SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon / 2017 / Volume: 27 Issue: 4

DESIGN OF AUTOMATIC TEXTILE AIRING PROGRAM: AN APPROACH TO SUSTAINABLE LAUNDERING

OTOMATİK TEKSTİL HAVALANDIRMA PROGRAMI TASARIMI: SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR TEKSTİL BAKIMI

Bükra Kalaycı
Başak Arslan İlkiz
Eda Hanife Budak
Pelin Altay
Nevin Çiğdem Gürsoy
Pages
—
Publication Date
2017-12-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Laundering includes exposing textile materials to a combined effects of water, heat, agitation and detergent.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Laundering includes exposing textile materials to a combined effects of water, heat, agitation and detergent.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Laundering includes exposing textile materials to a combined effects of water, heat, agitation and detergent.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Laundering includes exposing textile materials to a combined effects of water, heat, agitation and detergent.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sustainability · sustainable laundering · textile refreshing/airing program

Abstract

Laundering includes exposing textile materials to a combined effects of water, heat, agitation and detergent. Depending on the

Özet

Tekstil mamullerinin yıkama işlemi esnasında tekstil malzemesi su, ısı, mekanik etki ve deterjanın kombine etkilerine maruz

🔖

Cite This Article

Kalaycı, B., İlkiz, B. A., Budak, E. H., Altay, P., Gürsoy, N. Ç. (2017). DESIGN OF AUTOMATIC TEXTILE AIRING PROGRAM: AN APPROACH TO SUSTAINABLE LAUNDERING. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, Volume: 27 Issue: 4. https://ajindex.com/articles/1111384

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (26)

