Journals / Gıda / 2026 / Cilt: 50 Sayı: 2

GD24109-OPTIMIZATION OF VEGETABLE AND FRUIT BASED OATMEAL BAR PRODUCTION WITH SURFACE RESPONSE METHODOLOGY AND MODELLING OF DRYING PROCESS

OPTIMIZATION OF VEGETABLE AND FRUIT BASED OATMEAL BAR PRODUCTION WITH RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY AND MODELLING OF DRYING PROCESS

Büşra Acoğlu Çelik(Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi)0000-0002-6079-1970
Senanur Durgut Malçok(Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi)0000-0002-1314-4965
Canan Ece Tamer(Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi)0000-0003-0441-1707
Journal
Gıda
Pages
284–316
Publication Date
2025-04-14
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The effects of those variables on drying time, hardness and overall sensory acceptability of the bars were evaluated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to formulize the recipe of optimize the production of vegetable (celery, cauliflower and Brussel sprout) and fruit (apple, orange and date) based oat bar by surface response methodology and to determine the most suitable mathematical model for the drying process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Drying air temperature (65-95 °C), moisture content of the final product (25-35%) and bar thickness (0.5-1 mm) were determined as the main variables for the Box-Behnken experimental design.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The effects of those variables on drying time, hardness and overall sensory acceptability of the bars were evaluated.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sağlıklı atıştırmalık · fonksiyonel gıda · yanıt yüzey yöntemi (RSM)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to formulize the recipe of optimize the production of vegetable (celery, cauliflower and Brussel sprout) and fruit (apple, orange and date) based oat bar by surface response methodology and to determine the most suitable mathematical model for the drying process. Nuts (hazelnut and walnut), cinnamon and chestnut flour were also used in the formulation of the bars to improve their texture and taste. Drying air temperature (65-95 °C), moisture content of the final product (25-35%) and bar thickness (0.5-1 mm) were determined as the main variables for the Box-Behnken experimental design. The effects of those variables on drying time, hardness and overall sensory acceptability of the bars were evaluated. Based on the evaluation of the responses, 95 °C, 33.96% and 1.06 cm were obtained as optimum drying temperature, moisture content and bar thickness of the final product, respectively. It was determined that the effective diffusivity values of the bars varied between 3.04 × 10⁻¹⁰ and 7.00 × 10⁻¹⁰ m²/s. The most suitable models to represent the drying behavior of the bars were determined as Page and Modified Page. As a result of this study, an alternative functional bar production method and formulation that is suitable for consumption as a healthy snack and has high sensory acceptance especially for consumers having difficulty in consuming vegetables has been successfully optimized.

Özet

This study formulated vegetable (celery, cauliflower, brussel sprout) and fruit (apple, orange, date) oat bars, optimized production conditions using the response surface methodology (RSM), and identified the most suitable drying model. Nuts, cinnamon, and chestnut flour were incorporated to enhance texture and flavor. The Box-Behnken design evaluated drying temperature (65-95 °C), final moisture content (25-35%), and bar thickness (0.5-1 cm) concerning drying time, hardness, and sensory acceptability. The optimal conditions were determined as 95 °C drying temperature, 33.96% moisture content, and 1.06 cm thickness. Effective diffusivity values ranged from 3.04 × 10⁻¹⁰ to 7.00 × 10⁻¹⁰ m²/s, with Page and Modified Page models identified as the best fit. This study presents a functional and healthy snack alternative, particularly for individuals with difficulty consuming vegetables.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çelik, B. A., Malçok, S. D., Ömeroğlu, P. Y., Tamer, C. E. (2025). GD24109-OPTIMIZATION OF VEGETABLE AND FRUIT BASED OATMEAL BAR PRODUCTION WITH SURFACE RESPONSE METHODOLOGY AND MODELLING OF DRYING PROCESS. Gıda, Cilt: 50 Sayı: 2, 284–316. https://doi.org/10.15237/gida.GD24109

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (72)

  1. Abakpa, G. O., Adenaike, O. (2021). Antioxidant compounds and health benefits of citrus fruits. European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety, 13(2): 65-74.
