SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 38

A Study on the Estimation of Capital Stock in Turkish Manufacturing Industry: 2003-2015

TÜRK İMALAT SANAYİ SERMAYE STOKU TAHMİNİ ÜZERİNE BİR ÇALIŞMA: 2003-2015

Bedriye TUNÇSİPER
Tuğçe UYGURTÜRK GAZEL
Pages
235–252
Publication Date
2017-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

By creating capital stock data of each manufacturing subsector between the years 2003-2015, the change rate of proportions in the total capital stock and rankings are presented through the years

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Capital, one of the fundamental inputs of the production, has a critical role in the studies based on the production analysis and assessment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The accurate computation of the capital, which is different from other inputs as its contribution to production process lasts in the consecutive production cycles with a decreasing rate, is a substantial necessity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:By creating capital stock data of each manufacturing subsector between the years 2003-2015, the change rate of proportions in the total capital stock and rankings are presented through the years
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003-2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Manufacturing Industry · Capital Stock · Perpetual Inventory Method

Abstract

Capital, one of the fundamental inputs of the production, has a critical role in the studies based on the production analysis and assessment. The accurate computation of the capital, which is different from other inputs as its contribution to production process lasts in the consecutive production cycles with a decreasing rate, is a substantial necessity. The aim of this study is to generate capital stock data of Turkish manufacturing industry’s subsectors by NACE 2 digits by utilizing actual data. Perpetual Inventory Method generally applied in capital stock estimation is also applied in this study. By creating capital stock data of each manufacturing subsector between the years 2003-2015, the change rate of proportions in the total capital stock and rankings are presented through the years

Özet

En temel üretim girdilerinden biri olarak sermaye, üretimin analizi ve değerlendirilmesi çalışmalarında kritik bir role sahiptir. Diğer girdilerden farklı olarak üretime azalan oranlarda da olsa katkısı bir dönemden fazla olan sermaye girdisinin; bu doğrultuda doğru hesaplanması iktisadi faaliyet kollarının özellikle verimlilik analizi çalışmaları için önemli bir gerekliliktir. Bu araştırmanın amacı Türk imalat sanayi alt sektörlerinde NACE 2’li kodda güncel veri seti kullanarak sermaye birikim verisinin oluşturulmasıdır. Çalışmada sermaye stoku birikimi hesaplamada genel olarak başvurulan yöntem olan Aralıksız Envanter Yöntemi AEY ’e başvurulmuştur. 2003-2015 yılları arasında sermaye stok girdisi oluşturulan imalat sanayi alt sektörlerinin her biri için yıllara göre toplam sermaye stoku içindeki değişim oranları ve sıralamaları sunulmuştur

🔖

Cite This Article

TUNÇSİPER, B., GAZEL, T. U. (2017). A Study on the Estimation of Capital Stock in Turkish Manufacturing Industry: 2003-2015. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 38, 235–252. https://ajindex.com/articles/110837

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Altuğ, S., Filiztekin, A. ve Pamuk, Ş. (2008). Sources of long-term Economic GrowthforTurkey: 1880-2005. European Review of Economic History, 12, 393-430.
  2. Baycan, İ. O., ve Yıldırım, G. (2017). Examining the Dynamics of the Turkish Manufacturing Industry: A Hidden Markov Model Approach. Chinese Journal of Physics, 55, 703-709. BEA, (1999), Fixed Reproducible Tangible Wealth in the United States, 1925– 94, U.S. Berlemann, M. ve Wesselhöft, J. E. (2012). Estimating Aggregate Capital Stocks Using the Perpetual Inventory Method – New Empirical Evidence for 103 Countries Helmut Schmidt Universität Hamburg, Working Paper, No. 125. Blades, D. (1997). Depreciation in the National Accounts, OECD Capital Stock Conference. Filiztekin, A. (2001). Openness and Productivity Growth in Turkish Manufactıring Industry, Sabancı University Discussion Paper Series. Görzig, B. (2007). Depreciation in EU Member States: Empirical and Methodological Differences Harberger, A. C. (1978). Perspectives on Capita land Technology in Less Developed Countries, in: M. J. Artisand A. R. Nobay (Eds.): Contemporary Economic Analysis, London, 42–72.
  3. İsmihan, M. ve Metin-Ozcan, K. (2009). Productivity and Growth in an Unstable Emerging Market Economy: The Case of Turkey, 1960-2004. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 45 (5), 4-18.
  4. Kamps, C. (2006). New Estimates of Government Net Capital Stocks for 22 OECD Countries 1960–2001, IMF Staff Papers, 53 (1), 120–150.
  5. Kılıçaslan, Y., Sickles, C. R., Atay Kayış, A., ve Üçdoğruk Gürel, Y. (2017). Impact of ICT on the Productivity of the Firm: Evidence from Turkish Manufacturing. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 47, 277-289.
  6. Maraşlıoğlu, H. ve Tıktık, A. (1991). Türkiye Ekonomisinde Sektörel Gelişmeler: Üretim, Sermaye Birikimi ve İstihdam 1968-1988,
  7. Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı, İktisadi Planlama Başkanlığı, DPT: 2271-İPB: 428. Meinen, G., Verbiest, P. ve Wolf, de P.P (1998).
  8. Perpetual Inventory Method, Statisitcs Netherlands, Department of National Accounts Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2009).
  9. Measuring Capital, Paris, OECD publishing. Özkara, Y. ve Atak, M. (2015). Regional Total-Factor Energy Efficiency and Electricity Saving Potential of Manufacturing Industry in Turkey. Energy, 93, 495-510.
  10. Saygılı, Ş., Cihan, C. ve Yurtoğlu, H. (2002). Türkiye Ekonomisinde Sermaye Birikimi, Büyüme ve Verimlilik: 1972-2000,
  11. Ankara,
  12. Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı, No.2665. Saygılı, Ş., C