SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Experimed / 2025 / Volume: 15 Issue: 3

Simultaneous Detection of Monkeypox Virus and Varicella Zoster Virus Using a Multiplex qPCR Assay: Analytical Performance and Clinical Validation

Gökçe Akan(Near east univesity)0000-0002-3878-1135
Gülten Tuncel(NEAR EAST UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-3332-471X
Aysegul Bostancı(Near east univesity)0000-0003-4319-9032
Cenk Serhan Özverel(NEAR EAST UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-9932-4774
Murat Sayan(KOCAELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4374-7193
Kaya Süer(YAKIN DOĞU ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-2565-3425
Tamer Sanlidag(NEAR EAST UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-6015-8032
Journal
Experimed
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Its scalability and rapid turnaround time support the timely differential diagnosis of vesicular rash illnesses, particularly in outbreak-prone or resource-limited settings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Monkeypox virus (MPXV) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) cause clinically similar vesicular pustular rashes and systemic symptoms, often complicating the diagnosis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The 2022 multi-countries MPXV outbreak highlighted the importance of accurate diagnostics, while VZV continues to represent a global health burden.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Its scalability and rapid turnaround time support the timely differential diagnosis of vesicular rash illnesses, particularly in outbreak-prone or resource-limited settings.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2022 Verileri
⚙️Variables:MPXV · VZV · Multiplex qPCR

Abstract

Objective: Monkeypox virus (MPXV) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) cause clinically similar vesicular pustular rashes and systemic symptoms, often complicating the diagnosis. The 2022 multi-countries MPXV outbreak highlighted the importance of accurate diagnostics, while VZV continues to represent a global health burden. Misdiagnosis can delay treatment, hinder outbreak control, and trigger unnecessary public health measures. Most commercial polymerase chain reaction (PCR) kits detect only a single pathogen, which increases the cost and turnaround time when differential diagnosis is required. Materials and Methods: We developed a multiplex quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay targeting the F3L gene of MPXV and the ORF4 gene of VZV, incorporating human cyclophilin A (CYPA) gene as an internal control to monitor sample integrity and amplification efficiency. A total of 15 VZV samples (6 positive, 9 negative) and 6 MPXV samples (1 positive, 5 negative) were analyzed. Analytical performance was evaluated using ten-fold serial dilutions of viral DNA controls, whereas clinical validation was performed on vesicle swab samples previously confirmed by the QIAstat-Dx viral vesicular panel (Qiagen, Germany). Results: The assay demonstrated high efficiency (0.93 for MPXV, 1.01 for VZV) and strong linearity (R²=0.999 and 0.984, respectively). The 95% limits of detection were 39.37 copies/reaction for MPXV and 30.61 copies/reaction for VZV. Comparison with the QIAstat-Dx panel showed 100% concordance, confirming the accuracy and reliability. Conclusion: This multiplex qPCR assay provides sensitive, specific, and cost-effective simultaneous detection of MPXV and VZV. Its scalability and rapid turnaround time support the timely differential diagnosis of vesicular rash illnesses, particularly in outbreak-prone or resource-limited settings.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akan, G., Tuncel, G., Bostancı, A., Özverel, C. S., Sayan, M., Süer, K., Sanlidag, T. (2025). Simultaneous Detection of Monkeypox Virus and Varicella Zoster Virus Using a Multiplex qPCR Assay: Analytical Performance and Clinical Validation. Experimed, Volume: 15 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.26650/experimed.1778525

