Journals / Antropoloji / 2025 / Sayı: 51

Ergonomic Streets and Anthropometry: Dr. Derviş Eroğlu Dörtyol Boulevard (Kemer/Antalya) Example

Ergonomik Caddeler ve Antropometri: Dr. Derviş Eroğlu Dörtyol Bulvarı (Kemer/Antalya) Örneği

N. Damla Yılmaz Usta(SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ MİMARLIK FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-5672-3054
Barış Gür(SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MİMARLIK FAKÜLTESİ)0009-0004-1004-4661
Pages
1–16
Publication Date
2025-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When the relevant street is arranged by taking into account the suggested ergonomic criteria, it turns into a quality public space that attracts people to spend time by offering a fair, equitable, safe, comfortable and healthy life with its accessibility beyond a road that provides movement, and it gains an important place in the identity of the city with its increasing spatial feature and contributes to the economic cycle accordingly.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The streets that constitute the main transportation networks of cities should be designed universally with appropriate ergonomic criteria and anthropometric data in the human center and should be accessible and safe for everyone.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Derviş Eroğlu Dörtyol Boulevard, which is located between the Kemer district center of Antalya and the largest neighborhood of the district, was taken into consideration and the street's suitability and accessibility for everyone was examined with an ergonomic approach, and the aim was to identify problems and create solution suggestions for these problems.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When the relevant street is arranged by taking into account the suggested ergonomic criteria, it turns into a quality public space that attracts people to spend time by offering a fair, equitable, safe, comfortable and healthy life with its accessibility beyond a road that provides movement, and it gains an important place in the identity of the city with its increasing spatial feature and contributes to the economic cycle accordingly.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ergonomi · erişilebilirlik · evrensel tasarım

Abstract

The streets that constitute the main transportation networks of cities should be designed universally with appropriate ergonomic criteria and anthropometric data in the human center and should be accessible and safe for everyone. In this context, Dr. Derviş Eroğlu Dörtyol Boulevard, which is located between the Kemer district center of Antalya and the largest neighborhood of the district, was taken into consideration and the street's suitability and accessibility for everyone was examined with an ergonomic approach, and the aim was to identify problems and create solution suggestions for these problems. For this purpose, observations were made on different days during the week and on weekends, including evening hours, using the observation form created with criteria related to street ergonomics from relevant literature such as articles, books, and reports, especially the "Global Street Design Guide [GSDG]" and "Designing Streets for Children [DSC]". When the determinations regarding the ergonomic criteria of Dr. Derviş Eroğlu Dörtyol Boulevard are evaluated with the literature, it is understood that the importance of designing the streets, which are the main transportation networks of the city, with ergonomic criteria and anthropometric data to be suitable and accessible for everyone is understood. When the relevant street is arranged by taking into account the suggested ergonomic criteria, it turns into a quality public space that attracts people to spend time by offering a fair, equitable, safe, comfortable and healthy life with its accessibility beyond a road that provides movement, and it gains an important place in the identity of the city with its increasing spatial feature and contributes to the economic cycle accordingly.

Özet

Kentlerin ana ulaşım ağlarını oluşturan caddeler; insan merkezinde uygun ergonomi ölçütleri ve antropometrik verilerle evrensel tasarlanarak herkes için erişilebilir ve güvenli olması sağlanmalıdır. Bu bağlamda Antalya ili Kemer ilçe merkezi ile ilçenin en büyük mahallesi arasında konumlanan Dr. Derviş Eroğlu Dörtyol Bulvarı ele alınarak caddenin herkes için uygunluğu ve erişilebilirliği ergonomi yaklaşımı ile incelenerek sorunların tespit edilmesi ve bunlara çözüm önerileri oluşturulması amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla, “Küresel Sokak Tararım Rehberi [KSTR]”, “Çocuklar İçin Sokaklar Tasarlamak [ÇST]” başta olmak üzere makale, kitap, rapor gibi ilgili yazınlardan cadde ergonomisine ilişkin ölçütlerle oluşturulan gözlem formu üzerinden akşam saatlerini de kapsayacak şekilde hafta içi ve hafta sonu farklı günlerde gözlem yapılmıştır. Dr. Derviş Eroğlu Dörtyol Bulvarı’nın ergonomi ölçütlerine ilişkin tespitler literatür eşliğinde değerlendirildiğinde, kentin ana ulaşım ağlarından caddelerin herkes için uygun ve erişilebilir olması için ergonomi ölçütleri ve antropometri verileri ile tasarlanması gerektiğinin önemi anlaşılmaktadır. İlgili cadde önerilen ergonomi ölçütleri dikkate alınarak düzenlendiğinde, hareketi sağlayan bir yolun ötesinde erişilebilirliğiyle adil, eşitlikçi, güvenli, konforlu ve sağlıklı bir yaşam sunarak insanları vakit geçirmeye cezbeden kaliteli bir kamusal mekâna dönüşür, artan mekânsal özelliği ile kentin kimliğinde önemli bir yer edinir ve bunlara bağlı olarak ekonomik döngüye katkı sağlar.

