SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2

Retention Count Based Material Reliability Calculation for Molecular Dyanmics of Tritium Plasma at Graphene

Grafende Trityum Plazmasının Moleküler Dinamikleri için Tutma Sayısına Dayalı Malzeme Güvenilirliği Hesaplaması

Alper Pahsa(HAVELSAN AŞ)0000-0002-9576-5297
Pages
159–168
Publication Date
2025-11-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The surface tritium plasma atom retention calculation is completed by determining the graphene's Weibull distribution reliability based on the retention count assumption.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Structural dependability of Tokamak fusion reactors has to be taken into account while selecting reactor components.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We investigated the effect of tritium plasma ions with energy ranging from 5 to 35 keV on graphene walls using molecular dynamics simulations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The surface tritium plasma atom retention calculation is completed by determining the graphene's Weibull distribution reliability based on the retention count assumption.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:PMI tutma sayısı · malzeme güvenilirliği tutma sayısı · Tutma sayısına dayalı Weibull Güvenilirliği

Abstract

Structural dependability of Tokamak fusion reactors has to be taken into account while selecting reactor components. Heat- and energy-producing fusion events can change reactor walls. Reactions thus produce less efficiently the energy needed. For example, graphene is the fundamental building block used in fusion reactors to create their walls. Among the newest high-tech materials is graphene. We investigated the effect of tritium plasma ions with energy ranging from 5 to 35 keV on graphene walls using molecular dynamics simulations. To study the surface topology, we calculate the tritium retention count, since molecular dynamics gives a snapshot of the actual world in the molecular model setup. The surface tritium plasma atom retention calculation is completed by determining the graphene's Weibull distribution reliability based on the retention count assumption.

Özet

Tokamak füzyon reaktörlerinin yapısal güvenilirliği, reaktör bileşenleri seçilirken dikkate alınmalıdır. Isı ve enerji üreten füzyon olayları reaktör duvarlarını değiştirebilir. Bu nedenle reaksiyonlar ihtiyaç duyulan enerjiyi daha az verimli üretir. Örneğin, grafen, füzyon reaktörlerinin duvarlarını oluşturmak için kullanılan temel yapı taşıdır. En yeni yüksek teknoloji malzemeler arasında grafen de yer almaktadır. Moleküler dinamik simülasyonları kullanarak, 5 ila 35 keV arasında değişen enerjiye sahip trityum plazma iyonlarının grafen duvarları üzerindeki etkisini araştırdık. Yüzey topolojisini incelemek için, moleküler dinamikler moleküler model kurulumundaki gerçek dünyanın bir anlık görüntüsünü verdiğinden, trityum tutma sayısını hesapladık. Yüzey trityum plazma atom tutma hesabı, tutma sayısı varsayımına dayalı olarak grafenin Weibull dağılımının güvenilirliğini belirleyerek tamamlanır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Pahsa, A. (2025). Retention Count Based Material Reliability Calculation for Molecular Dyanmics of Tritium Plasma at Graphene. Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2, 159–168. https://doi.org/10.17134/khosbd.1690717

