SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gıda / 2026 / Cilt: 51 Sayı: 2

PHYSICOCHEMICAL, ANTIOXIDANT AND CORROSION INHIBITION PROPERTIES OF RHUS CORIARIA L. EXTRACTS OBTAINED USING SOLVENTS OF DIFFERENT POLARITY

FARKLI POLARİTEDEKİ ÇÖZÜCÜLERLE ELDE EDİLEN RHUS CORIARIA L. EKSTRAKTLARININ FİZİKOKİMYASAL, ANTİOKSİDAN VE KOROZYON İNHİBİSYONU ÖZELLİKLERİ

Gülşah Gökce(SEM-AS GIDA SAN. TUR. TIC. LTD. ŞTI., Ar-Ge Merkezi)0009-0003-2603-6984
Bahar Tan(KASTAMONU ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0001-8968-2882
Büşra Erdem(SEM-AS GIDA SAN. TUR. TIC. LTD. ŞTI., Ar-Ge Merkezi)0009-0007-6776-0046
Yakup Şirin(SEM-AS GIDA SAN. TUR. TIC. LTD. ŞTI., Ar-Ge Merkezi)0000-0002-8759-0132
Perihan Gürkan(SEMAS GIDA SAN. TUR. TIC. LTD. ŞTI. AR-GE Merkezi)0000-0002-0625-2482
Nurdane Yılmaz(KASTAMONU ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1760-8066
Journal
Gıda
Pages
327–343
Publication Date
2026-03-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study proves that sumac seeds, as a byproduct, offer a robust protective layer through synergistic phytochemical interactions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:While the antioxidant properties of Rhus coriaria L. have been extensively documented, its systematic evaluation as a green corrosion inhibitor through a direct comparison between powder and seed forms has not been previously investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study addresses this gap by examining the inhibition efficacy of sumac powder and seeds for mild steel in 1M HCl, where biomass forms are compared directly in their native states.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study proves that sumac seeds, as a byproduct, offer a robust protective layer through synergistic phytochemical interactions.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Absorbsiyon · antioksidan · ekstraksiyon

Abstract

While the antioxidant properties of Rhus coriaria L. have been extensively documented, its systematic evaluation as a green corrosion inhibitor through a direct comparison between powder and seed forms has not been previously investigated. This study addresses this gap by examining the inhibition efficacy of sumac powder and seeds for mild steel in 1M HCl, where biomass forms are compared directly in their native states. To elucidate the underlying mechanism, a comprehensive characterization was conducted using extracts obtained with water, ethanol, acetone, and chloroform to identify the influence of solvent polarity on the biomass matrix. Physicochemical analyses revealed that the seed form, particularly in ethanolic profiles, exhibits a higher total phenolic content (267.4 mg GAE/100 g) and superior redox-active profiles. Electrochemical evaluations via potentiodynamic polarization and EIS demonstrated that inhibition efficiency reaches a maximum of 60.79% for the seed form at 200 ppm. This performance is established as a direct consequence of the seed matrix’s higher antioxidant capacity and stabilized profile, which facilitate a more resilient adsorptive film than the powder form. This study proves that sumac seeds, as a byproduct, offer a robust protective layer through synergistic phytochemical interactions.