  2. Aggarwal, P., Kaur, S., Kaur, N. (2022). Intermediate moisture kinnow bar from low grade kinnow mandarins: phytonutritional profile, morphological characterization, and storage stability. Food Bioscience, 49:101837.
  3. Akter, F., Muhury, R., Sultana, A., Deb, U. K. (2022). A comprehensive review of mathematical modeling for drying processes of fruits and vegetables. International Journal of Food Science, 2022(1):6195257.
  4. Alemu, T. T. (2024). Nutritional contribution of fruit and vegetable for human health: A review. International Journal of Health Policy and Planning, 3(1): 1-9.
  5. Al Faik, M. A., Roy, M., Azam, M. S., Ahmmed, R., Hoque, M. M., Alam, M. M. (2024). Comprehensive study on potato drying in convective air dryer: experimental observations, mathematical modeling, and model validation. Measurement: Food, 14:100170.
  6. Ali, I. M., Forsido, S. F., Kuyu, C. G., Ahmed, E. H., Andersa, K. N., Chane, K. T.,.Regasa, T. K. (2024). Effects of extrusion process conditions on nutritional,anti-nutritional, physical, functional, and sensory propertiesof extruded snack: A review. Food Science & Nutrition, 00:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.4472
  7. Atik, H., Elvan, M., Harsa, S. (2024). Enhancing a Vegan Snack Bar: Edible Coating Infused with Lentil Protein and Pomegranate Peel. ACS Food Science & Technology, 4(10):2374-2383.
  8. Bhattacharya, M., Srivastav, P., Mishra, H. (2015). Thin-layer modeling of convective and microwave-convective drying of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus). Journal of Food Science and Technology-Mysore, 52:2013-2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-013-1209-2
  9. Bignardi, C., Cavazza, A., Corradini, C. (2012). Determination of furosine in food products by capillary zone electrophoresis-tandem mass spectrometry. Electrophoresis, 33:2382-2389. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201100582
  10. Bland, J. M., Bett‐Garber, K. L., Li, C. H., Brashear, S. S., Lea, J. M., Bechtel, P. J. (2018). Comparison of sensory and instrumental methods for the analysis of texture of cooked individually quick frozen and fresh‐frozen catfish fillets. Food Science & Nutrition, 6(6): 1692-1705.
  11. Boyer, J., Liu, R. H. (2004). Apple phytochemicals and their health benefits. Nutrition Journal, 3: 1-15.
  12. Brochard, M., Correia, P., Barroca, M. J., Guiné, R. P. (2021). Development of a new pasta product by the incorporation of chestnut flour and bee pollen. Applied Sciences, 11(14):6617.
  13. Chen, K., Zhang, M., Bhandari, B., Sun, J., Chen, J. (2022). Novel freeze drying based technologies for production and development of healthy snacks and meal replacement products with special nutrition and function: A review. Drying Technology, 40:1582-1597. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2021.1967375
  14. Corzo, O., Bracho, N., Alvarez, C. (2008). Water effective diffusion coefficient of mango slices at different maturity stages during air drying. Journal of Food Engineering, 87(4):479-484.
  15. Crank, P. (1975). The mathematics of diffusion, 2nd edn Oxford Univ Press. In: Oxford.
  16. Dadali, G., Apar, D., Özbek, B. (2007). Estimation of effective moisture diffusivity of okra for microwave drying. Drying Technology, 25:1445-1450. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373930701536767
  17. Deng, L.-Z., Yang, X.-H., Mujumdar, A., Zhao, J.-H., Wang, D., Zhang, Q.,… Xiao, H.-W. (2018). Red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) drying: Effects of different drying methods on drying kinetics, physicochemical properties, antioxidant capacity, and microstructure. Drying Technology, 36(8):893-907.
  18. Dimopoulou, M., Vareltzis, P., Floros, S., Androutsos, O., Bargiota, A., Gortzi, O. (2023). Development of a functional acceptable diabetic and plant-based snack bar using mushroom (Coprinus comatus) powder. Foods, 12(14):2702.
