SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kader / 2013 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

-

Kadı Abdulcebbar'ın İyilik-Kötülük Düalitesine Yönelttiği Eleştiriler

Aslan İbrahim
Journal
Kader
Pages
77–100
Publication Date
2013-01-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, it must be comprehended in such a way that, considering the historical context from which it arose, this, seemingly, has developed as a comparison between the consequence of rational theology and mythological theology deprived of internal consistency

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article analyzes the criticisms of the duality of Sanawi and Majusi theological and ethical components comprised by Qadi Abd al-Jabbar, a prominent figure in Mutazila Theology in an integrated methodology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The subject is based on the question which has created hot discussions: “Can we talk about evil and good, neither of which could be degraded to one another in the universe?” In theological context, Qadi Abd al-Jabbar, strove to put forward that duality cannot be defended depending on universe; from ethical point of view, however, he based his ideas on the fact that both we may not talk about a good and evil relationship which cannot be degraded to one another.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, it must be comprehended in such a way that, considering the historical context from which it arose, this, seemingly, has developed as a comparison between the consequence of rational theology and mythological theology deprived of internal consistency
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article analyzes the criticisms of the duality of Sanawi and Majusi theological and ethical components comprised by Qadi Abd al-Jabbar, a prominent figure in Mutazila Theology in an integrated methodology. The subject is based on the question which has created hot discussions: “Can we talk about evil and good, neither of which could be degraded to one another in the universe?” In theological context, Qadi Abd al-Jabbar, strove to put forward that duality cannot be defended depending on universe; from ethical point of view, however, he based his ideas on the fact that both we may not talk about a good and evil relationship which cannot be degraded to one another. Thus, it must be comprehended in such a way that, considering the historical context from which it arose, this, seemingly, has developed as a comparison between the consequence of rational theology and mythological theology deprived of internal consistency

Özet

This article analyzes the criticisms of the duality of Sanawi and Majusi theological and ethical components comprised by Qadi Abd al-Jabbar, a prominent figure in Mutazila Theology in an integrated methodology. The subject is based on the question which has created hot discussions: ?Can we talk about evil and good, neither of which could be degraded to one another in the universe?? In theological context, Qadi Abd al-Jabbar, strove to put forward that duality cannot be defended depending on universe; from ethical point of view, however, he based his ideas on the fact that both we may not talk about a good and evil relationship which cannot be degraded to one another. Thus, it must be comprehended in such a way that, considering the historical context from which it arose, this, seemingly, has developed as a comparison between the consequence of rational theology and mythological theology deprived of internal consistency.

🔖

Cite This Article

İbrahim, A. (2013). -. Kader, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 77–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/110905

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Abbas Muhammed Ğarîb, Câe Devru’l-Mecûs, (Mısır 2005, Mektebetu Rıdvan, 1. Baskı). Bakıllanî, Kitâbu’t-Temhîd, tah.İmaduddin Ahmed Haydar, Lübnan 1987, 1. Baskı. Câhız, Kitâbu’l-Hayavân, Kahire 1938,,,,,,,,,,,Kitâbu’l-Hucec ve’n-Nübüvve, „Resâil‟ içinde, Kahire 1933 Ebu‟l-Ferec İbn el-Cevzî, Telbîsu İblîs, tah.Hilmî b. İsmâil er-Reşîdî, Kahire 2000.
  2. Ernst Cassier, Sembolik Formlar Felsefesi II-Mitolojik Düşünme-, Ankara 2005
  3. Eyüp Şahin, Ruh-Beden Düalizmi, Felsefe Dünyası, 2008/1, sayı:47. Hayyât, el-İntisâr, tah.Muhammed Hicâzî, Kahire tsz. Hilmi Demir, Gnostik Ak ımlarla Mücadelesi, (Maturidî’nin Düşünce Dünyası adlı derleme içinde, edisyon. Ş.Ali Düzgün, T.C. Kültür Bakanlığı Yay., Ankara 2011), ss. 425-448.
  4. Hilmi Demir, Mit, Kozmos ve Ak ıl, Ankara 2011 İbn Nedîm, el-Fihrist, Lübnan-Beyrut, 1964 Ritter Baskısı. İmam Kasım er-Ressî, Mecmuu’l-Kutub ve’r-Resâil, tah. A. Ahmed Cedbân, San‟a 200 Kadı Abdulcebbar, el-Muğnî,el-Fırak Ğayr-ı İslâmiyye, tah. M. M. Kasım, Mısır 19, el-Muhit bit’Tek lîf, Ömer Seyyîd Azmî, Kahire tsz., Tesbîtu Delâilu’n-Nübuvve, tah. A.Abdurrahim es -Sâc, Tevfîk Alî Vehbe, Kahire 200 Maturidî, Kitâbu’t-Tevhîd, çev. Bekir Topaloğlu, Ankara 2002.
  5. Melhem Chokr, İslam’ın İk inci Asrında Zındık lık ve Zındık lar, çev. A.Meral, İstanbul 2002, Muhammed Âbid el-Câbirî, Sırâu’l-Ma’kûl ve’l-Lâ-Ma’kûl fî’l-Fikri’l-Arabî ve’l- İslâmî, Fikru‟l-Arabî el-Muâsır, 1982.
  6. Metin Özdemir, Maturidî’nin Kötülük Problemine Yaklaşımı, „Maturidî’nin Düşünce Dünyası‟ adlı derleme çalışması içinde, editör. Ş.A.Düzgün, T.C.Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı, Ankara 2011. Muhammed b. Ya‟kûb el-Kuleynî, Usûlu’l-Kâfî, tah. Muhammed Ca‟fer Şemsuddîn, Beyrut Lübnan 1990. Şehristanî, el-Milel ve’n-Nihal, tah. Ahmed Fehmî Muhammed, Dâru‟l-Kutub el- İlmiyye, Beyrut-Lübnan tsz.