  1. Allwood, J., Larson, S. & de Rodrig, M., 2006. Well Dressed?, Cambridge: University of Cambridge Institute of Manufacturing, 84. ASTM, 1997. Standard E544-75. Standard practice for referencing suprathreshold odour intensity. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing Materials. In Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 15.07:23-32. Bio Intellegence Service, 2009.
  2. Study on Water Efficiency Service, Paris: European Commision. d'Acampora Zellner, B., Dugo, P., Dugo, G. & Mondello, L., 2008. Gas chromatography-olfactometry in food flavour analysiS. Epub, Volume 4;1186(1-2), pp. 123-143.
  3. Fletcher, K., 2008. Sustainable Fashion and Textiles: Design Journeys. 2008 ed. London: Earthscan. Gintis, D. & Mead, E., 1959. The Mechanism of Pilling. Textile Research Journal, Volume 29, p. 578. Goynes, W. & Rollins, M., 1971. A SEM study of washer-dryer abrasion in cotton fibers. Textile Research Journal, 41(3), pp. 226-231.
  4. Haynes, W. M. e., 2011. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (92nd ed.). s.l.:CRC Press. ISO, 2007. ISO 8589:2007 Sensory analysis -- General guidance for the design of test rooms. s.l.:ISO. Jack, T., 2013. Laundry routine and resource consumption in Australia. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 6(37), pp. 666-674.
  5. Johnson, G. & Ganske, S., 2013.
  6. Johnson, Glenn, Houston, TX: NASA Johnson Space Center. Kadolph, S., 2007. Quality assurance for textiles and apparel. ISBN:156367-144-1 ed. s.l.:Fairchild Publication. Laitala, K., Klepp, I. & Boks, C., 2012. Changing Laundry Habits in Norway. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36(2), pp. 228-237.
  7. McQueen, R., Laing, R., Brooks, H. & Niven, B., 2007. Odor Intensity in Apparel Fabrics and the Link with Bacterial Populations. Textile Research Journal, 7(77), pp. 449-456.
  8. Okubayashi, S. & Bechtold, T., 2005. A Pilling Mechnism Of Man-Made Cellulosic Fabrics – Effects of Fibrillation. Textile Research Journal, 75(4), pp. 288-292.
  9. Powers, W., 2004. The Science of Smell Part 2: Odor Chemistry, s.l.: Iowa State University. Schindler, W. & Hauser, P., 2004. Chemical Finishing of Textiles Part18: Novel Finishes. s.l.:Woodhead Publishing. Shove, E., 2003.
  10. Converging Conventions of Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26(4), pp. 395-418.
  11. Sidel, J. & Stone, H., 2006. 57. Sensory Science: Methodology. In: Y. Hui, ed. Handbook of Food Science, Technology, and Engineering, Volume 2. s.l.:Taylor&Francis Group, pp. 57-3.
  12. Xiao, H., Liu, L. & Shi, M., 2011. Comparison of Deodorizing Properties of Several Typical Fibers. Journal of Fib Bioeng & Inform, 4(3), pp. 301-309.
  13. Yates, L. & Evans, D., 2016. Dirtying Linen: Re-evaluating the sustainability of domestic laundry. Environmental Policy and Governance, 26(2), pp. 101-115. and Tsigas, M.E. (1997) Structure of GTAP. Global Trade Analysis: modeling and applications, 13–73.
  14. Allwood, J., Larson, S. & de Rodrig, M., 2006. Well Dressed?, Cambridge: University of Cambridge Institute of Manufacturing, 84. ASTM, 1997. Standard E544-75. Standard practice for referencing suprathreshold odour intensity. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing Materials. In Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 15.07:23-32. Bio Intellegence Service, 2009.
  15. Study on Water Efficiency Service, Paris: European Commision. d'Acampora Zellner, B., Dugo, P., Dugo, G. & Mondello, L., 2008. Gas chromatography-olfactometry in food flavour analysiS. Epub, Volume 4;1186(1-2), pp. 123-143.
  16. Fletcher, K., 2008. Sustainable Fashion and Textiles: Design Journeys. 2008 ed. London: Earthscan. Gintis, D. & Mead, E., 1959. The Mechanism of Pilling. Textile Research Journal, Volume 29, p. 578. Goynes, W. & Rollins, M., 1971. A SEM study of washer-dryer abrasion in cotton fibers. Textile Research Journal, 41(3), pp. 226-231.
  17. Haynes, W. M. e., 2011. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (92nd ed.). s.l.:CRC Press. ISO, 2007. ISO 8589:2007 Sensory analysis -- General guidance for the design of test rooms. s.l.:ISO. Jack, T., 2013. Laundry routine and resource consumption in Australia. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 6(37), pp. 666-674.
  18. Johnson, G. & Ganske, S., 2013.
  19. Johnson, Glenn, Houston, TX: NASA Johnson Space Center. Kadolph, S., 2007. Quality assurance for textiles and apparel. ISBN:156367-144-1 ed. s.l.:Fairchild Publication. Laitala, K., Klepp, I. & Boks, C., 2012. Changing Laundry Habits in Norway. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36(2), pp. 228-237.
  20. McQueen, R., Laing, R., Brooks, H. & Niven, B., 2007. Odor Intensity in Apparel Fabrics and the Link with Bacterial Populations. Textile Research Journal, 7(77), pp. 449-456.
  21. Okubayashi, S. & Bechtold, T., 2005. A Pilling Mechnism Of Man-Made Cellulosic Fabrics – Effects of Fibrillation. Textile Research Journal, 75(4), pp. 288-292.
  22. Powers, W., 2004. The Science of Smell Part 2: Odor Chemistry, s.l.: Iowa State University. Schindler, W. & Hauser, P., 2004. Chemical Finishing of Textiles Part18: Novel Finishes. s.l.:Woodhead Publishing. Shove, E., 2003.
  23. Converging Conventions of Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26(4), pp. 395-418.
  24. Sidel, J. & Stone, H., 2006. 57. Sensory Science: Methodology. In: Y. Hui, ed. Handbook of Food Science, Technology, and Engineering, Volume 2. s.l.:Taylor&Francis Group, pp. 57-3.
  25. Xiao, H., Liu, L. & Shi, M., 2011. Comparison of Deodorizing Properties of Several Typical Fibers. Journal of Fib Bioeng & Inform, 4(3), pp. 301-309.
  26. Yates, L. & Evans, D., 2016. Dirtying Linen: Re-evaluating the sustainability of domestic laundry. Environmental Policy and Governance, 26(2), pp. 101-115. and Tsigas, M.E. (1997) Structure of GTAP. Global Trade Analysis: modeling and applications, 13–73.