🔖

Cite This Article

Usta, N. D. Y., Gür, B. (2025). Ergonomic Streets and Anthropometry: Dr. Derviş Eroğlu Dörtyol Boulevard (Kemer/Antalya) Example. Antropoloji, Sayı: 51, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.33613/antropolojidergisi.1677162

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (54)

  1. Aganad, S.L., Tabanda, K.F.A., Bellen, A.J.R., Magpantay, A.M.A. ve Custodio, B.P. (2017). F8-2 Ergonomic assessment of street warning signs for the visually impaired in Metro Manila, The Japanese Journal of Ergonomics, 53(2), 668-671, https://doi.org/10.5100/jje.53.S668
  2. Ahmed, T., Moeinaddini, M., Almoshaogeh, M., Jamal, A., Nawaz, I. ve Alharbi, F. (2021). A new pedestrian crossing level of service (PCLOS) method for promoting safe pedestrian crossing in urban areas. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8813. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168813
  3. Akın, G. ve Önal, S. (2016), Kentsel alanların tasarımında ergonomik sorunlar, Antropoloji Dergisi, 31, 51-60.
  4. Akyıldız Hatırnaz, A. (2019). Ergonomi çerçevesinde eşitlikçi mekân üretim yaklaşımı olarak “evrensel tasarım” kavramı. Ergonomi, 2(3), 178-193. https://doi.org/10.33439/ergonomi.544559
  5. Arslan, Y., Şahin, H. M., Gülnar, U. ve Şahbudak, M. (2015). Görme engellilerin toplumsal hayatta yaşadıkları zorluklar (Batman Merkez örneği), Batman Üniversitesi Yaşam Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(2), 1-14.
  6. Aykal, F. D. ve Günyel, B. (2010), Diyarbakır çocuk ve gençlik merkezinin ergonomik açıdan değerlendirilmesi, Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(32), 254-268.
  7. Barton H., Grant, M., Mitcham, C. ve Tsourou, C. (2009). Healthy Urban Planning in European Cities, Health Promotion International., 24 (S1), 91-99. doi:10.1093/heapro/dap059
  8. Başaran, İ. (2007). Sağlıklı kentler kavramının gelişiminde sağlıklı kentler projesi. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9 (3), 207-229.
  9. Bekçi, B. (2012). Fiziksel engelli kullanıcılar için en uygun ulaşım akslarının erişilebilirlik açıdan irdelenmesi: Bartın kenti örneği, Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(Özel Sayı), 26-36.
  10. Chalfin, A., Hansen, B., Lerner, J. vd. (2022). Reducing crime through environmental design: evidence from a randomized experiment of street lighting in New York City, J. Quant. Criminol., 38, 127–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-020-09490-6
  11. Cohen, R., Fernie, G. ve Roshan Fekr, A. (2020). A vision-based approach for sidewalk and walkway trip hazards assessment, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), 8438. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228438
  12. Currie, J.L. ve Stroll Develin, E. (2002). Your way to well-being: a survey of the perceived benefits, barriers, community support, and stigma associated with pram walking groups designed for new mothers, Sydney, Australia, Health Care Women Int., 23, 882–893. doi.org/10.1080/07399330290112380.
  13. Çakı, F. (2017). Aidiyet ve mekân olarak sokaklar: Balıkesir örnek olayı çerçevesinde bir tipoloji önerisi, Çekmece İZÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10-11(5), 25-54.
  14. Çatalyürekoğlu, S. (2022). Kent mobilyalarının tasarım süreçlerinin ergonomi kriteri açısından incelenmesi: Türkiye kapsamında 3 büyük şehir örneği, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
  15. Çelik, E., Sungur, A. ve Canbay Türkyılmaz, C. (2024). Ergonomic design for inclusive public spaces: A socio-demographic perspective on child’s ergonomics in Umraniye and Kadikoy, Istanbul, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2024.2399679
  16. Çelikyay, S. ve Karayılmazlar, A. S. (2016). Bartın kent merkezindeki kamusal alanların kentsel ergonomi ve kent kimliği açısından incelenmesi. Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 18 (2), 224-238. https://doi.org/10.24011/barofd.278907
  17. Çocuklar İçin Sokaklar Tasarlamak [ÇST]. (2022). Superpool Yayınları. (Orijinal yayın tarihi 2020) https://globaldesigningcities.org/publication/designing-streets-for-kids-tr/
  18. Dahlke, G. ve Drzewiecka-Dahlke, M. (2021). Ergonomic criterion in the design of roadside information: Letters size methodology verification, European Research Studies Journal, 24(s5), 196-208. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/2712