Özet

Sumak ( Rhus coriaria L.)’nin antioksidan özellikleri yaygın olarak belgelenmiş olsa da toz ve çekirdek formları arasındaki doğrudan bir karşılaştırma yoluyla yeşil korozyon inhibitörü olarak sistematik değerlendirmesi daha önce araştırılmamıştır. Bu çalışma, sumak tozu ve çekirdeklerinin 1M HCl ortamındaki korozyon inhibisyon etkinliğini, biyokütle formlarının doğrudan kıyaslandığı özgün bir kurguyla incelemektedir. Çözücü polaritesinin (su, etanol, aseton ve kloroform) biyokütle matrisi üzerindeki etkisini belirlemek ve mekanizmayı aydınlatmak amacıyla kapsamlı bir karakterizasyon yürütülmüştür. Fizikokimyasal analizler, çekirdek formunun toz formuna kıyasla daha yüksek toplam fenolik içeriği (26.4 mg GAE/100 g) ve üstün redoks-aktif profil sergilediğini göstermiştir. Elektrokimyasal değerlendirmeler, inhibisyon veriminin 200 ppm’de çekirdek formu için %60.79’a ulaştığını kanıtlamıştır. Elde edilen bu performansın, çekirdek formunun toz formuna kıyasla sahip olduğu üstün antioksidan kapasitesinin ve stabilize profilinin doğrudan bir sonucu olduğu ve metal yüzeyinde daha dirençli bir adsorpsiyon filmi oluşturduğu saptanmıştır. Bu çalışma, sumak çekirdeklerinin bir yan ürün olarak, sinerjik fitokimyasal etkileşimler yoluyla sağlam bir koruyucu şelat tabakası sağladığını kanıtlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Gökce, G., Tan, B., Erdem, B., Şirin, Y., Gürkan, P., Yılmaz, N. (2026). PHYSICOCHEMICAL, ANTIOXIDANT AND CORROSION INHIBITION PROPERTIES OF RHUS CORIARIA L. EXTRACTS OBTAINED USING SOLVENTS OF DIFFERENT POLARITY. Gıda, Cilt: 51 Sayı: 2, 327–343. https://doi.org/10.15237/gida.GD25138

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (35)