  19. Doymaz, I. (2006). Thin-layer drying behaviour of mint leaves. Journal of Food Engineering, 74:370-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.03.009
  20. Doymaz, I. (2011). Drying of Thyme (Thymus Vulgarıs L.) and Selection of A Suitable Thin-Layer Drying Model. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 35:458-465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4549.2010.00488.x
  21. Ertekin, C., Heybeli, N. (2014). Thin-Layer Infrared Drying Of Mint Leaves. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 38:1480-1490. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.12107
  22. Evin, D. (2012). Thin layer drying kinetics of Gundelia tournefortii L. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 90:323-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2011.07.002
  23. FAO. (2024). FAOSTAT: Food and Agriculture Data. Gıda ve Tarım Örgütü. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL (Erişim tarihi: 01.11.2024).
  24. García-Martínez, E., Igual, M., Martín-Esparza, M., Martínez-Navarrete, N. (2013). Assessment of the bioactive compounds, color, and mechanical properties of apricots as affected by drying treatment. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 6:3247-3255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-012-0988-1
  25. Ghodsi, S., Nouri, M. (2024). Vegan gummy candies with low calorie based on celery (Apium graveolens) puree and boswellia gum (Boswellia thurifera). Food Science & Nutrition, 12:5785–5798
  26. Gul, M. R., Ince, A. E., Ozel, B., Uslu, A. K., Çetin, M., Mentes, D.,. Oztop, M. H. (2024). Effect of microwave‐vacuum drying on the physicochemical properties of a functional tomato snack bar. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 104(1):83-92.
  27. Gupta, A., Sanwal, N., Bareen, M., Barua, S., Sharma, N., Olatunji, O.,. Sahu, J. (2023). Trends in functional beverages: Functional ingredients, processing technologies, stability, health benefits, and consumer perspective. Food Research International, 170:113046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113046
  28. Hastaoğlu, F., Hastaoğlu, E., Bağlam, N., Taş, İ. N. (2023). Sensorial and nutritional properties of a collagen-fortified snack bar designed for the elderly. Nutrients, 15(16), 3620.
  29. Inyang, U. E., Oboh, I. O., Etuk, B. R. (2018). Kinetic models for drying techniques—food materials. Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science, 8(2):27-48.
  30. Işık, B. (2024). Şeker ilavesiz yüksek lifli meyve barı üretimi ve depolama stabilitesi / Production and storage stability of no sugar added fruit bar with high fiber. Master Thesis. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi / Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü / Gıda Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı, 76 s.
  31. ISO 11132:2012b. Sensory analysis — Methodology — Guidelines for monitoring the performance of a quantitative sensory panel.
  32. ISO 3972: 2011. Sensory analysis - Methodology - Method of investigating sensitivity of taste.
  33. ISO 5496: 2006. Sensory analysis – Methodology – Initiation and training of assessors in the detection and recognition of odours.
  34. ISO 8586: 2012a. Sensory analysis–General guidelines for the selection, training and monitoring of selected assessors and expert sensory assessors.
  35. Jaworska, D., Hoffmann, M. (2008). Relative importance of texture properties in the sensory quality and acceptance of commercial crispy products. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 88(10):1804-1812.
  36. Jønsson, S. R., Angka, S., Olsen, K., Tolver, A., Olsen, A. (2019). Repeated exposure to vegetable-enriched snack bars may increase children's liking for the bars-but not for the vegetables. Appetite, 140:1-9.
  37. Karabacak, A. Ö., Suna, S., Tamer, C. E., Çopur, Ö. U. (2018). Effects of oven, microwave and vacuum drying on drying characteristics, colour, total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of celery slices. Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods, 10(2):193-205.
  38. Kıyak, S. N., Dağlı, Y., Zeren, Ü., Arıburnu, M., Gülbandılar, A., Dönmez, M., Okur, M. (2014). Fonksiyonel Bir Gıda:“Şifalı Top”. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 2(6):277-279.
  39. Koç, B., Kaymak-Ertekin, F. (2010). Yanıt yüzey yöntemi ve gıda işleme uygulamaları. Gıda, 35(1):1-8.
  40. Littardi, P., Paciulli, M., Carini, E., Rinaldi, M., Rodolfi, M. Chiavaro, E. (2020). Quality evaluation of chesnut flour addition on fresh pasta. LWT, 126:109303.
