SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 20 Sayı: 48

Academic Language Task Frequency and Self-Efficacy in EMI Higher Education: Patterns, Predictive Relationships, and Cross-Domain Influences

Eğitim Dili İngilizce Olan Programlarda Akademik Dil Becerilerinin Kullanım Sıklığı ve Öz-Yeterlik: Örüntüler, Yordayıcı İlişkiler ve Beceriler Arası Etkiler

Onur Uludağ(AFYON KOCATEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ, YABANCI DİLLER EĞİTİMİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0001-6912-2979
Pages
1559–1587
Publication Date
2025-12-24
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results have important implications for EMI program design, emphasizing the need for integrated language support and targeted interventions that address both skill-specific and cross-domain aspects of academic language development.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigated the relationships between academic language task frequency and self-efficacy beliefs among Turkish undergraduate students in English-medium instruction (EMI) programs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Using a comprehensive questionnaire, data were collected from 483 students across multiple disciplines to examine patterns of language task engagement and self-efficacy across reading, listening, speaking, and writing domains.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results have important implications for EMI program design, emphasizing the need for integrated language support and targeted interventions that address both skill-specific and cross-domain aspects of academic language development.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Akademik dil · beceri kullanım sıklığı · dil becerileri

Abstract

This study investigated the relationships between academic language task frequency and self-efficacy beliefs among Turkish undergraduate students in English-medium instruction (EMI) programs. Using a comprehensive questionnaire, data were collected from 483 students across multiple disciplines to examine patterns of language task engagement and self-efficacy across reading, listening, speaking, and writing domains. The study explored both within-domain and cross-domain relationships between task frequency and self-efficacy beliefs. Results revealed a clear hierarchy in language demands, with reading emerging as the most frequently required skill, followed by listening, speaking, and writing. Significant gaps were found between task frequency and self-efficacy across all domains, with students' confidence levels consistently lower than task demands. Multiple regression analyses demonstrated varying predictive relationships between task frequency and self-efficacy, with reading frequency showing the strongest cross-domain influence. The findings highlight the complex nature of language development in EMI contexts and suggest that mere exposure to academic tasks may be insufficient for developing robust confidence in academic language use. These results have important implications for EMI program design, emphasizing the need for integrated language support and targeted interventions that address both skill-specific and cross-domain aspects of academic language development.

Özet

Bu çalışma, eğitim dili İngilizce (EDI) programlarındaki 483 Türk lisans öğrencisinde akademik dil becerilerinin sıklığı ile öz-yeterlik arasındaki ilişkileri incelemiştir. Veriler, beceri kullanımında bir hiyerarşi (okuma>dinleme>konuşma>yazma) ve tüm becerin kullanım sıklığı ile öz-yeterlik arasında önemli farklar ortaya koymuştur. Öğrencilerin güven düzeyleri, beceri kullanım gereklerinin sürekli altında kalmıştır. Regresyon analizleri değişen yordayıcı ilişkiler göstermiş, okuma sıklığı en güçlü alanlar arası etkiyi sergilemiştir. Bulgular, akademik dile sadece maruz kalmanın EDI bağlamında dil güveni geliştirmek için yetersiz olabileceğini göstermektedir. Sonuçlar, EDI program tasarımında akademik dil gelişiminin hem beceriye özgü hem de alanlar arası yönlerini ele alan bütünleşik dil desteği ihtiyacını vurgulamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Uludağ, O. (2025). Academic Language Task Frequency and Self-Efficacy in EMI Higher Education: Patterns, Predictive Relationships, and Cross-Domain Influences. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 48, 1559–1587. https://doi.org/10.35675/befdergi.1678159

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (46)