  1. Abu Reidah, I. M., Ali Shtayeh, M. S., Jamous, R. M., Arráez Roman, D., Segura Carretero, A. (2015). HPLC-DAD-ESI-MS/MS screening of bioactive compounds from Rhus coriaria L. (Sumac) fruits. Food Chemistry, 181, 284-291.
  2. Al Amiery, A. A., Isahak, W. N. R. W., Al Amiery, M. H. H. (2023). Recent advances in green corrosion inhibitors derived from plant extracts: A review. Results in Engineering, 17, 100930.
  3. Al Juhaimi, F., Ghafoor, K., Özcan, M. M., Jahurul, M. H. A., Babiker, E. E., Jinap, S. & Zaidul, I. S. M. (2024). Effect of solvent type on phenolics and antioxidant activities of sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) fruit. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 18(1), 45-56.
  4. Almuhayawi, M. S. (2022). Comprehensive review of the phytochemical, pharmacological, and therapeutic properties of Rhus coriaria L. (Sumac). Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 29(1), 384-391.
  5. Al Quraishy, S., Metwally, D. M., El Afifi, S. H., Al Abadie, A. S., Abdel Baki, A. S. (2022). Rhus coriaria extract attenuates oxidative stress and inflammation. Journal of King Saud University Science, 34(4), 102013.
  6. Alsamri, H., Athamneh, K., Pintus, G., Eid, A. H., Iratni, R. (2021). Rhus coriaria: A comprehensive review of its phytochemistry and biological activities. Molecules, 26(11), 3125.
  7. AOAC. (2000). Official methods of analysis of AOAC International (17th ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
  8. Apak, R., Özyürek, M., Güçlü, K., Çapanoğlu, E. (2016). Antioxidant capacity/activity methods and their applications to fresh and processed foods. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 64(5), 997-1027.
  9. Azmir, J., Oliveros Belardo, E., Singh, H. (2013). Techniques for extraction of bioactive compounds from plant materials: A review. Journal of Food Engineering, 117(4), 426-436.
  10. Bedair, M. A., Soliman, S. A., Metwally, A. S., Hegazy, M. A. (2022). Experimental and theoretical studies on the corrosion inhibition of mild steel by Rhus coriaria extract in 1M HCl. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 356, 119044.
  11. Benzie, I. F., Strain, J. J. (1996). The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: The FRAP assay. Analytical Biochemistry, 239(1), 70-76.
  12. Bursal, E., Köksal, E. (2011). Evaluation of antioxidant capacity and radical scavenging activity of Rhus coriaria L. (Sumac). Food Research International, 44(9), 2717-2722.
  13. Chemat, F., Abert-Vian, M., Fabiano-Tixier, A. S., Strube, J., Uhlenbrock, L., Gunjevic, V., & Cravotto, G. (2019). Green extraction of natural products. Origins, status, and future challenges. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 118, 248-263.
  14. Cuendet, M., Hostettmann, K., Potterat, O. (1997). Iridoid glucosides with free radical scavenging properties from Fagraea blumei. Helvetica Chimica Acta, 80(4), 1144-1152.
  15. Damodaran, S. (2017). Food proteins: An overview. In S. Damodaran & K. L. Parkin (Eds.), Fennema’s Food Chemistry (5th ed.). CRC Press.
  16. Dehghani, A., Bahlakeh, G., Ramezanzadeh, B. (2019). Detailed macro/micro-scale exploration of the Rhus coriaria L. extract as a potent green inhibitor for the mild steel in HCl solution. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 279, 15-24.
  17. Doğan, M., Çelik, I. (2012). Determination of some physicochemical and nutritional properties of sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) fruits. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 49(2), 253-258.
  18. Fouda, A. S., Rashwan, S. M., Abo-Moussa, F. E., & El-Ewady, G. Y. (2020). Natural extract as a green corrosion inhibitor for carbon steel in 1M HCl. Scientific Reports, 11, 14923.
  19. Ghafoor, K., Choi, Y. H., Jeon, J. Y., Moon, S. S. (2011). Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of phenolic compounds, antioxidants, and anthocyanins from grape (Vitis vinifera) seeds. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 59(13), 7035-7043.
  20. Gökçe, Ş., Coşkuner, Y. (2023). Green corrosion inhibition of steel in acidic media by using sumac extracts. Journal of Materials Protection, 12(2), 145-156.
  21. Hussin, M. H., Rahim, A. A., Ibrahim, M. N. M., Brosse, N. (2016). The capability of ultrafiltered alkaline oil palm fronds lignin as a green corrosion inhibitor of mild steel in 0.5M HCl solution. Measurement, 91, 51-60.
  22. Koşar, M., Bozan, B., Temelli, F., Baser, K. H. C. (2006). Antioxidant activity and phenolic composition of sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) extracts. Phytochemical Analysis, 17(5), 327-334.
  23. Li, Y., Fabiano-Tixier, A. S., Chemat, F. (2021). Comminution as a pre-treatment for extraction of bioactive compounds. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 68, 102604.
  24. Mert, B., Coşkun, M., Ertürk, S. (2022). Influence of particle size on the extraction of pigments and phenolics from sumac fruits. Food Chemistry, 370, 131012.
  25. Mustafa, A., Turner, C. (2011). Pressurized liquid extraction as a green approach in food and herbal plants extraction: A review. Analytica Chimica Acta, 703(1), 8-20.
  26. Nawaz, A., Bakhtawar, S., Ahmad, S. (2020). Adsorption mechanism of green corrosion inhibitors in acidic media: A review. Corrosion Science, 164, 108342.
  27. Salamat, R., Rahimi, S., Noori, S. (2023). Structural stability and colorimetric properties of sumac anthocyanins. LWT, 175, 114482.
  28. Shamsudin, S. (2022). Optimization of extraction parameters for bioactive from Rhus coriaria. Separations, 9(10), 288.
  29. Slinkard, K., Singleton, V. L. (1977). Total phenol analysis: Automation and comparison with manual methods. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 28(1), 49-55.
  30. Spigno, G., Tramelli, L., De Faveri, D. M. (2007). Effects of extraction time, temperature and solvent on phenols extraction from grape marc. Journal of Food Engineering, 81(1), 200-208.
  31. Uysal, S., Zengin, G. (2021). Bioactive contents of Rhus coriaria extracts obtained by different solvents. Natural Product Research, 35(12), 2045-2049.
  32. Verma, C., Ebenso, E. E., Bahadur, I., & Quraishi, M. A. (2018). Characterization and corrosion inhibition potential of plant extracts. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 249, 18-35.
  33. Wang, L. (2023). Solvent effect on the ionic mobility and extraction yield of botanical compounds. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 375, 121345.
  34. Yüksel, E., Kaplan İnce, A. (2023). Redox activity and antioxidant profiles of Turkish sumac genotypes. Food Bioscience, 52, 102456.
  35. Zannou, O., Koca, I. (2022). Green extraction of bioactive compounds from sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) and their applications. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 45(4), e13994.