Journals / Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 01

Non-Invasive Rhinosinusitis: Clinical and Microbiological Perspective

Pages
21–26
Publication Date
2021-03-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

J Microbiol Infect Dis 2021; 11(1):21-26.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Objectives: Fungal rhinosinusitis is one of the important healthcare problems and its incidence and prevalence are increasing over the past three decades.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It affects approximately 20% of the population at some time in their lives.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:J Microbiol Infect Dis 2021; 11(1):21-26.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Fungal rhinosinusitis · Allergic rhinosinusitis · Aspergillus

Abstract

Objectives: Objectives: Fungal rhinosinusitis is one of the important healthcare problems and its incidence and prevalence are increasing over the past three decades. It affects approximately 20% of the population at some time in their lives. We aimed to identify and characterize the microorganisms causing non-invasive rhinosinusitis and to correlate the findings with the clinical profile of patients. Methods: Clinically suspected cases of rhinosinusitis were enrolled in the study and detailed clinical history was taken. Samples like nasal mucosa, nasal crusts, scrapings / excised nasal polyps, and biopsy were collected. The specimens were processed for fungal culture. Isolates were identified as per standard protocols. Results: A total of 74 patients clinically suspected of rhinosinusitis were enrolled in our study out of which 60.8% were males. The most common presenting complaint was nasal obstruction (91.8%) followed by nasal discharge (77%). Clinically characterizing, the most common type of non-invasive rhinosinusitis seen in our study was allergic rhinosinusitis (44.6%). KOH positivity was 45.6% and fungal culture positivity was 30.4%. The most common fungal isolate was Aspergillus flavus. Conclusion: Continuous and periodic evaluation of the microbiological patterns of isolates is necessary to decrease the potential risk of complications by early institution of appropriate treatment. J Microbiol Infect Dis 2021; 11(1):21-26.

🔖

Cite This Article

SANDHU, D., GUPTA, V., CHHİNA, D., MUNJAL, M. (2021). Non-Invasive Rhinosinusitis: Clinical and Microbiological Perspective. Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 01, 21–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/111278

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Kennedy DW, Thaler ER. Acute vs. chronic sinusitis: etiology, management, and outcomes. Infect Dis Clin Pract 1997; 2:49-58
  2. Das A, Bal A, Chakrabarti A, Panda N, Joshi K. Spectrum of fungal rhinosinusitis histopathologist’s perspective. Histopathology 2009;54(7):854-859
  3. Taxy J. Paranasal Fungal Sinusitis: Contributions of Histopathology to Diagnosis. The Am J Surg Pathol 2006;30(6):713-720. 4. deShazo RD, O’Brien M, Chapin K, Soto-Aguilar M, Swain R, Lyons M, et al. Criteria for the diagnosis of sinus mycetoma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997;99: 475-485
  4. Morgan J, Warnock DW. Fungi. In: Browning GG, Burton MJ, Clarke R, Hibbert J, et al. Scott-Brown’s Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery. 7th ed. London: Edward Arnold; 2008; 217- 79
  5. Baker RD. Mucormycosis: A new disease? JAMA 1957;163(10):805-8
  6. Prayaga N, Srinivas M, Jadi L, Sudhakar K, Anil N. Clinical application of a microbiological study on chronic suppurative otitis media. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 2:290-4
  7. Prakash M, Lakshmi K, Anuradha S, Swathi GN. Bacteriological profile and their antibiotic susceptibility pattern of cases of CSOM. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2013; 6:210-2
  8. Chander J. Fungal sinusitis. Textbook of Medical Mycology 3rd ed. New Delhi: Mehta Publishers; 2009:480- 520
  9. Browning GG, Burton MJ, Clarke R, et al. Rhinosinusitis. Scott-Brown’s Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery. 7th ed. London: Edward Arnold; 2008. p. 1423-1467
  10. Ponikau JU, Sherris DA, Kern EB, et al. The diagnosis and incidence of allergic fungal sinusitis. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 1999; 74:877-84
  11. Manning SC, Holman M. Further evidence for allergic pathophysiology in allergic fungal sinusitis. Laryngoscope 1998; 108:1485-96
  12. Micheal RC, Micheal JS, Ashbee RH, Mathews MS. Mycological profile of fungal sinusitis: an audit of specimens over a 7 year period in a tertiary care hospital in Tamil Nadu. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2008; 51(4):493-6
  13. Farhani F, Mashouf RY, Hashemian F, Esmaeli R. Antimicrobial Resistance Patters of Aerobic Organisms in Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis in Hamadan, Iran. Avicenna J Clin Microb Infec 2014;1(2):e18961
  14. Irfan S, Farooq I, Fayaz W. Microbiological profile of patients with chronic sinusitis in Kashmir valley. JMS 2014;4(1):410-16
  15. Joshi RR, Bhandary S, Khanal B, Singh RK. Fungal Maxillary sinusitis: A prospective study in a tertiary care hospital of eastern Nepal. Kathmandu Univ Med J 2007;5(2):195-198. 17.