  1. Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2006). Language and the experience of learning university physics in Sweden. European Journal of Physics, 27(3), 553–560. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/27/3/009
  2. Aizawa, I., & McKinley, J. (2020). EMI Challenges in Japan’s Internationalization of Higher Education. International and Development Education, 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47860-5_2/FIGURES/1
  3. Aizawa, I., Rose, H., Thompson, G., & Curle, S. (2023). Beyond the threshold: Exploring English language proficiency, linguistic challenges, and academic language skills of Japanese students in an English medium instruction programme. Language Teaching Research, 27(4), 837–861. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820965510/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_1362168820965510-FIG3.JPEG
  4. Aslan, M. (2018). The debate on English-medium instruction and globalisation in the Turkish context: a sociopolitical perspective. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(7), 602–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2017.1417413
  5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman and Company.
  6. Bradford, A. (2019). It’s not all about English! The problem of language foregrounding in English-medium programmes in Japan. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40(8), 707–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2018.1551402
  7. Breeze, R., & Dafouz, E. (2017). Constructing complex cognitive discourse functions in higher education: An exploratory study of exam answers in Spanish- and English-medium instruction settings. System, 70, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2017.09.024
  8. Chang, T.-S. (2013). The idea of a writing center in Asian countries: A preliminary search of models in Taiwan. Praxis: A Writing Center Journal, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.15781/T2RF5KX69
  9. Curle, S., Ali, H. I. H., Alhassan, A., & Scatolini, S. S. (2022). English-medium instruction in higher education in the Middle East and North Africa policy, Research and Pedagogy. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  10. Curle, S., Yuksel, D., Soruç, A., & Altay, M. (2020). Predictors of English-medium Instruction academic success: English proficiency versus first language medium. System, 95, 102378. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2020.102378
  11. Dearden, J. (2014). English as a medium of instruction: A growing global phenomenon. [Available Online at https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/pub_E484% 20EMI%20-%20Cover%20option_3%20FINAL_Web.pdf, Retrieved on November 11, 2024.]
  12. Ducker, N. (2024). Capturing the situated, dynamic nature of EMI-lecture listening comprehension in real time. Journal of English-medium Instruction, 3(2), 185–212. https://doi.org/10.1075/jemi.23001.duc
  13. Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The science of reading progresses: Communicating advances beyond the simple view of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S25–S44. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.411
  14. Evans, S., & Morrison, B. (2011). The student experience of English-medium higher education in Hong Kong. Language and Education, 25(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2011.553287
  15. Fitzgerald, J., & Shanahan, T. (2000). Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_5
  16. Galloway, N., Kriukow, J., & Numajiri, T. (2017). Internationalisation, higher education and the growing demand for English: an investigation into the English medium of instruction (EMI) movement in China and Japan. ELT Research Papers, 17, 2.
  17. Galloway, N., & Ruegg, R. (2020). The provision of student support on English medium Instruction programmes in Japan and China. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 45, 100846. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEAP.2020.100846
  18. Goetze, J., & Driver, M. (2022). Is learning really just believing? A meta-analysis of self-efficacy and achievement in SLA. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(2), 233–259. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.2.4
  19. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2016). Self-Regulated strategy development in writing. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215624216
  20. Hellekjær, G. O. (2010). Lecture comprehension in English-medium higher education. HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 45, 11–34. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v23i45.97343
  21. Hirvela, A. (2004). Connecting reading and writing in second language writing instruction. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.23736
  22. Kamaşak, R., Sahan, K., & Rose, H. (2021). Academic language-related challenges at an English-medium university. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 49, 100945. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEAP.2020.100945
  23. Kim, Y.-S. G. (2023). Executive functions and morphological awareness explain the shared variance between word reading and listening comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 27(5), 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2023.2195112
