Journals / Journal of International Environmental Application and Science / 2026 / Volume: 11 Issue: 1

Concept Paper on Shaft Sinking of the Mine "Trepca" in Stanterg New Horizons XIth to XIIIth

Muhamedin Hetemi(Public University of Mitrovica, Faculty of Geosciences, Mining Department, Mitrovica, KOSOVO)
Pages
—
Publication Date
2016-03-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This practice could be experienced in other similar mines as well.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this paper is to calculate the expenses for shaft sinking below horizon XI th and exploitation fronts in deep horizons of Trepça Stantërg lead and zinc mine and to evaluate on a conceptual basis if a shaft is most suited for underground access requirements from horizon XI to XII which is located on above sea level 15.20m to -45.20m.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Even the existing shaft is built until horizon XI there is high water in-flow on the depth, which would prevent the continuation of the shaft construction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This practice could be experienced in other similar mines as well.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:shaft · mining · construction

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to calculate the expenses for shaft sinking below horizon XI th and exploitation fronts in deep horizons of Trepça Stantërg lead and zinc mine and to evaluate on a conceptual basis if a shaft is most suited for underground access requirements from horizon XI to XII which is located on above sea level 15.20m to -45.20m. Even the existing shaft is built until horizon XI there is high water in-flow on the depth, which would prevent the continuation of the shaft construction. This paper was focused on the construction cost and schedule differences of shaft deepening that is currently the most typical access alternative used currently. According to the literature, there are several methods that can be used but no clear answer to state that one method is better because it depend on the ground situation and circumstances. Several different conditions will be assessed in order to find the degree of sensitivity of methods, in particular, comparison of the construction cost and schedule or sinking a shaft. This practice could be experienced in other similar mines as well.

🔖

Cite This Article

Hetemi, M., Zeqiri, R. (2016). Concept Paper on Shaft Sinking of the Mine "Trepca" in Stanterg New Horizons XIth to XIIIth. Journal of International Environmental Application and Science, Volume: 11 Issue: 1. https://ajindex.com/articles/1112487

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Brock D, Wooton D, (2000) Deep shaft construction in unconsolidated material and water-bearing formations. Frontier-Kemper Constructors Inc, Sylmar Canada
  2. Burger W, Delabbio, F., & Frenzel, C. (2010). Accessing deep orebodies using mechanical excavation equipment. Mining Engineering, 62, 146-149.
  3. Hetemi M, (2013, February). Contribution to the optimal modelling of mine field opening from level XI to level XIII in Stanterg mine. 1-129.University of Prishtina, Mitrovica, Kosovo.
  4. Lategan PN, (2009). Shaft sinking scheduling/planning. Shaft Sinking and Mining Contractors Conference. The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
  5. Stan Terg Mine, (2006). Feasibility study. Trepca Mine, Mitrovica.
  6. Walters DM. (2009). Ventilation for sinking vertical, sub vertical and decline shafts. Shaft Sinking and Mining Contractors Conference. The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
  7. Burger W, Delabbio, F., & Frenzel, C. (2010). Accessing deep orebodies using mechanical excavation equipment. Mining Engineering, 62, 146-149.