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. Ongena J., “Nuclear fusion and its large potential for the future world energy supply”, 2016, Nukleonika Journal, pp:425-432, web site ref: https://sciendo.com/pdf/10.1515/nuka-2016-0070
  2. Takeda S., Pearson R.Nuclear Fusion Power Plants.Power Plants in the Industry. 2018; Chap 6: 101-122, IntechOpen publishing, website ref: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/62970, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.80241
  3. IAEA.Fusion Energy for Peace and Sustainable Development. IAEA. Vienna. 2018: 2-18. web site ref: https://nucleus.iaea.org/sites/fusionportal/SiteAssets/18-03925E_BRO_Fusion.pdf
  4. IAEA.Kikuchi M., Lackner K., Tran M. Q.Fusion Physics. Vienna. 2012: 20-21, web site ref: https://wwwpub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1562_web.pdf
  5. Ibrahim S., Lahboub F. Z., Brault P., Petit A., Caillard A., Millon E., Sauvage T., Fernandez A., Thomann A.L.Influence of helium incorporation on growth process and properties of aluminum thin films deposited by DC Magnetron sputtering.Surface and Coatings Technology.2021; Vol;426, web site ref: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0257897221009828, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.127808
  6. Behrish R., Harries D. R.International Atomic Energy Agency.Lifetime Predictions For The First Wall and Blanket Structure of Fusion Reactors.Proceedings of a Technical Committee Meeting.Karlsruhe. Nuclear Fusion J. 1986; Vol: 26, DOI 10.1088/0029-5515/26/5/015
  7. IoP Publishing Ltd. Nuclear Fusion Half a Century of Magnetic Confinement Fusion Research.2002:230-258, web site ref: https://library.psfc.mit.edu/catalog/online_pubs/conference%20proceedings/fusion%20energy%20conferences/Nuclear%20Fusion%20(IOP)%20half%20a%20century.pdf
  8. Jones E. S., Rafelski J.Cold Nuclear Fusion.Scientific American.Springer Nature Publishing.1987: 66-71, web site ref:https://www.fulviofrisone.com/attachments/article/358/Cold%20Nuclear%20Fusion.pdf
  9. Kajita S., Kawaguchi, Ohno N., Yoshida N.Enhanced growth of large-scale nanostructures with mettalic ion precipitation in helium plasmas.Scientific Reports. Springer Nature.2018. web site ref: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322315992_Enhanced_growth_of_largescale_nanostructures_with_metallic_ion_precipitation_in_helium_plasmas, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18476-7
  10. Kotov V.Particle conservation in numerical models of the tokamak plasma edge. Physics Plasma Ph Archive.Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Energie- und Klimaforschung-Plasmaphysic.Partner of the Trilateral Euregio Cluster.Jülich, Germany, 2017; Vol 24, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4980858
  11. K. Wojcyzkowski.New Development in Corrosion Testing: Theory, Methods and Standards.AESF Foundation, Plating and Surface Finishing.2011; Vol January, web site ref: https://www.pfonline.com/articles/new-developments-in-corrosion-testing-theory-methods-andstandards
  12. Linden T.Compact Fusion Reactors.CERN Colloquium. Helsinki Institute of Physics 2015; Vol March, web site ref: http://cds.cern.ch/record/2004827
  13. L. Rajablou, S.M. Motevalli, F. Fadaei.Study of alpha particle concentration effects as the ash of deuterium-tritium fusion reaction on ignition criteria.Physica Scripta.2022; Vol 97, No 9: DOI 10.1088/1402-4896/ac831a
  14. Malo M., Morono A., Hodgson E. R.Plasma Etching to Enhance the Surface Insulating Stability of Aluminumina for Fusion Applications.Nuclear Materials and Energy.Elsevier.2016; Vol 9: 247-250, DOI:10.1016/j.nme.2016.05.008
  15. McFadden C., “Tokamak Energy has just made a breakthrough in nuclear fusion”, Interesting Engineering, 2023, web site ref: https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/tokamak-energy-made-a-breakthrough-in-nuclear-fusion?group=test_b