  24. Kırkgöz, Y. (2005). Motivation and Student Perception of Studying in an English-medium University. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 1(1), 101–123.
  25. Kırkgöz, Y. (2009). Students’ and lecturers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of foreign language instruction in an English-medium university in Turkey. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510802602640
  26. Kırkgöz, Y. (2014). Students’ perceptions of English language versus Turkish language used as the medium of instruction in higher education in Turkey. Journal of Turkish Studies, 9(12), 443–443. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.7596
  27. Kırkgöz, Y., İnci-Kavak, V., Karakaş, A., & Panero, S. M. (2023). Translanguaging practices in Turkish EMI classrooms: Commonalities and differences across two academic disciplines. System, 113, 102982. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2023.102982
  28. Li, M., & Pei, L. (2024). Exploring challenges in academic language-related skills of EFL learners in Chinese EMI settings. Acta Psychologica, 247, 104309. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTPSY.2024.104309
  29. Macaro, E. (2018). English medium instruction: Content and language in policy and practice. Oxford University Press.
  30. Macaro, E., & Akincioglu, M. (2018). Turkish university students’ perceptions about English Medium Instruction: Exploring year group, gender and university type as variables. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(3), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2017.1367398
  31. Macaro, E., Akincioglu, M., & Dearden, J. (2016). English Medium Instruction in Universities: A Collaborative Experiment in Turkey. Studies in English Language Teaching, 4(1), 51-76. https://doi.org/10.22158/selt.v4n1p51
  32. Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000350
  33. Matikainen, T. (2024). Academic writing in English: Lessons from an EMI-program in Japan. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 68, 101358. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEAP.2024.101358
  34. Ozturk, N. (2017). An analysis of teachers’ self-reported competencies for teaching metacognition. Educational Studies, 43(3), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1273761
  35. Pessoa, S., Miller, R. T., & Kaufer, D. (2014). Students’ challenges and development in the transition to academic writing at an English-medium university in Qatar. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 52(2), 127–156. https://doi.org/10.1515/IRAL-2014-0006/MACHINEREADABLECITATION/RIS
  36. Rose, H., Curle, S., Aizawa, I., & Thompson, G. (2020). What drives success in English medium taught courses? The interplay between language proficiency, academic skills, and motivation. Studies in Higher Education, 45(11), 2149–2161. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1590690
  37. Sahan, K. (2024). English-Medium Instruction in Turkish Universities. Policies, Practices, and Perceptions. Routledge Focus.
  38. Sanchez-Pérez, M. D. M. (2023). The impact of EMI on student English writing proficiency in a Spanish undergraduate engineering context. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 13(2), 373–397. https://doi.org/10.14746/SSLLT.38279
  39. Sawaki, Y. (2017). University faculty members’ perspectives on English language demands in content courses and a reform of university entrance examinations in Japan: A needs analysis. Language Testing in Asia, 7(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-017-0043-2
  40. Thompson, G., Aizawa, I., Curle, S., & Rose, H. (2022). Exploring the role of self-efficacy beliefs and learner success in English medium instruction. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(1), 196–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1651819
  41. Tortorelli, L. S., & Truckenmiller, A. J. (2024). Automaticity in writing in response to Reading: relations between oral reading fluency and compositional writing fluency in grades 3–5. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 40(2), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2023.2172757
  42. Ünlüer, Z. (2024). Expectations, motivations, and satisfaction of EFL students for utilizing an academic writing center. (Thesis No. 854417) [Master's thesis, Middle East Technical University Institute of Social Sciences]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Centre. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation].
  43. Wächter, B., & Maiworm, F. (2015). English-taught programmes in European higher education: The state of play in 2014. Lemmens.
  44. Wang, C., Kim, D. H., Bai, R., & Hu, J. (2014). Psychometric properties of a self-efficacy scale for English language learners in China. System, 44(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2014.01.015
  45. Wanzek, J., Otaiba, S. Al, Petscher, Y., Lemons, C. J., Gesel, S. A., Fluhler, S., Donegan, R. E., & Rivas, B. K. (2020). Comparing the effects of reading intervention versus reading and mindset intervention for upper elementary students with reading difficulties, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 54(3), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420949281
  46. Zhou, S., McKinley, J., Rose, H., & Xu, X. (2022). English medium higher education in China: Challenges and ELT support. ELT Journal, 76(2), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1093/ELT/CCAB082