Journals / Journal of International Environmental Application and Science / 2026 / Volume: 17 Issue: 1

Techno-Economic Analyses of the Moisture Adsorbed Materials

Ahmet Samancı(NECMETTİN ERBAKAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5412-1575
Gülin Gençoğlu Korkmaz(KONYA TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ MÜHENDİSLİK VE DOĞA BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ JEOLOJİ MÜHENDİSLİĞİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0003-0185-2806
Pages
—
Publication Date
2022-03-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Considering the laborious and costly preparation of synthetic adsorbents in the laboratory environment, and the abundance, cheap costs, and accessibility of the natural adsorbents in Turkey, it is necessary for our country to have an important place in the world markets, by establishing eco-friend, clean, and high-tech production facilities and orienting towards natural adsorbents.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The use of adsorbents, which are naturally formed in nature or created in a laboratory environment, in agriculture, industry, and daily life is increasing day by day.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is possible to classify adsorbents according to different criteria, however in this study, they are considered natural and synthetic adsorbents.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Considering the laborious and costly preparation of synthetic adsorbents in the laboratory environment, and the abundance, cheap costs, and accessibility of the natural adsorbents in Turkey, it is necessary for our country to have an important place in the world markets, by establishing eco-friend, clean, and high-tech production facilities and orienting towards natural adsorbents.
🔬Design:Review
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:adsorbent · natural adsorbents · eco-friendly

Abstract

The use of adsorbents, which are naturally formed in nature or created in a laboratory environment, in agriculture, industry, and daily life is increasing day by day. It is possible to classify adsorbents according to different criteria, however in this study, they are considered natural and synthetic adsorbents. Considering the laborious and costly preparation of synthetic adsorbents in the laboratory environment, and the abundance, cheap costs, and accessibility of the natural adsorbents in Turkey, it is necessary for our country to have an important place in the world markets, by establishing eco-friend, clean, and high-tech production facilities and orienting towards natural adsorbents.

🔖

Cite This Article

Samancı, A., Korkmaz, G. G. (2022). Techno-Economic Analyses of the Moisture Adsorbed Materials. Journal of International Environmental Application and Science, Volume: 17 Issue: 1. https://ajindex.com/articles/1112269

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (56)