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. Al-Dabbagh J, Mohammad Deeb E, Younis R, Eissa R. The dermatological manifestations and differential diagnosis of monkeypox: A narrative review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024; 103(44): e40359.
  2. Fan G, Kuang J, Zhang S, Yang Y, Liu Y, Lu H. Diagnostic approaches for monkeypox virus. iLABMED 2024; 2(1): 6–13.
  3. Chauhan RP, Fogel R Limson J. Overview of diagnostic methods, disease prevalence and transmission of mpox (formerly monkeypox) in humans and animal reservoirs. Microorganisms 2023; 11(5):1186.
  4. Silva SJRD, Kohl A, Pena L, Pardee K. Clinical and laboratory diagnosis of monkeypox (mpox): Current status and future directions. iScience 2023; 26(6): 106759.
  5. World Health Organization. WHO Director-General declares the ongoing monkeypox outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. 2024. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/14-08-2024-who-director-general-declares-mpox-outbreak-a-public-health-emergency-of-international-concern.
  6. World Health Organization. Mpox. 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/ news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mpox.
  7. World Health Organization. WHO Recommends New Name for Monkeypox Disease. 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/28-11-2022-who-recommends-new-name-for-monkeypox-disease.
  8. Gigante CM, Korber B, Seabolt MH, Wilkins K, Davidson W, Rao AK, et al. Multiple lineages of monkeypox virus detected in the United States, 2021-2022. Science 2022; 378(6619): 560-5.
  9. Happi C, Adetifa I, Mbala P, Njouom R, Nakoune E, Happi A, et al. Urgent need for a non-discriminatory and non-stigmatizing nomenclature for monkeypox virus. PLoS Biol 2022; 20(8): e3001769.
  10. O'Toole Á, Neher RA, Ndodo N, Borges V, Gannon B, Gomes JP, et al. APOBEC3 deaminase editing in mpox virus as evidence for sustained human transmission since at least 2016. Science 2023; 382(6670): 595-600.
  11. Africa CDC. Mpox molecular diagnostic tests (RT-PCR). Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. 2025. Available from: https://africacdc.org/ download/mpox-molecular-diagnostic-tests-rt-pcr/.
  12. Gershon AA, Breuer J, Cohen JI, Cohrs RJ, Gershon MD, Gilden D, et al. Varicella zoster virus infection. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2015; 1: 15016.
  13. Cohen JI. Herpes zoster. N Engl J Med 2013; 369(18): 1766-7.
  14. Kennedy PGE, Gershon AA. Clinical features of Varicella-Zoster virus infection. Viruses 2018; 10(11): 609.
  15. Adelino TÉR, Santos SC, Lima MT, da Costa AVB, Guimarães NR, Tomé LMR, et al. Differential diagnosis of exanthematous viruses during the 2022 Mpox outbreak in Minas Gerais, Brazil. J Clin Microbiol 2024; 62(6): e0010324.
  16. Mills MG, Juergens KB, Gov JP, McCormick CJ, Sampoleo R, Kachikis A, et al. Evaluation and clinical validation of monkeypox (mpox) virus real-time PCR assays. J Clin Virol 2023; 159: 105373.
  17. Schroeder K, Nitsche A. Multicolour, multiplex real-time PCR assay for the detection of human-pathogenic poxviruses. Mol Cell Probes 2010; 24(2): 110-3.
  18. Israeli O, Guedj-Dana Y, Shifman O, Lazar S, Cohen-Gihon I, Amit S, et al. Rapid amplicon nanopore sequencing (RANS) for the differential diagnosis of monkeypox virus and other vesicle-forming pathogens. Viruses 2022; 14(8): 1817.
  19. Lewis A, Josiowicz A, Hirmas Riade SM, Tous M, Palacios G, Cisterna DM. Introduction and differential diagnosis of monkeypox in Argentina, 2022. Emerg Infect Dis 2022; 28(10): 2123-5.
  20. Li Y, Zhao H, Wilkins K, Hughes C, Damon IK. Real-time PCR assays for the specific detection of monkeypox virus West African and Congo Basin strain DNA. J Virol Methods 2010; 169(1): 223-7.
  21. Kulesh DA, Baker RO, Loveless BM, Norwood D, Zwiers SH, Mucker E, et al. Smallpox and pan-orthopox virus detection by real-time 3'-minor groove binder TaqMan assays on the roche LightCycler and the Cepheid smart Cycler platforms. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42(2): 601-9.
  22. Elnifro EM, Ashshi AM, Cooper RJ, Klapper PE. Multiplex PCR: optimization and application in diagnostic virology. Clin Microbiol Rev 2000; 13(4): 559-70.
  23. Feng W, Chen Y, Han Y, Diao Z, Zhao Z, Zhang Y, et al. Key performance evaluation of commercialized multiplex rRT-PCR kits for respiratory viruses: implications for application and optimization. Microbiol Spectr 2024; 12(12): e0164124.
  24. Rasizadeh R, Shamekh A, Shiri Aghbash P, Bannazadeh Baghi H. Comparison of human monkeypox, chickenpox and smallpox: a comprehensive review of pathology and dermatological manifestations. Curr Med Res Opin 2023; 39(5): 751-60.
  25. Jezek Z, Szczeniowski M, Paluku KM, Mutombo M, Grab B. Human monkeypox: confusion with chickenpox. Acta Trop 1988; 45(4): 297-307.
  26. Pattnaik H, Surani S, Goyal L, Kashyap R. Making sense of monkeypox: a comparison of other poxviruses to the monkeypox. Cureus 2023; 15(4): e38083.
  27. Wilber E, Rebolledo PA, Kasinathan V, Merritt S, Titanji BK, Aldred B, et al. Utility of a viral vesicular panel multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay for the diagnosis of monkeypox, herpes simplex, and varicella zoster viruses. Open Forum Infect Dis 2023; 10(3): 140.
  28. Batty M, Papadakis G, Zhang C, Tran T, Druce J, Lim CK, Williamson DA, Jackson K. Laboratory assessment of a multi-target assay for the rapid detection of viruses causing vesicular diseases. J Clin Virol 2023; 165: 105525.
  29. Michel J, Targosz A, Rinner T, Bourquain D, Brinkmann A, Sacks JA, Schaade L, Nitsche A. Evaluation of 11 commercially available PCR kits for the detection of monkeypox virus DNA, Berlin, July to September 2022. Euro Surveill 2022; 27(45): 2200816.
  30. Atceken N, Bayaki I, Can B, Yigci D, Tasoglu S. Mpox disease, diagnosis, and point of care platforms. Bioeng Transl Med 2025; 10(3): e10733.