  41. Liu, X., Qiu, Z., Wang, L., Cheng, Y., Qu, H., Chen, Y. (2009). Mathematical modeling for thin layer vacuum belt drying of Panax notoginseng extract. Energy Conversion And Management, 50:928-932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2008.12.032
  42. Mahomoodally, M. F., Khadaroo, S. K., Hosenally, M., Zengin, G., Rebezov, M., Ali Shariati, M.,. Simal-Gandara, J. (2024). Nutritional, medicinal and functional properties of different parts of the date palm and its fruit (Phoenix dactylifera L.)–A systematic review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 64(22): 7748-7803.
  43. M'hir, S., Rtibi, K., Mejri, A., Ziadi, M., Aloui, H., Hamdi, M., Ayed, L. (2019). Development of a novel whey date beverage fermented with kefir grains using Response Surface Methodology. Journal of Chemistry, 1218058. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1218058
  44. Mrabet, A., Hammadi, H., Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, G., Jiménez-Araujo, A., Sindici, M. (2019). Date palm fruits as a potential source of functional dietary fiber: A review. Food Science and Technology Research, 25:1-10. https://doi.org/10.3136/fstr.25.1
  45. Nandasiri, R.; Semenko, B.; Wijekoon, C., Suh, M. (2023). Air-Frying is a better thermal processing choice for improving antioxidant properties of Brassica vegetables. Antioxidants, 12:490.
  46. Ozkan-Karabacak, A., Durgut-Malcok, S., Tunçkal, C., Tamer, C., Pandiselvam, R. (2023). Optimization of heat pump dryer conditions on bioaccessibility of some secondary metabolites of cornelian cherry-capia pepper pestil. Journal of Food Biochemıstry, 5443962. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5443962
  47. Özcan, M., Arslan, D., Menges, H. (2018). Evaluation of drying methods with respect to drying kinetics and mineral contents of dill and parsley. Iranian Journal Of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering-International English Edition, 37:237-245.
  48. Özkan Karabacak, A., Tunçkal, C., Tamer, C. E., Çopur, Ö. U., Yolci Ömeroğlu, P. (2022). Bioaccessibility of total phenolics and antioxidant activity of melon slices dried in a heat pump drying system. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 16(3):2154-2171.
  49. Özkan-Karabacak, A., Acoğlu-Çelik, B., Özdal, T., Yolci-Ömeroğlu, P., Çopur, Ö. U., Baştuğ-Koç, A., & Pandiselvam, R. (2023). Microwave‐assisted hot air drying of orange snacks: drying kinetics, thin layer modeling, quality attributes, and phenolic profiles. Journal of Food Biochemistry, 6531838.
  50. Parn, O. J., Bhat, R., Yeoh, T. K., Al-Hassan, A. A. (2015). Development of novel fruit bars by utilizing date paste. Food Bioscience, 9:20-27.
  51. Paciulli, M., Rinaldi, M., Cirlini, M., Scazzina, F., Chiavaro, E. (2016). Chestnut flour addition in commercial gluten-free bread: A shelf-life study. LWT, 70:88-95.
  52. Pashazadeh, H., Redha, A., Koca, I. (2024). Effect of convective drying on phenolic acid, flavonoid and anthocyanin content, texture and microstructure of black rosehip fruit. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 125:105738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2023.105738
  53. Ratner, B. (2009). The correlation coefficient: Its values range between+ 1/− 1, or do they? Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 17(2): 139-142. https://doi.org/10.1057/jt.2009.5
  54. Roos, Y. H., Roininen, K., Jouppila, K., Tuorila, H. (1998). Glass transition and water plasticization effects on crispness of a snack food extrudate. International Journal of Food Properties, 1(2):163-180.
  55. Santiago-Ramos, R., Silva, C. L., Ramos, I. N. (2022). Modelling and optimization of the processing of a healthy snack bar made of grape and tomato pomaces. Foods, 11(17): 2676.
  56. Sharma, N., Bajwa, J. S., Gautam, N. (2024). Evaluation of improved functional characteristics of Lactobacillus enriched fruit bar prepared from stone fruits of Mid Himalayan belt. Natural Product Research, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.02.034.