  1. Akyüz, T., Ergun, O., & Akyüz, S. (1991). Çankırı-Çorum Havzası, Uludağ Yöresi Tersiyer Zeolitlerinin Sezyum ve Stransiyum İyonlarını Soğurması. V. Ulusal Kil Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı, EskiĢehir, 227-231.
  2. Berkhout, E., Glover, D., & Kuyvenhoven, A. (2015). On-farm impact of the System of Rice Intensification (SRI): Evidence and knowledge gaps. Agricultural Systems, 132, 157-166.
  3. Bhardwaj, A., Shainberg, I., Goldstein, D., Warrington, D., & J. Levy, G. (2007). Water retention and hydraulic conductivity of cross‐linked polyacrylamides in sandy soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 71(2), 406-412.
  4. Breck, D. (1974). Zeolite Molecular Sieves Wiley. New York, 634.
  5. Bürküt, Y., Esenli, V., Çelenli, A. 1997. “Bigadiç Zeolitik Tüflerinin Bazı Katyonik İyon Değiştirme Yetenekleri”, Su ve Çevre Sempozyumu 97, TMMOB Jeoloji Mühendisleri Odası, Yayın No. 46, İstanbul, 199-204.
  6. Cabangon, R., Castillo, E., Bao, L., Lu, G., Wang, G., Cui, Y., Chen, C. (2001). Impact of alternate wetting and drying irrigation on rice growth and resource-use efficiency. Barker R, Loeve R, Li YH, Tuong TP, editors, 55-80.
  7. Cancela, G. D., Huertas, F., Taboada, E. R., Sánchez-Rasero, F., & Laguna, A. H. (1997). Adsorption of water vapor by homoionic montmorillonites. Heats of adsorption and desorption. Journal of colloid and interface science, 185(2), 343-354.
  8. Çetinel, G. (1993). Zeolite in the World wide and Turkey”. General directorate of mineral research and explaration, Ankara, 37-55.
  9. Chimeddorj, M. (2007). Farklı Bentonitlerin Nem Alıcı (desikant) Özelliklerin Belirlenmesi. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü,
  10. Demir, E., & Yalçın, H. (2014). Adsorbentler: Sınıflandırma, Özellikler, Kullanım ve Öngörüler/Adsorbents: Classification, Properties, Use and Projections.
  11. Demirel, H., Akasanı, B., Öztürk, H. 1989. “Zeolitin Çimento Üretiminde Kullanım Olanakları”, Türkiye Madencilik Bilimsel ve Teknik 11. Kongresi, Ankara, 321-332
  12. Dong, N. M., Brandt, K. K., Sørensen, J., Hung, N. N., Van Hach, C., Tan, P. S., & Dalsgaard, T. (2012). Effects of alternating wetting and drying versus continuous flooding on fertilizer nitrogen fate in rice fields in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 47, 166-174.
  13. Dontsova, K. M., Norton, L. D., Johnston, C. T., & Bigham, J. M. (2004). Influence of exchangeable cations on water adsorption by soil clays. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 68(4), 1218-1227.
  14. Ekebafe, L., Ogbeifun, D., & Okieimen, F. (2011). Polymer applications in agriculture. Biokemistri, 23(2).
  15. Esposito, F., Del Nobile, M. A., Mensitieri, G., & Nicolais, L. (1996). Water sorption in cellulose‐based hydrogels. Journal of applied polymer science, 60(13), 2403-2407.
  16. Evans, M. R. (2004). Ground bovine bone as a perlite alternative in horticultural substrates. HortTechnology, 14(2), 171-175.
  17. Fahmi, W., Al-Shamary, A., Al-deen Al-Khateeb, B., Telfah, E., Ghani, A., Al-Antary, T., & Kahlel, A. (2021). The Influence of Perlite And Irrigation Management on the Properties of Potatoes in Gypsiferous Soil. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin. Reference 18 Gandhidasan, P. (2004). A simplified model for air dehumidification with liquid desiccant. Solar energy, 76(4), 409-416.
  18. Gandhidasan, P., Al-Farayedhi, A. A., & Al-Mubarak, A. A. (2001). Dehydration of natural gas using solid desiccants. Energy, 26(9), 855-868.
  19. Gandhidasan, P., & Mohandes, M. A. (2008). Predictions of vapor pressures of aqueous desiccants for cooling applications by using artificial neural networks. Applied Thermal Engineering, 28(2-3), 126-135.
  20. Gholamhoseini, M., Ghalavand, A., Khodaei-Joghan, A., Dolatabadian, A., Zakikhani, H., & Farmanbar, E. (2013). Zeolite-amended cattle manure effects on sunflower yield, seed quality, water use efficiency and nutrient leaching. Soil and tillage research, 126, 193-202.
  21. Göktekin, A. (1990). Bigadiç Tülü Ovası Zeolitlerinin Teknolojik Özelliklerinin AraĢtırılması Projesi Kesin Raporu. İTÜ Yer Bilimleri ve Yeraltı Kaynakları Uygulama-AraĢtırma Merkezi, İstanbul.
  22. Hanna, H. (2006). A stir and disinfect technique to recycle perlite for cost-effective greenhouse tomato production. Journal of vegetable science, 12(1), 51-63.
  23. He, C., Osbaeck, B., & Makovicky, E. (1995). Pozzolanic reactions of six principal clay minerals: Activation, reactivity assessments and technological effects. Cement and Concrete Research, 25(8), 1691-1702. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(95)00165-4
  24. Hüttermann, A., Zommorodi, M., & Reise, K. (1999). Addition of hydrogels to soil for prolonging the survival of Pinus halepensis seedlings subjected to drought. Soil and tillage research, 50(3-4), 295-304.
  25. İpekoğlu, B., Kurşun, İ., Bilge, Y., & Barut, A. (1997). Türkiye bentonit potansiyeline genel bir bakış. 2. Endüstriyel hammaddeler sempozyumu, 16-17.
  26. Johnson, M., & Piper, C. (1997). Cross‐linked, water‐storing polymers as aids to drought tolerance of tomatoes in growing media. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 178(1), 23-27.
  27. Ju, M., Xu, Z., Wei-Ming, S., Guang-Xi, X., & Zhao-Liang, Z. (2011). Nitrogen balance and loss in a greenhouse vegetable system in southeastern China. Pedosphere, 21(4), 464-472.