  19. Di Pilla, S. (2010). Slip, trip, and fall prevention: A practical handbook, CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420082364
  20. Gehl, J. (2020). İnsan İçin Kentler. (Çev. E. Erten). Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları. (Orijinal yayın tarihi 2010).
  21. Hallmark, S., Hawkins, N. ve Smadi, O. (2015). Evaluation of dynamic speed feedback signs on curves: a national demonstration Project (No. FHWA-HRT-14-020; IHRB Project TR-579; InTrans Project 08-320). United States. Federal Highway Administration.
  22. Ivanišević, T., Trufunović, A., Čičević, S., Vukšić, V., Simović, S.ve Slović, Ž. (2021). Ergonomic aspects of e-bike transport, IETI Transactions on Engineering Research and Practice, 5 (2), 18-30. https://doi.org/10.6723/TERP.202112_5(2).0003
  23. Kalınkara, V. (2010). Yaşlı bireyler için yaşam çevresinin ergonomik tasarımı, Yaşlı Sorunları Araştırma Dergisi, 1, 54-64. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/203216
  24. Karayılmazlar, A. S. (2017). Kamusal alanların kentsel ergonomi açısından irdelenmesi, Bartın örneği, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Bartın Üniversitesi, Bartın.
  25. Kemer Belediyesi İmar Müdürlüğü Arşivi. (2016). Kentsel Mekânsal Standartların Geliştirilmesi [KMSG]” (2017). Yayına Hazırlayan: Mimar Sinan Üniversitesi Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi, T.C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı Yayını. İstanbul.
  26. Kostof, S. (1992). The city assembled: the elements of urban form through history, London: Thames & Hudson. Küresel Sokak Tasarım Rehberi [KSTR]. (2021). Marmara Belediyeler Birliği Yayınları. (Orijinal yayın tarihi 2015). https://globaldesigningcities.org/publication/global-street-design-guide-tr/
  27. Ma, Y., Gu, X., Zhang, W., Hu, S., Liu, H., Zhao, J. ve Chen, S. (2021). Evaluating the effectiveness of crosswalk tactile paving on street-crossing behavior: A field trial study for people with visual impairment, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 163, 106420, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106420.
  28. Ma, Y., Mo, S., Chen, S., Xing, G., Tang, K., Zhao, J. ve Guo, Z. (2023). Evaluating the effectiveness of accessibility features for roadway users with visual impairment: A case study for Nanjing, China, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 97, 301-313, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2023.07.021.
  29. Mehta, V. (2013). The street: A quintessential social public space, London and New York: Routledge. Moroni, J. L. S. ve Aymone, J. L. F. (2012). Ergonomics and design: Traffic sign and street name sign, Work, 41(1),1541-6. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0350-1541
  30. Morris, J. (2015). Wheelchairs belong on sidewalks, not streets. https://wheelchairtravel.org/wheelchairs-belong-on-sidewalks-not-streets/
  31. Mrázek, M. ve Kanická, L. (2020). Street furniture for seniors. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 68 (1), 81-94. doi: 10.11118/actaun202068010081
  32. Mustapha, A., Abdul-Rani, A.M., Saad, N. ve Mustapha, M. (2024). Ergonomic principles of road signs comprehension: A literature review, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 101, 279-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2023.12.020
  33. Oh, S., Lee, S.-M. ve Park, S.-J. (2015). Spatial factors on satisfaction level of baby stroller’s and parenting stress, J. Archit. Inst. Korea Plan. Des., 31, 75–82. doi: 10.5659/JAIK_PD.2015.31.7.75.
  34. Özkul, A.E. (1996). Ergonomi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  35. Resuloğlu, Ç. (2020). Yapı, anlam ve kimlik üzerinden Ankara, Tunalı Hilmi Caddesi’ni yeniden anlamak, Online Journal of Art and Design, 8 (1), 226-234.
  36. Santi, G., Leporelli, E. ve Di Sivo, M. (2019). Improving sustainability in architectural research: biopsychosocial requirements in the design of urban spaces, Sustainability, 11(6), 1585. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061585
  37. Sauter, G. ve Bruggeman, H. (2021), Making cycling safer: cyclists also need pavement markings, transportation safety division, 3M Company, https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/making-cycling-safer-cyclists-also-need-pavement-markings-sauter/
