim dallarında karşılaştırmalı bibliyometrik analiz çalışması (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi: Ankara
  34. Zhang, J., Yu, Q., Zheng, F., Long, C., Lu, Z., & Duan, Z. (2016). Comparing keywords plus of WoS and author keywords: A case study of patient adherence research. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(4), 967-972. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23437
  35. Zupic, I. & Cater, T. (2015) Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi:10.1177/1094428114562629