  28. Karimi, S., Reaney, I., Han, Y., Pokorny, J., & Sterianou, I. (2009). Crystal chemistry and domain structure of rare-earth doped BiFeO 3 ceramics. Journal of materials science, 44(19), 5102-5112.
  29. Kazanskii, K., & Dubrovskii, S. (1992). Chemistry and physics of “agricultural” hydrogels. Polyelectrolytes hydrogels chromatographic materials, 97-133.
  30. Kima, A. S., Chung, W. G., & Wang, Y.-M. (2014). Improving irrigated lowland rice water use efficiency under saturated soil culture for adoption in tropical climate conditions. Water, 6(9), 2830-2846.
  31. Köktürk, U. (1995). Zeolit madenciliği ve çevre sağlığına etkileri. Endüstriyel hammaddeler sempozyumu, 21-22.
  32. Krishnan, K. A., & Anirudhan, T. (2003). Removal of cadmium (II) from aqueous solutions by steam-activated sulphurised carbon prepared from sugar-cane bagasse pith: Kinetics and equilibrium studies. Water Sa, 29(2), 147-156.
  33. Kurama, H., Kaya, M. 1995. “Doğal Klinoptilolitin İyon Değişim Özellikleri, Pb++, Cu++, Cd++, Hg++/Na++ Dengesi”, Endüstriyel Hammaddeler Sempozyumu, İzmir, 313-321.
  34. Manjaiah, K. M., Mukhopadhyay, R., Paul, R., Datta, S. C., Kumararaja, P., & Sarkar, B. (2019). Chapter 13 - Clay minerals and zeolites for environmentally sustainable agriculture. In M. Mercurio, B. Sarkar, & A. Langella (Eds.), Modified Clay and Zeolite Nanocomposite Materials (pp. 309-329): Elsevier.
  35. Mumpton, F. A. (1999). La roca magica: Uses of natural zeolites in agriculture and industry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(7), 3463-3470.
  36. Nalley, L., Linquist, B., Kovacs, K., & Anders, M. (2015). The economic viability of alternative wetting and drying irrigation in Arkansas rice production. Agronomy Journal, 107(2), 579-587.
  37. Nie, L., Peng, S., Chen, M., Shah, F., Huang, J., Cui, K., & Xiang, J. (2012). Aerobic rice for water-saving agriculture. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 32(2), 411-418.
  38. Özaydın, S., 2008. Gizli Kalmış Zenginlik: Zeolit. http://www.madenhaber.net/haber.
  39. Ozbahce, A., Tari, A. F., Gönülal, E., Simsekli, N., & Padem, H. (2015). The effect of zeolite applications on yield components and nutrient uptake of common bean under water stress. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 61(5), 615-626.
  40. Özgüner, A. M. (2004). Doğu ve Güneydoğu Anadolu Doğal Kaynaklarının Bölge Kalkınmasında Kullanılması. MTA Dergisi.
  41. Pill, W. G., & Jacono, C. C. (1984). Effects of hydrogel incorporation in peat‐lite on tomato growth and water relations. Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 15(7), 799-810.
  42. Qin, J., Wang, X., Hu, F., & Li, H. (2010). Growth and physiological performance responses to drought stress under non-flooded rice cultivation with straw mulching. Plant, Soil and Environment, 56(2), 51-59.
  43. Rafatullah, M., Sulaiman, O., Hashim, R., & Ahmad, A. (2010). Adsorption of methylene blue on low-cost adsorbents: a review. J Hazard Mater, 177(1-3), 70-80. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.047
  44. Rahle, U. (2006). Desiccant kurutma ile nem kontrolü. Tesisat Mühendisliği Dergisi, 95, 37-42.
  45. Sabah, Y., Sabah, E., & Berktay, A. (2011). Doğal Zeolitlerin (Klinoptilolit) Su Yumuşatiminda Kullanimi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(3), 1155-1161.
  46. Sarkar, S., Datta, S., & Biswas, D. (2015). Effect of fertilizer loaded nanoclay/superabsorbent polymer composites on nitrogen and phosphorus release in soil. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences, 85(2), 415-421.
  47. Sherman, J. D., Breck, D. W., & engineers, A. i. o. c. (1978). Adsorption and ion exchange separations: American Institute of Chemical Engineers.
  48. Suner, F. (1991). Soda ve Zeolit Minerallerinin OluĢumu. İTÜ Dergisi, 49(1), 1-5.
  49. Ülkü, S. (1984). Application of natural zeolites in water treatment. Çevre Dergisi.
  50. Viero, P., Chiswell, K., & Theron, J. (2002). The effect of a soil-amended hydrogel on the establishment of a Eucalyptus grandis clone on a sandy clay loam soil in Zululand during winter. Southern African Forestry Journal, 2002(193), 65-76.
  51. Xiubin, H., & Zhanbin, H. (2001). Zeolite application for enhancing water infiltration and retention in loess soil. Resources, conservation and recycling, 34(1), 45-52.
  52. Yakupoğlu, T., Gülümser, E., ÇOPUR, M. D., & Başaran, U. (2019). Tek yıllık yem bitkisi yetiştiriciliği altındaki su tutucu uygulanmış topraktan meydana gelen sediment ve yüzey akış. Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Dergisi, 7(2), 99-109.
  53. Yapparov, F. S., Shilovskij, L., Tsitsishvili, G., & Andronikashvili, T. (1988). Growing tomatoes and cucumbers on substrates containing natural zeolites.
  54. Yörükoğulları, E., Orhun, Ö., Ġnel, O., Kayıkçı, N. 1989. “Doğal Zeolit ve Bazı Yöresel Killerin Islanma Isıları ve Katyon Değişim Kapasitelerinin Tayini”, IV. Ulusal Kil Sempozyumu, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi, Bildiriler, Sivas, 177-181
  55. Yücel, H., & Çulfaz, A. (1984). Doğal ve yapay zeolitlerin endüstriyel kullanım alanları. ODTÜ Uygulamalı Araştırmalar Dergisi Eki, 3(10), 1-20.
  56. Zheng, J., Chen, T., Xia, G., Chen, W., Liu, G., & Chi, D. (2018). Effects of zeolite application on grain yield, water use and nitrogen uptake of rice under alternate wetting and drying irrigation. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 11, 157-164. doi:10.25165/j.ijabe.20181101.3064.