  38. Streets as Places [SP]. (2008). Project for Public Spaces Inc. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/581110f944272e4a11871c01/5f1065684170b23883ef29e1_5b19499b941ffa434a23fea5_Using_Streets_to_Rebuild_Communities.pdf
  39. Szubski, E. C. (2023). Case study: An analysis of a sidewalk trip and fall after repair utilizing photograph scaling, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 67(1), 360-363. https://doi.org/10.1177/21695067231192700
  40. Şişman, E. E. ve Gültürk, P. (2016). Tekirdağ kent merkezi dış mekân tasarım elemanlarının antropometrik açıdan irdelenmesi. İnönü Üniversitesi Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, 6(14), 1-12. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/iujad/issue/24487/321814
  41. Tatano, V. ve Revellini, R. (2023). An alternative system to improve accessibility for wheelchair users: The stepped ramp, Applied Ergonomics, 108,103938, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103938
  42. Tiryaki, İ. D. ve Kürkçüoğlu, E. (2023). Ana caddelerin oluşumu üzerine morfolojik bir değerlendirme: Kurtuluş Caddesi, Antakya. Türkiye Kentsel Morfoloji Ağı, (IV. Kentsel Morfoloji Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı, s. 596–609). https://tnum.org.tr/index.php/tnum/article/view/293
  43. Toolkit for The Assessment of Bus Stop Accessibility and Safety [TABSAS]. (Tarih Yok). chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.mywaythere.org/downloads/bus_stop_accessibility_toolkit.pdf
  44. Welsh, B. C., Farrington, D. P. ve Douglas, S. (2022). The impact and policy relevance of street lighting for crime prevention: A systematic review based on a half-century of evaluation research, Criminology & Public Policy, 21, 739–765. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12585
  45. Wojnowska-Heciak, M., Heciak, J. ve Kłak, A. (2022). Concrete paving slabs for comfort of movement of mobility-impaired pedestrians-a survey, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health., 19(6), 3183. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063183
  46. Wolf, K. L. (2003). Ergonomics of the city: Green infrastructure and social benefits. In C. Kollin (Ed.), Engineering Green: Proceedings of the 11th National Urban Forest Conference, Washington D.C.: American Forests.
  47. World Health Organization [WHO]. (2013). Global Status Report on Road Safety 2013: supporting a decade of action. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241564564
  48. World Health Organization [WHO]. (2018). DSÖ Avrupa Sağlıklı Şehirler Ağı Faz VII (2019-2024) uygulama çerçevesi, chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.skb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/DSO-7.Faz-Rehberi-1.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 15.12.2024
  49. World Health Organization [WHO]. (2023). Pedestrian safety: a road safety manual for decision-makers and practitioners. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=z6q9EAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=World+Health+Organization+study+discovered+that+road+signs+can+reduce+the+risk+of+accidents+by+up+to+30%25&ots=Rok6tk1SXP&sig=cdhCYF5o-ps5rWSf5JEqcchV_Zg.
  50. Yılmaz, T. ve Gökçe, D. (2012). Kentsel açık ve yeşil alanların engelli bireylerin sosyal yaşamı açısından önemi, Engelsiz Turizm Sempozyumu Bildiri Kitabı (s. 31-40), Antalya.
  51. Yücel, G. F. (2013). Street furniture and amenities: designing the user-oriented urban landscape, Özyavuz, M. (Ed.), Advances in Landscape Architecture (s. 623-644), InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/55770
  52. Zahid, M., Chen, Y., Jamal, A., Al-Ahmadi, H. M. ve Al-Ofi, A. K. (2020). Adopting machine learning and spatial analysis techniques for driver risk assessment: Insights from a case study, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17, 5193. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145193
  53. Zorlu, T. (2017). Yaşlılar için konutta iç mekân tasarımı ve ergonomi, Yaşlı Sorunları Araştırma Dergisi, 10(2), 40-53.
  54. Barton H., Grant, M., Mitcham, C. ve Tsourou, C. (2009). Healthy Urban Planning in European Cities, Health Promotion International., 24 (S1), 91-99. doi:10.1093/heapro/dap059