  57. Stojceska, V., Ainsworth, P., Plunkett, A., İbanoğlu, E., İbanoğlu, Ş. (2008). Cauliflower by-products as a new source of dietary fibre, antioxidants and proteins in cereal based ready-to-eat expanded snacks. Journal of Food Engineering, 87(4):554-563.
  58. Sufer, O., Palazoglu, T. (2019). Microwave-vacuum drying of pomegranate arils (Punica granatum L. cv. Hicaznar): Effect on quality and nutrient content. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 43, e14085. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.14085
  59. Sun-Waterhouse, D., Teoh, A., Massarotto, C., Wibisono, R., Wadhwa, S. (2010). Comparative analysis of fruit-based functional snack bars. Food Chemistry, 119(4):1369-1379.
  60. Surendhar, A., Sivasubramanian, V., Vidhyeswari, D., Deepanraj, B. (2019). Energy and exergy analysis, drying kinetics, modeling and quality parameters of microwave-dried turmeric slices. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 136:185-197.
  61. Togrul, H. (2006). Suitable drying model for infrared drying of carrot. Journal Of Food Engineering, 77:610-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.07.020
  62. Torki-Harchegani, M., Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti, M., Ghanbarian, D., Sadeghi, M., Tohidi, M. (2016). Dehydration characteristics and mathematical modelling of lemon slices drying undergoing oven treatment. Heat and Mass Transfer, 52:281-289.
  63. Tunckal, C., Ozkan-Karabacak, A., Tamer, C. E., Yolci-Omeroglu, P., Goksel, Z. (2022). Mathematical modelling and optimisation of melon slice drying with response surface methodology ın a heat pump drying system. Latin American Applied Research, 52:101-10.
  64. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK). (2024). Bitkisel Üretim İstatistikleri. Türkiye İstatistik. Kurumu. https://www.tuik.gov.tr (Erişim tarihi: 01.11.2024).
  65. Wang, R., Zhou, W., Isabelle, M. (2007). Comparison study of the effect of green tea extract (GTE) on the quality of bread by instrumental analysis and sensory evaluation. Food Research International, 40(4): 470-479.
  66. Wang, C., Tian, S., An, X. (2022). The effects of drying parameters on drying characteristics, colorimetric differences, antioxidant components of sliced chinese jujube. Heat And Mass Transfer, 58:1561-1571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-022-03202-5
  67. Zhang, L., Qiao, Y., Wang, C., Liao, L., Liu, L., Shi, D.,Xu, Q. (2019). Effects of freeze vacuum drying combined with hot air drying on the sensory quality, active components, moisture mobility, odors, and microstructure of kiwifruits. Journal of Food Quality, 8709343. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8709343
  68. Zulaikha, Y., Yao, S. H., Chang, Y. W. (2021). Physicochemical and functional properties of snack bars enriched with tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) by-product powders. Foods, 10(8): 1908.
  69. Ali, I. M., Forsido, S. F., Kuyu, C. G., Ahmed, E. H., Andersa, K. N., Chane, K. T.,.Regasa, T. K. (2024). Effects of extrusion process conditions on nutritional,anti-nutritional, physical, functional, and sensory propertiesof extruded snack: A review. Food Science & Nutrition, 00:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.4472
  70. Gul, M. R., Ince, A. E., Ozel, B., Uslu, A. K., Çetin, M., Mentes, D.,. Oztop, M. H. (2024). Effect of microwave‐vacuum drying on the physicochemical properties of a functional tomato snack bar. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 104(1):83-92.
  71. Gupta, A., Sanwal, N., Bareen, M., Barua, S., Sharma, N., Olatunji, O.,. Sahu, J. (2023). Trends in functional beverages: Functional ingredients, processing technologies, stability, health benefits, and consumer perspective. Food Research International, 170:113046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113046
  72. Mahomoodally, M. F., Khadaroo, S. K., Hosenally, M., Zengin, G., Rebezov, M., Ali Shariati, M.,. Simal-Gandara, J. (2024). Nutritional, medicinal and functional properties of different parts of the date palm and its fruit (Phoenix dactylifera L.)–A systematic review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 64(22): 7748-7803.