  16. Nadler J.Inertial-Electrostatic Confinement (IEC) of A Fusion Plasma with Grids. Nuclear Engineering Department, University of Illinois.1995, web site ref: http://sites.apam.columbia.edu/SMproceedings/11.ContributedPapers/11.Nadler.pdf
  17. Nordlund K.Atomistic Simulations of Plasma-wall interactions in Fusion Reactors. Physica Scripta. 2006; Vol T124:53-57, DOI 10.1088/0031-8949/2006/T124/011
  18. Ongena J., “Nuclear fusion and its large potential for the future world energy supply”, 2016, Nukleonika Journal, pp:425-432, web site ref: https://sciendo.com/pdf/10.1515/nuka-2016-0070
  19. Perrault D.Nuclear Fusion Reactors-Safety and Radiation Protection Considerations for Demonstration Reactors that follow ITER facility.IRSN. 2017; Vol Nov: 15-27, web site ref: https://www.irsn.fr/EN/Research/publications-documentation/Scientificbooks/Documents/ITER-VA_web_non_imprimable.pdf
  20. Arena P., Maio P. A.Special Issue.Structural and Thermo-Mechanical Analysis in Nuclear Fusion Reactors.MDPI Applied Sciences.2020;web site ref: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/applsci/special_issues/Fusion_Reactors, https://doi.org/10.3390/app122412562
  21. Apostolakis G. E., Sanzo D. L. Limiter Probabilistic Lifetime Analysis. Fusion Engineering and Design. 1988;Vol. 6:229-267, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-3796(88)80111-X
  22. Du, X.Unified Uncertainty Analysis by the First Order Reliability Method.J. Mech. Des. 2008; Vol 30 (9): 091401-09410, DOI:10.1115/1.2943295
  23. Freidberg J.P., Mangiarotti F.J., Minervini J. Desgining a Tokamak Fusion Reactor-How Does Plasma Physics Fit In?. Plasma Science and Fusion Center.Massachusetts Insitute of Technology, Cambridge MA.2015; Vol June; 16.,https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4923266
  24. Fusion Energy Sciences Workshop.On Plasma Material Interactions-Report on Science Challanges and Research Opportunities in Plasma Material Interactions. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Fusion Energy Sciences, 2015
  25. Ask Hjorth Larsen, Jens Jørgen Mortensen, Jakob Blomqvist, Ivano E. Castelli, Rune Christensen, Marcin Dułak, Jesper Friis, Michael N. Groves, Bjørk Hammer, Cory Hargus, Eric D. Hermes, Paul C. Jennings, Peter Bjerre Jensen, James Kermode, John R. Kitchin, Esben Leonhard Kolsbjerg, Joseph Kubal, Kristen Kaasbjerg, Steen Lysgaard, Jón Bergmann Maronsson, Tristan Maxson, Thomas Olsen, Lars Pastewka, Andrew Peterson, Carsten Rostgaard, Jakob Schiøtz, Ole Schütt, Mikkel Strange, Kristian S. Thygesen, Tejs Vegge, Lasse Vilhelmsen, Michael Walter, Zhenhua Zeng, Karsten Wedel Jacobsen, “The Atomic Simulation Environment—A Python library for working with atoms”, Phys.: Condens. Matter Vol. 29 273002, 2017
  26. Karaca Y, Moonis M., “Multi-Chaos, Fractal and Multi-Fractional Artificial Intelligence of Different Complex Systems”, Chapter 14, pp:231-245, Academic Press, 2022
  27. K. Wojcyzkowski.New Development in Corrosion Testing: Theory, Methods and Standards.AESF Foundation, Plating and Surface Finishing.2011; Vol January, web site ref: https://www.pfonline.com/articles/new-developments-in-corrosion-testing-theory-methods-andstandards
  28. Nordlund K., “Molecular dynamics simulation of ion ranges in the 1-100 keV energy range”, Computational Material Science, Elsevier, Vol: 3, Iss: 4, pp: 448-456, March 1995,https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-0256(94)00085-Q
  29. A. Benard and E. C. Bos-Levenbach.Het uitzetten van waarnemingen op waarschijnlijkdeids-papier (The Plotting of Observations on Probability Paper).Statististica Neerlandica.1953;vol. 7:163–173, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9574.1953.tb00821.x
  30. Arena P., Maio P. A.Special Issue.Structural and Thermo-Mechanical Analysis in Nuclear Fusion Reactors.MDPI Applied Sciences.2020;web site ref: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/applsci/special_issues/Fusion_Reactors, https://doi.org/10.3390/app122412562